1 of 18

AMS-HD: Acute Mountain Sickness Detection with Hyperdimensional Computing

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum, Reeti Pradhananga, Jonas I. Schmidt,

Mehran Moghadam, M. Hassan Najafi, Bige Unluturk,

Ulkuhan Guler, Sercan Aygun

✢School of Computing and Informatics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, USA

✥Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

✝Electrical and Computer Engineering & Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

✠Electrical & Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

ID:1359

2 of 18

Agenda

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Background
  • Proposed AMS-HD
  • Experimental results
  • Conclusion

3 of 18

Abstract

  • AMS (Acute Mountain Sickness) is potentially life-threatening
  • Traditional machine learning for AMS detection have limitations
  • HDC(Hyperdimensional Computing) has not yet been applied to AMS detection with limited biomedical data
  • HDC offers high accuracy with low hardware complexity, ideal for resource-constrained devices like wearables
  • A novel framework, AMS-HD, is proposed using:
    • Custom feature engineering
    • Quasi-random hypervector encoding
  • AMS-HD enables real-time AMS detection and can be integrated into wearable devices for continuous health monitoring

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

4 of 18

Introduction

  • AMS occurs at altitudes above 2,500 meters due to low oxygen
  • Common symptoms: headache, nausea, tiredness, vomiting—can appear 6–12 hours after ascent
  • Early detection is critical to prevent severe complications
  • Wearable devices offer a lightweight, real-time solution
  • Traditional ML methods are computationally intensive and less suited for resource-constrained environments
  • HDC is introduced as a fast, efficient, and reliable alternative

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

5 of 18

Introduction

  • HDC mimics brain-like functionality using high-dimensional vectors for robust, noise-tolerant processing.

  • HDC uses binary or bipolar hypervectors with operations like XOR, Add, Shift, and Permute

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

6 of 18

Background

  • Conventional ML in AMS Prediction
    • ML models predict AMS severity using:�SpO₂ (peripheral oxygen saturation), heart rate, etc.
    • Genetic data-based models exist but are complex.
    • Common machine learning methods:�logistic regression, SVM, KNN, bagged trees

    • Limitations: High computational requirements, unsuitable for low-power or real-time applications

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

7 of 18

Background

  • Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC)
    • HDC represents data as high-dimensional vectors (HVs) with thousands of binary/bipolar values
    • Core operations: Binding (XOR/multiplication), Bundling (summation), Permutation (reordering)
    • HVs are nearly orthogonal and robust to noise/errors
    • Pseudo-random HVs may reduce orthogonality; quasi-random (Sobol) sequences improve accuracy
    • HDC supports efficient, low-memory, low-power real-time classification—ideal for wearables

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

8 of 18

Background

General HDC Framework

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

9 of 18

Proposed AMS-HD

  • Dataset Overview
    • Physiological responses (e.g., SpO₂, HR) at high altitude
    • Selected features: SpO₂ (%), HR (bpm)
    • AMS score range: 1 to 12
    • Binary classification: AMS (score ≥ 3) vs. NO AMS (score < 3)
    • Multiclass classification: Mild (3–5), Moderate (6–9), Severe (10–12)
  • Feature Engineering
  • Positional Encoding & Data Projection
  • Hypervector Generation
  • HD Classifier

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

10 of 18

Proposed AMS-HD

Feature Engineering

Positional Encoding & Data Projection

Features Selection

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

11 of 18

Proposed AMS-HD

HD Classifier

Hypervector (HV) Generation

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

12 of 18

Experimental results

  • Binary Classification
    • Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) 73% test accuracy.
    • Random Forest (RF) 53% test accuracy
    • HDC-Random and HDC-Quasirandom 67% test accuracy

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

13 of 18

Experimental results

  • Multi Classification
    • RF and SVM with 73% accuracy.
    • LR with 55% accuracy
    • HDC-Random achieved 64%, and HDC-Quasirandom achieved 73% accuracy

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

14 of 18

Experimental results

  • Runtime. HDC exhibits the shortest training time, with the quasi-random method achieving the lowest inference time

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

(a)Binary

(b) Multiclass

15 of 18

Experimental results

  • HDC-Q and HDC-R used less memory
  • HDC-Q and HDC-R use less power
  • HDC-Q achieves less energy

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

than Conventional models

16 of 18

Experimental results

  • HDC model performance on both recall and F1-score

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

17 of 18

Conclusion

  • HDC provides a powerful solution for machine learning tasks.

  • AMS-HD is an HDC-based framework designed for�1 real-time2 accurate3 resource-efficient detection of Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS)

  • AMS-HD is highly suitable for real-time health monitoring

  • AMS-HD can be integrated with wearable and IoT devices

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

18 of 18

Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum et al. (2025)

Email to: Abu Kaisar Mohammad Masum c00591145@louisiana.edu