1 of 37

Now- and forecasting the French GDP with a targeted dynamic factor model

��

Marie Bessec (Banque de France)

Séminaire de l’OFCE - 2012

2 of 37

2

Motivation

  • Growing interest in factor models to forecast macroeconomic variables in particular in Central Banks
  • Fed: Stock and Watson (1999, 2002), Giannone, Reichlin and Small (2008)
  • ECB: Giannone, Reichlin and Small (2008), Angelini et al. (2011),…
  • Banque de France: Barhoumi, Darné and Ferrara (2010)
  • Banca d’Italia: Altissimo et al. (2001, 2007)
  • Bundesbank: Schumacher (2007, 2010)

  • Problem of the number of variables N: Boivin & Ng (2006), Bai & Ng (2008)
  • in theory, N must be large
  • in practice, increasing N can be detrimental to the forecast
    • if the idiosyncratic components are large or correlated with each other
    • if a block of variables is driven by a factor less correlated to the forecast variable

  • Solution : Targeted predictors (Bai and Ng, 2008)

use of the LARS-EN algorithm to remove the irrelevant variables before the factor estimation

M. Bessec

3 of 37

3

Motivation

  • Previous applications in static factor models
    • Bai and Ng (2008): US inflation, industrial production,…
    • Charpin (2009): French GDP, h=1,0,-1
    • Schumacher (2010): German GDP, h=1,…,12
  • Aim of the paper: adapting the selection procedure in dynamic factor models to take into account the timeliness of indicators and the forecast horizon

  • Motivation: the dynamic factor model of Doz, Giannone and Reichlin (2011) and Giannone, Reichlin and Small (2008)
    • allows an update of GDP forecast with indicators released at a higher frequency
    • implementable on ragged edge data via the use of the Kalman filter
  • Application to the forecast of the French GDP: improvement on models estimated without pre-selection or with a pre-selection neglecting the timeliness of indicators and the forecast horizon

M. Bessec

4 of 37

4

T+1 M2

T+1 M1

T M3

T M2

T M1

T-1 M3

T-1 M2

T-1 M1

T-2 M3

T-2 M2

T-2 M1

X

X

X

Dec 2011

Jan 2012

Feb 2012

X

X

X

Nov 2011

X

X

X

Oct 2011

X

X

X

Sep 2011

X

X

X

Aug 2011

X

X

X

X

Jul 2011

X

X

X

Jun 2011

X

X

X

May 2011

X

X

X

X

Apr 2011

GDP

IPI

Manuf

Consump

Survey

4

Calendar: Forecast of quarter T

Forecasting, nowcasting and backcasting

M. Bessec

5 of 37

  • Specification: n variables xt=(x1t,x2t,…,xnt)’, r<< n factors, q≤r shocks

with ut i.i.d. N(0,Ιq) a white noise of dimension q (the dynamic shocks)

B is a r x q matrix

A1,…,Ar are r x r matrices of parameters

  • Estimation: 2-step method of Doz, Giannone and Reichlin (2011)

  • Forecast
    • Forecast of Ft with the VAR → FT+h|T
    • Forecast of yt with

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

5

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

6 of 37

Step 1 : on the balanced subsample t = T0,…,T-τ

    • estimation of Λ by PCA to xt → Ft (préliminaire)
    • estimation of VAR on Ft A1, A2, …, Ap
    • estimation of B by PCA to the estimated covariance of the residuals of the VAR ζt

Step 2 : on the whole sample t = 1,…,T

    • Kalman filter and smoother → Ft|t, Ft|T

at iteration t : E(eit²) = φi si xit released,

∞ otherwise

    • VAR on FtFT+h|T

tm

x1

x2

x3

xn

1

X

X

2

X

X

X

T0-1

X

X

X

T0

X

X

X

X

X

T0+1

X

X

X

X

X

T-4

X

X

X

X

X

T-3

X

X

X

X

X

T-2

X

X

X

T-1

X

X

T

X

Estimation of Θ = (Λ, A1, A2, …, Ap,Φ,Σζ,B) : Doz, Giannone et Reichlin (2011)

