RESEARCH PROGRESS REVIEW
Advanced Materials for Water Treatment
Adsorptive and Photocatalytic Approaches for Pollutant Removal
Project 1: Adsorption
UiO-66-NH₂/Fe-AC composites
As(V) & F⁻ removal
Project 2: Photocatalysis
Graphite/TiO₂ composites
Photodegradation of ofloxacin
Sonia Judith Segovia-Sandoval, Joaquín Silvestre Albero
Laboratorio de Materiales Avanzados — Instituto Universitario de Materiales, Universidad de Alicante
BACKGROUND
Arsenic and Fluoride: A Global Groundwater Threat
2
300-500 MILLION PEOPLE WORLDWIDE
are exposed to unsafe concentrations of arsenic and fluoride in drinking groundwater.
MAIN SOURCES
Weathering of As and F bearing minerals
Volcanic activity
Water-rock interaction
Anthropogenic activities
WHO GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING WATER QUALITY | |
Arsenic | 10 μg/L |
Fluoride | 1.5 mg/L |
Arsenic exposure
Chronic ingestion: arsenicosis, blackfoot disease, skin, lung, bladder, and kidney cancer.
Fluoride exposure
Osteoporosis, arthritis, infertility, brain damage, dental and skeletal fluorosis; children under 12 most vulnerable.
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Membrane Filtration
Chemical precipitation
Ion Exchange
Electrocoagulation
Adsorption
BACKGROUND
MOF/Activated Carbon hybrid composites
UiO66
UiO66-NH2
UiO66-NO2
Excellent water stability
Low toxicity
Develop and evaluate UiO-66-NH2/activated carbon composites for efficient arsenic and fluoride removal.
Metal ion
MOF
Organic
Linker
MOF / Activated Carbon Hybrid Adsorbents
More robust and efficient adsorbents
Activated carbon MOF
3
METHODOLOGY
Synthesis approaches
Fe Impregnated Activated Carbon
1
Synthesis route: In situ growth
2
FeAC
Synthesis route: Post-synthetic assembly
3
FeAC
UiO-66-NH2
C2H6O
4
UiO-66-NH₂@FeAC
nominal 50:50
(In situ)
UiO-66-NH₂/FeAC
exact 50:50
(Post-synthetic)
UiO-66-NH₂
FeAC
RESULTING MATERIALS
METHODOLOGY
C0 low C0 high
Sample
As(V) / F-
Stock sol.
AAS
As(V)
ISE
Fluoride
CONDITIONS
ADSORPTION ISOTHERM MODELS
Adsorption experiments performed at:
National Laboratory of Porous Materials, Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascalientes, México
Collaboration with: Dr. Adrián Bonilla-Petriciolet and Dra. Didilia Ileana Mendoza Castillo
Equilibrium adsorption experiments
3
Batch adsorber
5
RESULTS
Characterization
6
FeAC
UiO66-NH2
In situ
Post-synthetic
FeAC
UiO66-NH2
In situ
RESULTS
Characterization
Material | SBET (m2/g) | Vtotal (cm3/g) | Vmicro (cm3/g) | Vmeso (cm3/g) |
FeAC | 199 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
UiO-66-NH2 | 912 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.11 |
UiO-66-NH2@FeAC | 575 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.09 |
UiO-66-NH2/FeAC | 420 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.05 |
All samples:
Type I isotherms
Predominantly microporous.��PSD:
In situ: keeps the MOF's ~0.9 nm pores
Post synthetic: shifts to larger 1.4–1.8 nm pores
7
RESULTS
Characterization
Fe 2p:
• Mixed Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ oxides
• Confirms iron oxide nanoparticles
��Zr 3d & N 1s:
• Consistent with UiO-66-NH₂
• Framework preserved
8
RESULTS
Adsorption Performance
9
90 mg/g
UiO-66-NH₂
63 mg/g
UiO-66-NH₂/FeAC
46 mg/g
UiO-66-NH₂@FeAC
6 mg/g
FeAC
37 mg/g
UiO-66-NH₂
18 mg/g
UiO-66-NH₂@FeAC
16 mg/g
UiO-66-NH₂/FeAC
Arsenic
Fluoride
UiO-66-NH₂ exhibited the highest adsorption capacity due to accessible Zr active sites.
