Module 1: Formative Assessment: Supporting high-quality processes in the classroom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Educators and others may use or adapt. If modified, please attribute and re-title.
Version 1.0 | Updated January 2022 | Developed By:�Carla Evans & Jeri Thompson�National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment
Micro-Course 3:
Supporting teachers to accelerate learning using formative assessment processes in the classroom
Warm-Up
2
What recurring questions, topics, or themes emerge when you talk to teachers about formative assessment processes?
What questions do you have about how to promote high-quality formative assessment processes within your school/district?
Defining Formative Assessment Process
“…a planned, ongoing process used by all students and teachers during learning and teaching to elicit and use evidence of student learning to improve student understanding of intended disciplinary learning outcomes and support students to become self-directed learners.”
3
Council of Chief State School Officers (2018, p. 2). Revising the Definition of Formative Assessment. Retrieved from https://ccsso.org/resource-library/revising-definition-formative-assessment
Two Main Types of Classroom Assessment Processes
4
| Summative Classroom Assessments | Formative Classroom Assessments |
Purpose | Document student achievement of state content standards at a point in time (assessment of learning) | Elicit evidence of student learning to adjust teaching and learning to better meet students’ needs (assessment for learning) |
Administration | Typically administered at the end of a unit of instruction | On-going; occurs before, during, and after instruction |
Feedback Mechanisms | Graded and reported to parents and students | Not graded; feedback shared with students |
Misconception Alert
5
Embedded Formative Assessment Strategies
6
Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment, 2nd ed. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Embedded Formative Assessment Strategies
7
Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment, 2nd ed. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Big Idea:
“Evidence about student learning is used to adjust instruction to better meet students’ needs. In other words, teaching is adaptive to the learner’s needs.”
Discussion Tool for School Leaders
8
School leaders can use this tool in at least two ways.
Discussion Tool for School Leaders
9
Each of the five embedded formative assessment strategies is explained.
The key questions are listed on the slides for each strategy in gray boxes.
Potential observed or discussed practices are provided for each of the five embedded formative assessment strategies.
What might a teacher do?
Learning Intentions & Success Criteria
The learning goals, sometimes called “learning targets,” should be aligned to and derived from the broader curricular goals and state standards.
10
Key Questions: Is it clear what students are trying to learn? Has the teacher illustrated what success, or hitting the target, looks like?
Learning Intentions
11
What Might a Teacher Do?
Success Criteria
12
What Might a Teacher Do?
Elicit Evidence of Student Learning Progress
13
To elicit evidence of student learning, the teacher must engineer effective discussions, tasks, observations, and activities to make student thinking visible. This information is then used to differentiate and inform future instruction.
Key Question: How does the teacher use strategic questions, readiness pre-assessments, tasks/activities, and/or other formative assessment techniques to identify student learning progress before, during, and/or after instruction?
Evidence of Student Learning Progress
14
What Might a Teacher Do?
Tasks and activities that produce evidence of student learning
Cont’d: Evidence of Student Learning Progress
15
Classroom Questioning Techniques
Extend Student Thinking During Discourse
16
Feedback that Moves Learning Forward
The Quality & Type of Feedback
Related to the learning targets and success criteria.
Actionable, descriptive, and specific.
Appropriate to the student’s zone of proximal development (i.e., Goldilocks principle--not too far out ahead, not too far behind, but just right)
The Source of Feedback
Teacher
Student Self-Assessment
Peer
The Purpose of Feedback
Inform instruction (monitor and adapt)
Adjust student learning goals
Motivate and improve student learning
Key Question: How does the teacher provide students with actionable, descriptive and specific feedback about their progress related to the learning targets and success criteria?
Feedback that Moves Learning Forward
17
What Might a Teacher Do?
Peers as Learning Resources
18
Collaborative Learning
Reciprocal Teaching
Peer Assessment
Key Question: How does the teacher activate peers as learning resources for one another?
Peers as Learning Resources
19
What Might a Teacher Do?
Students as Owners of their own Learning
“For students to be actively involved in their learning, they must understand a learning goal, aim for it, and use assessment evidence along the way to stay on course” (p. 3).
20
Brookhart, S., & Lazarus, S. (2017). Formative assessment for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Connected to self-regulated learning (e.g., metacognition and motivation)
Key Question: How does the teacher activate students as owners of their own learning so they know where they are going, where they are now in the process, and what they need to do next to stay on track?
Metacognition
Metacognition, or “thinking about one’s own thinking,” is the internal dialogue taking place in the mind of a learner.
21
Students as Owners of their own Learning
22
What Might a Teacher Do?
Additional Teacher Practice Evidence
23
There are other ways a teacher can demonstrate these five formative assessment strategies.
These resources provide additional examples:
Remembering the Systems Component
24
Formative assessment processes operate within a classroom assessment and instructional system.
d
Shepard, L. A. (2019). Classroom assessment to support teaching and learning. In The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (pp. 183–200). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002716219843818
Micro-Course 3 Outline
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Module 4
25
Introduction
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Module 4
Reflection Questions
26