The Future of MS Therapy
MS-Selfie 16-Jan-2023
Prof G
www.ms-selfie.org
Disclosures
No relevant conflicts of interest in relation to this specific presentation.
Over the last 5 years I have received personal compensation for participating in advisory boards in relation to clinical trial design, trial steering committees, and data and safety monitoring committees from: Abbvie, Atara Bio, Biogen, Canbex, Sanofi-Genzyme, Genentech, GSK, MSD, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Roche, Synthon BV and Teva.
Black swan
Black Swan
The potential role of EBV in MS
‘ - EBV
Priming of latent autoimmunity
persistent EBV infection
1° EBV infection
direct CNS infection
dual infection model
e.g. HERV transactivation
‘hit-and-run’ hypothesis
Infectious mononucleosis
molecular mimicry
B-cell survival advantage
Multiple Sclerosis
other environmental factors/triggers
‘driver or cog’ hypothesis
Giovannoni et al Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Dec;68:104434.
Memory B Cells are Major Targets for Effective Immunotherapy in MS
Baker et al. EBioMedicine. 2017 Feb;16:41-50.
REBOUND ACTIVITY AFTER NATALIZUMAB/FINGOLIMOD WITHDRAWAL
Rigau et al. Neurology 2012;79:2214-6.
Alroughani et al. BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Oct 15;2014. pii: bcr2014206314.
Massive intracerebral Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in lethal multiple sclerosis relapse after natalizumab withdrawal.
Serafini et al. J Neuroimmunol. 2017 Jun 15;307:14-17.
Highly-active RRMS, severe neurologic impairment (EDSS 7)
Treated with natalizumab - EDSS 4.5
Due to severe depression, stopped Nz after 37 infusions.
3½ months later rapid disease worsening
Brain MRI showed >50 T2-lesions, mostly Gd-enhancing
JCV-PCR -ve in CSF
Rapidly worsened, died d17
PM active MS rebound
JCV-PCR -ve in brain
Rituximab vs. Fingolimod after Natalizumab
Alping et al. Ann Neurol. 2016 Jun;79(6):950-8.
Disclaimer: please note rituximab is not licensed to treat MS in Germany
Charcot Project: viral aetiology
HIV and lower risk of MS: beginning to unravel a mystery using a record-linked database study
Nexø et al. Epidemiology 2013; 24:331-2
Treatment of HIV and Risk of MS
Gold et al. JNNP August 4, 2014 as 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307932.
Raltegravir → RRMS (INSPIRE STUDY)
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01767701
Kaiser / VA
Canada / Sweden
Black Swan
70-75%
Saha & Robertson. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2578 Published May 2011
EBV & B-cell biology
Therapeutic strategies�and prognostic factors
Early intervention and long-term prognosis
www.msbrainhealth.org�Image reproduced with permission from Giovannoni G, et al. Brain health: Time matters in multiple sclerosis. 2015 Available at www.msbrainhealth.org/report Accessed 26 May 2016.
Increasing disability
Time
Intervention at diagnosis
Intervention later
Can we do better?
No treatment
Later intervention
Intervention at diagnosis
Early intervention with high efficacy DMTs and long-term prognosis
www.msbrainhealth.org version 2.0�Image reproduced with permission from Giovannoni G, et al. Brain health: Time matters in multiple sclerosis. 2015 Available at www.msbrainhealth.org/report Accessed 26 May 2016.
Increasing disability
Time
High efficacy DMTs
Low efficacy DMTs
No treatment
Low efficacy DMTs
High efficacy DMTs
Flipping the pyramid
#AttackMS study overview
Natalizumab IV + oral MP x5 days
Placebo IV +
oral MP x5 days
CIS/McDonald MS
(optic neuritis, brainstem or spinal cord)
MRI suggestive of demyelination (at least 2 lesions in typical location)
Primary objectives:
Blinded phase
Open label
Baseline
W8
W4
CSF
n = 20/arm
Placebo
Nz
W12
W16
W24
W20
Primary outcome: lesion MTR
End of study
OCT & VEP
OCT & VEP
DMT
Nz as per routine care, or switch to different DMT
Randomisation within 14 days of symptom onset
Placebo
Nz
Nz
Nz
Nz
Nz
Nz
Nz
sNfL
MRI
Slide courtesy of Prof. Klaus Schmierer
No treatments between courses
Immune reconstitution
Immunodepletion
Immune reconstitution
MS
MS
washout
Low-to-high efficacy
gradual-onset of action
EDA vs. MEDA vs. NEDA
Maintenance therapy (IFN-beta, GA, Nz, fingo, DMF, Teri, Ocre)
Consolidation and/or maintenance therapy
Induction therapy (mitoxantrone followed by IFNbeta/GA)
MS
NEDA
High efficacy
induction therapy
MS in remission (long-term / ? cure)
MS in remission (long-term / ? cure)
Immune-reconstitution therapy (IRT) (mitoxantrone alemtuzumab, cladribine, HSCT)
MS
Course 1
Course 2
Immunodepletion
NEDA
Giovannoni G. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018 Jun;31(3):233-243.
