GROUP 12
Flow (Q, q): 18 Years (and 2 months+, 10/10/1991 to 12/29/2010) (19 years, 2 months, 25 days)*
Rainfall: 39 years + (1/2/1984 to 11/28/2023), Jesmond
Few missing values in Q data and Rainfall (long_Meadows)
99.15% data availability
m3/s (Q), l/s*km2 (q), mm (Rainfall)
15 minutes
Task 1: Basic stats
Task 2: Hydrology
Mean: 0.3160 (Q), 5.747 (q, unit flow), 0.020 (Rainfall, Jesmond)
Median: 0.122 (Q), 2.22 (q), 0 (Rainfall, Jesmond)
Std Deviation: 0.758 (Q), 13.779 (q), 0.131 (Rainfall, Jesmond)
Plot two years of data – 94/95 and 07/08
Plot example: Wet (15/16) and dry (95/96) years flow values for a station in Cumbria
Task 3: Extreme Hydrology
Quantiles
Even more extreme!
AMAX series
Data Quality Control
Imputation – how to treat missing data:
CHOICE : Keeping all values, because we need a bigger record for finding the peak rainfall with a bigger return period. Imputation by mean and further finding the spatially distributed rainfall by using Thiessen method.
Reason : The rainfall for the overlapping period (period where data is available in all the stations) was checked. It is found that the use of the thiessen method for interpolation with imputation by 0s resulted in values that were less than the values obtained by imputation by mean.
Calculation of mean rainfall for spatial distribution and use of mean values for imputation gives slightly lower values. In a similar way the use of median values for interpolation resulted in under-estimation of the values.
Moreover, adding 0s in place of unknown values is not practical.
→ Thiessen method gives better spatially distributed rainfall values.
How much of the different timeseries to keep?
DATA : from 1/2/1984 till 20/6/2018