1 of 44

2 of 44

3 of 44

4 of 44

Introduction into the session: Alexandra Stef, APT-Inspire Change, Learning and Network Director

This workshop is about sharing a collective journey of exploration of the sector building roles of philanthropy infrastructure organizations through creating and testing in practice the 4C framework for reflection on infrastructure position and impact areas.

… and also how we are opening our understanding towards new roles to enable and stimulate our own transformation and the one of our partners and sectors. We called this the catalyst role - or in relationship to the 4C framework - the 5th C.

We would like to invite you as a thought partner and contributor on this journey.

5 of 44

Why 4C?

Useful & flexible framework to look at the sector & ecosystem building aspects of our work.

Why a catalyst lens?

  • Indirectly support deep social transformation on critical aspects connected to future opportunities and challenges
  • enabling our constituencies and other actors to engage, imagine, adapt and act in new ways
  • stimulative actions, trusting in the capacities of these constituencies to create, experiment, reiterate, learn and align.

Alexandra Stef, Inspire-Change

6 of 44

From 4C

As framed by Inspire-Change Please also consult WINGS materials for a full picture of 4C.

7 of 44

As framed by Inspire-Change Please also consult WINGS materials for a full picture of 4C.

From 4C to 5C

As framed by inspire-change.org

8 of 44

Opening exploration:

What is new in your country / region in the work of philanthropy infrastructure and ecosystem supporters? What shifts and changes?

What trends do you observe?

9 of 44

Perspectives:

  • Delphine Moralis, Philea, Europe – Chief Executive Officer
  • Carola Carazzone, Assifero, Italy – Secretary General
  • Alina Porumb, APT-Inspire Change, Romania – President
  • Ingrid Srinath, Center for Social Impact and Philanthropy at Ashoka University, India – Director
  • Ben Ocra, Ghana Philanthropy Forum, Ghana – Director
  • Pamela Cruz, Comunalia, Mexico – Special Projects

10 of 44

Perspectives: Delphine Moralis, Philea, Europe – Chief Executive Officer

11 of 44

Philea | philanthropy infrastructure as a space for sectoral transformation

12 of 44

As a community of communities

- We share the same soil

- And we share the same threats

With a role of catalyst

- Philanthropy Coalition for Climate

- Children and youth

- Futures’ philanthropy

- Building organisational development

- PEX catalyst infrastructure

Philea | philanthropy infrastructure as a space for sectoral transformation

13 of 44

Perspectives: Carola Carazzone, Assifero, Italy – Secretary General

14 of 44

Perspectives: Alina Porumb, APT-Inspire Change, Romania - President

15 of 44

Emphasis of our work: building the new collectively

Culturally, we tend to focus on contributions of individuals, organizations, visible work, coming together around a hero figure - as one person or organization who can help unlock potential. But many of the solutions to current issues are collective, requiring of us to evolve together, to change relationships, to foster new capacities, to work in more distributed ways.

Organizations may be the institutional space through which resources flow (and sometimes aggregate or concentrate), but both challenges and opportunities come from the space in between organizations, at the intersections.

The 4C framework helped us to make this intersections space more visible and bring us more clarity on how we can act in this space for long term, sector building effects. By making this space visible, it can also make visible to the role of infrastructure organizations.

We called the work at this level to stimulate, amplify, invite the new, expand and distribute capacities and decision-making - the catalyst role of infrastructure organizations.

Alina Porumb, Inspire-Change

16 of 44

Romania: Intentional building of new infrastructure

In Romania, as multi-actor philanthropy support system, we took the role of building intentionally towards new local infrastructure for philanthropic and civic leadership, stimulating the start-up of a movement of community foundations (CFs). This now covers more than 50% of the country, has a self-led infrastructure organization for learning, acting and developing assets together and is doing each day the long term work of building a culture of trust and solidarity.

CFs invite each day new players into their processes, being many times the first time supporter of a new initiative - that will grow into a new organization or continue informally. They are the first stimulus or contact point for a new donor/leader to find/join in fundraising for a local cause. They act as space for distributed opportunities, scouting talent and assets, strengthening potential and shaping new initiatives, organizations and movements.

When looking at the collective effects of CFs and their supporters in Romania, we found the 4C framework very useful. We also felt the need to further conceptualize and define the effects around 5th C, with a particular focus in our case on the effects on starting new initiatives and organizations, multiplying capacities and broadening and diversifying the civic and philanthropic sector, both as effects of CFs locally and as effects of their supporters nationally.

Alina Porumb, Inspire-Change

17 of 44

A 5C frame to map the collective impact of community foundations and their support infrastructure in Romania�

Customizing 4C outcomes Adding the catalyst lens

effects of starting new initiatives and organizations

Testing the 5C framework with CFs and CFSOsh Adding a data layer on the 5C

PEX Catalyst Infrastructure Conversations in partnership with Philea: principles, practices, shared experiments.

