1 of 79

Things you need to know

Steve Kirsch�Executive Director

COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund�stk@treatearly.org

stevekirsch.substack.com Mar 3, 2022

1

2 of 79

Things you need to know

About me and how I got involved

How to tell who is spreading misinformation vs. truth

Safety

Efficacy

Masks

6 foot rule

Mandates

Recovered immunity

Early treatments

Accountability

Corruption of science and medicine

Censorship

For more information…

2

3 of 79

3

About me

Retired high-tech serial entrepreneur. Age 65.

�Started CETF which funded fluvoxamine, HCQ, camostat, ...studies. Featured on 60 Minutes.

Doubly vaxxed before learning my friends were dead/disabled after vaccination. Driven by data, not “popular opinion.”

Quit my company to focus 100% on saving lives.

Not a doctor so not subject to intimidation tactics.

No conflicts of interest. No history of misinformation spreading or conspiracy theories < May 25, 2021.

4 of 79

4

About me

One of world’s top “misinformation spreaders” according to MIT Tech Review and CCDH

Permanently banned from Twitter, LinkedIn, Medium.

One of the few to be permanently banned from Twitter twice.

Top author on Quora and Substack.

5 of 79

Which side is telling the truth?

The side that wants a debate.

5

6 of 79

6

Our claim

Our hypothesis, that the vaccines are unsafe and largely ineffective, fits the data.

Their “safe and effective” hypothesis doesn’t.

They don’t want to debate us, even for $1M just to show up at the debate table (offered to members of the CDC and FDA external committee members). Nobody at the FDA, CDC, NIH, or any of the drug companies will debate us, even though it would reduce vaccine hesitancy (a key goal) if they won.

7 of 79

#1

7

8 of 79

The most important thing you need to know

The entire pandemic response was unwarranted.

We knew in March 2020 early treatment virtually eliminated hospitalization and death.

NIH ignored it. The virus and pandemic were both man-made.

You’re going to get it sooner or later. Why avoid the inevitable?

8

9 of 79

9

Considering a mandate? Take 10 minutes to read this remarkable speech first.

“I have no doubt that COVID-19 is the greatest threat to humanity we have ever faced; not because of a virus; … but because of our response to it.”

10 of 79

Do any lawmakers care?

10

11 of 79

Why aren’t we allowed to speak on campus?

The same reasons YouTube bans all videos that go against the government narrative.

Because:

  1. They don’t want anyone to learn the truth.
  2. They can’t counter our data.
  3. Censorship is the only alternative.

11

12 of 79

Safety

12

13 of 79

In the US, the vaccines kill more people than they are estimated to save

Killed: >150K1

Saved: ~10K2

13

1Estimating the number of vaccine deaths computes over 150K excess deaths due to the COVID vaccines 8 different ways.

2Pfizer’s 6 month phase 3 trials result clearly shows 1 life saved for every 22,000 full vaccinations. Since we’ve partially vaccinated almost 220M Americans, that’s at most 10,000 lives saved as of Oct 10, 2021. But that’s assuming the vaccines are as effective against Delta as they are against wild type virus. So it’s probably much less than 10,000 lives saved.

14 of 79

Validated it >10 other ways

All of these methods yielded excess death estimates of 150,000 or more

Source: Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America for the details on all 12 methods

  1. Excess CFR analysis
  2. Excess death analysis
  3. Small island study
  4. Norway data
  5. Poll #1
  6. Poll #2
  7. Doctor survey
  8. Pilot data (British Airways)
  9. Scotland data
  10. Columbia university excess death analysis using public datasets from US and Europe
  11. Indiana insurance company excess death rate 40% increase in 18 - 64 year-olds
  12. German life insurance company statistics
  13. Embalmer statistics

14

15 of 79

Vax is nonsensical �Killed > Saved for all ages

The table shows the numbers for Killed vs. Saved from COVID death over 6 months. Units for both columns are per million doses. The saved column assumes vaccines are 100% effective against projected COVID deaths over the 6 month efficacy period (the most optimistic scenario).

This article details how the numbers were calculated. Both columns are from US government data (VAERS and CDC) and subtract out background deaths.

Bottom line: It is nonsensical to vaccinate any age group.

15

Age

Killed

Saved

K:S

20-30

67

11

6.1:1

30-40

121

31

3.9:1

40-50

210

76

2.8:1

50-60

436

185

2.4:1

60-70

1031

450

2.3:1

70-80

2140

1133

1.9:1

80+

6276

3458

1.8:1

16 of 79

Killed > Saved validated in multiple papers published in the peer-reviewed medical literature

16

17 of 79

One of these vaccines is unsafe. Can you spot which one?

(nobody at the FDA or CDC can, including the advisory committees!)

These are known as “excess deaths.” If it wasn’t the vaccine, then what caused this?

17

Note: These results cannot be explained by “over-reporting” because physician surveys say they are seeing >100X increase in adverse events with these vaccines. Nor can they be explained by “more people” were vaccinated this year vs. typical years.

18 of 79

One of these vaccines is unsafe.

Can you spot which one?

