Site Supervision�&�Operations
Dr Adewale Abimbola, FHEA, GMICE
aabimbola@cavc.ac.uk
Aim and Objectives
Aim: Construction Planning Techniques
Objectives: At the end of the lesson, the students should be able to:
Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria
P5. Describe the key principles of construction project management.
M3. Compare different techniques for planning and managing resources.
INTRODUCTION - THE PRINCIPLES OF CONSTRUCTION PLANNING���
Figure 1. Iron triangle — triple constraints of project management (Dhillon, 2018).
Contract, or Master, Programme
Figure 2. An example of a contract, or master, programme (March, 2017).
Build-up of Operational Duration for Contract Programmes
1) From experience: the contractor will, over the years and from many projects, build up a library of information based on experience and feedback of data, such that labour and plant work rates, or outputs, often referred to as ‘constants’, are known.
2) From building price books: these present labour and plant constants for many operations in all fields of construction,
Check the Appendices for some build-up calculations.
Preparation of a Contract, or Master, Programme
Preparation of a full working contract, or master, programme for a building project involves detailed consideration of the following tasks:
(i) abstract quantities from the bill of quantities
(ii) develop a method statement
(iii) compile a programme calculation sheet
(iv) draw up a contract, or master, programme
(v) consider, if appropriate, the contribution of short-term programming
(vi) profile labour and plant requirements.
Figure 2. An example of a contract, or master, programme (March, 2017).
Preparation of a Contract, or Master, Programme
Preparation of a full working contract, or master, programme for a building project involves detailed consideration of the following tasks:
Figure 3. An example page of an abstract of quantities used in the preparation of a contract programme (March, 2017)
Preparation of a Contract, or Master, Programme
Preparation of a full working contract, or master, programme for a building project involves detailed consideration of the following tasks (cont’d):
(ii) develop a method statement
Figure 4. An example page of a method statement used in the preparation of a contract programme (March, 2017).
Preparation of a Contract, or Master, Programme
Preparation of a full working contract, or master, programme for a building project involves detailed consideration of the following tasks (Cont’d):
(iii) compile a programme calculation sheet
Figure 5. An example page of a programme calculation sheet used in the preparation of a contract programme (March, 2017).
(Check Appendices for some build-up calculations).
Preparation of a Contract, or Master, Programme
Preparation of a full working contract, or master, programme for a building project involves detailed consideration of the following tasks (cont’d):
(iv) draw up a contract, or master, programme
Figure 2. An example of a contract, or master, programme (March, 2017).
Preparation of a Contract, or Master, Programme
Preparation of a full working contract, or master, programme for a building project involves detailed consideration of the following tasks (cont’d):
(v) Consideration of short-term programming
(vi) Profiling the labour and plant requirements
Figure 6. An example of a resource programme (March, 2017)
Construction Planning Techniques
13
Construction Planning Techniques
In general, two construction planning methods are adopted in practice by most contracting organisations. These are bar charts and networks.
Networks are usually adopted by the organisation for the purpose of providing highly detailed programming for a project.
Bar charts used at the project site for clarity and ease of communication in conveying to site personnel the basis of the siteworks programme.
Planning Techniques: Bar Charts�
���
Figure 7. Example bar chart showing simple resource deployment information (March, 2017).
Planning Techniques: Gantt Charts��
What the advantages and disadvantages?
���
Construction Planning Techniques – Network Analysis
Figure 8. Nomenclature for compiling an arrow network diagram (March, 2017).
Figure 9. Nomenclature for compiling a precedence network diagram (March, 2017).
Planning Techniques – Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
PERT is a network analysis technique used to estimate project duration when there is a high degree of uncertainty about the individual activity duration estimates.
PERT uses probabilistic time estimates.
PERT weighted average =
optimistic time + (4 X most likely time) + pessimistic time
6
Example:
PERT weighted average =
8 + (4 X 10) + 24 = 12 days
6
where optimistic time= 8 days, most likely time = 10 days, & pessimistic time = 24 days
Therefore, you would use 12 days on the network diagram instead of 10 when using PERT for the above example.