6

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

M. Bessec

June 2011

7 of 37

  • Specification: n variables xt=(x1t,x2t,…,xnt)’, r<< n factors, q≤r shocks

with ut i.i.d. N(0,Ιq) a white noise of dimension q (the dynamic shocks)

B is a r x q matrix

A1,…,Ar are r x r matrices of parameters

  • Estimation: 2-step method of Doz, Giannone and Reichlin (2011)

  • Forecast
    • Forecast of Ft with the VAR → FT+h|T
    • Forecast of yt with

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

7

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

8 of 37

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

8

Let yt be the variable to be forecast and xt the predictors

  • EN criterion (Zou and Hastie, 2005)

  • Resolution with LARS algorithm

At the first iteration, all the coefficients are set to 0. In the following iterations, the variables are selected one by one according to their correlation with yt while taking into account the correlation with the regressors already selected.

  • Remarks
    • instead of choosing λ1, we define the number of regressors NA to select among the N possible predictors
    • in this application, the LARS-EN algorithm is only used to select the NA predictors

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

9 of 37

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

9

The selection procedure needs to be adapted in the dynamic factor model

  • First, we do not consider a horizon specific model as usually done in the static approach ⇒ the targeted variable is the same ∀ h ⇒ a classical pre-selection procedure would lead to the same specification ∀ h

  • Second, short term indicators have different publication lags
    • survey and financial variables: 0 month
    • real indicators: 1 or 2 months

When ignoring the publication lags, the pre-selection would favor real indicators like IPI highly correlated to GDP but published with a significant delay.

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Static FM

Dynamic FM

Yt+0 = δ Ft + εt for h=0

Yt+1 = δ Ft + εt for h=1

Yt+2 = δ Ft + εt for h=2

Yt+h = δ Ft+h + εt ∀ h

M. Bessec

June 2011

10 of 37

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

10

  • Adaptation of the selection procedure in the dynamic factor model

1. Construction of a pseudo real time dataset for h

with x the monthly indicator and d the publication lag of x

2. Monthly series converted to quarterly data

with xQ = the quarterly value in the third month of the quarter

unobserved otherwise

3. Application of the LARS-EN algorithm to this dataset

  • Example: manuf consumption in the 2nd month of the quarter to be forecast

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

11 of 37

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

11

T+1 M2

T+1 M1

T M3

T M2

T M1

T-1 M3

T-1 M2

T-1 M1

T-2 M3

T-2 M2

T-2 M1

X

Dec 2011

Jan 2012

Feb 2012

X

X

Nov 2011

X

X

X

Oct 2011

X

X

X

Sep 2011

X

X

X

Aug 2011

X

X

X

X

Jul 2011

X

X

X

Jun 2011

X

X

X

May 2011

X

X

X

X

Apr 2011

PIB

IPI

Conso Manuf

Enquêtes

11

Calendar: Forecast of quarter T

?

M. Bessec

June 2011

12 of 37

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

12

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Example 1: forecast in the last month of the current quarter (M-2)

X a monthly indicator with d=0, Y a monthly indicator with d=1, Z a monthly indicator with d=2

tQ

tm

X

Y

Z

1

X1

Y1

Z1

2

X2

Y2

Z2

1

3

X3

Y3

Z3

4

X4

Y4

Z4

5

X5

Y5

Z5

2

6

X6

Y6

Z6

T-2

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

T-1

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1

T/3

T

XT

YT

ZT

full dataset

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

X3

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

X6

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

XT

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

Z2|1

X3

Y3|2

Z3|1

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

Z5|4

X6

Y6|5

Z6|4

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1|T-2

XT

YT|T-1

ZT|t-2

constructed dataset

real-time dataset

M. Bessec

June 2011

13 of 37

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

13

T+1 M2

T+1 M1

T M3

T M2

T M1

T-1 M3

T-1 M2

T-1 M1

T-2 M3

T-2 M2

T-2 M1

Dec 2011

Jan 2012

Feb 2012

Nov 2011

X

Oct 2011

X

X

Sep 2011

X

X

X

Aug 2011

X

X

X

X

Jul 2011

X

X

X

Jun 2011

X

X

X

May 2011

X

X

X

X

Apr 2011

PIB

IPI

Conso Manuf

Enquêtes

13

Calendar: Forecast of quarter T

?

