1 of 12

An awardees account of the DaCCoTA

Sanku Mallik

Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences

North Dakota State University

Fargo, ND 58105

Sanku.Mallik@ndsu.edu

1

2 of 12

Declarations

  • Presenter does not have any conflict of interest.

  • This conference is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54GM128729.

  • The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

2

3 of 12

Outcomes and content

  • Leverage NIH grant applications with DaCCoTA support

Strategies to increase competitiveness of NIH grant applications

Requirements of “Preliminary Results”

Common mistakes in grant applications

3

4 of 12

Background (Purpose)

  • My R01 award (1R01 GM114080; 2015 – 2019) was due for the renewal. However, without demonstrating the efficacy of the targeted nanoparticles in mice tumors, the chances of a “fundable score” was low.

  • So, I decided to defer the renewal application by an year, requested a no-cost extension from NIH, and decided to apply for a DaCCoTA grant for the animal experiments.

  • Feasibility application “Nanoparticles for drug delivery to triple-negative breast cancer.”
  • DaCCoTA funded the application in 2019.

4

5 of 12

Impact of the DaCCoTA award (Method)

  • With the award, we determined the efficacy of targeted nanoparticles in reducing triple-negative breast cancer in a mouse model.

  • We established a collaboration with an oncologic surgeon (Dr. Daniel M. Tuvin) at the Sanford Broadway Clinic, Fargo, North Dakota.

  • We received six patient samples of triple-negative breast cancer to generate patient-derived xenografts (PDX) for testing the nanoparticles.

5

6 of 12

Results from the DaCCoTA award

  • The award led to three peer-reviewed publications in American Chemical Society journals.
  • The published results formed the critical component of “Progress Report and Preliminary Studies” for successful NIH R01 award renewal in 2020 (2 R01 GM114080).
  • The R01 grant allowed me to continue to serve as the PI for a COBRE Phase 2 application (2 P20 GM109024; Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Pancreatic Cancer). I also “drafted” Dr. Venkatachalem to serve as the Co-Director for the COBRE Center.
  • We submitted the COBRE renewal application on September 27, 2021. We received the Impact Score in February 2022. It was “certainly within the striking distance.”
  • NIGMS COBRE Grants Management Specialist asked us to submit the “JIT Information” on April 25, 2022. We submitted the documents on May 02, 2022.
  • We received another request from NIGMS COBRE Grants Management Specialist on June 02 to submit IACUC approval pages for the three projects. We submitted the documents on June 17.
  • We received an email from the Grants Management Specialist on July 06 saying “we are aiming for July 15th for the NoA to be posted.” Current status of the application in eRA Commons is “award prepared.”

6

7 of 12

Results from another DaCCoTA award

  • I wanted to develop a new R01 proposal to NIH, probing the mechanisms of gender variation in the severity of Covid-19 infection.

  • To obtain the “Preliminary Results,” I applied and received a DaCCoTA Pilot Project award on Covid infection severity in patients with lung metastatic breast cancer.

  • The Pilot Project expanded the triple-negative breast cancer PDX models into a biobank containing 250 frozen tumor tissues and 40 primary cell cultures.

  • We are using the biobank to study if hypoxia overexpresses the two proteins responsible for the cellular internalization of the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, we have not published the results yet.

  • Hence, we submitted an NIH R03 application (1 R03 CA277207-01; Expressions of ACE2 receptor in male and female lung cancer patients under hypoxia) to obtain additional results for an R01 application.

7

8 of 12

Overall impact of the DaCCoTA awards (Conclusions)

8

  • The two DaCCoTA awards helped me tremendously to continue to conduct nationally-competitive research and fulfill my career goals.

  • The same opportunity is available to all awardees.

9 of 12

Methods to increase competitiveness of NIH proposals

  • Select the appropriate collaborator with complementary expertise directly related to the project.

  • Plan ahead; think critically. Do I have sufficient published preliminary results? If not, postpone the proposal submission and apply for the appropriate DaCCoTA support.

  • The peer reviews of the DaCCoTA proposal will allow you to improve the NIH application. The support will provide the necessary preliminary results.

  • Clinical collaborators and the use of PDX cancer models are viewed favorably by the NIH Study Sections (translational aspects of foundational projects).

  • If the DaCCoTA project is progressing slowly, apply for a no-cost extension. Instead of an R01 application, consider R03 or R21 proposals.

9

10 of 12

Requirements of Preliminary Results

  • For R01 applications, published preliminary results are mandatory. Use DaCCoTA support and publish to demonstrate the feasibility of each Specific Aim.

  • Publish papers with the clinical collaborator to demonstrate to the reviewer that you have an established clinical collaboration.

10

11 of 12

Common mistakes in NIH grant applications

  • The Specific Aims are sequential; success of Aim 2 depends on completion of Aim 1.

  • No clinical collaborator or PDX models of cancer to show future translational aspects of the project.

  • Insufficient preliminary results to demonstrate feasibility of the proposed studies or the results lack scientific rigor.

11

12 of 12

Acknowledgments

  • DaCCoTA (NIGMS, U54GM128729)
  • Pilot Projects Program: Dr. Sathish Venkatachalem – discussion on the feasibility of the idea, relevance to DaCCoTA, animal experiments, translational aspects.

  • Clinical Research Resources and Facilities Core: Tabatha Lemke, Miranda Ruiter – IRB application, patient sample procurement.

  • Confocal fluorescence microscope: Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, purchased with DaCCoTA funds.

  • NIH (NIGMS) 2R01 GM114080

  • NIH COBRE Animal Studies Core Facility (1 P20 GM109024)

12

  • Dr. Satish Venkatachalem, NDSU

  • Dr. Jiyan Mohammad

  • Dr. Narendra Kale

  • Shubhashri Ambhore
  • Connor Edvall
  • Babak Mamnoon
  • Parinaz Ghanbari