31.1

Chapter 31

​

Network Security

31.2

31-1 SECURITY SERVICES

Network security can provide five services. Four of these services are related to the message exchanged using the network. The fifth service provides entity authentication or identification.

Message Confidentiality�Message Integrity�Message Authentication�Message Nonrepudiation

Entity Authentication

Topics discussed in this section:

31.3

Figure 31.1 Security services related to the message or entity

31.4

31-2 MESSAGE CONFIDENTIALITY

The concept of how to achieve message confidentiality or privacy has not changed for thousands of years. The message must be encrypted at the sender site and decrypted at the receiver site. This can be done using either symmetric-key cryptography or asymmetric-key cryptography.

Confidentiality with Symmetric-Key Cryptography

Confidentiality with Asymmetric-Key Cryptography

Topics discussed in this section:

31.5

Figure 31.2 Message confidentiality using symmetric keys in two directions

31.6

Figure 31.3 Message confidentiality using asymmetric keys

31.7

31-3 MESSAGE INTEGRITY

Encryption and decryption provide secrecy, or confidentiality, but not integrity. However, on occasion we may not even need secrecy, but instead must have integrity.

Document and Fingerprint�Message and Message Digest�Creating and Checking the Digest�Hash Function Criteria

Hash Algorithms: SHA-1

Topics discussed in this section:

31.8

To preserve the integrity of a document,

both the document and the fingerprint are needed.

31.9

Figure 31.4 Message and message digest

31.10

The message digest needs to be kept secret.

31.11

Figure 31.5 Checking integrity

31.12

Figure 31.6 Criteria of a hash function

31.13

Can we use a conventional lossless compression method as a hashing function?

Solution

We cannot. A lossless compression method creates a compressed message that is reversible. You can uncompress the compressed message to get the original one.

Example 31.1

31.14

Can we use a checksum method as a hashing function?

Solution

We can. A checksum function is not reversible; it meets the first criterion. However, it does not meet the other criteria.

Example 31.2

31.15

Figure 31.7 Message digest creation

31.16

SHA-1 hash algorithms create an N-bit message digest out of a message of

512-bit blocks.�

SHA-1 has a message digest of 160 bits (5 words of 32 bits).

31.17

Figure 31.8 Processing of one block in SHA-1

31.18

31-4 MESSAGE AUTHENTICATION

A hash function per se cannot provide authentication. The digest created by a hash function can detect any modification in the message, but not authentication.

MAC

Topics discussed in this section:

31.19

Figure 31.9 MAC, created by Alice and checked by Bob

31.20

Figure 31.10 HMAC

31.21

31-5 DIGITAL SIGNATURE

When Alice sends a message to Bob, Bob needs to check the authenticity of the sender; he needs to be sure that the message comes from Alice and not Eve. Bob can ask Alice to sign the message electronically. In other words, an electronic signature can prove the authenticity of Alice as the sender of the message. We refer to this type of signature as a digital signature.

Comparison�Need for Keys�Process

Topics discussed in this section:

31.22

A digital signature needs a public-key system.

31.23

Figure 31.11 Signing the message itself in digital signature

31.24

In a cryptosystem, we use the private and public keys of the receiver;

in digital signature, we use the private and public keys of the sender.

31.25

Figure 31.12 Signing the digest in a digital signature

31.26

A digital signature today provides message integrity.

31.27

Digital signature provides message authentication.

31.28

Figure 31.13 Using a trusted center for nonrepudiation

31.29

Nonrepudiation can be provided using a trusted party.

31.30

31-6 ENTITY AUTHENTICATION

Entity authentication is a technique designed to let one party prove the identity of another party. An entity can be a person, a process, a client, or a server. The entity whose identity needs to be proved is called the claimant; the party that tries to prove the identity of the claimant is called the verifier.

Passwords�Challenge-Response

Topics discussed in this section:

31.31

In challenge-response authentication,

the claimant proves that she knows a secret without revealing it.

31.32

The challenge is a time-varying value sent by the verifier;

the response is the result of a function applied on the challenge.

31.33

Figure 31.14 Challenge/response authentication using a nonce

31.34

Figure 31.15 Challenge-response authentication using a timestamp

31.35

Figure 31.16 Challenge-response authentication using a keyed-hash function

31.36

Figure 31.17 Authentication, asymmetric-key

31.37

Figure 31.18 Authentication, using digital signature

31.38

31-7 KEY MANAGEMENT

We never discussed how secret keys in symmetric-key cryptography and how public keys in asymmetric-key cryptography are distributed and maintained. In this section, we touch on these two issues. We first discuss the distribution of symmetric keys; we then discuss the distribution of asymmetric keys.

Symmetric-Key Distribution�Public-Key Distribution

Topics discussed in this section:

31.39

Figure 31.19 KDC

31.40

A session symmetric key between two parties is used only once.

31.41

Figure 31.30 Creating a session key between Alice and Bob using KDC

31.42

Figure 31.21 Kerberos servers

31.43

Figure 31.22 Kerberos example

31.44

In public-key cryptography, everyone has access to everyone’s public key;

public keys are available to the public.

31.45

Figure 31.23 Announcing a public key

31.46

Figure 31.24 Trusted center

31.47

Figure 31.25 Controlled trusted center

31.48

Figure 31.26 Certification authority

31.49

Figure 31.27 PKI hierarchy