(This is the EU system. The same notes appy.)

18

19 of 79

19

Is this what they mean by a “slightly elevated” risk of myocarditis?

Could be as frequent as 1 in 100 teenage boys

20 of 79

High vaccine adverse events are not due to “over-reporting.” There are more events reported because there are more events occurring.

Small practice

750 patients�Reports in 29 years: 0�Reports this year: 25

Large practice

20,000 patients�Reports in 11 years: 0�Reports this year: >1,0001

1A more than 10,000X increase over the average year!

20

21 of 79

VAERS for influenza shows there was no increase in reporting this year�Therefore, the overreporting “explanation” is a not supported by data.

21

22 of 79

For ages 5-11: Kill 117 → Save 1

22

Dr. Rogers is a specialist in risk-benefit analysis. Because he couldn’t find an accurate risk benefit analysis on the Internet, he did his own using CDC numbers and VAERS data extrapolated downward to the 5 to 11 age group.

23 of 79

23

Menstrual issues are highly elevated by up to 8,800X vs. baseline.

CDC does not want you to know this

24 of 79

A list of some of the cardiac events in VAERS…

Tachycardia is 7,973X above baseline. �Cardiac failure is 475X above baseline rates.

24

25 of 79

The CDC is lying about “no deaths caused by the mRNA vaccines.”

Peter Schirmacher, one of the world’s top pathologists, did autopsies of 40 people who died after vaccination. He found that at least 30% to 40% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine. His work was later validated by other German pathologists who found even higher minimum percentages. The true percentage could be 100%. Schirmacher just set the floor.

They threatened his family if he spoke out. So he’s been silent.

Why can’t the CDC find a single death in over 18,000 cases worldwide?!?

25

26 of 79

Jessica Rose

Yes, you can apply the five Bradford-Hill criteria to VAERS to prove causality.

(The CDC is lying to you when they claim you can’t).

26

27 of 79

Efficacy

27

28 of 79

The vaccines make things worse (UK data)

28

29 of 79

Ontario, Canada shows the vaccines don’t protect against infection. Why should they be mandated?

29

30 of 79

Denmark study: Negative VE

30

31 of 79

How can they cancel Christmas in Gibraltar?!?

The vaccination rate there is >118% (they vaccinate people from Spain who come to Gibraltar to work).

31

32 of 79

Masks

32

33 of 79

Everyone should watch this video of 2 Marines

33

34 of 79

The only PPE that may make a difference are P100 respirators and higher (such as PAPR)

They only protect the wearer.

You should add goggles or a full face mask since eyes are an entry point.

34

35 of 79

The medical journals distort the science

Science says masks don’t work. They’ve never worked for respiratory viruses.

The CDC says masks don’t work for smoke. The virus is 25X smaller than smoke.

When they did the first major study of masks against COVID in Denmark, the scientists found that masks made things worse. But the journals refused to publish the finding unless it was changed to fit the popular narrative. They changed the conclusion so it didn’t match the data and their study was published. This is documented in this Editor’s Choice article in the BMJ.

35

36 of 79

CDC journal: Masks don’t work in EITHER direction

"We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility."

36

This was a meta-analysis of research all the way back to 1946. It didn’t include the 1919 paper by W.H. Kellogg of the Calif State Board of Health that masks were useless in stopping the Spanish flu.

A 2015 RCT which showed that cloth masks promoted more flu-like infections was excluded.

37 of 79

The Bangladesh study was the nail in the coffin for mask efficacy

37

Mask proponents proclaimed that the Bangladesh mask study PROVED masks worked.

But none of these experts looked closely at the study! As soon as they saw the result they wanted to see, they hailed the study as definitive!

Except for one tiny little problem: if you actually look at the underlying data, it proved masks did not work at all.

Read this analysis by UC Berkeley Professor Ben Recht Revisiting the Bangladesh Mask RCT and The cult of statistical significance and the Bangladesh Mask RCT (Nov 29, 2021)

38 of 79

N95 masks

Are worse than surgical masks!!!

(reality: both do nothing)

38

39 of 79

Bangladesh study

Zero effectiveness of purple cloth masks

→ cloth, surgical, and N95 masks do nothing

39

40 of 79

“Masks do nothing, nothing!”

- Sgt Schultz

40

41 of 79

Social distancing

41

42 of 79

Stephen Petty

“If there isn’t great ventilation, the virus can take hours to days to settle. Therefore, 6 feet distancing makes no sense.”

42

43 of 79

43

44 of 79

Draft

Dimension /Density

Distance

Duration

44

45 of 79

Mandates

45

46 of 79

Can anyone explain this?

46

Vaccine

# Killed/M vaccinated

Action

Smallpox

1

Halt

COVID-19

1,000

Mandate for all

47 of 79

“Where there is risk, there must be choice”

47

48 of 79

48

Then vaccine mandates are pointless

Are COVID vaccines effective and safe?

