1 of 16

世界市場で入手可能な心理診断テストの現在の実践 / Reflection of the Current Practice in Psychological Diagnostics

of Language-based Diagnostic Tools

​

Mgr. Lothar Filip Rudorfer

2 of 16

心理学における診断

psychometric approach – inference incomplete induction (conclusions cannot be inferred from all the data – jump between facts and conclusions) – correct administration and choice of test is required

clinical approach – on the contrary, supplementing information with data from psychometric instruments

The concept of measurement in psychology: measurement is part of psychodiagnostic activity (psychometrics), it is the measurement of psychological phenomena (registration of observed behavior). The goal of psychometrics is the construction and verification of psychodiagnostic methods. Before any psychodiagnostic method can be used, it must go through the processes of construction, validation, and standardization (allowing us to consider which method to functionally use for which problem).

Tato fotka od autora Neznámý autor s licencí CC BY

3 of 16

調査研究

  • Urbánek (2009): the problem is that there is no designated control body that would supervise the use of the tools to prevent their incorrect use or even abuse if an unqualified user works with the psychodiagnostic tool. The correct use of psychodiagnostics is part of ethical codes adopted by professional associations of psychological application areas, but they are not legally binding.
  • European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (2009)
  • EFPA (EFPA Board of Assessment)
  • (srov. Revelle, W., 2015; Urbánek, T., 2010; Cígler, H., 2019; Ciharova, M., et al., 2020)
  • Parallel studies in CR- Urbánek, Cígler, Ježek (2020)
  • We follow the quantitative standard for solving research investigations with an overlap into clinical practice, case studies and the diagnostic application framework -> to connect QUANT and QUAL

4 of 16

プロジェクトの目的とフェーズ

  • Map the awareness of the professional psychological public about psychometric standards
  • A review study
  • Overviews, recommendations, market research and legislation
  • Questionnaire survey focusing on the test batteries used (for psychologists in practice / for researchers)
  • Test statistics of selected tools
  • Outputs: peer-reviewed articles, conference outputs (e.g. psychodiagnostics of FSS MU Brno)

​

5 of 16

論文の主題と目標は、診断言語パフォーマンステストの分析方法の探索的研究です。この調査には、次のようないくつかの部分が含まれています。

チェコ共和国と海外の言語能力に焦点を当てたテストの違いをマッピングし、説明することを目的とした研究に先立つ概要研究の結果、

次に、態度リッカート尺度の使用に基づいて、心理学の実践者および研究機関の研究者に対するアンケート調査。研究分野は主に、使用される診断ツールの選択に影響を与える要因、それが使用される条件、および個々の心理的職場での能力のサポートです。 2 つのアンケートのそれぞれに対して 32 項目が作成されました。テスト ツールの提供に対する満足度、能力、リソース、およびニーズという 4 つの要素の測定モデルが想定されました。

順序確認因子分析に基づいて、同じ因子に関連する項目間の残差共分散を考慮に入れると、仮定されたモデルとデータとの許容可能な適合を見つけることができます。

アンケート調査からのデータの分析に基づいて、最も使用され広く普及しているテスト バッテリーを評価し、その後、最後の改訂と標準化に関して構成の妥当性、信頼性、および適時性を検証できます。

この作業の成果は、まず、国内外の実務家および研究者 (AJ、NJ、ČJ、JAP) の言語パフォーマンスの分野における特定の種類の診断に使用される方法の概要であり、次に能力のマッピングです。および心理診断テストを管理する分野の開業医のニーズ、および最終的に、言語および認知障害の領域に特に焦点を当てた現在最も使用されている心理テストの適切性、関連性、および修正の必要性をレビューし、心理測定的に評価します。

  • Anotace:

6 of 16

準備段階: 2021 年 3 月～5 月

• スクリーニングアンケートの準備と完了。卒業論文で得られた経験により、テスト教材の形式が確定します。

• パイロット調査。

• 研究への参加を希望する学校 (公立および私立大学、初等および中等教育レベルの学校心理学者) を探し、連絡をとること。

• テストツールの提供、能力、リソース、実務家や研究者のニーズに対する満足度。

​

実施段階：2021年4月～2021年8月

• データ収集 – すなわち、チェコ共和国の選択された心理学の職場と研究機関でのスクリーニング

2021年8月～12月

• 得られた調査結果は、データ アーカイブ用のデータベースに継続的に入力されます。

​

2022年-2023年-

次に、処理フェーズが続きます

• データ収集の完了。

• データベースへの記録のアーカイブの完了。

• 最初のデータ分析、チェコ共和国での会議でのデータの部分的なプレゼンテーション (少なくとも 1 回の会議で予備的な結果を提示)

