1 of 14

Exploring patterns of beneficial ownership reform

Angus Barry

DPhil Researcher,

Blavatnik School of Government

2 of 14

  • Strengthened FATF beneficial ownership recommendations, alongside 4th Round Mutual Evaluations
  • Inclusion of beneficial ownership transparency in the UN Convention Against Corruption
  • G7 Finance Ministers Communiqué on tackling illicit finance
  • IMF inclusion of beneficial ownership reforms in Covid recovery loans, and World Bank support
  • New corporate transparency laws across advanced industrial democracies: US Corporate Transparency Act; UK Economic Crime Bill; EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directives

3 of 14

  1. Coercion, in which countries adopt policies to avoid punishment;
  2. Mimicry, in which countries adopt policies for legitimacy, for example to signal governance maturity;
  3. Competition, for example by undercutting other countries with lower tax rates;
  4. Learning, in which policymakers replicate successful policies from other countries.

4 of 14

5 of 14

6 of 14

International factors:

Experience of FATF greylisting may incentivise BOT reforms

7 of 14

Domestic political economy:

More democratic countries are more likely to implement beneficial ownership transparency reforms

Independent variable

Democratic participation

Electoral democracy

Electoral democracy

Political stability

Civil society strength

Civil society strength

Measure

(V-Dem 2019)

(V-Dem 2019)

(Freedom House 2019)

(World Bank 2021)

(V-Dem 2019)

(World Bank 2019)

Correlation with Company Information score

0.224

0.225

0.253

0.163

0.164

0.250

Statistical significance at 10%

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

8 of 14

9 of 14

The effects of domestic policy impact on BOT reforms appear to be conditional on the level of democracy

10 of 14

Government effectiveness

Government effectiveness – technology

Legal framework

Legal framework

Size of the informal economy

Measure

World Bank 2019

Internet penetration (World Bank 2019)

Regulatory quality (World Bank 2021)

Rule of law (World Bank 2021)

World Bank 2019

Correlation with Company Information score

0.495

0.351

0.423

0.388

-0.102

Statistical significance at 10%

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

There are also correlations between BOT reforms, and governance and legal capacity, including after controlling for GDP per capita

11 of 14

Coefficient

Standard Error

t-stat

Standard Coefficient

p-value

b

14.74

2.74

5.38

0.00

0.00

Experience of greylisting in the previous decade

6.27

4.66

1.35

0.14

0.18

Civil society participation

-3.07

2.87

-1.07

-0.17

0.29

Government effectiveness

11.90

2.79

4.26

0.55

0.00

Interaction of Corruption perceptions and Electoral democracy

0.12

0.07

1.61

0.22

0.11

12 of 14

South Africa: As Simple as FATF?

?

13 of 14

By passing the [GLA Act], this house demonstrates its commitment to not only addressing the issues which risk the greylisting by FATF, but more importantly, this government’s commitment to rooting out and preventing financial crime and the proceeds of corruption.

Enoch Godongwana, Minister of Finance

14 of 14

Theoretical framework based on other areas of global governance and early experience of beneficial ownership reform

Exploratory quantitative analysis using the Global Data Barometer’s 2021 Company Information dataset

South Africa case study

Indonesia case study

Predictive quantitative analysis using the Global Data Barometer’s 2025 Company Information dataset

The more we can understand what factors are associated with beneficial ownership reforms, the more effectively we can support it.

Conclusions: Cross-country comparisons and implications for internal and external actors supporting BOT reforms