FeAC
Negligible
Is comparing the adsorption capacity per gram of composite really the fairest comparison?
RESULTS
MOF utilization efficiency in hybrid composites
Nominal synthesis composition (50 wt.% MOF)*. Normalizing the adsorption capacity by the nominal MOF mass fraction (0.5) reveals how efficiently the MOF phase is being used..
Composite, Ce=150 mg/L | Pure MOF | Per g MOF | vs. pure |
@FeAC, 30°C | 90.0 | 92 | +2% |
/FeAC, 30°C | 90.0 | 126 | +40% |
Composite, Ce=150 mg/L, 30 °C | Pure MOF (mg/g) | Per g MOF (mg/g) | vs. pure |
10
As(V) adsorption capacity (mg/g), fixed Ce = 150 mg/L, 30 °C
Key findings
RESEARCH PROGRESS REVIEW
Advanced Materials for Water Treatment
Adsorptive and Photocatalytic Approaches for Pollutant Removal
Project 1: Adsorption
UiO-66-NH₂/Fe-AC composites
As(V) & F⁻ removal
Project 2: Photocatalysis
Graphite/TiO₂ composites
Photodegradation of ofloxacin
Sonia Judith Segovia-Sandoval, Joaquín Silvestre Albero
Laboratorio de Materiales Avanzados — Instituto Universitario de Materiales, Universidad de Alicante
RESULTS
Characterization
G
TiO2
1G/4TiO2
Characterization techniques and preliminary photocatalytic experiments for OFL in collaboration with Prof. Inna Melnyk and Prof. Oksana Makota�Institute of Geotechnics, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Košice.
12
XPS
• Ti 2p and O 1s binding-energy shifts.
• Evidence of electronic interaction between G & TiO₂
13
Photocatalytic activity
RESULTS
Condition | %Degradation t = 60 min |
Catalyst | |
Photolysis | 10 |
G | 5 |
TiO2 | 90 |
1G/1TiO2 | 95 |
1G/4TiO2 | 100 |
1G/9TiO2 | 98 |
Dosage (mg/mL) | |
5/100 | 60 |
15/100 | 94 |
25/100 | 100 |
OFL concentration (mg/L) | |
10 | 100 |
20 | 92 |
30 | 75 |
Water matrix | |
Distilled water | 100 |
Tap water | 86 |
Seawater | 39 |
Light source | |
UV | 100 |
Natural sunlight (NS) | 97 |
Simulated sunlight (SS) | 94 |
Visible light (VL) | 60 |
Key findings
14
Recycling experiments and Scavenger test
RESULTS
Proposed photocatalytic mechanism
15
Photocatalytic performance in binary pollutant mixtures
RESULTS
16
Secondment and Other Activities
Manuscripts to be submitted:
“Graphite–TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced charge separation for efficient photocatalytic degradation of ofloxacin in single and binary aqueous systems”
S. J. Segovia-Sandoval*1, I. Melnyk2, O. Makota2,3, J. Silvestre-Albero*1
“UiO-66-NH₂ and Fe-impregnated activated carbon composites for As(V) and fluoride removal from water: role of synthesis route and individual component contribution”
S. J. Segovia-Sandoval1*, D.I. Mendoza-Castillo2, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet2, J. Silvestre-Albero1*
17
Acknowledgment
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101131382 “Multifunctional sustainable adsorbents for water treatment assisted with plasma technologies and for health protection from xenobiotics” (CLEANWATER)
I would like to thank all the colleagues and institutions who contributed to this work.