• 統計データ分析の完了。

7 of 16

Overview Study / 概要検討

•   口頭および書面によるプレゼンテーション

​

• 読む

​

• アチーブメント / パフォーマンス テスト

​

• 知能テスト

​

• アーティキュレーション テスト

​

•社会適応能力とスキルのテスト

​

• 運動機能検査 • 5歳まで（就学前）

​

• 6-8 • 9-11 • 12 ～ 14 • 14 ～ 18 歳 • 18～25歳

​

Tato fotka od autora Neznámý autor s licencí CC BY-ND

8 of 16

Overview Study / 概要検討

​

​

  • 46 のテスト機器とその専門記事、レビュー、専門マニュアル、いくつかのテスト バッテリーを管理する国内外の組織の推奨文書 (APA、ミシガン大学、MSMT-13319/2019-1、PedF CUNI 診断機器アーカイブ、American Guidance Service, Inc . , 京都大学 京都大学, UC Berkeley, FSS MUNI Test Forum, Universität München)
  • カテゴリ: 名前、略語、タイプ、分類、標準化、標準化のサンプル、改訂、チェコ共和国で利用可能、チェコ共和国での標準化、発行国、グループ管理、価格、通貨、評価、サブテストの数、および年齢グループ

9 of 16

V Česku používané (n=17 z celku n=64)

  • WIAT-II
  • WJ III ACH
  • KABC-II
  • MSCA
  • WISC-IV Integrated
  • WJ III COG
  • KSPT
  • SON-R 2½ – 7
  • IDS
  • MaTeRS
  • DISMAS
  • BTFS
  • S-B IV
  • T-22
  • ZAREKI
  • T-239
  • DysTest

10 of 16

Deskriptivní statistiky I

11 of 16

Deskriptivní statistiky IV

12 of 16

Questionare EN version / アンケートEN版

13 of 16

​

Questionare EN version / アンケートEN版

14 of 16

Hypotheses and methodology / 仮説と方法論

  • 定量的および統計的分析
  • H0 診断ツールの管理の分野における心理学者の能力と彼らのニーズとの間に関係はありません
  • H1 テストの選択は権威要因によって条件付けられる
  • H2 テストの選択は、経済的または法的要因によって条件付けられる
  • H3 プラクティショナーは、言語パフォーマンスの精神診断バッテリーの管理において有能であると感じています
  • H4 研究者と方法開発者は、テスト統計データを歪めて方法を市場に出さない

​

​

15 of 16

Risk management / 危機管理

  • chybějící data - nezahrnuty baterie a testy národních jazyků, které nejsou v kompetenci výzkumníka (Latinská Amerika, Španělsko, Portugalsko, Čína, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, JV Asie)
  • možné kreslení - chyba měření, paradox pozorovatele, Hawthorne effect (1924) Labov paradox (1972), upřímné odpovědi výzkumníků a praktiků
  • neuznání vymezení projektu vůči již probíhajícím podobným v ČR (vzhledem aktuálnosti tématu)
  • změna legislativy (tlaky na ČMPSY, UPAČR, MŠMT, MZV pro realizaci diagnostiky v online prostředí vs. odlišné názory jiných asociací)
  • ambivalentní výsledky výzkumného šetření (aneb. vím, že nic nezměřím)
  • zamítnutí poskytnutí obsahu standardizačních studií pro vybrané často užívané a´baterie (přesný způsob výpočtu skóre respondenta)

​

16 of 16

Sources / 引用と出典:

