1 of 37

REGARDS and RURAL – Cohorts for Potential Dementia Questions

Suzanne Judd

2 of 37

Suzanne Judd �George Howard�Virginia Howard�Mary Cushman�Jennifer Manly�

REGARDS

REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke

3 of 37

REGARDS�

  • Central participant recruitment using mail and telephone
  • Central computer-assisted telephone interview
  • In-home evaluation for physical, venipuncture and EC Central laboratory and repository for serum and urine samples and ECG readings
  • Central follow-up for detection of suspected stroke events
  • Blinded adjudication of stroke events

4 of 37

REGARDS Study Design�Components of Telephone Interview

  • Demographics (including SES measures)
  • Major cardiovascular risk factors
  • Lifestyle choices (smoking, alcohol, physical activity, etc)
  • General Health and quality of life measures
  • Access to care
  • Depression
  • Cognitive functioning screener

5 of 37

REGARDS Study Design�Self-Administered Packet

  • Completed by the participant and returned to UAB by pre-addressed envelope
  • Components
    • Food Frequency Questionnaire (Block)
    • “Where have you lived” Questionnaire
    • Family history of stroke and heart disease
    • “You and your doctor” Questionnaire

6 of 37

REGARDS Study Design�Lab Assay

  • Conducted at the central lab at the University of Vermont (Mary Cushman)
  • Components (partial list)
    • Lipids, glucose, insulin, A1C, creatinine, urinary ACR, cystatin, CRP, cytokines, BNP, interleukins, GFAP
    • Samples saved for planned case/control studies

• Serum • Cells (genetic studies)

• Plasma • Urine

7 of 37

REGARDS Study Design�Second in Home Visit (SSuRF)

  • 2013-2016
  • Goals
    • 2nd inhome visit
      • Same lab and phenotype data as baseline
      • Timed walk
      • Chair stand
      • Digit symbol substitution
    • 2nd longer telephone survey
      • Baseline questions
      • Lifespace
      • AD8

8 of 37

White American

Black American

N = 30,239

REGARDS Participants

9 of 37

Retention

 

N at Start

Active

Dead

Withdraws

Passive

Withdraws

TOTAL

30,183 (100%)

8836 (29%)

12716 (42%)

8008 (27%)

623 (2%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Black Participants

12,514 (100%)

3178 (26%)

5397 (43%)

3638 (29%)

301 (2%)

Black Males

4746 (100%)

1064 (23%)

2381 (50%)

1201 (25%)

100 (2%)

Black Females

7768 (100%)

2114 (27%)

3016 (39%)

2437 (31%)

201 (3%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

White Participants

17,669 (100%)

5658 (32%)

7319 (41%)

4370 (25%)

322 (2%)

White Males

8805 (100%)

2610 (30%)

4206 (48%)

1868 (21%)

121 (1%)

White Females

8864 (100%)

3048 (34%)

3113 (35%)

2502 (28%)

201 (2%)

Cognitive Status

 

 

 

 

 

Ever impaired

11,524 (100%)

2899 (25%)

5968 (52%)

2377 (21%)

280 (2%)

Never impaired

18,093 (100%)

5937 (33%)

6324 (35%)

5489 (30%)

343 (2%)

10 of 37

Current Cognitive Outcomes

  • Continuous test scores
    • Word List Learning (WLL) and Delayed Recall (WLD)
      • Administered every other year, scored automatically
    • Semantic (Animal) Fluency and Phonemic (Letter F) Fluency
      • Administered every other year, recorded and scored by trained individuals
    • Six Item Screener (SIS)
      • Administered annually, scored automatically
  • Continuous factor scores
    • Memory
    • Language
    • Overall cognition
  • Cognitive Impairment
    • Based on robust normative sample
    • Can be applied to any of the above outcomes

11 of 37

Cognitive Assessment Frequency

6 month follow up No cognitive tests

12 month follow up 6 item cognitive screener

18 month follow up Word List Learning and Animal Naming and MOCA

24 month follow up 6 item screener

30 month follow up No cognitive tests

36 month follow up 6 item screener

42 month follow up Word List Learning and Animal Naming and MOCA

.

.

.

