1 of 26

Crash Analysis of Truck and Portable Concrete Barrier (PCB)

Arnob Banik

ab353@uakron.edu

PhD Candidate�Dept. of Mechanical Engineering�The University of Akron

AdvisorDr. KT Tan

Advanced Metacomposites Laboratory

Report on

2 of 26

2| The University of Akron

Presentation Outline

  • Objectives
  • Truck Model
  • Rebar Material Properties
  • PCB Designs
    • J-J Hook
    • J-J Hook Alternate Reinforcing
    • F-Shape
    • F-Shape Modified Reinforcment
  • Comparison
  • Conclusion

3 of 26

3| The University of Akron

Objectives

  • Modifying the reinforcing design of F-F shape PCB
  • Comparing the crash performance with J-J hook PCB

4 of 26

4| The University of Akron

Truck Model

  • Chevrolet Silverado 2007
    • NHTSA
  • Weight : 2 tons

5 of 26

5| The University of Akron

ASTM A615 Grade 60

Mass Density= 7.849e-09 tonne/mm3 (0.284 lb/in3)

Young’s Modulus= 2.0e+05 N/mm2 (29007) Ksi

Poisson’s Ratio= 0.3000000

Yield Stress = 413 N/mm2 (60 ksi)

ASTM A706 Grade 60

Mass Density= 7.849e-09 tonne/mm3 (0.284 lb/in3)

Young’s Modulus= 2.050e+05 N/mm2 (29733 Ksi)

Poisson’s Ratio= 0.29

Yield Stress = 468.843 N/mm2 (68 ksi)

ASTM A 36

Mass Density= 7.800e-09 tonne/mm3 (0.282 lb/in3)

Young’s Modulus= 2.0e+05N/mm2 (29007 Ksi)

Poisson’s Ratio= 0.26

Yield Stress = 255 N/mm2 (37 ksi)

Rebar Material Properties

For Reinforcement

For Hinge Bars or Steel Plate

6 of 26

6| The University of Akron

J-J Hook PCB

7 of 26

7| The University of Akron

Concrete

Compressive Strength = 34 Mpa (4930 Psi)

J-J Hook PCB

8 of 26

8| The University of Akron

J-J Hook PCB Reinforcing

Longitudinal Rebar (4)

J- Hook Connector

ASTM A706 Grade 60

ASTM A36

Deflection Limiter (4)

ASTM A706 Grade 60

9 of 26

9| The University of Akron

Truck and PCB Model

  • Speed: 62 mph
  • Direction: 25⁰
  • PCB Length: 108 ft / 32.9184 m

10 of 26

10| The University of Akron

J-J Hook PCB

  • J-J hook connection detached

11 of 26

11| The University of Akron

J-J Hook PCB Alternate Reinforcing

12 of 26

12| The University of Akron

J-J Hook PCB Alternate Reinforcing

Long Longitudinal Rebar (4)

J- Hook Connector

ASTM A706 Grade 60

ASTM A36

Deflection Limiter (4)

ASTM A706 Grade 60

Short Longitudinal Rebar (8)

ASTM A706 Grade 60

13 of 26

13| The University of Akron

J-J Hook PCB Alternate Reinforcing

  • J-J hook connection detached

14 of 26

14| The University of Akron

F-shape PCB

15 of 26

15| The University of Akron

Concrete

Compressive Strength = 34 Mpa (4930 Psi)

F-shape PCB

16 of 26

16| The University of Akron

Longitudinal Bars (8)

Stirrup Bar (10 pair)

Pin slot Bar (6)

Loop Bar (6)

ASTM A615 Grade 60

ASTM A615 Grade 60

ASTM A615 Grade 60

ASTM A36

F-shape PCB

17 of 26

17| The University of Akron

F-shape PCB

  • Pin Connection not broken or detached

18 of 26

18| The University of Akron

F-shape modified reinforcing PCB

19 of 26

19| The University of Akron

Longitudinal Bars (4)

Stirrup Bar (3 pairs)

Loop Bar (4)

ASTM A615 Grade 60

ASTM A615 Grade 60

ASTM A36

  • Changes in Reinforcement
    • Longitudinal bars – 8 to 4
    • Stirrup bar – 10 pairs to 3 pairs
    • Loop bar – 6 to 4
    • No Pin slot bar

F-shape modified reinforcing

20 of 26

20| The University of Akron

F-shape modified reinforcing

  • Pin Connection not broken or detached

21 of 26

21| The University of Akron

J-J Hook

J-J Hook Alternate Reinforcing (J-J Hook_AR)

F-Shape

F-Shape Modified Reinforcing (F-Shape_MR)

Comparison

22 of 26

22| The University of Akron

J-J Hook

J-J Hook_AR

F-Shape

F-Shape_MR

Eroded Volume

23 of 26

23| The University of Akron

J-J Hook

J-J Hook_AR

F-Shape

F-Shape_MR

Displacement

24 of 26

24| The University of Akron

Difference in Crash

J-J Hook

F-Shape_MR

25 of 26

25| The University of Akron

  • J-J hook modified reinforcing showed 15% less eroded volume percentage
  • F-shape PCB produced 44% less displacement than both J-J Hook PCB design
  • J-J hook connection detached after hitting by the truck
  • Pin connection in F-shape was not broken or detached because of the hitting by the truck.
  • F-shape modified reinforcing PCB shows slightly higher eroded volume ratio and displacement than F-shape full reinforcement design.
  • F-shape modified reinforcing PCB can be suggested to use for experimental outcomes.

Conclusion

26 of 26

26| The University of Akron

THANK YOU