System of characters (denotative) or independent creation of graphics (depictive)?
Dual mating of depictive by method and denotative by purpose
Disproportion exists in Japanese masks, in film editing, child drawings, etc.
Not interested in absolute realism…
“The shot is by no means an element of montage. The shot is a montage cell”
Microorganism in an embryo
Conflict, Collision of two given factors arises a concept
Not brick by brick, wall by wall
Linkage is merely a possible special case, most collisions are not so!
Series of montages = series of explosions of an internal combustion vehicle driving it forward
6 of 8
Conflicts
Conflicts in the frame
Scales, volumes, masses, depths, event and duration, darkness and lightness, etc
Conflicts of acoustics and optics
Frame of the shot and the object
Organizing logic of the director and the inert logic of the object in collision - dialectic of the camera angle
We don’t distinguish between shot-content and montage
It’s all in collision and conflict with each other
Japanese and slow tempo
7 of 8
Conclusion
For Eisenstein, “brick” (Kuleshov & Pudovkin) mentality (continuity) doesn’t produce good art; the world’s all too familiar (you need defamiliarization!)
Do not predigest the world for the audiences
Exert control over the world through montage (breaking it into components)
Shock the audiences through real raw emotional stuff (montage of attractions)
Control the way audiences feel/ react to the movie
Transformative/explosive happens when you put images in conflict
Dialectics: thesis + antithesis = synthesis (thesis for another argument and so on…)
Process based on opposition / tension / conflict
Juxtaposition from which the audiences have to make the connection / link / meaning