  • Albers, C. A., & Grieve, A. J. (2007). Test Review: Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development– Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906297199
  • Bain, S. K., & Allin, J. D. (2005). Book Review: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300108
  • Bain, S. K., & Gray, R. (2008). Test Reviews: Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second edition. Circle Pines, MN: AGS. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907300461
  • Blackwell, T. L. (2001). Test Review: Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson® III Test. Riverside Publishing Company. Itasca, IL. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44(4), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/003435520104400407
  • Braden, Jeffery & Alfonso, Vincent. (2003). The Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities in Cognitive Assessment Courses. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012628982-4/50013-1. 
  • Brem, S., Kuhn, C., & Mehringer, H. (2016). Lese- und/oder Rechtschreibstörung: leitlinienbasierte Diagnostik und Therapie. PSYCH Up2date, 10(06), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110743
  • Brock, S. E., & Knapp, P. K. (1996). Reading comprehension abilities of children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1(3), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/108705479600100305
  • Cígler, H., & Mafková, J. (2013). Metoda barvově-slovních asociací (takzvané Barvy života) není diagnostickým nástrojem. TESTFÓRUM, 2(2), 15-27.            DOI:https://doi.org/10.5817/TF2013-2-9
  • Cígler, Hynek. (2018). Verbální fluence u dětí ve věku 5–12 let: české normy a vybrané psychometrické ukazatele. E-psychologie. DOI: 12. 16-30. DOI: 10.29364/epsy.329. 
  • Cohen, M. J., Morgan, A. M., Vaughn, M., Riccio, C. A., & Hall, J. (1999). Verbal Fluency in Children: Developmental Issues and Differential Validity in Distinguishing Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Two Subtypes of Dyslexia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(5), 433–443. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(98)00038-9
  • Deimel, Wolfgang. Testverfahren zur Diagnostik der Lese-Rechtschreibstörung. München: Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (2002), 11 S. 2008/4
  • Eriksson, M., & Berglund, E. (1999). Swedish early communicative development inventories: words and gestures. First Language, 19(55), 55–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379901905503
  • Frazier, T. W., Demaree, H. A., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2004). Meta-analysis of intellectual and neuropsychological test performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychology, 18(3), 543–555. http://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.543
  • Fukushima, Shino. (2014). Characteristics of Developmental Dyslexia in Japanese Kana from the Viewpoint of the Japanese Feature. Journal of Psychological Abnormalities in Children. 03. DOI: 10.4172/2329-9525.1000126. 
  • Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Greenwood, C. R., & Montgomery, J. K. (2017). Language assessment in a snap: Monitoring progress up to 36 months. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 33(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659016660599
  • Green L, Myerson J. A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Bull. 1999;130(5):769-792. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
  • Hendl, J. (2012). Přehled statistických metod: Analýza a metaanalýza dat. 4. vydání Praha: Portál, 2012, 736 s. ISBN 978-80-262-0200-4.
  • JASP Team (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1)[Computer software].
  • Kaufman, A. S., Flanagan, D. P., Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. T. (2006). Test Review: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(3), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906288389
  • Landerl, K., Fussenegger, B., Moll, K., & Willburger, E. (2009). Dyslexia and dyscalculia: Two learning disorders with different cognitive profiles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 309–324. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.006
  • Levy, G., Jacobs, D. M., Tang, M.-X., Côté, L. J., Louis, E. D., Alfaro, B., … Marder, K. (2002). Memory and executive function impairment predict dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 17(6), 1221–1226. http://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10280
  • McCane, S. J. M. (2007). An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Test of Dyslexia-Rapid Assessment Profile. Https://Core.Ac.Uk/, 1. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268771263.pdf
  • McCauley, R. J., & Strand, E. A. (2008). A review of standardized tests of nonverbal oral and speech motor performance in children. American journal of speech-language pathology, 17(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/007)
  • Mccauley, Rebecca & Strand, Edythe. (2008). A Review of Standardized Tests of Nonverbal Oral and Speech Motor Performance in Children. American journal of speech-language pathology / American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 17. 81-91. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/007). 
  • McCrimmon, A. W., & Climie, E. A. (2011). Test Review: Test of Written Language—Fourth Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(6), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406646
  • Mccrimmon, Adam & Climie, Emma. (2011). Test Review: Test of Written Language--Fourth Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 29. 592-596. DOI: 10.1177/0734282911406646. 
  • Moll, K., Thompson, P. A., Mikulajova, M., Jagercikova, Z., Kucharska, A., Franke, H., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2016). Precursors of Reading Difficulties in Czech and Slovak Children At-Risk of Dyslexia. Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 22(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1526
  • Moll, Kristina & Thompson, Paul & Mikulajova, Marina & Jagercikova, Zuzana & Kucharska, Anna & Franke, Helena & Hulme, Charles & Snowling, Margaret. (2016). Precursors of Reading Difficulties in Czech and Slovak Children At-Risk of Dyslexia. Dyslexia (Chichester, England). DOI: 22. 10.1002/dys.1526. 
