1 of 39

EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS

1

OFFICE EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT

2 of 39

CE PRE-TEST.

2

Please complete this pre-test on your phone or computer in order to receive CE credit for participation in this workshop. You can access the pre-test at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/eplpre

3 of 39

DISCLOSURES

3

Participants must attend 100% of this workshop.

Participants must complete the evaluation survey at the beginning and end of the workshop

No relevant financial relationships to disclose with ineligible companies.

4 of 39

LEARNING OBJECTIVES.

4

    • Conduct a history and physical exam for first trimester bleeding to help distinguish normal from abnormal pregnancies.
    • Interpret ultrasound and labs results to diagnose early pregnancy loss (EPL)
    • Describe the three options for management of EPL

- Expectant management

- Medical management

- Aspiration procedure management

5 of 39

TERMINOLOGY

5

MISCARRIAGE

EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS (EPL)

SPONTANEOUS ABORTION

Interchangeable for a nonviable pregnancy in the first trimester (<13 weeks of gestation); preferred terminology is early pregnancy loss (EPL)

6 of 39

Additional Terminology

6

  • Threatened Abortion
  • Incomplete Abortion
  • Missed Abortion
  • Anembryonic Pregnancy
  • Embryonic or Fetal Demise
  • Ectopic Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy of Unknown Location (PUL)

7 of 39

EPIDEMIOLOGY

7

  • 1 in 4 women* will experience EPL

  • 10% of clinically diagnosed pregnancies

  • 50% caused by chromosomal abnormalities

  • The most common risk factors are advanced maternal age and a previous pregnancy loss

8 of 39

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF EPL

8

      • Vaginal bleeding
      • Pelvic pain or cramping
      • Absent fetal heart tones on Doppler when pregnancy should be > 10 weeks
      • Size-dates discrepancy on bimanual exam
      • POCs seen by clinician at cervical os or in vaginal vault on speculum exam

9 of 39

1ST TRIMESTER BLEEDING ALGORITHM

9

10 of 39

ALGORITHM FOR DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY OF UNKNOWN LOCATION (PUL)

10

11 of 39

DIAGNOSIS – ULTRASOUND FINDINGS

11

Table 2. Guidelines for Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Pregnancy Failure in a Woman with an Intrauterine Pregnancy of Uncertain Viability

Findings Diagnostic of Pregnancy Failure

Findings Suspicious for, but not Diagnostic of, Pregnancy Failure

  • Crown-rump length of ≥ 7 mm and no heartbeat
  • Mean sac diameter of ≥ 25 mm and no embryo
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat ≥ 2 wk after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat ≥ 11 days after a scan that showed a gestational sac with a yolk sac
  • Crown-rump length of < 7 mm and no heartbeat
  • Mean sac diameter of 16-24 mm and no embryo
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat 7-13 days after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat 7-10 days after a scan that showed a gestational sac with a yolk sac
  • Absence of embryo ≥ 6 wk after last menstrual period
  • Empty amnion (amnion seen adjacent to yolk sac, with no visible embryo)
  • Enlarged yolk sac (> 7 mm)
  • Small gestational sac in relation to the size of the embryo (< 5 mm difference between mean sac diameter and crown-rump length)

12 of 39

DIAGNOSIS – ULTRASOUND FINDINGS

12

CLASSIFICATION

VAGINAL BLEEDING

ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS

PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION SEEN ON ULTRASOUND

COMPLETE EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS

Little or none

Any, though typically < 30 mm

None

INCOMPLETE EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS

Little or none

Any

Heterogenous tissues (with or without a gestational sac) distorting the endometrial midline

EMBRYONIC OR FETAL DEMISE

Yes or no

Any

Gestational sac with fetal tissue (i.e., fetal pole or yolk sac) present, meeting ultrasound criteria for SAB (i.e. >7 mm with no FH)

ANEMBRYONIC PREGNANCY

Yes or no

Any

Gestational sac without fetal tissue (i.e. no fetal pole or yolk sac) present, meeting ultrasound criteria for SAB (i.e. MSD > 25 mm without yolk sac)

13 of 39

OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT

13

EXPECTANT

Watchful waiting

MEDICATION

PROCEDURE

Mifepristone*

+

Misoprostol

Uterine Aspiration

* Mifepristone is not always available. With mifepristone, the success rate is 84% overall. With only misoprostol, the success rate is 67% overall.

* Mifepristone is not always available. With mifepristone, the success rate is 84% overall. With only misoprostol, the success rate is 67% overall.

14 of 39

PATIENT CASE: JENNIFER

14

  • She/Her pronouns
  • 22 years old
  • LMP was 7 weeks ago
  • Positive urine pregnancy
  • She is having some vaginal bleeding

ADDITIONAL HISTORY? AND ON PHYSICAL?

15 of 39

1ST TRIMESTER BLEEDING ALGORITHM

15

16 of 39

JENNIFER’S ULTRASOUND.

