1 of 32

Title IX - Updated Regulations

August 14, 2020

From the Office of Human Capital Development

2 of 32

Agenda

  • Title IX
    • Overview of Changes
    • New Title IX Grievance Process

3 of 32

Title IX -

New Regulations

4 of 32

5 of 32

Title IX

  • Prohibits discrimination “on the basis of sex” in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance.
    • 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (2).

****Discrimination on the basis of sex can include rape, sexual assault, or other types of sexual harassment.

  • Protects both male and female students
  • Prohibits sexually harassing conduct towards members of the opposite sex as well a members of the same sex;

6 of 32

Title IX

  • Applies to sexual harassment directed toward students by school employees (Teachers, coaches, 3rd parties);
  • Applies to sexual harassment between students (peer sexual harassment)
  • Title IX applies to the entire school district
    • Does not apply if the conduct occurred against a person outside to of the U.S.

7 of 32

Title IX Over the Years (History Lesson)

  • Enacted in 1972
  • Franklin v. Gwinnett County Pub. Schs. (US 1992)
    • An implied private right of action for money damages could be sustained where a teacher allegedly sexually abused a student.
  • Gebser v. Lago Vista Indep. Sch. Dist. (U.S. 1998)
    • Damages for sexual harassment of a student by a teacher can only be recovered where:
      • An official who has authority to institute corrective measures on the district’s behalf
      • Has actual notice of the teacher’s misconduct, and
      • Acts deliberately indifferent to such misconduct

8 of 32

Title IX Over the Years

  • Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Educ. (US 1999)
    • Private damages actions may be sustained against a school board in the case of student-on-student harassment, BUT only where:
      • The District acts with deliberate indifference to known acts of harassment in its programs or activities; AND
      • The harassment is so severe, pervasive, AND objectively offensive that it effectively bars the victim’s access to an educational opportunity or benefit
  • Administrative Guidance
    • 2001: Clinton Administration OCR Regulations
    • 2001-02: Bush Administration
    • 2011: Obama Administration on-campus sex assault DCLs and OCR enforcement
    • 2016: Obama Administration DCL on transgender student rights

9 of 32

Sexual Harassment

  • “Quid Pro Quo” - school employee conditioning the provision of a school aid, benefit, or service on an individual’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct
  • Unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the school’s education program or activity (Gebser/Davis)

10 of 32

Updates on the Regulations

El coche

11 of 32

The New Regulations

  • Effective August 14, 2020
    • No sign of a stay or delayed implementation
  • Focus on schools’ response to allegations of sexual harassment
  • Provide specific procedures and require specific personnel
    • BUT Not all alleged Title IX violations are subject to new procedures

12 of 32

When Can a District Be Liable?

  • A district with actual knowledge of sexual harassment must take steps to address it.
    • As written, this covers all employees including custodians, secretaries, Paras, food service workers, etc.
  • Once the district has knowledge, it must act in a way that is not deliberately indifferent to the alleged harassment.

13 of 32

The Players

  • Complainant
    • An individual who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute sexual harassment
  • Respondent
    • An individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute sexual harassment

14 of 32

The Players

  • Title IX Coordinator
    • Employee who will coordinate with the district’s efforts to comply with its responsibilities under Title IX.
  • Investigator
    • If possible, should not be the Title IX Coordinator
  • Decision-Maker
    • Must not be the Title IX Coordinator or the Investigator
  • Appellate Decision-Maker
    • Must not be the Title IX Coordinator, Investigator or Decision-Maker
  • Informal Mediator

15 of 32

The Process

El coche

16 of 32

Response Under the New Regulations

  • Three Categories of Complaints/Allegations
    • Sex discrimination NOT involving sexual harassment
    • Sex harassment WITHOUT formal complaint
    • Sex harassment WITH formal complaint

17 of 32

General Response to ALL Allegations of Sexual Harassment (with or without a formal complaint)

  • If the school has:
    • Actual knowledge
    • Of sexual harassment
    • In an education program or activity
    • Against a person in the U.S.
  • The school must respond
    • Promptly
    • In a manner that is not deliberately indifferent

18 of 32

General Response to ALL Allegations of Sexual Harassment (with or without a formal complaint)

  • School is deliberately indifferent only if its response to sexual harassment is clearly unreasonable in light of known circumstances
    • Rejects the “known or reasonably should have known” standard imposed by rescinded guidance

19 of 32

General Response to ALL Allegations of Sexual Harassment (with or without a formal complaint)

