1 of 17

RESEARCH PROGRESS REVIEW

Advanced Materials for Water Treatment

Adsorptive and Photocatalytic Approaches for Pollutant Removal

Project 1: Adsorption

UiO-66-NH₂/Fe-AC composites

As(V) & F⁻ removal

Project 2: Photocatalysis

Graphite/TiO₂ composites

Photodegradation of ofloxacin

Sonia Judith Segovia-Sandoval, Joaquín Silvestre Albero

Laboratorio de Materiales Avanzados — Instituto Universitario de Materiales, Universidad de Alicante

2 of 17

BACKGROUND

Arsenic and Fluoride: A Global Groundwater Threat

2

300-500 MILLION PEOPLE WORLDWIDE

are exposed to unsafe concentrations of arsenic and fluoride in drinking groundwater.

MAIN SOURCES

Weathering of As and F bearing minerals

Volcanic activity

Water-rock interaction

Anthropogenic activities

WHO GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING WATER QUALITY

Arsenic

10 μg/L

Fluoride

1.5 mg/L

Arsenic exposure

Chronic ingestion: arsenicosis, blackfoot disease, skin, lung, bladder, and kidney cancer.

Fluoride exposure

Osteoporosis, arthritis, infertility, brain damage, dental and skeletal fluorosis; children under 12 most vulnerable.

TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

Membrane Filtration

Chemical precipitation

Ion Exchange

Electrocoagulation

Adsorption

3 of 17

BACKGROUND

MOF/Activated Carbon hybrid composites

UiO66

UiO66-NH2

UiO66-NO2

Excellent water stability

Low toxicity

  • High surface area
  • Tunable porosity
  • Abundant active sites

Develop and evaluate UiO-66-NH2/activated carbon composites for efficient arsenic and fluoride removal.

  • Poor mechanical strength
  • Difficult recovery
  • High cost

Metal ion

MOF

Organic

Linker

MOF / Activated Carbon Hybrid Adsorbents

More robust and efficient adsorbents

Activated carbon MOF

3

4 of 17

METHODOLOGY

Synthesis approaches

Fe Impregnated Activated Carbon

1

Synthesis route: In situ growth

2

FeAC

Synthesis route: Post-synthetic assembly

3

FeAC

UiO-66-NH2

C2H6O

4

UiO-66-NH₂@FeAC

nominal 50:50

(In situ)

UiO-66-NH₂/FeAC

exact 50:50

(Post-synthetic)

UiO-66-NH₂

FeAC

RESULTING MATERIALS

5 of 17

METHODOLOGY

C0 low C0 high

Sample

As(V) / F-

Stock sol.

AAS

As(V)

ISE

Fluoride

CONDITIONS

  • pH 7
  • T = 30 and 40 °C
  • Adsorbent mass 1 g
  • [Pollutant]0 10–200 mg/L

ADSORPTION ISOTHERM MODELS

  • Langmuir

  • Freundlich

  • Radke-Prausnitz

Adsorption experiments performed at:

National Laboratory of Porous Materials, Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascalientes, México

Collaboration with: Dr. Adrián Bonilla-Petriciolet and Dra. Didilia Ileana Mendoza Castillo 

Equilibrium adsorption experiments

3

Batch adsorber

5

6 of 17

RESULTS

Characterization

6

FeAC

UiO66-NH2

In situ

Post-synthetic

FeAC

UiO66-NH2

In situ

  • FeAC: Rough, layered morphology typical of activated carbon.
  • UiO-66-NH₂: Homogeneous spherical particles (~50–100 nm).
  • In situ: Uniform MOF dispersion with intimate interfacial contact.�Post-synthetic: Visible MOF aggregates and weaker interfacial contact

7 of 17

RESULTS

Characterization

Material

SBET

(m2/g)

Vtotal

(cm3/g)

Vmicro (cm3/g)

Vmeso

(cm3/g)

FeAC

199

0.13

0.08

0.05

UiO-66-NH2

912

0.45

0.34

0.11

UiO-66-NH2@FeAC

575

0.33

0.24

0.09

UiO-66-NH2/FeAC

420

0.23

0.18

0.05

All samples:

Type I isotherms

Predominantly microporous.��PSD:

In situ: keeps the MOF's ~0.9 nm pores

Post synthetic: shifts to larger 1.4–1.8 nm pores

7

8 of 17

RESULTS

Characterization

Fe 2p:

• Mixed Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ oxides

• Confirms iron oxide nanoparticles

��Zr 3d & N 1s:

• Consistent with UiO-66-NH₂

• Framework preserved

8

9 of 17

RESULTS

Adsorption Performance

9

90 mg/g

UiO-66-NH₂

63 mg/g

UiO-66-NH₂/FeAC

46 mg/g

UiO-66-NH₂@FeAC

6 mg/g

FeAC

37 mg/g

UiO-66-NH₂

18 mg/g

UiO-66-NH₂@FeAC

16 mg/g

UiO-66-NH₂/FeAC

Arsenic

Fluoride

UiO-66-NH₂ exhibited the highest adsorption capacity due to accessible Zr active sites.