114 month follow up Word List Learning and Animal Naming and MOCA

120 month follow up 6 item screener

126 month follow up No cognitive tests

132 month follow up 6 item screener

138 month follow up Word List Learning and Animal Naming and MOCA

144 month follow up 6 item screener

12 of 37

Six Item Screener

Number of Assessments

Number of Participants

Percent %

0

1302

4.3

1

2467

8.2

2

2011

6.7

3

2041

6.8

4

1767

5.9

5

1577

5.2

6

1502

5.0

7

1371

4.5

8

1439

4.8

9

1331

4.4

10

1303

4.3

11

1377

4.6

12

1499

5.0

13

1677

5.6

14

1671

5.5

15

1589

5.3

16

1540

5.1

17

1480

4.9

18

1067

3.5

19

172

0.6

Total Number of participants with at least 1 assessment

28881

 

Total assessments administered

257134

 

13 of 37

Word List Learning

Number of Assessments

Number of Participants

Percent

%

0

3694

12.2

1

4822

16.0

2

3448

11.4

3

3008

10.0

4

2883

9.6

5

2825

9.4

6

3098

10.3

7

3063

10.2

8

2250

7.5

9

1001

3.3

10

91

0.3

Total Number of participants with at least 1 assessment

26489

 

Total assessments administered

114347

 

14 of 37

CESD and MOCA

Number of Assessments

Number of Participants

Percent

%

0

7132

23.6

1

4200

13.9

2

2971

9.8

3

2745

9.1

4

2423

8.0

5

2830

9.4

6

3423

11.3

7

3427

11.4

8

1032

3.4

Total Number of participants with at least 1 assessment

23051

 

Total assessments administered

95002

 

15 of 37

Animal Naming

Number of Assessments

Number of Participants

Percent

%

0

3958

13.1

1

5075

16.8

2

3516

11.7

3

2968

9.8

4

2903

9.6

5

2716

9.0

6

3047

10.1

7

3080

10.2

8

2159

7.2

9

761

2.5

Total Number of participants with at least 1 assessment

26225

 

Total assessments administered

110166

 

16 of 37

Letter F

Number of Assessments

Number of Participants

Percent

%

0

7097

23.5

1

4518

15.0

2

3023

10.0

3

2790

9.2

4

2651

8.8

5

2933

9.7

6

3429

11.4

7

2747

9.1

8

995

3.3

Total Number of participants with at least 1 assessment

23086

 

Total assessments administered

91966

 

17 of 37

Brain Health Study – In Home Visits to Identify MCI and Dementia in 1000 participants

City

Total

SC/NC

171

Bham

147

NYC

106

ATL

212

LA

197

CHI

94

Indy

9

18 of 37

NDI Process

  • REGARDS links with the NDI annually
  • NDI returns ICD10 codes for records that include
    • underlying cause of death (the disease or injury that initiates the chain of events leading to death) 
    • any mention of a condition or cause of death on the death certificate 
  • Previous work in MESA indicated a PPV 73.2-92.6%
  • Previous work in HRS included any dementia-related diagnosis (ICD-10 codes F00-F03, G30, G31.0-G31.1, and R54) or AD (ICD-10 codes F00 and G30). 

19 of 37

Table of NDI Values in Freeze

20 of 37

Not to be confused with this dataset that we share….

21 of 37

Alzheimer’s disease ICD 10 Codes �https://icd.who.int/browse10/2019/en#/F00-F09

22 of 37

REGARDS NDI

  • We have received cause of death from NDI through 12/31/2020
  • 10696 REGARDS participants have a cause of death in the NDI
  • 1445 of those are coded as dementia
  • 579 of the dementia deaths are coded as Alzheimer’s disease

23 of 37

Age

All REGARDS

Dementia Death

All Death

30183

1445 (4.8%)

10696 (35.4)

45-54

3784

3 (0.08%)

362 (9.6%)

55-64

11533

120 (1.0%)

2455 (21.3%)

65-74

9684

556 (5.7%)

4110 (42.4%)

75-84

4569

632 (13.8%)

3241 (70.9%)

85-94

586

134 (22.8%)

526 (89.8%)

95+

2

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

24 of 37

Race & Sex

All REGARDS

Dementia Death

All NDI Death

30183

1445 (4.8%)

10696 (35.4%)

Black Female

7756

381 (4.9%)

2506 (32.3%)

Black Male

4742

180 (3.8%)

2048 (43.2%)

White Female

8859

458 (5.2%)

2545 (28.7%)

White Male

8801

426 (4.8%)

3597 (40.9%)

25 of 37

Region

All REGARDS

Dementia Death

All NDI Death

30183

1445 (4.8%)

10696 (35.4%)

Belt

10441

525 (5.0%)

3743 (35.9%)

Buckle

6304

275 (4.4%)

2053 (32.6%)

Nonbelt

13413

645 (4.8%)

4900 (36.5%)

26 of 37

SES

All REGARDS

Dementia Death

All Death

30183

1445 (4.8%)

10696 (35.4%)