M. Bessec

June 2011

14 of 37

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

14

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Example 2: forecast in the first month of the current quarter (M-4)

X a monthly indicator with d=0, Y a monthly indicator with d=1, Z a monthly indicator with d=2

tQ

tm

X

Y

Z

1

X1

Y1

Z1

2

X2

Y2

Z2

1

3

X3

Y3

Z3

4

X4

Y4

Z4

5

X5

Y5

Z5

2

6

X6

Y6

Z6

T-2

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

T-1

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1

T/3

T

XT

YT

ZT

full dataset

X

Y

Z

X1

X4

XT-2

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1|0

Z1|-1

X2|1

Y2|0

Z2|-1

X3|1

Y3|0

Z3|-1

X4

Y4|3

Z4|2

X5|4

Y5|3

Z5|2

X6|4

Y6|3

Z6|2

XT-2

YT-2|T-3

ZT-2|T-4

XT-1|T-2

YT-1|T-3

ZT-1|T-4

XT|T-2

YT|T-3

ZT|t-4

constructed dataset

real-time dataset

M. Bessec

June 2011

15 of 37

Dynamic factor model

LARS-EN algorithm

A real time pre-selection of indicators

15

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

X

Y

Z

X1|0

Y1|-1

Z1|-2

X2|0

Y2|-1

Z2|-2

X3|0

Y3|-1

Z3|-2

X4|3

Y4|2

Z4|1

X5|3

Y5|2

Z5|1

X6|3

Y6|2

Z6|1

XT-2|T-3

YT-2|T-4

ZT-2|T-5

XT-1|T-3

YT-1|T-4

ZT-1|T-5

XT|T-3

YT|T-4

ZT|t-5

X

Y

Z

X1|-1

Y1|-2

Z1|--3

X2|-1

Y2|-2

Z2|--3

X3|-1

Y3|-2

Z3|--3

X4|2

Y4|1

Z4|0

X5|2

Y5|1

Z5|0

X6|2

Y6|1

Z6|0

XT-2|T-4

YT-2|T-3

ZT-2|T-6

XT-1|T-4

YT-1|T-3

ZT-1|T-6

XT|T-4

YT|T-3

ZT|t-6

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1|0

Z1|-1

X2|1

Y2|0

Z2|-1

X3|1

Y3|0

Z3|-1

X4

Y4|3

Z4|2

X5|4

Y5|3

Z5|2

X6|4

Y6|3

Z6|2

XT-2

YT-2|T-3

ZT-2|T-4

XT-1|T-2

YT-1|T-3

ZT-1|T-4

XT|T-2

YT|T-3

ZT|t-4

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y3|1

Z2|1

X3|2

Y3|1

Z3|1

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5|4

Z5|4

X6|5

Y6|4

Z6|4

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1|T-2

ZT-1|T-2

XT|T-1

YT|T-2

ZT|T-2

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

Z2|1

X3

Y3|2

Z3|1

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

Z5|4

X6

Y6|5

Z6|4

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1|T-2

XT

YT|t-1

ZT|T-2

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

Z2

X3

Y3

Z3|2

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

Z5

X6

Y6

Z6|5

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1

XT

YT

ZT|T-1

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

Z2

X3

Y3

Z3

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

Z5

X6

Y6

Z6

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1

XT

YT

ZT

X

Y

Z

X1|-2

Y1|-3

Z1|--4

X2|-2

Y2|-3

Z2|--4

X3|-2

Y3|-3

Z3|--4

X4|1

Y4|0

Z4|-1

X5|1

Y5|0

Z5|-1

X6|1

Y6|0

Z6|-1

XT-2|T-5

YT-2|T-4

ZT-2|T-7

XT-1|T-5

YT-1|T-4

ZT-1|T-7

XT|T-5

YT|T-4

ZT|t-7

M. Bessec

June 2011

16 of 37

Survey variables in manufacturing industry, services, retail trade, construction and consumer surveys

Exchange rate of euro, key macroeconomic indicators in Germany and the US

Stock price indices, monetary aggregates, interest rates, spread, market volatility, price indices

Household consumption of manufactured goods, registrations of new vehicles, exports and imports of goods, industrial production, housing starts and building permits