Add-on low-to-high efficacy
MEDA vs. NEDA
MS
MS
washout
Low-to-high efficacy
gradual-onset of action
EDA
Combination maintenance therapy (DMF, etc…..)
✅
✅
?
?
Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is evident in RRMS
NB: Patients were rebaselined according to a roving EDSS reference system vs a fixed study baseline;�*Defined as a relapse that was recorded from ≤30 days prior to the reference EDSS assessment to ≤30 days post progression assessment. �EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; RRMS, relapsing-remitting MS;
Adapted from Kappos L, et al. Mult Scler 2018;24:963–973.
Cumulative probability (%)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
24
48
72
96
120
144
168
192
216
240
264
288
Weeks from the first natalizumab infusion
Confirmed EDSS progression unrelated to concurrent relapse*
Overall confirmed EDSS worsening
37.1%
24.5%
~2/3
Analysis of 5,562 patients with RRMS in the Tysabri Observational Programme (TOP)
PIRA represented 66% �of overall confirmed disability worsening
Predictors of long-term outcome in subjects
with MS treated with interferon beta-1a
Bermel et al. Ann Neurol 2012.
Prentice Criteria for a surrogate endpoint
Prentice. Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):431-40.
Predictors of long‐term disability accrual in relapse‐onset multiple sclerosis
Jokubaitis et al. MS-BASE .Annals of Neurology, 2016; 80(1):89-100.
Prentice Criteria for a surrogate endpoint
Prentice. Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):431-40.
❌
❌
❌
Ofatumumab (anti-CD20) vs. Teriflunomide (ASCLEPIOS I and II)
�focal inflammation vs. neurodegeneration (end-organ damage)
Hauser et al. ECTRIMS 2019
≠
Slides courtesy of Stephen Hauser.
Higher dose study designs in patients with RMS (MUSETTE) or PPMS (GAVOTTE)
aComposite measure of disability progression based on worsening EDSS scores and 9-hole peg test and/or timed 25-foot walk test.
12w-cCDP, 12-week confirmed composite disability progression; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis; RMS, relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Study in patients with RMS (MUSETTE)
Study in patients with PPMS (GAVOTTE)
Slides courtesy of Stephen Hauser.
Teriflunomide as a maintenance treatment after ocrelizumab induction (iTeri Study)
Teriflunomide 14mg daily PO
Ocrelizumab
(600mg ivi 6-monthly
RMS treated with ocrelizumab for at least 18 months (4 courses)
MRI suggestive of demyelination & CSF with OCBs
Randomised
Primary outcome: 24 months - CSF immunoglobulin light chain levels
Secondary outcomes:
BVL 24 months relative to baseline
12 & 24 months - Plasma neurofilament levels (area under the curve)
Cortical gray matter atrophy
T1 lesion volume
MRI new T2 lesions (inflammation)
Proportion of subjects OCB-ve
Disease improvement (EDSS, T25W, 9HPT, SDMT, ….)
