Climate Model Ensembles:�Why they are complicated, valuable, and fascinating�
May 22, 2024, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m. ET
Benjamin Brown-Steiner, Ph.D.
Research Associate, PRI
1
1
1
4
4
4
Surface Temperature, Two Layers
Surface Temperature, Many Layers
4
16
16
160
160
Simple Climate Models
Atmosphere
Ocean
Simple Climate Models
Atmosphere
Land
Ocean
Simple Climate Models
Atmosphere
Land
Ocean
Simple Climate Models
Atmosphere
Land
Ocean
Global Climate Models
Q&A Session #1
The Spark
t=0
t=t1
Perhaps the most familiar attempts to get at uncertainty/mystery…
IPCC, Guidance Notes, July, 2005
IPCC, AR5, Summary for Policymakers
“There is high confidence that the ENSO will remain the dominant mode…and precipitation variability on regional scales will likely intensify. Natural variations…are large and thus confidence in any specific projected change in ENSO …remains low.”
What is science?
the study of or
knowledge about
the natural world
One more complexity…all that stuff science cannot do
Facts
Values
Knowledge
Wisdom
Decisions
Actions
Facts
Values
Knowledge
Wisdom
Decisions
Actions
Very Certain
Uncertain
Facts
Values
Knowledge
Wisdom
Decisions
Actions
“One of the purposes of objectivity, in practice, is to avoid coming to a moral conclusion.”
- Wendell Berry
REAL WORLD�(OMNISCIENT)
the past today the future
OUR VIEW AS OBSERVERS�(NOT OMNISCIENT)
AVAILABILITY (missing data)
ACCURACY (inexactness)
INDETERMINANCY (unobservable)
IGNORANCE (mystery)
UNPREDICTABILITY (the unexpected)
PATH DEPENDENT (what will we decide?)
the past today the future
“…we will always experience [data] as probabilistic, as shimmering, rather than fixed.”
“…all knowledge about [the earth system] depends fundamentally on modeling.”
- Paul Edwards, A Vast Machine, page 352
SCIENTIFIC METHOD�LETS US PUT THINGS TOGETHER�
“the world exists”
“what we see is what is there”
Parameterizations: ß, Ω, µ
Theoretical Knowledge
Empirical Knowledge
Computational Capabilities
Structure
modus ponens (if A 🡪 B, A .˙. B)
“we can represent the world with mathematics”
BC & IC
PEL Model,
Scientific Method in Practice,
Hugh Gauch, Jr. (2003)
This is important
But the interesting stuff is out here
Understanding = Knowledge + Ignorance
Bill Vitek and Wes Jackon, Virtures of Ignorance, 2005
We must characterize what we don’t know as much as what we do know.
BUILDING TRUST �THROUGH CHARACTERIZING UNCERTAINTIES
EPISTEMIC
UNCERTAINTIES
ALEATORY
UNCERTAINTIES
Observational Uncertainty (the past shimmers)
Chaos / Dependence on Initial Conditions
Internal Variability
Surprises (non-linearities, unobservables)
Known-Unknowns: uncertainties in the parameters or model components
Unknown-Knowns: the very rare happy surprise (more often luck)
Unknown-Unknowns: things we cannot or do not know how to describe
We want to know how much
rain will pass through
that forest canopy.
ALEATORY
UNCERTAINTIES
EPISTEMIC
UNCERTAINTIES
If we look at the aleatory
uncertainties as chaos
or randomness, we have to
consider: “Does ‘random’
in this (or any) context
describe a verifiable condition
or a limit of perception?”
When we use random do we
mean “random as far as we can tell?”
- Wes Jackson, Virtues of Ignorance, page 22
MYSTERY?
RANDOM?
PERTURB BOUNDARY CONDITIONS�(a.k.a. CREATE SCENARIOS)
PERTURB INITIAL CONDITIONS
t0
t50
t100
Adapted from Wilks 2006
Full
Range
of
Possibilities
Figure 2: Scenarios of future emissions for various greenhouse gases and other pollutants. Image from Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
Q&A Session #2
D6
D6
D4
D8
D12
D20
D10
Group Name Dice
“Today” D6 + D6
“2.6” D6 + D4
“4.5” D6 + D8
“6.0” D6 + D12
“8.5” D6 + D20
Group Name Dice
“Today” D6 + D6
“2.6” D6 + D4
“4.5” D6 + D8
“6.0” D6 + D12
“8.5” D6 + D20
X
Gigatons of Emitted GHG (as CO2-eq)
Today D6 + D6
X
RCP6.0 D6 + D12
X
Gigatons of Emitted GHG (as CO2-eq)
X
Today D6 + D6
RCP6.0 D6 + D12
X
Gigatons of Emitted GHG (as CO2-eq)
X
Today D6 + D6
RCP6.0 D6 + D12
X
Gigatons of Emitted GHG (as CO2-eq)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Today D6 + D6
RCP6.0 D6 + D12
X
Gigatons of Emitted GHG (as CO2-eq)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Today D6 + D6
RCP6.0 D6 + D12
Dice Models
Thanks!
COMPARE TO INDEPENDENT MODELS�(WE HOPE)�
Mason and Knutti, 2011
https://crt-climate-explorer.nemac.org/
Questions to Consider
https://atlas.climate.copernicus.eu/atlas
Questions to Consider
https://www2.cesm.ucar.edu/experiments/cesm1.0/diagnostics/cam5_diag/f40_amip_cam5_c03_78b/f40_amip_cam5_c03_78b-obs/
https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/ipcc-scenarios
FIXING IMPERFECT MODELS�(THAT DON’T MATCH THE OBSERVATIONS)
REAL WORLD
MODEL RESULTS
OBSERVATIONS
What could be wrong?
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS
(1) Think Harder / Do Better
(2) Tune Your Model (a.k.a. “play with the knobs”)
PROJECTING INTO THE FUTURE�(WE MUST BE OUT OF OUR MINDS)
…unless
you
wait.
The future is literally unverifiable