YES

NO

49 of 79

49

“Once again publicly available data demonstrate that vaccines are not reducing infectivity or transmission, 2 of the main criteria for an injection to be considered a vaccine. Public health officials are brazenly proclaiming these embarrassing facts, while at the same time continuing to parrot the mantra to get vaccinated and stop the spread.

At this point, anyone with a working brain can see that whatever the vaccine mandate push is for, that it is not about public health and stopping the transmission of COVID.”

-- Dr. Chris Martenson

50 of 79

Recovered immunity

50

51 of 79

CDC admits�Recovered can’t spread the virus

51

52 of 79

New Harvard study confirms the CDC admission: recovered can’t spread the virus.

52

53 of 79

Early treatments

53

54 of 79

If you treat early with a combinations of drugs such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol you can

reduce hospitalization by 99.76% and death by 100%��for all variants with no risk of death or disability. NIH totally ignores this.

54

Dr. George Fareed

55 of 79

Just taking aspirin after getting sick reduces your chance of being hospitalized by over 40%

55

56 of 79

Fluvoxamine alone

has far greater death benefit than any of the vaccines or pills

Reduces risk of death by 92%... Turns COVID into the flu.

By contrast, Pfizer’s own study showed only a 50% death benefit. Fluvoxamine is 6X better. Biden promotes the Pfizer drug and ignores fluvoxamine entirely in his State of the Union speech.

56

57 of 79

Ivermectin alone is 3X better at preventing death than any vaccine (24% vs. 72%)

57

58 of 79

Ivermectin prevented death >3X more than remdesivir

58

59 of 79

But they don’t want you to know any of that

59

60 of 79

Every early treatment that works is ignored

(unless it comes from big pharma)

60

61 of 79

Accountability

61

62 of 79

62

Why can’t anyone answer a single question on my top 100 questions list?

Here are the first two questions:

  1. Why won’t a single fact checker organization, public health official, mainstream media talking head, or anyone in the medical community or employee of the FDA, CDC, or NIH debate anyone on our team in a recorded call? If they want to stop misinformation, the fastest way is to discredit them on camera, not to attempt to censor them.

  • What is the underreporting factor (URF) for death in VAERS? Kirsch calculated it at 41 from anaphylaxis data 6 months ago, and Joe Smalley recently found the exact same number using actual death statistics released in Massachusetts. So if it isn’t 41, what is it and how do you know?

63 of 79

Corruption

63

64 of 79

No comment

64

65 of 79

65

How can a kid who was in the Pfizer 12-15 year-old trial be paralyzed (likely for life) and not have that reported in the trial report to the FDA?

How can you approve a vaccine for < 12 when you haven’t yet investigated the 12-15 year old safety?

The FDA promised to investigate. They did nothing. Nobody investigated. Why?

66 of 79

66

Health experts are ignoring the elephant in the room

67 of 79

67

Forced vaccination using a known deadly vaccine is corrupt. We are next.

November 19, 2021

68 of 79

68

California Governor

Gavin Newsom

Got booster. Dropped from sight for 12 days after due to GBS. Claimed no injury.

He’s lying.

He’s mandating that you and your kids get injured too. He won’t allow his kids to get vaccinated, but he mandates it for your kids.

69 of 79

Censorship

69

70 of 79

Even for $1M, they won’t answer any questions. Not one.

70

71 of 79

71

72 of 79

Summary

72

73 of 79

Can you complete

The Kirsch Challenge?

73

74 of 79

74

SUMMARY

  1. Vaccines are both unsafe and ineffective causing negative VE. They are more likely to hurt you than help you.
  2. The vaccinated are as contagious as the unvaccinated. Only people with recovered immunity stop the virus from spreading.
  3. Mask wearing is useless; even a P100 respirator is speculative. Hierarchy of controls is the right approach.
  4. Social distancing/6 foot rule is nonsensical
  5. Mandates are counter-productive and unethical.
  6. Vaccination with a non-sterilizing vaccine in the middle of a pandemic is dangerous; the worst possible solution.
  7. If you get COVID, treat with an early treatment protocol.
  8. Mitigation measures aren’t needed; we’ll all get it anyway. Focus should be on early treatment + natural immunity.
  9. Early treatment is the only way to get to zero COVID. It is better on every metric.

Nobody will debate us. The one thing every hospitalized COVID patient has in common: they didn’t use a proven early treatment protocol.

75 of 79

75

76 of 79

76

FOLLOW ME

Substack�stevekirsch.substack.com

Gab, GETTR, Telegram, Truth Social

stkirsch

77 of 79

Appendix

77

78 of 79

Additional topics

Masks v respirators

Hierarchy of control dilution (ventilation) filtration destruction

Omicron hysteria

Hand washing and surface washing

Mandates/Societal benefit? Where there risk, there must be choice

Are fully vaccinated kids healthier? All the studies show the opposite.

The 4Ds: duration draft density distance

Corruption: Maddie, ACM deaths, no trial data available, exclusions, …

Blaming the unvaccinated?

The origins of delta (in a vaccinated patient)

78

79 of 79

My popular slide decks

The elephant in the room

Vaccine Essentials

All you need to know

Vaccine policies

Read until you are convinced

79