1 of 20

J Andrés Gannon

Assistant Professor, Political Science

Faculty Affiliate, Data Science Institute

Vanderbilt University

2 of 20

Puzzle

2

Albania

  • Coastline: ~240 mi

3 of 20

Puzzle: Specialized militaries are supposed to be efficient

3

Albanian Stan Patrol 4207

  • Coastline: ~240 mi
  • Range: ~ 2,800 mi

4 of 20

Question: why do small states develop niche militaries?

4

5 of 20

Answer: niche militaries allow small states in asymmetric alliances to be security producers

Niche contributions have outsized value when they are asset specific:

  • Geography
  • Non-traditional threats

Overcome traditional alliance dilemmas through:

  • Efficient resource allocation
  • Intra-alliance bargaining leverage

5

6 of 20

Roadmap

  1. Burden-sharing configurations matter
  2. Theory of niche security
  3. Evidence from post-Cold War NATO expansion

6

7 of 20

Allies contribute different amounts…but of what?

7

8 of 20

Existing state of the art

  • Capability aggregation model (Olson and Zeckhauser 1966) oft criticized (Weitsman 2004, Bensahel 2007, Alley 2021)
  • Asymmetric alliances differentiate goals for dominant and subordinate states (Morrow 1991, Palmer and Souchet 1994)
  • Conclusion: small states provide non-security benefits to dominant alliance partners (Oneal and Elrod 1989, Lake 1999)

8

9 of 20

New theory of niche defense portfolios

Concerns with small state defense capacity:

  • To dominant state: adventurism and loss of reliance
  • To subordinate state: resource allocation and abandonment

9

10 of 20

New theory of niche defense portfolios

Niche portfolios overcome those concerns:

  1. Dominant state: reduces adventurism
  2. Subordinate state: mutual hostage-taking
  3. Both: frees up resources

10

11 of 20

New computational text analysis approach

Doctrine: National Security Strategies www.militarydoctrines.com

Force structure: Distribution of Military Capabilities (rDMC) www.militarycapabilities.com

11

12 of 20

New computational text analysis approach

12

13 of 20

13

14 of 20

14

15 of 20

15

16 of 20

16

17 of 20

New NATO states spend similarly

17

Country

Albania

Bulgaria

Czech Republic

Estonia

Hungary

Latvia

Lithuania

Poland

Romania

18 of 20

New NATO states spend similarly…but specialize differently

18

Country

Specialization Type

Albania

Coastal patrol

Bulgaria

Transport aircraft

Czech Republic

Land-based defense

Estonia

Cyber defense

Hungary

Transport, radar

Latvia

Communication

Lithuania

NA

Poland

Air defense, SOF

Romania

NA

19 of 20

Within alliances, arms configurations vary (NATO 2010)

19

20 of 20

Conclusion

Small states are often security producers in alliances

Efficiency of niche contributions is not evidence of free riding, but a solution to it

20