UniversiUtrecht
(except logos)
Open Science – wat? hoe? ik?
Track 10: Open en innovatief – wat betekent dat voor mij
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman,
KNVI Jaarcongres 2016, Nieuwegein, 10 november 2016
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman
Shared presentation
What do researchers do all day? �examples of (closed) research practices
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
A model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writing
publication
outreach
assessment
discovery
A model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writing
publication
outreach
assessment
discovery
Preparation:
Discovery:
Analysis:
Writing:
Publication:
Outreach:
Assessment:
A model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writing
publication
outreach
assessment
discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
adapted from:
Marina Noordegraaf – Open Science: op zoek naar de schatten Vogin cursus 2016
Open Science
articles
posters
presentations
blog posts
social media conversations
study registrations
protocols
funding proposals
data management �plans
lab notebooks
research data
peer review
Open Science
Open Science is more than having publications and data openly available …
Open Science implies openly creating, sharing and assessing research, wherever viable
Open Science – 6 shades of open
Educational
Resources
Source
Data
Hardware
Access
Science
Open Science practices
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
open peer review •
open (lab)notes •
plain language •
open drafting •
open access •
CC-0/BY •
good
efficient
open
technical changes & standards
research governance changes
economic
& copyright changes
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government
library
Charters, manifestos and declarations
2003: Berlin Declaration
2012: San Francisco DORA
2015: Leiden Manifesto
2015: The Hague Declaration
And 50+ more …
(access)
(assessment)
(metrics use)
(data)
Government, funder and institutional policies
“Calls …. to further develop the European Open Science Agenda, in order to further increase the impact of science to society at large, to stimulate an effective mobilization of all the
potential knowledge from open science actions.”
“As such, we must all examine old positions on the dissemination of research outputs and have the courage to rise to the challenge which Open Science brings.”
“De Universiteit Utrecht loopt binnen Europa voorop op het gebied van open science, vanuit de overtuiging dat wetenschappelijk onderzoek haar rol in het bijdragen aan oplossingen voor complexe problemen beter kan leveren als kennis zo veel en zo snel mogelijk gedeeld wordt.”
NWO asks researchers to publish in a completely Open Access journal (Golden Road) or to deposit the article in a centrally managed, findable database of the university or professional discipline (Green Road).
[Data:] "Open where possible, protected where needed"
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
UniversiUtrecht
(except logos)
Open Science – wat? hoe? ik?
Track 10: Open en innovatief – wat betekent dat voor mij
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman,
KNVI Jaarcongres 2016, Nieuwegein, 10 november 2016
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman
adapted from:
Marina Noordegraaf – Open Science: op zoek naar de schatten Vogin cursus 2016
Open Science
articles
posters
presentations
blog posts
social media conversations
study registrations
protocols
funding proposals
data management �plans
lab notebooks
research data
peer review
Do researchers support Open Science �in theory ?
i.e. openly creating, sharing and assessing research, wherever viable
Open Science practices
preparation
analysis
writing
publication
outreach
assessment
discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
�Searching information with open tools
Sciences
Social Sciences
Arts & Hum.
Project: editor of PhilPapers category on Political Obligation
Who?
link:
How?
Discovery
Analysis
Writing
Publication
Outreach
Assessment
Preparation
What?
Sharing preprints
Sciences
Social Sciences
Arts & Hum.
Project: Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of�protein complexes
Who?
link:
How?
Discovery
Analysis
Writing
Publication
Outreach
Assessment
Preparation
What?
�Sharing posters
Sciences
Social Sciences
Arts & Hum.
Project: Sexual development among Dutch youth: The role of psychological and physical factors
Who?
link:
How?
Discovery
Analysis
Writing
Publication
Outreach
Assessment
Preparation
What?
�[Research practice]
Sciences
Social Sciences
Arts & Hum.
Project: …
Who?
link:
How?
Discovery
Analysis
Writing
Publication
Outreach
Assessment
Preparation
[or add tool logo]
What?
Who are the Open Science practitioners?