NEDA
Safety
Antibody response to FLU virus in year 2
` Plasma immunoglobulin levels at year 2
Barts-MS, version 1.0, 03-Oct-2019
Power exploratory n = ?? / arm
M0
M6
M12
M3
M9
M15
M18
M21
M24
Lumbar puncture & CSF
Lumbar puncture & CSF
Study
End
Relapses
Unreported relapses
Clinical disease progression
Subclinical relapses: focal MRI activity
Focal gray and white matter lesions �not detected by MRI
Brain atrophy (whole brain/regional) / SELs
Spinal fluid and blood neurofilament levels
Biomarkers
NEDA
End-organ damage
Biomarkers
Spinal fluid oligoclonal bands / CNS B-cell follicles
Treat-2-Target - beyond NEIDA (no evident inflammatory activity)
Neurorestoration
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Optimising anti-inflammatories
Brain Health
Smouldering MS
Pathological drivers of smouldering MS
TSPO PET, translocator protein-18 kDa positron emission tomography
1. Mahad DH, et al. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:183–193; 2. Colasanti A, et al. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1112–1118;�3. Absinta M, et al. Neurology 2015;85:18–28; 4. Dal-Bianco A, et al. Acta Neuropath 2017;133:25–42�5. Laule & Moore. Brain Pathol, 28 (5), 750-764 Sep 2018. �6. Huhn et al. Front. Neurol., 11 February 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00084
Potential imaging markers
Pathological drivers
Meningeal enhancement3
TSPO PET �binding2
Slowly expanding�lesions4
Myelin water �imaging5
Sodium
imaging6
Demyelination
Hot microglia
B & plasma cells
Iron
Energy deficits
Viruses
Cladribine induces long lasting OCB disappearance in RMS patients: 10-year observational study
Rejdak et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:117-120.
Plasma B cells
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
CNS plasma cell and B cell-targeted treatments for MS
Baker et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jun 26;35:19-25.
Evobrutinib reduced SEL volume in a dose-dependent manner
*P value <0.05�BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; QD, once daily; SEL, slowly expanding lesions.
SEL volume decreased with increasing evobrutinib dose relative to the placebo
| | | Location shift [95% CI] | P value |
(1) STRATIFIED ANALYSIS – ALL PATIENTS | Evobrutinib 25 mg QD (n=50) | | –136.5 [–618.0, 309.0] | 0.505 |
Evobrutinib 75 mg QD (n=51) | | –246.0 [–712.0, 97.0] | 0.192 | |
Evobrutinib 75 mg BID (n=53) | | –474.5 [–1098.0, –3.0] | 0.047* | |
| | | | |
(2) STRATIFIED ANALYSIS – COMPLETERS (Week 48) | Evobrutinib 25 mg QD (n=50) | | –96.5 [–601.0, 446.0] | 0.699 |
Evobrutinib 75 mg QD (n=51) | | –244.3 [–716.8, 72.0] | 0.126 | |
Evobrutinib 75 mg BID (n=53) | | –408.3 [–1006.3, 13.3] | 0.058 |
Favors evobrutinib
Favors placebo
Decreasing SEL volume (mm3)
Increasing SEL volume (mm3)
Doug Arnold, AAN 2022; slide courtesy of Merck KGaA
Anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus
Mackensen et al. Nat Med. 2022 Nov 3. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02091-9.
Phenytoin for neuroprotection in patients with acute optic neuritis:�a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Phase 3 add-on neuroprotection
study
Raftopoulos et al. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Mar;15(3):259-69.
Nogo, MAG, OMgP
LINGO-1-NgR-p75NTR
GAP-43
NCAM
Neuregulin
Agents in development or completed PoC trials:�
Figure courtesy of Sharmilee Gnanapavan.
Remyelination
Mistake / Warning: active add-on rehabilitation & exercise
Exercise / Rehabilitation Essential
Axonal�sprouting
Axonal�remodelling
Synaptogenesis
Cortical�Plasticity
Kerschensteiner et al. J Exp Med. 2004;200(8):1027-38.
Waxman. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(12):932-41.
Courtesy Paul Matthews�Imperial College.
Stampanoni et al. Mult Scler. 2017 Jul doi: 10.1177/1352458517721358.
*
Rehabilitation
Non-MS targets�‘Brain Health’
The holistic management of MS
Therapeutic pyramid
Anti-inflammatory
Neuroprotection
Remyelination
Neurorestoration
MS-specific targets
Essential
Add-on
Anti-ageing
Brain Health�Physical Health
Prehabilitation
Exercise diminishes plasma neurofilament light chain and reroutes the kynurenine pathway in MS
Joisten et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 Mar 29;8(3):e982.
Moderate continuous training (MCT)
vs.
