1 of 18

RDA-OfR WG on Managing and Integrating Multiomics Data

Brainstorming Workshops

Thursday 7 September

08:00-09:00 UTC

16:00-17:00 UTC

Connie Clare (connie.clare@rda-foundation.org)

2 of 18

A few logistics

3 of 18

A few logistics

4 of 18

RDA-OfR WG on Managing and Integrating Multiomics Data

Brainstorming Workshops

Thursday 7 September

08:00-09:00 UTC

16:00-17:00 UTC

Connie Clare (connie.clare@rda-foundation.org)

5 of 18

Aim for today

  1. To discuss and define the scope of the new RDA-OfR WG�on Managing and Integrating Multiomics Data (title of WG to be confirmed)
  2. Capture main points/ideas to draft the Case Statement (deadline Friday 22 September)
  3. Identify initial WG co-chairs and members

Add your name to the collaborative notes (page 2)

6 of 18

Today’s agenda

10 min

Welcome & introductions

All

5 min

Overview of the WG - Aims and your initial thoughts

Facilitator

20 min

WG Overview:�What issues will the WG address? �What should the output be?

All

20 min

Value proposition: �Who will benefit from the output?�What are tangible impacts?

All

5 min

Next steps

Facilitator

7 of 18

Workshop 1: Welcome to participants 👋🏼

Christine Ballard

Senior Research Advocate

Oracle, Inc.

USA

Connie Clare

Community Development Manager

Research Data Alliance

UK

Jurgita Gammall

Data Science Manager

Oracle Health

UK

Helge Hecht

Research Infrastructure Team Leader

RECETOX, Masaryk University

Czech Republic

Irina Hope

Global Events Manager

Research Data Alliance

UK

Lei Li

Senior Research Advocate

Oracle

Australia

Flavio Licciulli

Senior Technologist

CNR - ITB

Italy

Paulette Lieby

Research Engineer

Institut Français de Bioinformatique (IFB / ELIXIR-FR)

France

David Molik

Computational Biologist

USDA ARS - ADADRU

USA

Rowland Mosbergen

Strategic Engagement Manager

WEHI

Australia

Gera Pradeepini

Professor

KL University

India

Ana Teixeira

Product Manager for Multi-omics

Oracle

UK

Claire Rye

New Zealand

8 of 18

Workshop 2: Welcome to participants 👋🏼

Lindsey Anderson

Computational Scientist

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory / U.S. Department of Energy

USA

Heather Barnes

Data Curator/Manager

RTI

USA

Stuart Chalk

Professor of Chemical Informatics

University of North Florida

USA

Connie Clare

Community Development Manager

Research Data Alliance

UK

Marcy Collinson

Sr. Principal Strategic Partnerships

Oracle for Research

USA

Francis P. Crawley

Executive Director

GCPA & SIDCER

Belgium

Aedin Culhane

Professor of Cancer Genomics

University of Limerick

Ireland

Romain David

Researcher - Data steward

ERINHA (European Research Infrastructure on Highly Pathogenic Agents)

Belgium

Gísli Einarsson

Senior Research Fellow

Queen’s University Belfast

UK

Maira Elahi

Founder, Research Lead

TIVEA

Canada

Michael Feichtinger

Data Steward

University of Vienna - Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science

Austria

Anupama Gururaj

Program Officer

NIH

USA

Rob Hooft

Working group lead for omics and samples data

Health-RI

Netherlands

9 of 18

Workshop 2: Welcome to participants 👋🏼

Irina Hope

Global Events Manager

Research Data Alliance

UK

Bin Hu

Staff scientist

National Microbiome Data Collaborative (NMDC) and Los Alamos National Laboratory

USA

Brett Johnson

Lead

Stoneface Ventures

USA

Nick Juty

Project Portfolio Manager

The University of Manchester

UK

Matthias Lange

Senior Scientist Data Engineering

Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research

Germany

Dina Mikdadi

Senior Manager

Deloitte Consulting

USA

Chris Mungall

Staff Scientist

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

US

Isabelle Perseil

R&D

INSERM

France

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Professor of Data Readiness; also Co-lead

