1 of 16

Other

Female

Why we need better data

on the LGBTQ+ community

2 of 16

About Mei

  • They/Them Pronouns
  • 中文名字柯梅
  • Nonbinary and Queer
  • Masters Degree in International Affairs from UC San Diego
  • Specialization in mediation and diplomacy
  • Experienced in intercultural LGBTQ+ advocacy

3 of 16

Goals for this Presentation

  • Higher level topic, but still accessible
  • Combining education and advocacy
  • Small changes, large impacts
  • Different levels of solutions

4 of 16

The Problem:

LGBTQ+ people need recognition and representation in data

Group Question!

5 of 16

LGBTQ+ people need recognition and representation in data

  • Data has an impact on policy, advocacy, and funding
  • Inclusivity creates efficiency in funding and accurate policy decisions
  • Gap between education and implementation

6 of 16

Case Study:

Surveys

7 of 16

Why Surveys as a Case Study?

Effort

Impact

Surveys

  • Small part, large impact
  • Easy to make, easy to change
  • Accessible for all programs

8 of 16

Why is this important?

  • Applicable to almost every field
    • Medicine, Social Services, Grants, etc
  • Efficiency in data is vital
    • Costs of cleaning “messy” data
    • Bad surveys create mistrust

Group Question!

9 of 16

Why aren’t current education efforts working?

  • Education is not optimized to this problem
  • Organizations need direct guidance

10 of 16

11 of 16

12 of 16

13 of 16

Solutions

Group Question!

14 of 16

What can YOU do?

  • Continue these conversations
  • Focus on self-education
  • How can you be improve?

15 of 16

What can the SYSTEM do?

  • Build up networks of coordination between advocacy groups
  • Pinpoint gaps in the framework
  • Proactive, not reactive approach

16 of 16

Discussion