1 of 25

Construction Robotics

Juliette Cilia

2 of 25

“New York will be a great place, if they ever finish it.”

O. Henry, 1872

3 of 25

$1.3 tn

2018 value of US construction Industry

Commerce Department

68%

World population expected to live in cities by 2050

UN DESA Data

Demand for efficient construction is ongoing & growing

$12.7 tn

Expected global value of construction Industry by 2022

Reuters

4 of 25

But Construction productivity, has

not only struggled to keep up…

It’s plunged in half since the 1960s.

5 of 25

Labor Driven Industry

with a Growing Labor

Shortage

The productivity crisis is due to many factors at play

Fragmented

landscape & distributed project ownership

Risk averse workforce (hesitant to adopt new tech/approaches)

6 of 25

Workers left during the recession, never to return

600,000

workers left in the recession

GlobeSt.com

286,000

vacant jobs today

Bureau of Labor Statistics, April 2019

“We feel the shortage when our subcontractors tell us that they can’t get something done on time. We know that’s just because they can’t get the guys for the job.”

-Construction Manager

7 of 25

And now the labor shortage is driving up the cost of doing business

5.86%

2018 Cost Increase According to the Turner Price Index

8 of 25

VCs are investing in Construction Tech at large

Yet little money is going into tackling the labor shortage head on

Software to Optimize Current Processes

Design Tools

Document Management

Collaboration Tools

HR & Finance Applications

Equipment & Talent Marketplaces

$3.1 Billion

VC Investment in Construction Tech 2018

300%

YOY growth

TechCrunch Data

3D Printing

Pre -Fab

Modular & Pre- Fab Construction

9 of 25

I set out to explore the robotics that could potentially solve for the labor shortage…

Modular & Pre- Fab Construction

Software to Optimize Current Processes

Autonomous On-Site Construction Equipment

10 of 25

Can robotics do for construction what they did for manufacturing?

  1. The Tech: What is currently being automated?
  2. The Customer: What technology would contractors/developers actually adopt?
  3. The Investment Opportunity: Is the time now?

11 of 25

Starting with the tech

  • The Tech: What is currently being automated?
  • The Customer: What technology would contractors/developers actually adopt?
  • The Investment Opportunity: Is the time now?

12 of 25

Today’s robotics companies take on the form of a subcontractor

Excavation

Foundation

Bricklaying

Framing

DryWall/

Plaster

Facade

Painting

Roofing

Cleaning

13 of 25

They adopt existing technology to automate

a construction-specific task

Group 1:

Autonomous software applied to traditional machinery

Group 2:

Manufacturing robotics applied to construction tasks

14 of 25

Most companies are currently in a pilot program,

1.5 - 2 years from a commercial ready product

Pilot w. Extra Engineering Oversight

Completed

Pilot

Commercially Ready Product

15 of 25

With so many tasks that we could possibly automate,

we need to look to the customer for direction

  • The Tech: What is currently being automated?
  • The Customer: What technology would contractors/developers actually adopt?
  • The Investment Opportunity: Is the Time Now?

16 of 25

The Customer: Large returns will come from selling to larger projects

Early Adopters

Late Adopters

Large Developers /Construction Companies Managing Budget $20 million plus

Multi-Family/Office Developers Managing Budget $5-$20 million

17 of 25

The Construction Manager

Curious. Risk Averse. Cost Conscious.

Unlike manufacturing in which there is a single owner who is incentivized to operate as efficiently as possible and invest in large CAPEX projects that pay off over time,

construction managers are motivated to turn around a single project as cost-effectively as possible while delivering to the architect’s specifications.

Furthermore, they only get a handful of projects a year, therefore they have a low willingness to experiment.

They would be open to new tech, if it was proven to reduce their costs.

18 of 25

The question becomes which vertical costs the most?

And if automated, where could the most value be captured?

Interviews with

Construction

Managers

& Superintendents

Interviews with Members of Construction Admin Program

19 of 25

Costs are heavily held up in a few core verticals, and then distributed widely across smaller tasks

20 of 25

Smaller tasks (cost wise) are being automated today

21 of 25

“Dry-Wall could be cool, but I still would just rather get the guys to do it.

That doesn’t cost that much to me.”

Construction Executive

22 of 25

We need to look at who is automating the tasks that cost the most

23 of 25

While the experimentation has begun, we have yet to see robots conquer these tasks at the scale needed for a large construction site

Cast in Place Concrete:

Steel

Curtain-walling

Samsung Experimented with CW in 2005, did not have successful results.

FACADE:

STRUCTURE:

MECHANICAL & PLUMBING

MIT robotically printed large foam structures for bigger concrete casting projects - still not at large development scale.

MX3D in Amsterdam made the first 3D printed steel bridge. Unclear if 3D printing is the future of large scale ‘autonomous steel.’

24 of 25

Investment direction: hold off for larger returns

While there is a major labor shortage threatening the construction industry- contractors & developers remain cost aware and risk averse. They are willing to adopt technology only when major cost savings are to be gained.

My conclusion for today is to hold off on further investment in this space until we see projects who are aiming to to tackle the following verticals at scale:

Keep a Lookout For:

Cast-in-Place Concrete

Steel Structure Installation

Curtain Wall Installation

25 of 25

Thank you!

Juliette Cilia

JCilia20@gsb.columbia.edu