Example 1 – PERT
Using the information in the table below;
All time in weeks.
Activity/Task | Optimistic (O) | Realistic (R) | Pessimistic (P) | PERT time t = (O + 4R + P)/6 (Expected duration) | predecessor |
A | 2 | 3 | 4 | | |
B | 1 | 2 | 3 | | A |
C | 3 | 5 | 7 | | A |
D | 2 | 5 | 8 | | C |
E | 3 | 4 | 5 | | B |
F | 8 | 10 | 18 | | D |
G | 3 | 3 | 9 | | D, E |
H | 6 | 6 | 12 | | F, G |
Example 1 – Solution
Activity/Task | Optimistic (O) | Realistic (R) | Pessimistic (P) | PERT time t = (O + 4R + P) /6 (Expected duration) | predecessor |
A | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |
B | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | A |
C | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | A |
D | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 | C |
F | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | B |
G | 8 | 10 | 18 | 11 | D |
H | 3 | 3 | 9 | 4 | D, E |
I | 6 | 6 | 12 | 7 | F, G |
All time in weeks.
Example 1 – Solution
Construct the project network
Activity/Task | PERT time t = (O + 4R + P) /6 (Expected duration) | predecessor |
A | 3 | |
B | 2 | A |
C | 5 | A |
D | 5 | C |
E | 4 | B |
F | 11 | D |
G | 4 | D, E |
H | 7 | F, G |
Example 1 – Solution
Find the critical path and expected project completion time.
Example 1 – PERT
Activity/Task | Optimistic (O) | Realistic (R) | Pessimistic (P) | PERT time t = (O + 4R + P) /6 (Expected duration) | predecessor |
A | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |
B | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | A |
C | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | A |
D | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 | C |
E | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | B |
F | 8 | 10 | 18 | 11 | D |
G | 3 | 3 | 9 | 4 | D, E |
H | 6 | 6 | 12 | 7 | F, G |
Self-assessment Task 1 - PERT
Using the information in the table below;
All time in days.
Activity/Task | Activity - Installing Roof Trusses | Optimistic (O) | Realistic (R) | Pessimistic (P) | PERT time t = (O + 4R + P) /6 (Expected duration) | predecessor |
A | Clear site and stabilise the ground | 3 | 5 | 7 | | |
B | Erect scaffolding | 2 | 4 | 6 | | A |
C | Deliver mobile crane and timber materials | 1 | 2 | 5 | | A |
D | Install wall plates | 2 | 3 | 4 | | B, C |
E | Install trusses and bracings | 5 | 7 | 10 | | D |
F | Install felt and battens | 6 | 8 | 11 | | E |
G | Handover to roofers | 1 | 2 | 2 | | F |
Self-assessment Task 2 - PERT
Using the information in the table below;
All time in days.