16

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dataset

Pre-selection of variables

M. Bessec

June 2011

17 of 37

Survey variables in manufacturing industry, services, retail trade, construction and consumer surveys

Exchange rate of euro, key macroeconomic indicators in Germany and the US

Stock price indices, monetary aggregates, interest rates, spread, market volatility, price indices

Household consumption of manufactured goods, registrations of new vehicles, exports and imports of goods, industrial production, housing starts and building permits

17

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dataset

Pre-selection of variables

M. Bessec

June 2011

18 of 37

Survey variables in manufacturing industry, services, retail trade, construction and consumer surveys

Exchange rate of euro, key macroeconomic indicators in Germany and the US

Stock price indices, monetary aggregates, interest rates, spread, market volatility, price indices

Household consumption of manufactured goods, registrations of new vehicles, exports and imports of goods, industrial production, housing starts and building permits

18

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dataset

Pre-selection of variables

M. Bessec

June 2011

19 of 37

19

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dataset

Pre-selection of variables

M. Bessec

June 2011

20 of 37

20

Selection of predictors (NA=20 or 40)

Horizon

Type

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

publication lag = 0

75%

80%

65%

90%

85%

63%

50%

50%

publication lag = 1

15%

15%

20%

10%

10%

20%

25%

25%

publication lag = 2

10%

5%

15%

0%

5%

18%

25%

25%

survey

40%

40%

40%

65%

55%

40%

38%

45%

nominal

30%

50%

50%

15%

25%

28%

20%

0%

international

20%

10%

10%

20%

20%

20%

13%

15%

real

10%

0%

0%

0%

0%

13%

30%

40%

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dataset

Pre-selection of indicators

T-1

T

T+1

M. Bessec

June 2011

21 of 37

21

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Dataset

Pre-selection of indicators

h

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

20000Q1 2010Q4

Business expectations (IFO)

General prod expect Industry

Business expectations (IFO)

Expected demand industry

IP manuf in US

IP manuf US

IP manuf

IP manuf

General prod expect Industry

Business expectations (IFO)

General product expect Industry

IP manuf in US

Business expect Industry

Business expect Industry

IP other manuf

IP other manuf

Business expectation (ZEW)

Stress index

Past fin situation Households

General prod expect Industry

Expected demand Industry

Expected demand Industry

Business expectationIndustry

IP Industry

Exp financial sit Households

Exp Financial sit Households

Exp Financial sit Households

Business expectations (IFO)

General prod Exp Industry

General prod Exp Industry

IP Industry

Business expect Industry

M1

Yield curve in France

Stress index

Business expectation (ZEW)

Business expectation (IFO)

Business expectations (IFO)

Unemployment

General production expect Industry

past financial sit Households

Business expectation (ZEW)

SBF250

Stress index

Past production Building (D)

Unemployment US

General production exp Industry

Unemployment

CUR Construction

Past financial sit Households

Order books Industry (D)

Business expect Services (D)

Business expectation (ZEW)

Past production Building (D)

Exports

Exp financial situation households

General prod exp Industry (D)

Major purchase Households

CUR Construction

Exp Financial Sit Households

stress index

Business expectations (ZEW)

Past production Building (D)

Order books Building (D)

CPI

General prod exp Industry (D)

Yield curve

Expected demand Services

Business expect Services (D)

Expected Financial sit Households

Order books Building (D)

Past production Building (D)

Past financial sit Households (D)

CUR construction

Major purchase Households

Expect Orders Retail sales (D)

Order books Building (D)

Order books Building (D)

Exp financial situation Household

Consumption of manufactured goods

Yield curve

Eurostoxx50

Past production Construction (D)

Dow Jones

Expected financial sit households

Business exp Services (D)

Consumption of manufactured goods

Employment US

Major purchases Households

SBF 250

Business exp Industry (D)

Order books Building (D)

SBF250

Job vacancies

Job vacancies

Exports

IP construction

Yield curve in US

Eurostoxx50

Major purchase Households

Eurostoxx50

Exp Employment Retail sales (D)

Business expectations (ZEW)

Business expectations (ZEW)

Yield curve in US

Business expect Services (D)