  • Neuwirthová, Barbora. (2015). Baterie testů pro diagnostiku specifických poruch učení u studentů vysokých škol a uchazečů o vysokoškolské studium: Recenze metody. TESTFÓRUM. 4. DOI: 10.5817/TF2015-6-88. 
  • Pedroli, Elisa & Padula, Patrizia & Guala, Andrea & Meardi, Maria & Riva, Giuseppe & Albani, Giovanni. (2017). A Psychometric Tool for a Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Approach for Dyslexia. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2017. 1-6. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7048676. 
  • Příloha č. 1 Seznam podporovaných diagnostických nástrojů.pdf, https://www.msmt.cz/file/46583/, MSMT
  • Puranik, C. S., Patchan, M. M., Sears, M. M., & McMaster, K. L. (2017). Examining Alphabet Writing Fluency in Kindergarten: Exploring the Issue of Time on Task. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508416665324
  • Radencich, M. C. (1988). Book Review: Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6(2), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298800600208
  • Rehfeld DM, Padgett RN. Test Review: Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language–Second Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2019;37(4):524-529. DOI:10.1177/0734282917753484
  • Rehfeld, D. M., & Padgett, R. N. (2019). Test Review: Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language–Second Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(4), 524–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917753484
  • Rinehardt, E., Eichstaedt, K., Schinka, J. A., Loewenstein, D. A., Mattingly, M., Fils, J., … Schoenberg, M. R. (2014). Verbal Fluency Patterns in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 38(1–2), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1159/000355558
  • Richard W. Woodcock. (1984) A Response to Some Questions Raised About the Woodcock-Johnson II. Efficacy of the Aptitude Clusters. School Psychology Review 13:3, pages 355-362. 
  • Sands R., D’Amato R.C. (2018) McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities. In: Kreutzer J., DeLuca J., Caplan B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1462-3
  • Sands, R. & D'Amato, Rik. (2017). McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1462-3. 
  • Scattone, D., Raggio, D. J., & May, W. (2011). Comparison of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Psychological reports, 109(2), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.10.PR0.109.5.626-634
  • Scattone, Dorothy & Raggio, Donald & May, Warren. (2011). Comparison of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Psychological reports. 109. 626-34. DOI: 10.2466/03.10.PR0.109.5.626-634. 
  • Schulte-Körne, G. (2017). Lese- und/oder Rechtschreibstörung. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 165(6), 476–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-017-0290-4
  • Seitl, M. S. (2015). Testové psychodiagnostické metody pro výběr zaměstnanců. Https://Www.Ff.Upol.Cz/. https://www.ff.upol.cz/fileadmin/userdata/FF/katedry/pch/vyzkum/SEITL-Testove_psychodiagnosticke_metody.pdf
  • Shenoy, S. (2014). Assessment tools to differentiate between language differences and disorders in English language learners. Berkeley Review of Education, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/B85110048 Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nj5f2x7
  • Shenoy, Sunaina. (2014). Assessment tools to differentiate between language differences and disorders in English language learners. Berkeley Review of Education. 5. DOI: 10.5070/B85110048. 
  • Šmahelová, Lucie. (2018) Prožívání depresivity v raných fázích otcovství [online]. Brno, 2018 [cit. 2021-02-22]. Available from: <https://is.muni.cz/th/fa7bj/>. Master's thesis. Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies. Thesis supervisor Ivo Plaňava.
  • Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L. Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997 Jun;22(3):313-28. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.3.313. PMID: 9212550.
  • Squires, Jane & Bricker, Diane & Potter, LaWanda. (1997). Revision of a Parent-Completed Developmental Screening Tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. Journal of pediatric psychology. 22. 313-28. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.3.313.
  • Strawser, S., & Sileo, N. (1999). Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning – Third Edition (DIAL-3). Diagnostique, 24(1–4), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/153450849902401-410
  • Strawser, S., & Sileo, N. (1999). Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning – Third Edition (DIAL-3). Diagnostique, 24(1–4), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/153450849902401-410
  • Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., Hamilton, Z., Peacock, K., & Hutton, U. M. Z. (2005). Working Memory Period: The Endurance of Mental Representations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(3), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000098
  • Towse, John & Hitch, Graham & Hamilton, Zoë & Miller, Kirsty & Hutton, Una. (2005). Working Memory Period: The Endurance of Mental Representations. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology. 58. 547-71. DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000098. 
  • Vladescu, Jason. (2007). Test Review: Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-Second Edition (KTEA-II). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment - J PSYCHOEDUC ASSESS. 25. 92-100. DOI: 10.1177/0734282906294708. 
  • Volden J, Smith IM, Szatmari P, Bryson S, Fombonne E, Mirenda P, Roberts W, Vaillancourt T, Waddell C, Zwaigenbaum L, Georgiades S, Duku E, Thompson A. Using the preschool language scale, fourth edition to characterize language in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Aug;20(3):200-8. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0035). Epub 2011 Apr 8. PMID: 21478278.
  • Witruk, Evelin. (2011). Assessment and Treatment of Dyslexia - An Overview. Ad verba liberorum. 3. DOI: 10.2478/v10196-011-0022-1. 
  • ��