Activity/Task | Optimistic (O) | Realistic (R) | Pessimistic (P) | PERT time t = (O + 4R + P) /6 (Expected duration) | predecessor |
A | 3 | 4 | 8 | | - |
B | 5 | 10 | 12 | | - |
C | 2 | 3 | 5 | | A |
D | 1 | 2 | 4 | | B |
E | 8 | 10 | 12 | | C |
F | 6 | 9 | 13 | | D |
G | 3 | 6 | 9 | | E, F |
Critical Path
Programme Float
Planning Techniques: Critical Path Method (CPM)
���
Planning Techniques: Critical Path Method (CPM)�
���
Example 2
Activity/Task | Duration (days) | predecessor |
A | 3 | |
B | 8 | A |
C | 10 | A |
D | 12 | C |
E | 15 | B |
F | 9 | D, E |
G | 13 | F |
H | 5 | F |
I | 2 | A |
J | 5 | G, H, I |
Example 2: Solution
Activity/Task | Duration (days) | predecessor |
A | 3 | |
B | 8 | A |
C | 10 | A |
D | 12 | C |
E | 15 | B |
F | 9 | D, E |
G | 13 | F |
H | 5 | F |
I | 2 | A |
J | 5 | G, H, I |
Example 2: Solution
Example 2: Solution
Self-assessment Task 3 – CPM
Activity/Task | Days ending | predecessor |
A | 7 | |
B | 15 | A |
C | 10 | A |
D | 12 | B |
E | 17 | C, D |
Self-assessment Task 4 – CPM
Activity/Task | Days ending | predecessor |
A | 6 | - |
B | 9 | A |
C | 8 | A |
D | 7 | B |
E | 11 | B, C |
F | 3 | C |
G | 1 | D, E, F |
Similarities – PERT & CPM
Graphically display the precedence relationships & sequence of activities
Estimate the project’s duration
Identify critical activities that cannot be delayed without delaying the project
Estimate the amount of slack/float associated with non-critical activities
Major Difference – PERT & CPM
Program Evaluation & Review Technique (PERT):
Many tasks pushed the boundaries of science & engineering (tasks’ duration = probabilistic)
Critical Path Method (CPM):
A complex undertaking, but individual tasks are routine (tasks’ duration = deterministic)
References/Bibliography
Calculating Durations for Labour Inputs to the Programme
Example
Suppose a bricklayer had to build a one-brick thick (215 mm) wall, 20 metres long by 3 metres in height. How long would this take?
Solution
Volume of work: 20 X 3 = 60 m^2
60 m^2 of 215 mm brickwork = 7,200 bricks approx. qty
[For a one-brick wall, 1 m2 = 120 bricks (Flemish or English bond)]
A bricklayer can lay 50 bricks per hour (Labour constant)
Therefore, Volume of work (qty)/work output = 7,200/50 = 144 hours
Convert the rate into unit of measure used on the programme, i.e. week (40 hours).
Therefore, duration = 144 / 40 = 3.6 weeks for one operative
In simplified term, the duration would be 0.9 weeks for a gang of 4 operatives.
The constitution of the work gang, i.e. the ratio, in a situation such as that given, would be 4 to 1 or 4 to 2 depending on the requirements of the work, where one or two general operatives are deployed to assist the four trade operatives.
Appendix A
Calculating Durations for Plant Inputs to the Programme
Example
Suppose an operation involves excavating 5000 m^3 of spoil with an excavator performance output of 25 m^3/hr (constant). How long would this take?
Solution
Machine output = Volume of excavated material / total plant hours
Therefore constant = Volume/duration
Or
25 = 5000 / duration
Duration = 5000/25 = 200 machine hours
Convert the rate into unit of measure used on the programme, i.e. week (40 hours)
Therefore,
Duration = 200 / 40 = 5 weeks
Appendix B
Calculating Durations for Plant Inputs to the Programme
Example
Suppose the same excavating operation as before, i.e. 5000 m^3 of spoil, is to be excavated in 20 working days. What is the required machine output to achieve this?
Solution
Total plant hours = 20 (days) X 8 (hours/day) = 160 hours
Therefore required output is = Volume of excavated material / total plant hours
= 5000 / 160 = 32 m^3 per hour.
Example
Suppose an excavator with an output of 36 m^3 per hour is being used and the spoil must be removed by lorries with 3 m^3 capacity to a spoil tip with a 20 minute cycle time. How many lorries will be required?
Solution
Number of lorries = cycle time / loading time
Loading time = machine output / capacity = 36 /3 = 12 lorry loads/hour or 5 mins loading time
Therefore,
Number of lorries = cycle time / loading time
= 20 mins / 5 mins = 4 lorries
The cycle of operations involve the time taken to load the lorry; and the time taken to travel to the tip, off-load and return – for the four lorries over a one-hour cycle.
Appendix C