DAX

DAX

Exp Employment Retail sales (D)

Major purchase Households

Employment US

Major purchase Households

Consumption of textile

M1

M2

euro/uk

Major purchase Households

Consumption of manufactured goods

Major purchase Households

Job vacancies

DAX

DAX

CPI

Exp Employment Retail sales (D)

Business exp Industry (D)

IP car

Consumption of goods

Consumption of goods

IP manuf in US

IPC

M3

Past financial sit Households

10year interest rate

Dow Jones

Past financial situation Household

Expected eco situation households

Business Expect building (D)

Real estate interest rate

M1

Past production Building (D)

M2 US

Employment

Expected economic situation households

Business expectations Service

Current situation (ZEW)

Topix

1 year interest rate

Business exp Industry (D)

DAX

Business exp Industry (D)

Business expectation services

Consumption of household durables

Eurostoxx50

Business expect Services

IP manuf in US

General prod exp Industry (D)

Past financial sit Households

Stress index

Business exp Industry (D)

M1

M. Bessec

June 2011

22 of 37

Pseudo real time evaluation of the forecast

1) Recursive forecast in M-7, M-6, …, M-0 of 2000Q1 to 2010Q4 🡪 8 sets of forecasts conditional on the info in M-7,…,M-0 🡪 8 sets of forecast errors

2) Application of usual evaluation criteria to the forecast errors

Directional accuracy test of Pesaran et Timmermann

Limits : 1) omission of the impact of the revisions of data,

2) selection of the variables over the whole sample

T T+h

22

1990T1

2000T1

2010T4

Calendar

Pseudo-real time evaluation

Processes under competition

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

23 of 37

23

Processes under competition

  • Factor model with a pre-selection in real time
    • with NA = {20,40,60,80}
    • with λ2 = {0.1,0.25,0.5,1.0,1.5}

  • Usual benchmarks: AR and RW with a drift
  • Factor model without pre-selection
  • Factor model with a pre-selection on the full dataset
    • with NA = {20,40,60,80}
    • with λ2 = {0.1,0.25,0.5,1.0,1.5}

Individual forecast / pooling of FM over NA , λ2, r , q and p → 160 specifications

Calendar

Pseudo-real time evaluation

Processes under competition

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

24 of 37

24

Gradual improvement with the increase in monthly information

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

The forecast is quite inaccurate 7 months before the release of GDP but the results improve gradually with the increase in monthly information…

… the forecast made a few days before the GDP release tracks GDP quite well.