  • Includes locations, events or circumstances over which the school exercised
    • Substantial control over both the respondent, AND
    • The context in which the sexual harassment occurs
  • Electronic or in person
  • Does not say “on campus” or “off campus”

20 of 32

General Response to ALL Allegations of Sexual Harassment (with or without a formal complaint)

  • Equitable Treatment
    • Supportive Measures
    • Follow Grievance Process that complies with procedural requirements BEFORE imposition of ANY disciplinary sanction
  • Title IX Coordinator communication

21 of 32

General Response to ALL Allegations of Sexual Harassment (with or without a formal complaint)

  • Emergency Removal
    • Individualized safety and risk analysis
    • An immediate threat to the physical health or safety of anyone
    • Notice and an opportunity to challenge the decision immediately following the removal
  • Administrative Leave

22 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment: The Grievance Process (Formal Complaint)

  • Formal Complaint
    • Signed by complainant or Title IX Coordinator
    • Alleges sexual harassment
    • Requests investigation

23 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • First Steps once a formal complaint is filed
    • Provide the parties with notice of the allegations, including:
      • Identity of parties
      • Conduct alleged to be sexual harassment
      • Date and location of incident
  • Provide notice of:
    • Notice of the grievance process including any informal resolution processes available
    • Statement that the respondent is presumed not responsible and that the determination of responsibility will not be made until the end of the process,
    • Ability to have advisor (including an attorney) at all stages, and
    • The section of the code of conduct that prohibits providing false statements and information during the grievance process
    • Determine if the conduct, as alleged, would violate Title IX

24 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • School must dismiss the complaint if the allegations:
    • Would not constitute sexual harassment even if proved;
    • Did not occur in the school’s education program or activity;
    • Did not occur against a person in the United States
  • School may dismiss if
    • Complainant requests (in writing to the TixC) to withdraw the formal complaint;
    • Respondent is no longer enrolled or employed by the district;
    • Specific circumstances prevent school from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination

25 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment: The Grievance Process - Investigation

  • Some underlying principles for sexual harassment investigations:
    • Equitable, Impartial, Thorough, Prompt
    • Not the complainant’s job to “prosecute” the case or respondent’s job to “defend” the case
    • Burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination regarding responsibility rest on the school and not on the parties.
    • District must gather “sufficient” evidence to reach a determination

26 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • Focus on due process - overview of major investigation steps
    • Each party must have equal opportunity to present witnesses, including fact and expert witnesses, and other evidence;
    • Cannot restrict the ability of either party to discuss the allegation or gather/present relevant evidence;
    • Allow each party to have an advisor of their choosing at each step
      • The district may establish consistent restrictions on the extent to which the advisor may participate in the proceedings
      • Provide each party the opportunity to inspect and review all evidence; and
      • Prior to the completion of the formal investigation report, send to each party and his/her advisor, the evidence subject to inspection and review.
        • Each party must be given 10 days to provide written responses

27 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • The Investigation Report
    • This is a formal written report that must fairly summarize relevant evidence;
    • The investigator must provide both parties and their advisors a copy of the investigation report at least 10 days prior to the determination regarding responsibility so the parties may review and provide a written response

28 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • The Decision-Making Process
    • After the investigation Hearing
    • Live hearings are OPTIONAL for K-12 schools (Don’t do them)
    • The decision-maker still must:
      • Give each party the opportunity to submit relevant questions that the party wants asked for any party or witness;
      • Provide each party with the answers to those questions; and
      • Allow for follow up questions

Remember that the burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination regarding responsibility rests on the district, not the parties

29 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • The Decision-Making Process
    • Written Determination
      • Identify the allegations
      • Describes the Procedures / Summary of Investigation
      • Make findings of fact
      • Make conclusions regarding the application of Code of Conduct to facts
      • Contain a statement of rationale for result as to each allegations (including determination of responsibility or not)
      • Process for Appeal
      • Provided simultaneously to both parties

30 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • Appeals
    • Must be offered for
      • Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of matter
      • New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal was made that could affect the outcome of the matter
      • Title IX Coordinator, investigator(s), or decision-maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or the individual complainant or respondent that affected the outcome of the matter
    • Equal opportunity for parties to submit a statement in support of or challenging outcome

31 of 32

Response to Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

  • Informal Resolution
    • Can’t be required
    • Only in response to formal complaint
    • May be offered at any time prior to determination of responsibility.
    • BUT can’t be used to resolve allegations that a teacher sexually harassed a student

32 of 32

QUESTIONS?