Catalyst lens conversations with Inspire international CF(SO)s community.

Alina Porumb, Inspire-Change

18 of 44

International

PEX Catalyst Infrastructure Conversations in partnership with Philea, IAC Berlin & Assifero : helping define how we might start looking collectively at the catalyst roles on different levels: of principles, practices, shared experiments.

Catalyst infrastructure principles (within PEX Catalyst Infrastructure Group):

1. Broaden perspective to inter-organizational/inter-sectoral levels;

2. Break the silos;

3. Embrace complexity, non-linearity and risk;

4. Foster decentralized decisions and agility at all points of a support system;

5. Proactively foster the new and multiplicity of paths and actors;

6. Be reflective and aware of own influence, as an enabler and obstacle of transformation and cultivate adaptability & (un)learning.

Alina Porumb, Inspire-Change

19 of 44

Conversations within INSPIRE community of CFSOs and CFs from emerging spaces in Africa, Europe and Latin America:

Exploring within a community of practice the roles of community foundations as local infrastructure for transformation, with a big focus on their role to stimulate new actors to join the sectors (many times acting as a first supporter) and building trust and enabling cultures for the development of local civic and philanthropic sectors.

Reflecting on the CFSO roles at the start up of new movements and/or in response to context changes, with a combined focus on the 4C with the catalyst lens.

WINGS Lift Up Philanthropy community of practice focusing on philanthropy infrastructure, mapping and communicating their role and effects.

Alina Porumb, Inspire-Change

20 of 44

Perspectives: Ingrid Srinath, Center for Social Impact and Philanthropy at Ashoka University, India – Former Director

21 of 44

4Cs: Framing our work at the CSIP, Ashoka University

Coherence: Context mapping/Gap analysis; Strategic Priorities

Communication: Making sense to all our stakeholders

Collaboration: Linking and integrating team roles

Learning & Evaluation: Goal setting; outcome tracking; impact measurement

Ingrid Srinath, CSIP, Ashoka University

22 of 44

Capacity 

Building Resources

Capability 

Building Skills, Knowledge and Expertise

Credibility  

Building Reputation, Recognition and Influence

Connection

Building Relations

  • How support organizations generate money and other resources for the field.
  • E.g.: training on fundraising and information on fund sources, providing references and other linkages, ways of building resources

  • Know-how to enable organizations to use their resources effectively.
  • This can cover topics ranging from governance, management, evaluation, and legal matters and are transmitted through diverse means such as online resources, seminars, webinars, peer-learning, convenings, and fellowships.
  • Build the profile of the field, enhancing understanding and status with all stakeholders and wider society
  • This entails acting on behalf of sectors to disseminate achievements and advocate for a supportive legal and fiscal environment
  • Convening, networking, peer-learning and sharing, as well as providing a platform for action in pursuit of a common purpose.
  • Bringing organizations together creates a virtuous circle in which the connections further reinforce the capacity and capability

Ingrid Srinath, CSIP, Ashoka University

23 of 44

Framing CSIP’s approach to addressing key sectoral gaps with research, norm building, convening, and capacity building programs

CAPACITY

CONNECTIONS

CAPABILITY

CREDIBILITY

Decision-making inhibited by the lack of quality data on resource allocation

Absence of accountability, transparency and governance norms

Limited peer-learning, inter-sectoral dialogue or sector vision and voice development

Lack of opportunities for leadership, institution building and governance

  • Improved data available for decision making in philanthropy

  • Creation of infrastructure for philanthropy (ecosystem, regulation)

  • Influence overall value of financial capacity and resources

  • A pipeline of young leaders and researchers to strengthen talent in sector

  • Equipped organisations with tools on strategy and scale

  • Mapped established standards of practice and co-created norms

  • Increased engagement and public support by showcasing sector knowledge

  • Raised awareness of different practices by introducing new ideas and innovation

  • Enabled communication and engagement with spaces and convenings

  • Created platforms to strengthen voice and action around critical issues and increase collaboration

NEEDS

OUTCOMES

24 of 44

Programme timeline: 2016-2020

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Launched Mother Teresa Fellowship*

Partnered with Harvard Business School to launch SNMI

Research Roundtable

Strategic Non-profit Management- India (SNMI)*

India Development Review*

Giving Tuesday India

Advocacy, Rights and Civil Society

Estimating Philanthropic Flows-Vol. I

Ecosystem Network*

Legal, regulatory, grants-in-aid system

Regulatory Frameworks for India’s voluntary sector

Tax incentive study

Social Innovation Summit*

Impact of Covid-19 on NGOs

Resilience Strategies for Non-Profits*

Talent management study

Social Stock Exchange Technical Committee

Launch of Student Engagement*

State of the support ecosystem

* recurring programmes

Launch of Research Fellowship Programme*

Capacity

Capability

Credibility

Connections

Ingrid Srinath, CSIP, Ashoka University

25 of 44

Reviewing CSIP’s achievements over the first 5 years

Capacity

Capability

Credibility

Connections

Created neutral spaces for dialogue and collaboration

Strengthened reputation and recognition of sector by curating knowledge, co-creating norms and showcasing best practice/innovations

