1 of 59

Cayley Graphs

Arthur Cayley

August 16, 1821-January 26, 1895

Abstract Definitions and Concrete Pictures

Robert “Dr. Bob” Gardner

ETSU Abstract Algebra Club

Fall 2024

2 of 59

Primary References

Introduction to Modern Algebra 1 and 2

Intro. Modern Algebra (Maybe)

Graph Theory 1 and 2

Graph Theory Supplement

3 of 59

Niccolò Tartaglia (1500-1557) and Ludovico Ferrari (1522-1565)

 

4 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 of 59

The Early History of Group Concepts 1

Joseph-Louis Lagrange, in the early 1770s set out to understand why equations of third and fourth degree equations have formulas for solutions. He realized that a “key object” in the reason was the group of permutations of the roots.

Joseph-Louis Lagrange (1736-1813)

6 of 59

The Early History of Group Concepts 2

In 1799, Paola Ruffini gave a several hundred page “proof” of the impossibility of solving a 5th degree polynomial (and higher) with an algebraic formula. Unfortunately, gaps have been found in Ruffini’s proof (though his result is correct).

Paolo Ruffini (1765-1822)

He was the first to explore several group theory results in the setting of permutation groups, including the order of an element, conjugacy, and cycle decomposition of permutations. He did not define a group (or even a permutation group).

7 of 59

Abel and the (Algebraic) Unsolvability of the Quintic

Groups (rings and fields) became part of algebra in the 19th century. While look-ing for an algebraic formula for the zeros of an nth degree polynomial, Abel showed that there is not (in general) an algebraic solution to a 5th degree (or higher) polynomial equation. These conditions involved permutations of the zeros of the polynomial and a key part of his proof is based on commutativity (that’s why we call commutative groups “Abelian”).

Niels Henrik Abel

(1802-1829)

8 of 59

Galois and the Classification of Solvable Equations

Evariste Galois

(1811-1832)

Galois gave conditions for the existence of an algebraic solution of a general nth degree polynomial equation (the condition is that the Galois group of the equation must be “solvable”). The permutations of the zeros of a polynomial in the study of algebraic equations led in the 19th century to the more abstract study of groups in general and permutation groups in particular.

9 of 59

Cayley Defines a “Group”

Arthur Cayley gave the first definition of a group in 1854.

 

(page 41)

10 of 59

The Early History of Group Theory

In his 1854 paper, Cayley gave tables for several groups and described groups of matrices. He described groups of orders 4, 6, 18, and 27.

The first two complete Cayley Tables ever published

11 of 59

 

Definition of Group

12 of 59

Examples of Groups

 

 

 

 

 

13 of 59

Cayley Explores a Group Theory Problem

Cayley published two papers on group theory in 1878. These were follow-ups to his 1854 paper.

A. Cayley, Desiderata and Suggestions: No. 1. The Theory of Groups, American Journal of Mathematics, 1(1), 50-52 (1878)

A. Cayley, Desiderata and Suggestions: No. 2. The Theory of Groups: Graphical Representation, American Journal of Mathematics, 1(2), 174-176 (1878).

 

14 of 59

Cayley Introduces Cayley Graphs/Digraphs

 

But what does this mean?

15 of 59

 

Fraleigh Discusses Cayley Digraphs

Fraleigh uses arcs (and edges) to represent MULTIPLICATION ON THE RIGHT!

A Standard Here:

16 of 59

 

Gallian’s Definition of a Cayley Digraphs

Gallian uses arcs (and edges) to represent MULTIPLICATION ON THE RIGHT!

17 of 59

 

1

2

3

Permutations

 

 

 

18 of 59

Permutations

 

 

 

1

3

2

 

19 of 59

Permutations

 

 

1

3

2

 

20 of 59

Permutations

 

 

1

3

2

 

21 of 59

We find that the multiplication table for the group of symmetries of an equilateral triangle is:

 

Notice that it contains a subgroup or order 3.

