1 of 11

Follow the Money:�Paying for the Cloud

Jonathan WhiteCloud & Infrastructure Strategist�University of Central Florida

Cloud Forum 2019

Ben RotaAssociate Director, Technology Development�Harvard University

Helen Hockx YuEnterprise Data Architect�University of Notre Dame

Noah AbrahamsonDirector, Technology Consulting Group�Stanford University

Martin SagerComputer Services Manager�University of Michigan

2 of 11

TBM: Communicating the true TCO for IT to your customers by establishing a common language and taxonomy

Cost Pools

Internal�Services

Telecom

Facilities�& Power

Outside�Services

Internal�Labor

External�Labor

Resources

End User

Application

Delivery

IT�Management

Security & Compliance

Output

Network

Storage

Compute

Data Center

Services

University IT Capabilities

Existing (Run) Portfolio

University View

Finance View

IT View

Delivery Services

Platform Services

Infrastructure Services

University Application Services

End User Services

Software

Hardware

Other

Emerging

Transform Portfolio�Examples: ERP Virtualization, UCF IT

Grow Portfolio�Example: UCF Downtown Campus

3 of 11

4 of 11

Organization

  • HUIT is a central, cost-recovery business unit within a distributed University

Paying for Cloud costs

  • Direct contracts with the three major IaaS providers
  • Bill is paid centrally
  • Custom, in-house billing software parses the bill and re-charges to local billing codes

Paying for people costs

  • Engineers providing instance management paid for by weighted instance count (larger instance sizes result in higher charge)
  • Dedicated, embedded engineers paid for by normalized FTE rate
  • Cloud networking, consulting, and security paid for by an awkward combination of a headcount-based charge and a per-VPC charge

Paying for Cloud migration program

  • Funded entirely on reserves, with the expectation of recouping costs
  • Debt was eventually partially funded by central funds

5 of 11

6 of 11

7 of 11

8 of 11

9 of 11

Noah Abrahamson�Stanford University

DIRECTOR, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING GROUP

�all cost recovery

  • “Fully Managed” vs “Augmented Support” vs “No Managed” experiences�Fully Managed gets you a full account; one account per billing code

Dozens, hundreds of discrete accounts that roll into an invoice�Rebilled in arrears�

  • Augmented Support gets you guardrails, consultation, audits�Useful for PHI and local IT support�
  • No managed support gets you infrastructure and KB articles��
  • Fully Managed Experience�$177 or $143/hour�+ statement of work�+ MRC that “seems fair” � recover work where appropriate��
  • Augmented Support�2 hours of T&M for setup, consult�½ hour of T&M monthly recurring�2.5% of the cloud spend��
  • Stanford Research Computing Center�partially subsidized, cost recovery�“buy shares” of computing infra�statement of work to recover��
  • Scalr partnership for self-service portal, terraform-based with a light skim by reselling RIs �

10 of 11

ITS - University of Michigan

  • Provide Security guard rails
  • Providing cloud training with vendors
  • Grant assistance
  • Centralized billing - usage recharged out to units
  • Requests for assistance support starting to reach team capacity limits

11 of 11

Follow the Money:�Paying for the Cloud

Jonathan WhiteCloud & Infrastructure Strategist�University of Central Florida

Cloud Forum 2019

Ben RotaAssociate Director, Technology Development�Harvard University

Helen Hockx YuEnterprise Data Architect�University of Notre Dame

Noah AbrahamsonDirector, Technology Consulting Group�Stanford University

Martin SagerComputer Services Manager�University of Michigan