Atlantic Conservation Coalition
A natural and working lands focused Climate Pollution Reduction Grant (CPRG) initiative
Project Partners
Project Vision and Purpose
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
ACC at a glance
$421 million over 5 years
28 million metric tons CO2e reduced by 2050
2 project measures
ACC Funding Breakdown
$421 million
$200 million State Allocation
MD $50M
VA $50M
NC $50M
SC $50M
$200 million TNC Regional Allocation
MD $42.4M
VA $45M
NC $68M
SC $42.4M
DNCR Funds Administration
$21M
Expected Outputs
Coastal Habitat and Peatlands
Forestlands
Supports NC’s Executive Order 305
Set goals to achieve the following by 2040:
Permanently conserve one million new acres of North Carolina’s natural lands, with special focus on wetlands
01
Restore or reforest one million new acres of North Carolina’s forests and wetlands
02
Plant one million trees in urban regions of the state
03
Project Summaries
Project Overviews: Maryland
Project 1: Coastal Wetlands ($35.3 million)
Install 400 acres of living shoreline, 200 acres of marsh restoration, 400 acres of tidal connectivity, develop coastal resilient management plans
Project 2: Agricultural Resource Conservation and Management
($4.8 million)
Windbreaks, alley cropping, and silvopasture to improve soil health and water conservation on 1,000 acres through cost-share grants
Project 3: Afforestation and Urban Trees ($8.1 million)
Restore 500 acres of critical habitat, enhance forest management on 1,000 acres, and expand state nursery to market locally sourced trees
Project Overviews: Virginia
Project 1: Hog Island Wildlife Management Area ($2.8 million)
Project 2: Ragged Island Wildlife Management Area ($9.7 million)
Project 3: Comprehensive Tidal Marsh Restoration In Guinea Marshes ($10.5 million)
Project 4: Saltmarsh Acquisition and Protection at Frog Stool Preserve ($1.6 million)
Project 5: New Wetland Restoration and Enhancement Project ($5.4 million)
Project 6: Acquisition and Afforestation in City of Chesapeake ($10 million)
Project 7: Eastern Shore Wildlife Management Areas Forest Restoration ($4.7 million)
Project 8: Quail Roost Farm Afforestation ($3.3 million)
Project 9: Tribal Restoration and Conservation Program Set-aside ($1.7 million)
Project Overviews: North Carolina
Project 1: Coastal Habitat Enhancement Initiative ($30 million)
NC Coastal Federation- 100 acres of peatland restoration, living shoreline installation protecting 595 acres of salt marsh, 131 acres of conservation for marsh migration, USGS study on carbon sequestration in coastal habitats
Project 2: High Carbon Acquisitions for State Park System ($10 million)
Acquire up to 3,300 acres of forests and peatlands to add to the state park system and avoid conversion
Project 3: Climate Smart Forestry in Low-income and Disadvantaged Communities ($3 million)
Tree planting and climate smart forestry on 6,000 acres with historically marginalized landowners
Project 4: Rapid Tree Growth High-Carbon Forestry Cost Share ($5 million)
Cost share program to incentivize 49,000 acres worth of high-carbon tree seedling plantings across tree farms statewide
Project 5:Urban Tree Planting Program ($1 million)
1,250 urban trees to be planted and maintained. Priority will be given to small and medium-sized communities with limited financial capacity for urban forestry programs.
Project 6: Executive Order 305 Implementation ($1 million)
Funding for NCDNCR to implement goals and deliverables of EO 305
Project Overviews: South Carolina
Project 1: Pee Dee Upland ($5 million)
Project 2: Pee Dee Bottomland ($14.4 million)
Project 3: Lowcountry Forest ($18.5 million)
Project 4: Unidentified Land Conservation ($11.5 million)
Project Overviews: Regional (The Nature Conservancy)
ACC Administration
Duke Conservation Dashboard
Climate and Community Co-Benefits
Carbon Sequestration and Storage
Coastal Habitat and Peatlands
Forested Land
Verification of Carbon Benefits
Justice 40 and Environmental Justice
Low-income and disadvantaged communities that may benefit from NC projects
LIDAC Census Block Groups identified if historical data and project plans pointed a project potentially being in area
AND
Block group had at least one EJ index over the 80th percentile nationally using EJ Screen
Climate Resilience
Other Co-Benefits
Concepts into Action
Blue Carbon
Emissions Reduction Assumptions
Sources
Warnell, Katie, Lydia Olander, and Carolyn Currin, "Sea level rise drives carbon and habitat loss in the US mid- Atlantic coastal zone," PLoS Climate 1, no. 6 (2022): e0000044. https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000044
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, “North Carolina Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2050),” January 2024. https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/AirQuality/DocView.aspx?id=468498&dbid=0&repo=AirQuality&cr=1
Reithmaier, Gloria MS, Alex Cabral, Anirban Akhand, Matthew J. Bogard, Alberto V. Borges, Steven Bouillon, David J. Burdige et al., "Carbonate chemistry and carbon sequestration driven by inorganic carbon outwelling from mangroves and saltmarshes,“ Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 8196. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44037-w
Maryland Department of Natural Resources and Maryland Department of the Environment, “Maryland Blue Carbon Flux: Estuarine Wetlands and Submerged Aquatic Vegetation. Data and Methodology Documentation as prepared for the 2020 Maryland Greenhouse Gas Inventory.” January 6, 2023 .https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/air/ClimateChange/Documents/VIMAL/MD_Bluecarbon_Flux_Methodology_01.06.23.pdf
Holmquist, James R., Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Norman Bliss, Stephen Crooks, James T. Morris, J. Patrick Megonigal, Tiffany Troxler et al., "Accuracy and precision of tidal wetland soil carbon mapping in the conterminous United States," Scientific Reports 8, no. 1 (2018): 9478. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-26948-7
The Nature Conservancy & Maryland Department of Natural Resources, ”TNC Maryland Blue Carbon Resilience Credit Feasibility Study,” December 2023.https://dnr.maryland.gov/ccs/Documents/Maryland- Blue-Carbon-Resilience-Credit- Feasibility-Study-2023-12-22.pdf
Avoided Conversion
Assumption: if not for putting x carbon-rich land into easement, x land will be bought and converted by developers, resulting in both release of carbon and prevention of future storage from lack of trees, peatland etc.
Land with high carbon storage +
Existing and known development interests
= Preservation of most valuable land at highest risk of conversion
Contact
NC Gov Office- Bailey Recktenwald bailey.recktenwald@nc.gov
NCDNCR- Deans Eatman deans.eatman@dncr.nc.gov
NCDNCR- Emma Hughes emma.hughes@dncr.nc.gov
For carbon methodology contact katie.warnell@duke.edu