High intensity interval training (HIIT)
*
Metformin and fasting restores CNS remyelination
capacity by rejuvenating aged stem cells
Neumann et al. Cell Stem Cell 2019; 25(4):473-485.
Vasconcelos et al. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 4;10:33.
Diet: caloric restriction, Intermittent fasting, ketogenic diet
Nutriceuticals
Metformin, fumarates (DMF, etc.)
Exercise, etc.
*
Diet - prolonged fasting
*
Efficacy and Safety of Opicinumab in Participants with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial (AFFINITY Part 1)
Calabresi P,1 Giovannoni G,2 Hartung H-P,3-6 Naismith RT,7 Fox R,8 Sormani M-P,9 Arnold DL,10,11 Valis M,12 Newsome SD,1 Bartholomé E,13 Belkin MI,14 Cheng W,15 �Ke J,15 Riester K,15 Javor A,15 Lyons J,15 Bradley DP,15 Fisher E,15 Naylor ML,15* Belachew S,15 Deykin A,15 Franchimont N,15 Zhu B,15 on behalf of the AFFINITY study investigators
1Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA; 2Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; 3Heinrich-Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; 4Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 5Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 6Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; 7Washington University, St. Louis, USA; 8Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA; 9University of Genoa, Genova, Italy; 10NeuroRx Research; 11Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; 12Charles University in Prague, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic; 13CHU-Tivoli, La Louvière, Belgium; 14Michigan Institute for Neurological Disorders, Farmington Hills, USA; 15Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
*with Biogen at the time of analysis.
Acknowledgments: This study was sponsored by Biogen (Cambridge, MA, USA). Writing and editorial support for the preparation of this poster was provided by Excel Scientific Solutions (Fairfield, CT, USA): funding was provided by Biogen.
DMF = dimethyl fumarate; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MS: multiple sclerosis; ODRS = Overall Disability Response Score.
Click on a button below to navigate through the poster
Introduction
Methods
Results
Objective
Conclusions
147 | 37th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment & Research in Multiple Sclerosis | October 13-15, 2021
Conclusions
DMF = dimethyl fumarate; DMT = disease-modifying therapy; IFN-β = interferon beta; NAT = natalizumab; ODRS = Overall Disability Response Score.
(4 of 6)
| Placebo n =29 | Opicinumab n = 28 |
Mean* Difference 95% CI p-value | 0.01 | -0.01 -0.02 (-0.45, 0.4) 0.93 |
| Placebo n =43 | Opicinumab n = 43 |
Mean* Difference 95% CI p-value | -0.09 | 0.37 0.46 (-0.01, 0.9) 0.06 |
| Placebo n =59 | Opicinumab n = 61 |
Mean* Difference 95% CI p-value | -0.04 | 0.20 0.24 (-0.28, 0.75) 0.37 |
IFN-β
NAT
Figure 5. Efficacy in DMT subgroups
Placebo
Opicinumab
DMF
Baseline
Week 12
Week 24
Week 36
Week 48
Week 60
Week 72
Baseline
Week 12
Week 24
Week 36
Week 48
Week 60
Week 72
Baseline
Week 12
Week 24
Week 36
Week 48
Week 60
Week 72
Adjusted mean ODRS with 95% CI
–0.4
–0.2
0.0
0.4
0.6
–0.6
0.2
Adjusted mean ODRS with 95% CI
–0.4
–0.2
0.0
0.4
0.6
–0.6
0.2
Adjusted mean ODRS with 95% CI
–0.4
–0.2
0.0
0.4
0.6
–0.6
0.2
*Adjusted mean of ODRS at 72 weeks in opicinumab group and in placebo group.
Results
Introduction
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Vascular Comorbidity Accelerates Disability Progression!
Marrie et al. Neurology 2010;74:1041–1047.
6yrs
Effect of high-dose simvastatin on brain atrophy and disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS-STAT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Chataway et al. Lancet 2014; 383: 2213–21.
BSI (Boundary Shift Integral)
41
Holistic management of MS
Rehabilitation
Non-MS targets�‘Brain Health’
The holistic management of MS
Therapeutic pyramid
Anti-inflammatory
Neuroprotection
Remyelination
Neurorestoration
MS-specific targets
Essential
Add-on
Anti-ageing
Brain Health�Physical Health
Prehabilitation
Conclusions
Conclusions
Questions