1 of 23

3-D Printing Bioreactors for Continuous Cell-Free Gene Expression

By Aubrie Hetherington

NSF REU at the University of Minnesota

Summer 2025

2 of 23

Cell-Free Gene Expression

  • Cell-free transcription translation (TXTL) is an in vitro platform to synthesize RNA and proteins.
  • Escherichia coli TXTL is the most common cell-free system, because of fast replication rates, affordability, and accessibility of engineering strains.

DNA

DNA

TXTL Mix

Cell Lysis

TXTL

5 - 12 h

29 - 37°C

Prototyping, analyzing

Engineering, biomanufacturing

Building, interfacing

DNA

3 of 23

Gene Circuit Prototyping

4 of 23

Continuous Systems

  • By feeding a TXTL reaction with energy molecules through a semi-permeable membrane it is possible to extend the reaction times from 10 hours to 2 days.
  • The commercially available membrane systems are not ideal because:
    • High cost (~$2000)
    • Single-use
    • Low throughput
    • Incompatibility with standard fluorescence readers, which prevents temporal monitoring

5 of 23

My Research Goal

  • Create a continuous system plate that is:
    • Cost-effective
    • High-throughput
    • Easily created
    • Shareable
    • Fluorescence reader compatible

6 of 23

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

Bhattacharjee et al., 2016

7 of 23

Diffusion through the Membrane

https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/protein-biology/protein-biology-learning-center/protein-biology-resource-library/protein-biology-application-notes/separation-characteristics-dialysis-membranes.html

8 of 23

Diffusion through the Membrane

Semi-permeable membrane

Feeding Solution

Cell-Free Reaction

9 of 23

Constructing the Design

Semi-permeable membrane

10 of 23

Test Design

  • We started simple with a 3-well design to perfect our lip feature
  • This showed us:
    • No glue on reaction site
    • Tighter membrane reducing wrinkles
    • Great alignment
    • Still needing to use glue

11 of 23

Current Design

Alignment pins insure accurate alignment of both wells

Lips tighten the membrane and prevent glue on the reaction site

  • 24-Wells allows for high throughput experiments
  • Sized for compatibility with standard fluorescence readers

Air funnels permit extra air to oxygenate the TXTL reaction.

12 of 23

Water Absorption

  • FDM 3-D printing doesn’t produce watertight prints
    • Prints layer by layer
    • Infill is usually only 15%
  • Could we lose our sample to absorption?
  • Doesn’t seem so, but we plan to test again

2 Layers

4 Layers

6 Layers

13 of 23

Glue Toxicity

  • Through our design process, we have utilized two different glues.
  • Loctite EA E-120HP was easier to apply and was stronger.
  • JB Weld Marine Weld was tough to apply but also sealed well.
  • We tested these glues with a TXTL reaction to determine if the glue was toxic to the reaction.
  • Loctite (A & C) completely killed the reaction while JB Weld (B & D) seems to show no effect.

A

B

C

D

10

11

12

6

3

2

27

50

23

1577

1264

2400

12819

9992

19047

4

4

5

10

11

18

906

3974

3189

7186

31859

25708

vs

https://www.jbweld.com/product/marineweld-twin-tube?srsltid=AfmBOooM8JC_6mpX803fAZXfCHo6Fp5m2V5waDBSN1wmqOU7-YvYU2qX

https://next.henkel-adhesives.com/us/en/products/industrial-adhesives/central-pdp.html/loctite-ea-e-120hp/BP00000164738.html

14 of 23

Kinetic Dye Test

  • To confirm correct membrane usage, we measured the transport of different sized dyes across it over a 52-hour period.
  • The membrane had a MWCO of 12-14kDa.

15 of 23

Aligning the Fluorescence Reader

  • Standard fluorescence readers are manufactured for standard microplates
  • Our design specifics and improvements required a custom alignment
  • Using different concentrations of 40kDa Fluorescein, we centered the reader on each well

https://www.microplates.com/product/24-well-clear-bottom-ps-microplate-white-f-bottom-assay-plate/

16 of 23

My Research Completion

  • Creates a continuous system plate that is:
    • Cost-effective
    • High-throughput
    • Easily created
    • Shareable
    • Fluorescence reader compatible

17 of 23

Approximate Cost = $7

  • Filament cost for one of our prints is $3
  • Membrane costs $2 per design
  • Glue costs $ 2 per design
  • Printer is free to use
    • If purchasing personal printer $1000

18 of 23

High-Throughput

  • 24-well design with scalability allows for whatever throughput desired
  • Simple to create and use multiple plates

19 of 23

Easily Created and Shareable

  • Average time spent directly with design:
    • <2 Hour
  • Time to print:
    • 14 Hours
  • Glue Curing
    • 15 Hours
  • CAD file allows anyone with 3-D printing access to print it
  • Simple process to glue
  • Minimal time hands-on
  • Lightweight for shipping to collaborators

20 of 23

Fluorescence Reader Compatible

  • Sized for standard fluorescence reader
  • Can be read from top of bottom

21 of 23

Future Plans

  • Progression to a TXTL reaction to confirm effectiveness
  • Expanding to more wells to increase throughput
    • 48-wells
    • 96-wells
  • Modifying membrane usage
    • Reduce waste
    • Reduce cost
    • Eliminate risk of communication through membrane

22 of 23

Thank you!�

Acknowledgements:

Antoinette Barsoum

Kellen Grimes

Ava Scroggins

Aset Khakimzhan

Vincent Noireaux

Anderson Student Innovation Labs Staff

23 of 23

Bhattacharjee, N., Urrios, A., Kang, S., & Folch, A. (2016). The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics. Lab on a Chip, 16(10), 1720–1742. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00163G

References