 

FeAC

Negligible

Is comparing the adsorption capacity per gram of composite really the fairest comparison?

10 of 17

RESULTS

MOF utilization efficiency in hybrid composites

Nominal synthesis composition (50 wt.% MOF)*. Normalizing the adsorption capacity by the nominal MOF mass fraction (0.5) reveals how efficiently the MOF phase is being used..

Composite, Ce=150 mg/L

Pure MOF

Per g MOF

vs. pure

@FeAC, 30°C

90.0

92

+2%

/FeAC, 30°C

90.0

126

+40%

Composite, Ce=150 mg/L, 30 °C

Pure MOF (mg/g)

Per g MOF (mg/g)

vs. pure

10

As(V) adsorption capacity (mg/g), fixed Ce = 150 mg/L, 30 °C

Key findings

  • Hybrid strategy provides a practical support
  • Enables a more efficient utilization of the MOF phase

11 of 17

RESEARCH PROGRESS REVIEW

Advanced Materials for Water Treatment

Adsorptive and Photocatalytic Approaches for Pollutant Removal

Project 1: Adsorption

UiO-66-NH₂/Fe-AC composites

As(V) & F⁻ removal

Project 2: Photocatalysis

Graphite/TiO₂ composites

Photodegradation of ofloxacin

Sonia Judith Segovia-Sandoval, Joaquín Silvestre Albero

Laboratorio de Materiales Avanzados — Instituto Universitario de Materiales, Universidad de Alicante

12 of 17

RESULTS

Characterization

G

TiO2

1G/4TiO2

Characterization techniques and preliminary photocatalytic experiments for OFL in collaboration with Prof. Inna Melnyk and Prof. Oksana MakotaInstitute of Geotechnics, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Košice.

12

XPS

• Ti 2p and O 1s binding-energy shifts.

• Evidence of electronic interaction between G & TiO₂

13 of 17

13

Photocatalytic activity

RESULTS

Condition

%Degradation

t = 60 min

Catalyst

Photolysis

10

G

5

TiO2

90

1G/1TiO2

95

1G/4TiO2

100

1G/9TiO2

98

Dosage (mg/mL)

5/100

60

15/100

94

25/100

100

OFL concentration (mg/L)

10

100

20

92

30

75

Water matrix

Distilled water

100

Tap water

86

Seawater

39

Light source

UV

100

Natural sunlight (NS)

97

Simulated sunlight (SS)

94

Visible light (VL)

60

Key findings

  • Best performance: 1G/4TiO₂.
  • Complete degradation under UV in 60 min.
  • Increasing the catalyst dosage improved degradation efficiency.
  • Seawater reduced efficiency.
  • Activity under visible light was lower but still significant.

14 of 17

14

Recycling experiments and Scavenger test

RESULTS

Proposed photocatalytic mechanism

15 of 17

15

Photocatalytic performance in binary pollutant mixtures

RESULTS

  • OFL-ACT (Acetaminophen)
  • OFL-RhB (Rhodamine B)

16 of 17

16

Secondment and Other Activities

  • Secondment at ANAMAD facilities from 18/01/2026 to 25/01/2026.

  • Delivered an oral presentation entitled "Hybrid Zr-MOF/Carbon Adsorbents for Water Purification: Linking Design and Performance" at the International Conference on Hybrid Materials for Environmental Applications (HyMEA), Alicante, Spain, July 6–8, 2026.

Manuscripts to be submitted:

“Graphite–TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced charge separation for efficient photocatalytic degradation of ofloxacin in single and binary aqueous systems”

S. J. Segovia-Sandoval*1, I. Melnyk2, O. Makota2,3, J. Silvestre-Albero*1

“UiO-66-NH₂ and Fe-impregnated activated carbon composites for As(V) and fluoride removal from water: role of synthesis route and individual component contribution”

S. J. Segovia-Sandoval1*, D.I. Mendoza-Castillo2, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet2, J. Silvestre-Albero1*

17 of 17

17

Acknowledgment

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101131382 “Multifunctional sustainable adsorbents for water treatment assisted with plasma technologies and for health protection from xenobiotics” (CLEANWATER)

I would like to thank all the colleagues and institutions who contributed to this work.