 

22 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23 of 59

Writing Elements in terms of Generators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24 of 59

 

Bondy and Murty Define Cayley Graphs in an Exercise

Bondy and Murty use edges to represent MULTIPLICATION ON THE LEFT!

25 of 59

 

 

Godsil and Royle’s Definition of a Cayley Graph

Godsil and Royle use edges to represent MULTIPLICATION ON THE LEFT!

26 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Cayley Graph

 

 

27 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Godsil and Royle’s Definition of a Cayley Digraph

Godsil and Royle use edges and arcs to represent MULTIPLICATION ON THE LEFT!

28 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

30 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

31 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32 of 59

 

33 of 59

 

 

34 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notice that this Cayley Digraph is different from the previous one!

37 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38 of 59

Remember Cayley’s Original Digraph?

A. Cayley, Desiderata and Suggestions: No. 2. The Theory of Groups: Graphical Representation, American Journal of Mathematics, 1(2), 174-176 (1878).

39 of 59

 

 

40 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Based on Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Group Theory by Benjamin Baumslag and Bruce Chandler, NY: McGraw-Hill (1968).

41 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Cayley’s Second 1878 Paper

 

42 of 59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Cleaner Drawing of the First Cayley Digraph

A. Cayley, Desiderata and Suggestions: No. 2. The Theory of Groups: Graphical Representation, American Journal of Mathematics, 1(2), 174-176 (1878).

43 of 59

 

 

 

44 of 59

Theorem 1 “Picture Proof”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45 of 59

Theorem 1 “Picture Proof” (continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46 of 59

What Can a Group Tell us about a Cayley Graph?

 

 

47 of 59

 

Can We Recognize a Graph as a Cayley Graph?

So a graph that does not contain a Hamiltonian path is not a Cayley graph of a finite abelian group.

Definition. A Hamiltonian path in a graph is a path (i.e., a sequence of consecutively adjacent distinct vertices) that includes all vertices of the graph.

48 of 59

 

A Cayley Graph Isomorphism Result

 

 

49 of 59

Theorem 5. Every finite group is the automorphism group of some finite graph.

Some Graph Automorphism Results

 

Definition. An automorphism of a graph is an isomorphism of a graph with itself.

Theorem 5 is due to Robert Frucht (1939), and the proof is based a Cayley graph of the given group!

50 of 59

Theorem 5. Every finite group is the automorphism group of some finite graph.

Some Graph Automorphism Results 2

Wait! EVERY FINITE GROUP?

That means we can draw PICTURES of groups!!! I pictures…

51 of 59

 

 

 

52 of 59

 

 

 

…with some “additions”

53 of 59

 

 

 

Based on “Automorphism Group of Graphs (Supplemental Material for Intro to Graph Theory),” R.B. Beeler (2018).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54 of 59

Conclusion

 

55 of 59

  1. Truncated octahedral graph on first slide: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CayleyGraph.html
  2. Cayley’s two 1878 papers: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2369433.pdf and https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2369306.pdf
  3. Image of Ferrari from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRnkSJSVOmo
  4. Images of Lagrange and Ruffini: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_group_theory
  5. “Automorphism Group of Graphs (Supplemental Material for Intro to Graph Theory),” R.B. Beeler (2018): https://faculty.etsu.edu/beelerr/automorph-supp.pdf

References and Sources

Websites

56 of 59

  1. J.B. Fraleigh, N.E. Brand, A First Course in Abstract Algebra, 8th edition (Pearson, 2021).
  2. J.A. Gallian, Contemporary Abstract Algebra, 8th edition (Brooks/Cole, 2013).
  3. C. Godsil and G. Royle, Algebraic Graph Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics #207 (Springer, 2001).
  4. J.A. Bondy and U.S.R. Murty, Graph Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics #244 (Springer, 2008).

References and Sources

Books

57 of 59

Happy Halloween!

The ending slide from Young Frankenstein (Mel Brooks, 1974)

58 of 59

59 of 59