Some tools for finding them
Search data/code archives & OS platforms:
Search academic networks:
Search scholarly blogs:
Search Twitter for “Open Science” in tweets/bio:
Browse to see who registers PR at Publons:
Search preprint archives archives:
Look for people doing active outreach:
�Sharing videoregistration of research experiments
Sciences
Social Sciences
Arts & Hum.
Project: Martian groundwater outflow processes and morphology, reconstruction of paleohydrology using landscape evolution experiments
Who?
link:
How?
Discovery
Analysis
Writing
Publication
Outreach
Assessment
Preparation
[or add tool logo]
What?
�Sharing knowledge online through podcast
Sciences
Social Sciences
Arts & Hum.
Project: In-house contracts and public-public cooperation issues under Directive 2014/24/EU
Who?
link:
How?
Discovery
Analysis
Writing
Publication
Outreach
Assessment
Preparation
[or add tool logo]
What?
�Sharing conference posters
Sciences
Social Sciences
Arts & Hum.
Project: Thrombosis in organs in chips
Who?
link:
How?
Discovery
Analysis
Writing
Publication
Outreach
Assessment
Preparation
[or add tool logo]
What?
Enabling and constraining contexts of �choosing open and reproducible workflows
Enabling and constraining contexts of �choosing open and reproducible workflows
political support at (inter)national level •
pressure from funders •
public stance on Open Science by institution •
user-friendly and powerful tools •
interoperability •
role models •
attention for positive effects •
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
UniversiUtrecht
(except logos)
Open Science – wat? hoe? ik?
Track 10: Open en innovatief – wat betekent dat voor mij
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman,
KNVI Jaarcongres 2016, Nieuwegein, 10 november 2016
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman
adapted from:
Marina Noordegraaf – Open Science: op zoek naar de schatten Vogin cursus 2016
Open Science
articles
posters
presentations
blog posts
social media conversations
study registrations
protocols
funding proposals
data management �plans
lab notebooks
research data
peer review
Questions for ourselves:�(librarians / information professionals)
Do researchers support Open Science �in theory ?
i.e. openly creating, sharing and assessing research, wherever viable
Open Science practices
preparation
analysis
writing
publication
outreach
assessment
discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
Enabling and constraining contexts of �choosing open and reproducible workflows
political support at (inter)national level •
pressure from funders •
public stance on Open Science by institution •
user-friendly and powerful tools •
interoperability •
role models •
attention for positive effects •
Questions for ourselves:�(librarians / information professionals)
Concrete actions
Types /levels of research support
| Inform | Support | Advise, advocate | (Co-)shape policies |
e.g.: | Info on website, in LibGuides etc. | Offer training, Q&A | What is a good choice, why, what is important | Think with institution, graduate schools etc. |
asks for: | Knowledge, organizing info | Communication skills, expertise | Advocating priorities, field-specific knowledge; a vision | Authority, role being accepted |
workshopresultaat: Open Science acties op “inform” niveau |
|
workshopresultaat: Open Science acties op “support” niveau |
|
workshopresultaat: Open Science acties op “advise/advocate” niveau |
|
workshopresultaat: Open Science acties op “policy (co-)shaping” niveau |
|
Government, funder and institutional policies
“Calls …. to further develop the European Open Science Agenda, in order to further increase the impact of science to society at large, to stimulate an effective mobilization of all the
potential knowledge from open science actions.”
“As such, we must all examine old positions on the dissemination of research outputs and have the courage to rise to the challenge which Open Science brings.”
“De Universiteit Utrecht loopt binnen Europa voorop op het gebied van open science, vanuit de overtuiging dat wetenschappelijk onderzoek haar rol in het bijdragen aan oplossingen voor complexe problemen beter kan leveren als kennis zo veel en zo snel mogelijk gedeeld wordt.”
NWO asks researchers to publish in a completely Open Access journal (Golden Road) or to deposit the article in a centrally managed, findable database of the university or professional discipline (Green Road).
[Data:] "Open where possible, protected where needed"
“Openness and Outreach!
Together with an efficient workflow and
minimal costs for researchers.
�Impact should be shared with and created by the public. That is only possible with Open Science.”
http://101innovations.wordpress.com