University of Oxford; also ELIXIR Interoperability Platform

UK

Ugis Sarkans

Technical Team Lead

EMBL-EBI

UK

Maria Tsagiopoulou

Post Doctoral Researcher

CNAG

Spain

Adam Vials Moore

Product Specialist - PIDs

Jisc

UK

Elisha Wood-Charlson

User Engagement Lead

LBNL, KBase

USA

10 of 18

An Overview of the Working Group: Aims and your initial thoughts

11 of 18

About the RDA-OfR�Working Group

  • Public-private partnership model
    • WG facilitated by the RDA (12 months duration)
    • Outputs owned by the RDA community
    • Powered by Oracle for Research
  • Dedicated Technical Advisory Board liaison
  • At least 2 international co-chair experts
  • WG open to all RDA community members
  • Monthly meetings & three-monthly progress review
  • Promotion & communication activities
  • Outputs & recommendations openly available under CC-BY license

12 of 18

Challenges of managing multi-omics data

Sensitive data, privacy and ethical data sharing

Lack of diverse datasets for human Omics (GWAS)

Lack of ontologies and controlled vocabularies across disciplines to enable synchronous metadata

Lack of clear standards and best practices for data management (formats) and sharing (bioinformatics and in silico)

Lack of integrated / linked repositories

Different methodologies and data formats across disciplines

Data volume (managing, analysing big, complex datasets)

Lack of compute resources

Fragmented standards across Omics disciplines

Lack of / incomplete metadata hindering reproducibility

Lack of awareness, training and capacity-building pipelines

Varying fragmented standards = challenge to integrate across Omics disciplines

Lack of publicly available tools for integrated analysis

13 of 18

Your ideas for the scope of this WG

  1. BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING MULTIOMICS DATA

  • Engage with stakeholders to co-create recommendations on multiomics data management best practices.
  • Identify best practices for managing and sharing data from different -omics disciplines.
  • Identify tools and platforms which align with best practices.
  • Consult stakeholders, and understand their incentives and barriers to implementing FAIR practices and standards.
  • Determine ‘easiest target, low-barrier’ FAIR standards and best practices for managing multiomics data.
  • Provide advocacy and training materials for multiomics data standards and best practices for FAIR data generation.
  • Collect use cases, supplemented with example data and tutorials/guides for beginners on how to manage multiomics data.
  • Create recommendations for how to engage and support researchers and provide training infrastructure.

2. METADATA STANDARDS FOR MULTIOMICS DATA

  • Create a Multi-Omics Metadata Schema Standard reporting template with community representation across domains with use-case examples.
  • By leveraging pre-existing domain metadata standards, ontologies, and reporting guidelines this working group could advance current siloed community harmonization efforts with much needed cross-disciplinary diversity for creating more sustainable standard outputs fully representative of various data types and computational formats.
  • Understand the different levels of metadata for specific roles while being flexible enough for researchers.
  • Important: Leverage existing standards at all possible, and standards best practices…

14 of 18

Your ideas for the scope of this WG

Collecting use cases from various -omics domains and identifying standards/best practices across them to identify metadata standards that could link across -omics domains

leading to the deliverable of a metadata schema standard reporting template

15 of 18

Time for discussion!�Head to the Google doc

16 of 18

  • Register your interest to join the WG by adding a tick (✔️) in the Google doc
  • Co-chairs may undergo selection to encourage diversity
  • Please review, draft and edit the Case Statement by Friday 22 September
  • Note: Co-chairs will be involved in drafting sections of the case statement

17 of 18

Next steps

  • Friday 22 September - Workshop participants review and edit case statement
  • Monday 2 October- Publication of case statement for review
  • 28 October - Endorsement of case statement by community, TAB and Council
  • November - Monthly meeting
  • December - Monthly meeting
  • January - Monthly meeting & three-month review
  • February - Monthly meeting
  • March - Monthly meeting
  • April - Monthly meeting & three-month review

Photo by Gio Bartlett on Unsplash

18 of 18