Phytoplankton, Chemistry, Clouds, and Climate
Dr. Patrick R. Veres
NCAR Research Aviation Facility Science and Instrumentation Group, Research Scientist, Group Lead
pveres@ucar.edu
https://airborne-science.com
NCAR ASP Summer Colloquium, July 19, 2023
Atmosphere/Ocean Interactions in the Marine Boundary Layer
Understanding of Earth’s atmosphere requires global observations
We must identify, address, anticipate, and prepare for challenges related to processes within Earth’s atmosphere
Atmospheric measurement programs are overwhelmingly biased to continental regions: instruments can’t swim*, most labs don’t float and remote regions are expensive to reach
Unfortunately oceans cover > 70% of our planet and significantly impact atmospheric composition and climate
Adapted from NOAA CSL
Air-Sea exchange impacts chemistry and cloud processes
Air-Sea exchange of gases and aerosols plays an important role in many atmospherically relevant processes
The recent discovery of hydroperoxymethyl thioformate (HPMTF, Veres et al. 2020, PNAS), a product of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation, has led to a reevaluation marine sulfur emissions
Thompson et al. 2022, BAMS
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) was a well understood oceanic emission
Marine phytoplankton produce dimethylsulfonium propionate which undergoes enzymatic cleavage to form DMS, to dominant volatile sulfur species in ocean surface water
Until recently, DMS atmospheric chemistry was described in this reduced form:
DMS → 0.6 SO2 + 0.4 MSA
Zheng et al. 2021, Nature Comms
Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in the Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA, 2018)
First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-1, 1995)
Clark et al. 1998, JGR
For > 20 years we have understood the need to incorporate this chemistry into global models to understand the climate impact of this cycle
Simplified illustration of marine aerosol sources and DMS chemistry circa ~ 2017
DMS in the marine atmosphere and its role in the climate
In 1987, Charlson, Lovelock, Andreae and Warren proposed the CLAW hypothesis
Charlson, R.J., Lovelock, J.E., Andreae, M.O. and Warren, S.G., 1987. Nature
Quinn, P.K. and Bates, T.S., 2011. Nature
This has prompted extensive research over the last 30+ years, evidence for this feedback is weak and highly debated but not been definitively ruled out.
Proposes a self regulating climate feedback from DMS emissions:
Temp = DMS emissions
DMS = CCN and clouds
clouds = Temp
Phytoplankton
Chemistry
Clouds
Climate
NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) 2016 - 2018
The NOAA iodide chemical ionization mass spectrometer was deployed during ATom 3&4 (2017/18)
Four global flights on the NASA DC-8 aircraft to provide data in the remote atmosphere for model evaluation
Thompson et al. 2022, BAMS
A new DMS oxidation product hydroperoxymethyl thioformate
Rapidly incorporated into ongoing research, cited 90 times since 2020. The actual implications of this discovery on the fate of marine biogenic sulfur is far more complicated than originally understood
HPMTF, ppt
Seawater dimethyl sulfide (DMS), nM
Veres et al., 2020. PNAS
DMS → 0.2 SO2 + 0.4 MSA + 0.4 HPMTF
DMS → 0.6 SO2 + 0.4 MSA
During ATom a new DMS oxidation product was observed in the atmosphere
(Veres et al. 2020)
DMS
SO2
HPMTF
Adapted from Novak et al., 2021. PNAS
Vermeuel et al. 2020. ES&T
Jernigan et al. 2022. GRL
Novak et al., 2021, PNAS
Jernigan et al. 2022. JPCA
Assaf et al. 2023. JPCA
Veres et al., 2020, PNAS
HPMTF loss to clouds dominates the fate of maine sulfur
Rapid cloud removal of HPMTF observed during ATom
Veres et al., 2020. PNAS
The spatial distribution of of SO2 and sulfate is significantly altered when accounting for cloud loss → climate impacts
Quantifying the impact of HPMTF cloud loss on global SO2 and sulfate (SO42-) Novak et al., 2021. PNAS
Initial ATom observations of rapid cloud loss were subsequently quantified during the NASA Student Airborne Research Program (SARP, 2019)
Novak et al. evaluated cloud impacts based on one cloud type and incorporated into models through a chemical rate expression that included entrainment into clouds and fractional cloud cover
We can and need to emulate/evaluate what a global model would simulate in various cloud types to better understand the role of clouds on chemistry and climate
Cloud type variability will impact atmospheric composition
Cloud type illustration: Cesana et al. 2019, Earth Syst. Sci. Data
Large eddy simulations (LES): Kazil et al. 2021, JAMES, Narenpitak et al. 2022, JAMES
Spatial variability of chemical species, fluxes, and conversion rates will depend on cloud type and degree of boundary layer decoupling
Large-eddy simulations (LES) in the marine boundary layer (MBL)
MBL dynamics and circulation are driven by:
Large eddy simulations represent clouds and turbulent mixing at high resolution
DMS approximation
DMS approximation
Adapted from Brasseur et al. 2023, Atmosphere
LES simulations can be used to probe the impact of boundary layer dynamics on atmospheric processing of gases and aerosols –
we need more data and better computers
Atmospheric Emissions and Reactions Observed from Megacities to Marine Areas (AEROMMA 2023)
Additional field data is needed to advance our understanding
Sulfur emissions and chemistry: Do we understand the source budget and fate of sulfur in the MBL?
Air/Sea Exchange: What are the fluxes of key gas phase species into and out of the oceans?
Aerosol Nucleation and Growth: What chemical and microphysical conditions are conducive to this process?
Coupling of Chemistry and Cloud Processes: How do various cloud types impact the fate of gas-phase species?
AEROMMA flights targeted variable cloud fields and clear sky conditions
Figures by Siyuan Wang (NOAA)
DMS (ppb)
The next chapters are coming soon
Four research flights were conducted from 6/16/23 - 6/23/23
2023 FARE Users’ Workshop
September 18–22, 2023
Boulder, Colorado
Facilities for Atmospheric Research and Education (FARE)
Registration ends August 15 !
NSF FARE USERS’ WORKSHOP
September 18 – 22, 2023
Boulder, Colorado
Questions?
Please contact Brigitte Baeuerle (baeuerle@ucar.edu) or Bart Geerts (geerts@uwyo.edu)
Workshop website: https://www.eol.ucar.edu/fare-users-workshop
Limited funding is still available to support registration and travel for MSI, PUI, and community college participants