1 of 18

"Let them transfer"

The challenge of second-order team training in socio-ecological integrated management

Nils Ferrand, Géraldine Abrami, Wanda Aquae-Gaudi

UMR/JRU G-EAU Managing Water, Stakeholders & Uses

IRSTEA : French National Institute for Research and Technology on Environment and Agriculture - Montpellier, FRANCE

www.irstea.fr

Pour mieux affirmer �ses missions, �le Cemagref devient Irstea

2 of 18

Take-Home Insights

→ « Let them transfer» to learn how to change

  • 2nd order transfer as a strategy to foster better methodological integration and wider social extension
  • Adapted to complex methodological sequences
  • Tested in various cultural contexts
  • Issues with meta-rules and validity constraints

2

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

3 of 18

Background & context

  • International applied research on multi-level governance and management, incl. social extension goals
    • Water & other Nat Res focus
  • CoOPLAaGE approach & toolkit development since 2007, with 110 Wat-A-Game case studies, worldwide
      • Cf. ECOS16 S10.14, Ferrand & alii, « Coupling […] »
      • > 3500 users, 350 trainees in 2015
  • Education / training on participatory methods & decision procedures, not on substantive « solutions »
  • All levels, all types of trainees (ministers, PMs, managers, scientists, citizens, students, pupils…)

3

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

4 of 18

4

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

5 of 18

A typical process

5

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

6 of 18

e.g. Natural Resource Management�in Africa (FP7 Afromaison 2011-2014)

6

Co-design the process itself

Share equity preferences

Propose actions�Build and assess integrated strategies

Build own model�Simulate new actions and norms

Agriculture intensification and soil degradation in uncertain land tenure context

Proposal and validation of INRM plan in context of overexploitation of land and resources

Source: E. Hassenforder, 2015

6

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

7 of 18

As multi-stakeholders process, coupling tools (Uganda)

Source: E. Hassenforder 2015

7

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

8 of 18

8

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

9 of 18

9

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

10 of 18

10

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

11 of 18

Toward « deep » resilience and autonomy

  • Aiming at communities & institutions able to adapt and revise their own boundaries, within their own pre-set (i.e. fair) procedural / deliberative rules

= assess own situation & compare with values

= discuss goals, actions (options) and strategies

= assess possible consequences

= choose

= implement

= monitor & evaluate

→ → → capacity to analyse, decide & act, minimizing « external » dependency = autonomy (Castoriadis, Varela)

11

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

12 of 18

Challenge: let them learn to change, if they wish

  • Support social change about practices, norms and deliberations on… change !
    • Focus on socio-ecological processes
  • But limited means, time, human resources to do it
  • Cultural, linguistic, legitimacy, relational barriers (for « us »)
  • And social change IS challenging

  • How can we support such large social change?

>>>Tested strategy = 2nd order transfer

12

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

13 of 18

2nd order transfer

  • Getting some selected actors’ groups to quickly learn how to teach others in their own social environment how to address change

« Us » → « transfer group » → general population

→ Research on methods and tools to facilitate this process, and evaluate its impact at larger scale

13

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

14 of 18

Recent cases

  • Uganda (FP7 Afromaison): 3rd order: us → 2 champions → 32 facilitators → ~1500 participants in 300 reg. events
  • Kenya (IMAWESA IFAD-IWMI): us → 9 traineers → 2 community groups → … ?
  • New-Caledonia (Fonds Pacifique): us → 7 traineers → 5 working groups
  • Costa-Rica & Nicaragua: us → 9+3 traineers → 4+3 transfer groups
  • Kiribatis (Fonds Pacifique): us → 3 traineers → 5 target groups
  • France (MSc courses): us → 22 + 80 students → 15 external extension groups

14

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

15 of 18

Main protocol

  • « We » identify group level 1 (« traineers »)
  • Practical training on methods applied to the local real case study
  • Self-test
  • « They » select & engage their transfer groups
  • « They » repeat the process toward the transfer groups, under our loose coaching
  • Evaluation and debriefing
  • Autonomous extension under monitoring and evaluation

TOTAL timing ph 1-6 : 2 weeks maximum

15

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

16 of 18

Key results & insights

  • Low control on final result… (« lâcher prise »)
  • Methods and tools must be free, adaptable, robust
  • Level 1 group selection is critical: for engagement, social position, freedom of innovation, stability
  • Targets « traineers » groups mainly: mutual support
  • Trade-off between accuracy & completeness vs. adaptability, relevance & quick delivery to be accepted
  • 2nd order challenge to be known early & planned
  • Legitimacy issues for more technocratic target groups
  • Process robust to cultural / context diversity
  • In Uganda, demonstrated multi-level transfer
  • Monitoring & evaluation critical but (as usual) tricky to get accepted and autonomized

16

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

17 of 18

Conclusions & perspectives

  • A general process minimizing cost vs. impact for socio-environmental transformative processes
  • Adapted to low-tech open methods & tools
  • Can cope with complexity, but requires good 1st lv group

Ongoing developments:

  • Digital strategy (AgreenCamp) → e-learning for 2nd order transfer challenges & groups training
  • Improving material attached to CoOPLAaGE toolkit
  • Phd on M&E of groups’ impacts

17

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016

18 of 18

2d order outscaling by training facilitators and full transfer

  • A wide international multi-level training program (2015: 350)
  • Training trainers by letting them « do » CoOPLAaGE on their own case study AND directly test it with a test group

(cf. ECOS S08-25 Let them transfer": The challenge of second-order team training in socio-ecological integrated management. Session 180 Aug 30, 15:15 Joffre)

18

http://watagame.info

© Nils.Ferrand@IRSTEA.fr , 2016

ECOSUMMIT

2016