1 of 1

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

The Influence of Accent Prestige on Lexical and Syntactic Alignment in “Dialogue”

​

Hanna-Sophia G. Shine and L. Robert Slevc, PhD

University of Maryland, College Park

Linguistic alignment is a conversational phenomenon that occurs when a speaker adopts linguistic aspects of their conversational partner's speech. The current research assesses the impact of accent prestige, an underexplored social factor, on the frequency of alignment between native English speakers and foreign-accented English speakers. Using a novel interactive narrative task, native English-speaking participants took turns describing pictures with a prerecorded speaker to tell a collaborative story. Critically, the prerecorded speakers had different foreign accents that varied in social prestige as assessed through a prior norming study. Data collection is ongoing. These results may have important implications for cross-cultural interactions in many settings such as the workplace, the classroom, or just in day-to-day life.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Methods

Participants

  • Undergraduate participants (N = 109; 34 men, 73 women, 2 non-binary, Mean age = 19 years; SD = 1.17), who are native English speakers completed this study.
    • 51.38% White, 19.27% Asian/Asian American, 17.43% Black/African American, 7.34% Hispanic/Latino American, and 4.59% mixed or other.

​

Measures

  • Ranking Survey: Participants completed a 10-item measure assessing rankings of six foreign-accented English speakers on various characteristics related to perceived social status and prestige using a 5-point ranking scale.
    • e.g., “How do you think most people would rank these speakers in terms of popularity? In this context, popularity refers to ‘the relative interpersonal position of a member within a group as determined by other group members’. Drag the speakers upward and downward to rearrange them for your response with 1 being the most popular and 5 being the least popular.”
    • Participants ranked the accented speakers against each other on each item.
    • One item was not used in the analysis due to an experimental error.

​

Procedures

  • Participants completed the measures described through a Qualtrics survey.

​

Results

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Discussion

​

  • Across six items in the measure, the British-accented speaker was ranked first.
  • Across six items in the measure, the Cantonese-accented speaker was ranked last.
  • These rankings informed our accent selection in Study 1B.

​

Limitations and Future Directions

  • Future research should consider the addition of more diverse accents that are not easily identifiable.
  • Linguistic alignment is a phenomenon that occurs when a speaker uses a linguistic aspect of their conversational partner’s speech (Pickering & Garrod, 2004).
    • This alignment could be lexical, using the same terminology, syntactic, using the same sentence structure, or phonetic, using the same vowel pronunciation for instance (Rahimi et al., 2017).

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

  • There are two main theories as to why alignment occurs.
    • the Interactive Alignment Model (IAT), argues that alignment is an automatic process that increases comprehension (Pickering & Garrod, 2004).
    • Prior work has shown support for the IAT in both a verbal teamwork task (Garrod & Anderson, 1987) and a cooperative decision-making task (Fusaroli et al., 2012).
    • Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT), proposes that alignment is influenced by sociocultural factors and the level of alignment between a speaker and their conversational partner reflects their social attitudes towards one another (Giles & Ogay, 2007).
    • Prior research has found support for CAT as factors such as interpersonal similarity (Weatherholtz et al., 2014), the perceived standardness of a speaker's accent (Weatherholtz et al., 2014), and familiarity with a speaker's accent (Chun et al., 2016), can affect alignment in conversation.
  • The current research assesses both the comprehension-based (IAT) and socially-based (CAT) accounts of alignment by exploring the impact of accent prestige, an underexplored social factor, on the frequency of lexical and syntactic alignment between native English speakers and foreign-accented English speakers.

​

Methods

Participants

  • Undergraduate participants who are native English speakers can participate in this study.

MET

Procedures

  • Partner Narration Task: Participants alternate narrating simple line-drawn picture stories with two “partners”.
    • Participants narrate two short stories with each partner.
    • The partners are a pre-recorded British accented speaker and a pre-recorded Cantonese accented speaker. The order in which participants interact with the pre-recordings is randomized.
    • The pre-recorded accented speakers use specific lexical items (e.g., “couch” vs “sofa”) and syntactic structures (e.g., specific dative sentence structures) in their narrations.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Exploratory Measures

  • ADHD: 1-item measure assessing ADHD diagnosis.
    • “Have you ever received a formal ADHD diagnosis from a licensed practitioner?”
  • Autism: 1-item measure assessing Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosis.
    • “Have you ever received a formal Autism diagnosis from a licensed practitioner?”
  • Social Anxiety: 1-item measure assessing Social Anxiety Disorder diagnosis.
    • “Have you ever received a formal social anxiety disorder diagnosis from a licensed practitioner?”
  • Extraversion: 8-item adaption of the Big Five Inventory (John & Srivastava, 1999) assessing extraversion using a 5-point response scale (1: Disagree strongly; 5: Agree strongly; “Has an assertive personality.”).
  • Need to Belong: 10-item Need to Belong Scale (NTBS) (Leary, 2013) assessing desire for acceptance using a 5-point response scale (1: Strongly disagree; 5: Strongly agree; “I want other people to accept me.”).
  • Partner Report: 6-item measure assessing participants’ evaluation of their partners across four domains: comprehension, prestige, perceived social status, and native English status (e.g., “Based on your subjective evaluation which of the two partners was more prestigious? Your response will not be shared with the other participants.”).
  • Study Purpose: 1-item measure assessing participants’ beliefs regarding the purpose of the study.
    • “Please briefly describe what you believe this research is about.”

​

Results

  • Study 1B is preregistered ( https://osf.io/sp9ag; right QR code).
  • Data collection is ongoing.

​

​

STUDY 1A

STUDY 1B

Contact Information: Hanna-Sophia G. Shine | hshine@umd.edu

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

“Dominic tossed a party hat [festive hat] to Lauren.”

Sample Response: “Rachel gave flowers to Dominic.”

“Rachel gave flowers to Dominic.”

“Rachel gave Dominic flowers.”

Not Aligned

Aligned

“Dominic tossed a party hat [festive hat] to Lauren.”

Poster Print Size:

This poster template is 36” high by 48” wide. It can be used to print any poster with a 3:4 aspect ratio.

Placeholders:

The various elements included in this poster are ones we often see in medical, research, and scientific posters. Feel free to edit, move, add, and delete items, or change the layout to suit your needs. Always check with your conference organizer for specific requirements.

Image Quality:

You can place digital photos or logo art in your poster file by selecting the Insert, Picture command, or by using standard copy & paste. For best results, all graphic elements should be at least 150-200 pixels per inch in their final printed size. For instance, a 1600 x 1200 pixel photo will usually look fine up to 8“-10” wide on your printed poster.

To preview the print quality of images, select a magnification of 100% when previewing your poster. This will give you a good idea of what it will look like in print. If you are laying out a large poster and using half-scale dimensions, be sure to preview your graphics at 200% to see them at their final printed size.

Please note that graphics from websites (such as the logo on your hospital's or university's home page) will only be 72dpi and not suitable for printing.

�[This sidebar area does not print.]

Change Color Theme:

This template is designed to use the built-in color themes in the newer versions of PowerPoint.

To change the color theme, select the Design tab, then select the Colors drop-down list.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

The default color theme for this template is “Office”, so you can always return to that after trying some of the alternatives.

Printing Your Poster:

Once your poster file is ready, visit www.genigraphics.com to order a high-quality, affordable poster print. Every order receives a free design review and we can deliver as fast as next business day within the US and Canada.

Genigraphics® has been producing output from PowerPoint® longer than anyone in the industry; dating back to when we helped Microsoft® design the PowerPoint® software.

​

US and Canada: 1-800-790-4001�Email: info@genigraphics.com

�[This sidebar area does not print.]