16

ANEMBRYONIC GESTATION

Mean sac diameter >25 mm with no embryo

17 of 39

DIAGNOSIS – ULTRASOUND FINDINGS

17

Table 2. Guidelines for Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Pregnancy Failure in a Woman with an Intrauterine Pregnancy of Uncertain Viability

Findings Diagnostic of Pregnancy Failure

Findings Suspicious for, but not Diagnostic of, Pregnancy Failure

  • Crown-rump length of ≥ 7 mm and no heartbeat
  • Mean sac diameter of ≥ 25 mm and no embryo
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat ≥ 2 wk after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat ≥ 11 days after a scan that showed a gestational sac with a yolk sac
  • Crown-rump length of < 7 mm and no heartbeat
  • Mean sac diameter of 16-24 mm and no embryo
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat 7-13 days after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac
  • Absence of embryo with heartbeat 7-10 days after a scan that showed a gestational sac with a yolk sac
  • Absence of embryo ≥ 6 wk after last menstrual period
  • Empty amnion (amnion seen adjacent to yolk sac, with no visible embryo)
  • Enlarged yolk sac (> 7 mm)
  • Small gestational sac in relation to the size of the embryo (< 5 mm difference between mean sac diameter and crown-rump length)

18 of 39

PATIENT CASE: JENNIFER

18

  • This is not her fault
  • She can decide on the management option

What does she need to know?

19 of 39

EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

19

20 of 39

SUCCESS OF EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

20

Group

N

Complete Day 7

Complete Day 14

Success Day 49

Incomplete

221

117 (53%)

185 (84%)

201 (91%)

Fetal demise

138

41 (30%)

81 (59%)

105 (76%)

Anembryonic

92

23 (25%)

48 (52%)

61 (66%)

TOTAL

451

181 (40%)

314 (70%)

367 (81%)

21 of 39

21

RISKS

  • Timing not predictable
  • Less effective
  • Infection (rare)
  • Need for emergent uterine aspiration (rare)
  • Hemorrhage/transfusion (very rare)

EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

BENEFITS

  • Noninvasive
  • More Private
  • More “natural”
  • Inexpensive
  • No medication side effects
  • Availability

Butler et al J Fam Pract 2005 54:889-90

22 of 39

PATIENT INSTRUCTIONS: EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

22

  • Expect cramping and heavy bleeding

  • Pain control: ibuprofen, +/- low dose narcotic, heating pad

  • Call for “heavy bleeding”: soaking through ≥ 2 pads per hour for two hours in a row

  • Give contact information for reaching clinician

  • Patient does NOT need to bring products of conception back to the clinician

23 of 39

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT: MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL

23

Jennifer does not want to wait anymore

24 of 39

24

RISKS

  • Side effects from medications
  • Infection (rare)
  • Need for aspiration (rare)
  • Hemorrhage or transfusion (rare)
  • Mifepristone not available widely

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

BENEFITS

  • Timing of bleeding more predictable than expectant management
  • Noninvasive
  • Private
  • Inexpensive
  • Flexible timing

25 of 39

SUCCESS RATES WITH MISOPROSTOL ALONE VS MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL

25

25

SUCCESS RATE (EXPULSION OF GESTATIONAL SAC) BY DAY 2

MISOPROSTOL ALONE

MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL

ALL SUBCATEGORIES OF EPL

67%

84%

EMBRYONIC DEMISE

68%

85%

ANEMBRYONIC

65%

80%

Medical management can be done with misoprostol alone or with the combination of mifepristone followed by misoprostol 24 hours later.

26 of 39

GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

26

1. Candidates

Those with diagnosis of nonviable intrauterine pregnancy less than 12 weeks by ultrasound

2. Labs

      • Rh screen if > 8 weeks (if status is not available)
      • Hematocrit
      • Quantitative serum hCG (quant not always needed if ultrasound diagnosis is definitive)
      • Consider gonorrhea/chlamydia if patient is at risk

3. Consent forms

Danco or GenBioPro mifepristone agreement; consider additional evidence-based consent form

27 of 39

GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

27

1. Mifepristone 200mg (one tab) orally

      • Dispensed in the office
      • Patient instructed to take when convenient

2. Misoprostol 800mcg (four tabs) vaginally

      • If prescribed with mifepristone, use 24 hours following mifepristone
      • If prescribed alone, use when convenient
      • Repeat misoprostol dose if no bleeding or only light bleeding

3. Pain management

      • Ibuprofen 600-800 mg Q6 hours
      • A few tablets of narcotics available if needed

28 of 39

SIDE EFFECTS OF MISOPROSTOL

28

  • Bleeding
  • Cramping
  • Low grade fevers and/or chills
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Diarrhea

All side effects should resolve within 24 hours

29 of 39

PATIENT INSTRUCTIONS

29

  • Lie down for 30 minutes after using misoprostol; okay if medication falls out after 30 minutes

  • Warning signs same as for expectant management:
      • Call for “heavy bleeding,” fever, purulent vaginal discharge, or uncontrolled pain not improved with medication
      • Patient does NOT need to bring products of conception back to the clinician
      • Contact information for reaching clinician

30 of 39

WHAT DO YOU NEED TO START USING MEDICATION FOR EPL IN YOUR PRACTICE?

