Poster #: P1049�Real-world effectiveness and safety of etrasimod in Ulcerative Colitis: interim analysis of the EFFECT-UC study�
P.M. Irving, R. Battat, S. Mehta, P. Harrow, D. Gaya, A. Walsh, T. Kucharzik, C. Maaser, E. Jörgensen, Y. Leung, E. Binder, M. Kudela, B. Sahin, T. Meng, A. Falsafi, K. Wosik, S. Hahne, U. Helwig
Slides compiled by Dr. Waqqas Afif
Introduction
Background & Objectives
Methods
UC, ulcerative colitis; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; PRO2, patient-reported outcome 2; SFS, stool frequency subscore; RBS, rectal bleeding subscore; NRS, numerical rating scale; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Irving PM et al. ECCO 2026 (Abstract citation ID: jjaf231.1230, P1049).
2
Results
CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; NRS, numerical rating scale; PRO2, patient-reported outcome 2; SFS, stool frequency subscore; RBS, rectal bleeding subscore; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate.�Irving PM et al. ECCO 2026 (Abstract citation ID: jjaf231.1230, P1049).
3
Demographics and baseline characteristics | |
Demographics (N=121) | |
Age (years), mean (SEM) | 40.2 (1.1) |
Median (range) | 38.0 (19.0–64.0) |
Female, n (%) | 49 (40.5) |
BMI (kg/m²), mean (SEM) | 26.5 (0.5) |
Disease activity | |
Duration of UC (years), mean (SEM) (N=115) | 7.8 (0.8) |
Median (range) | 5.0 (0.0–36.0) |
Extent of disease, n (%) (N=49) | |
Ulcerative proctitis | 6 (12.2) |
Proctosigmoiditis | 6 (12.2) |
Left-sided colitis | 22 (44.9) |
Pancolitis | 15 (30.6) |
MMS, mean (median) (N=36) | 4.9 (5.0) |
Mayo ES, mean (median) (N=39) | 2.3 (2.0) |
Mayo ES of 3, n (%) | 11 (28.2) |
PROs (N=113) | |
PRO2, mean (median) | 2.5 (2.0) |
SFS | 1.6 (2.0) |
RBS | 0.9 (1.0) |
Bowel urgency NRS, mean (median) | 5.4 (6.0) |
Abdominal pain NRS, mean (median) | 2.8 (2.0) |
Biomarkers | |
fCAL (µg/g), median (range) (N=67) | 560.0 (9.0–8000.0) |
hsCRP (mg/L), median (range) (N=93) | 1.8 (0.1–72.0) |
Prior/Concomitant therapies (N=121) | |
Line of therapy, n (%) | |
No previous advanced therapy | 73 (60.3%) |
1 previous advanced therapy | 21 (17.4%) |
≥2 previous advanced therapies | 27 (22.3%) |
Prior advanced therapies for UC, n (%) | |
Biologics | 45 (37.2%) |
TNFα inhibitor | 35 (28.9%) |
Integrin inhibitor | 25 (20.7%) |
Interleukin-12/23 inhibitor | 13 (10.7%) |
JAKi | 14 (11.6%) |
S1P receptor modulator | 1 (0.8%) |
Concomitant CS use, n (%) | 40 (33.1%) |
Concomitant 5-ASA, n (%) | 56 (46.3%) |
Results
PRO2, patient-reported outcome 2; SFS, stool frequency subscore; RBS, rectal bleeding subscore; NRS, numerical rating scale; CRP, C-reactive protein; UC, ulcerative colitis.
Irving PM et al. ECCO 2026 (Abstract citation ID: jjaf231.1230, P1049).
4
Effectiveness outcomes
Patient-reported outcomes over time
Note: Data at the bottom of each data bar are n/N; data in brackets are 95% CI.
Note: Bowel urgency and abdominal pain are assessed using an 11-point NRS. Scores ranged from 0 (“no urgency” and “none”, respectively) to 10 (“worst possible urgency” and “worst possible pain”, respectively).z
Conclusions
Significance to clinical practice
UC, ulcerative colitis.
Irving PM et al. ECCO 2026 (Abstract citation ID: jjaf231.1230, P1049).
5