M. Bessec

June 2011

25 of 37

25

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

NA

h

M. Bessec

June 2011

26 of 37

26

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

NA

h

M. Bessec

June 2011

27 of 37

27

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

NA

h

M. Bessec

June 2011

28 of 37

RMSFE comparison

28

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Ratio of RMSE

M. Bessec

June 2011

29 of 37

29

Impact of the timeliness and forecast horizon in the preselection

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

30 of 37

30

X

Y

Z

X1|0

Y1|-1

Z1|-2

X2|0

Y2|-1

Z2|-2

X3|0

Y3|-1

Z3|-2

X4|3

Y4|2

Z4|1

X5|3

Y5|2

Z5|1

X6|3

Y6|2

Z6|1

XT-2|T-3

YT-2|T-4

ZT-2|T-5

XT-1|T-3

YT-1|T-4

ZT-1|T-5

XT|T-3

YT|T-4

ZT|t-5

X

Y

Z

X1|-1

Y1|-2

Z1|--3

X2|-1

Y2|-2

Z2|--3

X3|-1

Y3|-2

Z3|--3

X4|2

Y4|1

Z4|0

X5|2

Y5|1

Z5|0

X6|2

Y6|1

Z6|0

XT-2|T-4

YT-2|T-3

ZT-2|T-6

XT-1|T-4

YT-1|T-3

ZT-1|T-6

XT|T-4

YT|T-3

ZT|t-6

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1|0

Z1|-1

X2|1

Y2|0

Z2|-1

X3|1

Y3|0

Z3|-1

X4

Y4|3

Z4|2

X5|4

Y5|3

Z5|2

X6|4

Y6|3

Z6|2

XT-2

YT-2|T-3

ZT-2|T-4

XT-1|T-2

YT-1|T-3

ZT-1|T-4

XT|T-2

YT|T-3

ZT|t-4

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y3|1

Z2|1

X3|2

Y3|1

Z3|1

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5|4

Z5|4

X6|5

Y6|4

Z6|4

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1|T-2

ZT-1|T-2

XT|T-1

YT|T-2

ZT|T-2

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

Z2|1

X3

Y3|2

Z3|1

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

Z5|4

X6

Y6|5

Z6|4

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1|T-2

XT

YT|t-1

ZT|T-2

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

Z2

X3

Y3

Z3|2

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

Z5

X6

Y6

Z6|5

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1

XT

YT

ZT|T-1

X

Y

Z

X1

Y1

Z1

X2

Y2

Z2

X3

Y3

Z3

X4

Y4

Z4

X5

Y5

Z5

X6

Y6

Z6

XT-2

YT-2

ZT-2

XT-1

YT-1

ZT-1

XT

YT

ZT

X

Y

Z

X1|-2

Y1|-3

Z1|--4

X2|-2

Y2|-3

Z2|--4

X3|-2

Y3|-3

Z3|--4

X4|1

Y4|0

Z4|-1

X5|1

Y5|0

Z5|-1

X6|1

Y6|0

Z6|-1

XT-2|T-5

YT-2|T-4

ZT-2|T-7

XT-1|T-5

YT-1|T-4

ZT-1|T-7

XT|T-5

YT|T-4

ZT|t-7

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

M. Bessec

June 2011

31 of 37

31

Impact of the timeliness and forecast horizon in the preselection

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

32 of 37

32

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

At the beginning of the forecasting exercise, the leftmost distribution corresponds to a pre-selection carried out with data in M-7. The distributions shift to the right as information is integrated in the selection, indicating that the forecasts deteriorate.

Symmetrically, shortly before the publication of GDP, the pre-selection conducted with full information leads to better results. Distributions now shift to the right when the pre-selection is performed with less information.

M. Bessec

June 2011

33 of 37

33

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

Motivations

Theoretical: a robust tool in the presence of misspecification and parameter instability (Timmermann, 2005, Clements and Hendry, 2004)

Empirical: SW (2004), Clark and McCracken (2010), Schumacher (2010)

Processes under competition

  • Factor model with a pre-selection in real time pooled over
    • NA = {20,40,60,80}
    • λ2 = {0.1,0.25,0.5,1.0,1.5}
    • r = {1,…,4}, q={1,2}, p = 1

  • Usual benchmarks: AR and RW with a drift
    • Factor model without pre-selection pooled over r = {1,…,4}, q={1,2}, p = 1
  • Factor model with a pre-selection on the full dataset pooled over NA , λ2 , r, p, q

M. Bessec

June 2011

34 of 37

RMSFE comparison

34

Individual forecasts

Pooled forecasts

Dynamic factor model with targeted predictors

Data

Experimental design

Out-of-sample results

M. Bessec

June 2011

35 of 37

35

  • The Bai & Ng procedure is adapted to dynamic factor models

The selection is made on the information available at each horizon

  • Empirical results

    • financial and survey variables are predominant at larger horizons, real variables at shorter ones
    • improvement on models estimated without pre-selection
    • improvement on models estimated with a pre-selection neglecting the timeliness of the indicators and the forecast horizon

  • Potential extensions

    • a replication of this exercise on survey data to remove a potential impact on the results of the revisions of the data,
    • a comparison of our approach to the procedure of Rünstler (2010)

Main results and potential extensions

M. Bessec

36 of 37

36

  • The Bai & Ng procedure is adapted to dynamic factor models

The selection is made on the information available at each horizon

  • Empirical results

    • financial and survey variables are predominant at larger horizons, real variables at shorter ones
    • improvement on models estimated without pre-selection
    • improvement on models estimated with a pre-selection neglecting the timeliness of the indicators and the forecast horizon

  • Potential extensions

    • a replication of this exercise on survey data to remove a potential impact on the results of the revisions of the data,
    • a comparison of our approach to the procedure of Rünstler (2010)

Main results and potential extensions

M. Bessec

37 of 37

37

Main results and potential extensions

M. Bessec