[1] Chaudhuri et al. (2025). TripCraft: A benchmark for spatio-temporally fine-grained travel planning. ACL.
[2] Xie et al. (2024). TravelPlanner: A benchmark for real-world planning with language agents. ICML.
[3] Choi et al. (2026). ATLAS: Constraints-aware multi-agent collaboration for real-world travel planning. ICLR.
UTP-Bench: Uncertainty-aware Travel Planning Benchmark
Etcharla Revanth Rao1, Priyanshu Karmakar1, Shubhojit Mallick2 , Manish Gupta2, Shreya Ghosh1, Abhik Jana1
IIT Bhubaneswar1, Microsoft2
Why UTP-Bench?
Code & resources
(UTP-Bench)
A valid itinerary can still
be a fragile itinerary.
Research question
Can LLMs plan appropriate time buffers to handle real-world travel uncertainty?
Real uncertainty signals
Historical transport delays and hourly crowd patterns.
Human reference plans
1,000 queries with itineraries refined by 14 trained annotators.
Robustness evaluation
BAS, CATS and TDAS reveal failures hidden by static pass rates.
What the benchmark adds
Coverage
504
Indian cities
33
states / UTs
1,000
travel queries
20
uncertainty-data cities
Traveler risk profiles
Risk-tolerant
Tighter schedules, smaller buffers
Risk-optimized
Moderate buffer allocation
Risk-averse
Larger safety margins
UTP-Bench
Travel databases + empirical uncertainty + traveler risk profile
Three Metrics for Robust Travel Plans
BAS
Buffer Adequacy Score
Does activity slack match visit duration, crowd conditions and the traveler’s risk profile?
CATS
Crowd-Aware Timing Score
Do attraction visits avoid peak crowd windows and favor quieter periods?
TDAS
Transport Delay Absorption Score
Do transport buffers absorb expected delays without excessive slack?
Hourly crowd-level distributions across attractions and restaurants.
Robustness across Trip Duration
Final Pass Rate
References
Agentic Baseline
Conclusion