30

Office aspiration or referral

A PLAN FOR WHEN MEDICATION DOESN’T WORK

DANCO CONSENT FORM

PATIENT HANDOUTS

ORDER MIFEPRISTONE TO STOCK IN OFFICE

CLINICAL GUIDELINES

ON-CALL GROUP ALL FAMILIAR WITH MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

RESOURCE FOR HANDOUTS: WWW.REPRODUCTIVEACCESS.ORG

31 of 39

DIAGNOSING COMPLETION AFTER MEDICAL MANAGEMNT OF EPL

31

  • Quant bHCG drop of more than 50% 48 hours or 80% by 7 days

  • Vaginal ultrasound with no sac or pregnancy after prior ultrasound documenting intrauterine pregnancy�

32 of 39

OFFICE PROCEDURE OPTION: UTERINE ASPIRATION

32

32

Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA)

            • Sharp curettage (D&C) no longer an acceptable option due to higher complication rates

33 of 39

MVA INSTRUMENTS & SUPPLIES

33

34 of 39

Advantages to Office MVA

34

  • Avoid repeated exams that occur in hospital
  • Cost
  • Avoid cumbersome OR protocols (NPO requirements, discharge criteria)
  • Reduced wait time, OR scheduling difficulties
  • Personalized care
  • Convenience, privacy, patient autonomy

35 of 39

KEY�LEARNING POINTS.

35

  • There are three office options to be offered for miscarriage management:

- Expectant

- Medical (mifepristone and misoprostol, and misoprostol alone)

- Procedure: MVA

  • Mental health outcomes for patients are best when they are involved in the decision-making around their care

36 of 39

RESOURCES.

36

37 of 39

REFERENCES.

Allison JL, Sherwood RS, Schust DJ. “Management of first trimester pregnancy loss can be safely moved into the office.” Rev Obstet Gynecol; 2011;4(1):5-14

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. "Early Pregnancy Loss. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 200." Obstet Gynecol vol. 132, no. 5 (2018): e197-207.

Butler, Charles et al. “Clinical Inquiries. How Long Is Expectant Management Safe in First-Trimester Miscarriage?” The Journal of family practice 54.10 (2005): 889–890.

Chen B, Creinin M, “Contemporary Management of Early Pregnancy Failure.” Clin Obstet and Gynecol Volume 50, Number 1, (2007) 67–88.

Creinin, Mitchell D. et al. “Factors Related to Successful Misoprostol Treatment for Early Pregnancy Failure.” Obstetrics and gynecology 107.4 (2006): 901–907.

Doubilet, Peter M. et al. “Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester.” Ultrasound quarterly 30.1 (2014): 3–9.

Emily M. Godfrey, Lawrence Leeman, and Panna Lossy. “Early Pregnancy Loss Needn’t Require a Trip to the Hospital.” Journal of Family Practice 58.11 (2009): 585–590.

Ghosh J, Papadopoulou A, Devall AJ, Jeffery HC, Beeson LE, Do V, Price MJ, Tobias A, Tunçalp Ö, Lavelanet A, Gülmezoglu AM, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD012602. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.

Luise, Ciro et al. “Outcome of Expectant Management of Spontaneous First Trimester Miscarriage: Observational Study.” BMJ 324.7342 (2002): 873–875.

Milingos, D. S. et al. “Manual Vacuum Aspiration: A Safe Alternative for the Surgical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.” BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 116.9 (2009): 1268–1271.

Prine LW, Macnaughton, H. “Office Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.” AAFP 84.1 (2011): 75–82.

Tunçalp, Ozge, A. Metin Gülmezoglu, and João Paulo Souza. “Surgical Procedures for Evacuating Incomplete Miscarriage.” Cochrane database of systematic reviews 9 (2010): CD001993.

Wallace, Robin, Angela DiLaura, and Christine Dehlendorf. “‘Every Person’s Just Different’: Women’s Experiences with Counseling for Early Pregnancy Loss Management.” Women’s health issues: official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health 27.4 (2017): 456–462.

Wallace, Robin R. et al. “Counseling Women with Early Pregnancy Failure: Utilizing Evidence, Preserving Preference.” Patient education and counseling 81.3 (2010): 454–461.

Zhang, Jun et al. “A Comparison of Medical Management with Misoprostol and Surgical Management for Early Pregnancy Failure.” The New England journal of medicine 353.8 (2005): 761–769.

38 of 39

CE �POST-TEST.

38

Please complete this post-test on your phone or computer in order to receive CE credit for participation in this workshop. You can access the pre-test at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/EPLPost

39 of 39

THANK YOU.

39