Citational Justice and the Capabilities Approach
Sam Popowich, MLIS PhD
Acting Associate Dean, University of Winnipeg Library
Outline
Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, pp. 153-156.
1990/2011
2005
2011
Iris Marion Young (1949 – 2006)
Rejecting the “Distributive Paradigm”
“Social justice concerns the degree to which a society contains and supports the institutional conditions necessary for the realization of [the values the constitute the good life]. The values comprised in the good life can be reduced to two very general ones: (1) developing and exercising one’s capacities and expressing one’s experience… and (2) participating in determining one’s action and the conditions of one’s actions. […] To these two general values correspond two social conditions that define injustice: oppression, the institutional constraint on self-development, and domination, the institutional constraint on self-determination.” (Young, J&PD, p. 37).
Citational Justice becomes less about the distribution of citations, or even the distribution of privileges that go along with citation, but about the structural (e.g. academic) conditions of oppression and domination which uses citation and citation metrics to maintain and reproduce themselves.
In Canada, we typically see this in things like tenure and promotion committees (i.e. “publish or perish”), but also in the distribution of privileges like Canada Research Chairs and Tri-Agency research funding.
In the UK REF system, how is impact measured? How does citation fit into measurement of impact, how does REF influence what researchers and scholars write and publish? How does the distribution of citations affect REF evaluation and research funding?
“The Research Excellence Framework is lumbering and expensive. For a fraction of the cost, a digital census of academic research would create unrivalled and genuine information about UK universities’ research performance.” (LSE Blog, June 10, 2011)
The Five Faces of Oppression
1999
2011
“Capability Deprivation”
Sen, DaF, p. 87.
“Central Capabilities”
Nussbaum, CC, p. 18.
Senses, Imagination, and Thought
Nussbaum, CC, p. 33.
Young and the Capabilities Approach
Making and Doing and Being (poeisis, praxis, and ousia)
Young, J&PD, p. 39.
Thank You. Questions?