Income - missing

3718

267 ( 7.2%)

1469 (39.5%)

$20K

5472

326 ( 6.0%)

2686 (49.1%)

$20K–$34K

7304

418 ( 5.7%)

3081 (42.2%)

$35K–74K

8910

338 ( 3.8%)

2627 (29.5%)

$75+

4754

96 ( 2.0%)

833 (17.5%)

Years of education

<High school

3792

264 ( 7.0%)

2024 (53.4%)

High school

7804

391 ( 5.0%)

2947 (37.8%)

Some college

8090

344 ( 4.3%)

2759 (34.1%)

College+

10472

446 ( 4.3%)

2966 (28.3%)

27 of 37

Co-Morbid

All REGARDS

Dementia Death

All Death

30183

1445 (4.8%)

10696 (35.4%)

Hypertension

17830

945 ( 5.3%)

7474 (41.9%)

Diabetes

6388

346 ( 5.4%)

3229 (50.5%)

BMI -underweight

318

24 ( 7.5%)

171 (53.8%)

BMI – normal

7087

482 ( 6.8%)

2751 (38.8%)

BMI – overweight

11049

561 ( 5.1%)

3794 (34.3%)

BMI - obese

11486

375 ( 3.3%)

3860 (33.6%)

Central Adiposity

14718

624 ( 4.2%)

5412 (36.8%)

No exercise

10226

557 ( 5.4%)

4409 (43.1%)

4+ times per week exercise

8796

451 ( 5.1%)

2898 (32.9%)

28 of 37

Brain Related

All REGARDS

Dementia Death

All Death

30183

1445 (4.8%)

10696 (35.4%)

Baseline SIS Impairment

1939

193 (10.0%)

1002 (51.7%)

Baseline Stroke

1922

128 ( 6.7%)

1194 (62.1%)

Baseline TIA

1114

79 ( 7.1%)

625 (56.1%)

Incident Stroke

2020

138 ( 6.8%)

1153 (57.1%)

29 of 37

REGARDS Renewal – Addressing Secular Trends in Stroke Mortality

From 1900 to 2010, United States life expectancy increased 65%, driven by an 80% decline in stroke mortality and a 68% decline in heart disease mortality. The remarkable gains in life expectancy were not equal by race, as gains were greater in non-Hispanic and Hispanic White Americans than in Black Americans.

30 of 37

Aim 1. To understand mechanisms of brain health disparities, including secular trends in cognitive function, stroke, and risk factors (established and novel) for stroke and VCID in the REGARDS-2 cohort. We will recruit and follow the REGARDS-2 cohort (n=20,000) to determine if recent increases in stroke and VCID are driven by changes in risk factor profile, and quantify the impact of changes in risk factor profile on widening racial disparities in stroke and VCID and their associated risk factors.

31 of 37

Suzanne Judd �Vasan Ramachandran�

32 of 37

Urban Rural Disparities

  • The youngest ages experience the greatest disparities between rural and urban communities
    • 90% increase in all cause mortality
    • 51% increase in CHD mortality
    • 107% increase ion COPD mortality
  • Risk Factor Disparities
    • 131% increase smoking
    • 93% increase in diabetes
    • 127% greater risk in being uninsured

33 of 37

Barriers to Research Participation

  • Traditional cohort studies require a clinic that is typically near academic medical centers
  • Taking a clinic to the participants can limit diagnostic testing
  • Trust is challenging when face to face interaction is limited
  • Exposure to medical research
  • Research questions from the community may not be the same as investigators

34 of 37

Bring the Clinic to the Participants

35 of 37

RURAL Exam

    • Total exam time 3.5 hours
    • MEU has lab, CT room, interview room, bathroom and reception space
    • Physical
    • Blood draw
    • Spirometry
    • mHealth (phone and fitbit)
    • ECG, CT scan, echocardiogram
    • Questionnaires (lifestyle, diet, neighborhood, stress, medications, health history, etc)

36 of 37

RURAL Objectives

    • Recruit 4000-4600 aged 25-64 participants from 10 counties across Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Kentucky
    • Build a mobile examination unit to provide a consistent evaluation for each participant
    • Develop a genetic and biospecimen repository for future studies
    • Engage each county through a community engagement coordinator who lives in the county throughout the study
    • Retain participants for many years to come

37 of 37

How can I get involved?

    • Write a manuscript
    • Ancillary studies
      • Add new exposure
      • Add new outcome
      • Analyze existing data through secondary data analysis
    • Community based projects using existing infrastructure (advisory boards, focus groups, etc)
    • https://www.theruralstudy.org/
    • www.regardsstudy.org