JUDGING SPEECH AND DEBATE
Kate Hamm Ransom Everglades khamm@ransomeverglades.org
Thank you for taking time to judge!!
Important General Information
Speech Ballots
Speechwire Speech Judges:
Speech Ballot Ranking and Points
Speech Ballot - Writing Comments
Awesome Speech Events!
EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEAKING AND IMPROMPTU
AFTER-DINNER SPEAKING (ADS),INFORMATIVE SPEAKING, ORIGINAL ORATORY
INTERPRETATION OF LITERATURE EVENTS
Extemporaneous Speaking – What is it?
Extemporaneous Speaking
Ballots for Extemporaneous Speaking
Ballots for Extemporaneous Speaking
Impromptu Speaking - What is it?
Impromptu Speaking
After Dinner Speaking - What is it?
Informative Speaking and Original Oratory
ADS, Informative Speaking and �Original Oratory
Ballots for ADS, Info and OO
Ballots for ADS, Info and OO
Interpretation of Literature Events
Interp Events
Extra Interp Observations - POI
Ballots for Interp
Ballots for Interp
What NOT to write on ANY ballot!
Important Reminders:
Before Submitting Speech Ballots
Debate Events!
Congressional Debate
Lincoln Douglas
Debate
Public Forum Debate
World Schools Debate
Congressional Debate - Also called Student Congress
Speechwire - You have a SC Ballot!
Hit Start the Round.
Then Open the classroom.
Congressional Debate
Congressional Debate Scoring
Judge Duties: Please take note of the differences in scoring congress from speech or other formats of debate!
Submit your Congress Ballots
Lincoln Douglas Debate
Lincoln Douglas Debate
Judge Duties:
Public Forum Debate
Public Forum Debate
Judge Duties:
Before Submitting Debate Ballots
PF Ballot Comments and RFD (reason for decision)
Judge: F3 XXXXX
School X ABCD (Aff/Pro) vs. School Y EFGH (Neg/Con) // ABCD Points: 27 // EFGHPoints: 28 //Winning debater(s): School Y EFGH
Comments for ABCD
Great work both of you, just a few pointers.
weighing arguments usually means comparing impacts side by side and then explaining to the judge why yours matter more.
The United States doesn't exist entirely on its own in the world, the things it does have global consequences, and the same is true of any other country. Thus, it is strategic and expected to consider impacts on people in places outside of the United States, such as Afghanistan.
Make sure you explain HOW you get to your impact of stopping cyber crime. Show the judge how imposing regulations gets us into a world with less fraud.
Comments for EFGH
Great work! Just a few pointers. Make sure you explain WHY regulations are relevant in your first contention. As it is now, you only discuss migrant remittances and don't clearly
connect it to the resolution.
(BTW the US dollar is not on the gold standard.)
Reason for Decision
I vote neg on remittances.
World Schools Debate - the format
WSD - Differences with other formats
Communication on the bench: students are allowed and even expected to communicate with each other during other speeches as there is no allotted prep time. This is not seen as disrespectful unless the whispers become too loud and distract the speaker. Speakers on the bench may move to sit together while the other member of their team goes to center of the room to speak.
Use of devices: computers and/or other electronic devices should NOT be used at any point in the delivery of speeches for either prepared or impromptu debates. Cell phones may be used for timing only. Impromptu motion preparation may only utilize a published English language dictionary or a published bilingual dictionary and a published single-volume encyclopedia or almanac per team. No digital resources are permitted.
World Schools Debate - Team Roles - definitions
1) Definitions should be a) reasonable, b) obvious (understandable, expected and accepted by an average voter / intelligent person), c) fair (allow “normal” / quality debate)
2) Time and Place setting are not allowed - definitions and Interpretations should be as general or as specific as the motion.
3) “Squirreling” is not allowed and is considered strategically bad.
1) accept it
2) broaden it
3) challenge it
4) run an "even if" case
WSD - Communication Style
Communication style: speeches are persuasive in nature and delivered at conversational speed. There should be no "spreading" in this format. Students are encouraged to use notecards or bullet points for delivery rather than reading directly from text. Eye contact, facial expressions, and gestures are all part of persuasive delivery. If you think of Oratory or Extemp speed and style, you will have a sense of what you are looking for in a WS speech. This does NOT mean that signposting arguments or noting where the speaker is attacking opponent arguments is precluded; it DOES mean that the average person in the back of the room should be able to keep up with what is being advocated and argued. World Schools is very flexible in allowing competitors to be who they are in round (whether that means being sassy, having strong rhetoric, or using humor) if the discourse is courteous.
WSD - Arguments and Evidence
There should be a focus on proving the motion and clashing “big ideas.” Arguments are derived from logic, rather than through a focus on carded evidence.Students are not expected to cite their evidence (name, publication, date, etc.) and should not be penalized in any way for not doing so. In general, arguments are supported by warrants (analysis and logic) and examples (used from across the globe). Students are expected to be able to provide examples from outside the United States to support their arguments unless the motion is country-specific. There are no “cards” that are read. Evidence cannot be “called for” or looked at during or after the round. As in all forms of debate, the example should not BE the point, rather, it is an illustration OF the point. New content is expected to be presented in both constructive speeches (delivered by the 1st and 2nd speakers). The 3rd speaker is allowed to have new warrants and to make extensions but is generally not offering new substantive arguments. Replies should not have any new content (unless the Prop Reply is replying to new material in the Opp 3) as they should be crystallizing the debate. Debates aren’t won solely based on what’s on the “flow”—often in American debates people think if an argument is conceded it is automatically true, but a lot of judges in the WS format won’t vote on arguments they think are poorly explained/justified or wildly implausible even if the other team doesn’t explicitly respond to them.
WSD - POI instead of cross examination or crossfire
WSD - Special Judging Formula
The WS judging rubric: allocates 40% for content (“the matter”), 40% for style (“how the matter is presented”) and 20% for strategy (“how the matter is utilized”). The team with the higher total points wins the rounds. There are no tied team points, nor low point wins based on team points.
Final Reminders for Debate Judges
Thank You!!