Industry and Multi-Institution Interdisciplinary Partnerships and Their Role in Graduate BME Curriculum
Dhruv R. Seshadri, PhD
Assistant Professor
P.C. RCEAS
Dept of Bioengineering,
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
1
Nathan Jacobs, PhD
SD Academic and Impact Programming
Phil and Penny Knight Campus
Dept of Bioengineering,
Univ of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Theme 3: The future of graduate programs in biomedical engineering, May 30th, 2024
2
Connecting Academia and Industry via the Graduate Student
Faculty
Graduate Student
3
What Does Industry Seek?
Source: Johns Hopkins BME
4
NABC Model From Stanford Research Institute
Identifying Unmet Medical Need
I understand you want coffee (need). Let's go to Philz Coffee. (approach). It is close, the coffee and vibe is great, and we can continue working on our BIOE assignment (benefits). The alternative is Starbucks, which can be crowded (competition or alternative).
Pediatric patients who present with cleft pallet have a 23x higher likelihood of developing congenital heart disease. This often goes unmonitored. Current medical monitoring systems are not amenable to this population. (need). We seek to develop a flexible, wearable, epidermal device for monitoring key vitals in this vulnerable population. (approach). Our device will alleviate all known concerns with current monitoring systems (benefits). The alternative are wired systems which increase nurse and patient burden. (competition or alternative).
5
NABC Model Exercise
Form small group and develop an NABC model based needs from academic partners
Product Manager at a medical device company for their wearables business. How would your team present findings to management?
6
Connecting Academia and Industry via the Graduate Student
Success in biomedical engineering necessitates interdisciplinary, multi-institutional and industry partnerships (IMIIP) to harness the expertise of each group towards improving patient outcomes. It is critical to engage industry for the eventual broader application and adoption of the technologies and tools to realize the full potential and bring the benefits of these technological innovations to patients. The academic-industrial partnership model is expected to more readily overcome barriers to accelerating the development and adoption of promising tools and technologies faced by either academia or industry working alone.
The primary objective is to support milestone-driven, targeted technological development projects through strategic alliances and partnerships between academia and industry (e.g. sponsored research, senior design, contract research). The partners are expected to establish a robust engineering solution and develop tools and technologies that fulfill an unmet need in biomedical research or the practice of medicine. The goal is to support technological innovations that deliver new capabilities which can realize meaningful solutions within 5 – 10 years.
The session will focus on:
�
7
Connecting Academia and Industry via the Graduate Student
Fundamental Science to Platform Technology
Clinical Assessment of Technology
Commercialization
Example: Gx Sweat Patch
Pathway 1: Engineering Device
Pathway 2: Clinical Testing
Partner with Med Device/Pharma
(or Independent Validation)
Statistically sound trials
Disseminate Learnings via Peer Reviewed Approach
Example: BioCore and Concussions
Pathway 3: Partnership to Device
Partner with Med Device/Pharma
Independent Validation and Identify Critical Path Elements
Innovate based on Gaps🡪
Device with company
Example: Purdue, IU, Cook Medical for Pediatric Devices
Join our Google Doc to post responses
8
https://tinyurl.com/bdzj5ttc
9
Scope and Rationale
Goal: Defining the scope and rationale for including IMIIP training in the graduate BME curriculum.
https://tinyurl.com/bdzj5ttc
10
Strengths and Weaknesses
Goal: Comparative assessment of approaches as it relates to integrating the needs from industry towards further research efforts and graduates' education
https://tinyurl.com/bdzj5ttc
11
Identifying Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities
Goal: Discussion on gaps, challenges, and opportunities in implementing and sustaining IMIIP training within the graduate BME curriculum.
https://tinyurl.com/bdzj5ttc
12
Assessment Methods and Metrics
Goal: Examination of assessment methods and metrics for evaluating IMIIP training in the classroom and beyond, with a focus on measuring student outcomes, program effectiveness, and impact on career trajectories.
https://tinyurl.com/bdzj5ttc
13
Key Takeaways and Next Steps
Goal: Synthesis of key takeaways and exploration of actionable next steps for enhancing IMIIP training and shaping the future trajectory of BME education and professional development.
Long-term Vision: We want to publish these learnings to help biomedical engineering/bioengineering departments around the country tailor or adapt their programs to maximize the potential of their graduate students. If interested, please email Dhruv Seshadri at dhs223@lehigh.edu
14
NABC Model Exercise
Develop an NABC model based on industry needs from academic partners
Scenario: Hiring manager at partner industry company wants to explore internship/co-op opportunity