Enhanced the sectors skills and knowledge through leadership programs, fellowships and standards/norms 

Increased the capacity of the sector by generating knowledge for effective and efficient resource allocation by stakeholders 

  • Ecosystem Network
  • Non-profit legal compliance group
  • Charcha-Philanthropy
  • Research Roundtables
  • Legal, regulatory, grants-in-aid systems
  • Regulatory Frameworks
  • Regulation and Fundraising
  • India Development Review
  • Case studies
  • Social Innovation Summit
  • Talent Management Research
  • Research Fellowship
  • Mother Teresa Fellowship
  • Student Engagement
  • Strategic Non-Profit Management India
  • Resilience Strategies for Non-Profits
  • Estimating Philanthropic Capital
  • Advocacy, Rights and Civil Society
  • Impact of Covid-19
  • Tax incentive study
  • State of the support ecosystem
  • Online Giving- #Giving Tuesday
  • Global Philanthropy Indices
  • Candid India Philanthropy Portal

Programmes

4 C’s

Outcomes

26 of 44

Reviewing Strategy : Significant need gaps in India’s nonprofit ecosystem

Mistrust between govt. and non-profits

Low adoption of accountability standards

Growing regulatory complexity

Limited visibility of grassroots non-profits

Funding skew towards certain sectors

Limited public understanding of non-profits

Low levels of giving for non-religious purposes

Limited learning support for philanthropists

Limited dialogue for strategic CSR

No standards for impact measurement and reporting

Limited learning support on impact measurement for non-profits

Lack of transparency by private philanthropy

Weak sector advocacy for non-profits and philanthropy

Limited media coverage of the non-profit sector

Limited focus on governance

Limited funding/learning support for org-building

Slow adoption of technology by non-profits

Limited focus on talent management

27 of 44

Programme Opportunities: 2021-24

Social impact of non-profit sector

* recurring programmes

Technology

Narrative

Norms

People & Org

Ashoka

Ecosystem

Repository of sector knowledge

Social Innovation Summit

Economic impact of non-profit sector

Ease of Doing Good

Giving India

Philanthropy Transparency

Indian Civil Society Association

Impact Reporting Norms

Social Confidence Index

Capacity

Capability

Credibility

Connections

Media Fellowship

Advanced technologies and giving

Data usage and policies of non-profits

Technology and NPO performance

Cap building on adoption of technologies

Media Monitor

Civil Society Perception Study

SNMI/RSN

CSR Cap building

Jumpstart Philanthropy

Pay it forward coaching

Board Governance

Talent Management Study

Ashoka Quest

Young Scholars Program

Student Engagement

Mother Teresa Fellowship

Journal of third sector research

Research Fellowship

Research on intermediaries' impact

ISTR Conference

Ecosystem Network

Ingrid Srinath, CSIP, Ashoka University

28 of 44

Source: Building Philanthropy Ecosystems, WINGS

29 of 44

Perspectives: Ben Ocra, Ghana Philanthropy Forum, Ghana – Director

30 of 44

The Case of Ghana:

Using the 4C framework to conceptualize organizational capacities for new community foundations in Ghana.

How does a support role contribute to systemic change in local communities?

Community Foundations are essential actors in the localization agenda because they are uniquely positioned to channel resources, engage communities, and leverage local knowledge and expertise. Their role in mobilizing, allocating, and managing resources aligns closely with the principles and objectives of localization in development and humanitarian work.

Ben Ocra, Ghana Philanthropy Forum

31 of 44

4Cs

In 2023 the learnings helped us in enhancing the Standard Operating Procedures SOP/ for CFs in southern Ghana including;�

  • Working Groups on Geographic, Social, Cultural and Economic lines)
  • Stakeholder Forums aimed at building capacity, network, etc
  • Accountability Forums to show transparency,

From a practical point of view, we can say that, the effect of each of these factors can vary depending on the specific circumstances, goals, and challenges in a community. Furthermore, these factors are often interconnected and mutually reinforcing, and their relative importance can change over time.

The next slides demonstrates how 2 CFs in Ghana have used the 4Cs framework in serving as a catalyst in their local settings thereby attracting credible partners in undertaking needful community projects.

Ben Ocra, Ghana Philanthropy Forum

32 of 44

4Cs

In 2021/22, we (GPF) engaged with 7 communities (CFs) to consider the application of the 4Cs and identify attributes that could define the various Cs ( Capacity, Capability, Credibility and Connections).

In 2022 we - went on a follow up engagement with the 7 CFs again, this time to ascertain the relative strength of the 4Cs as it relates to practice and the CF’s long term sustainability.

After the exercise, CREDIBILITY emerged as the most impactful among the 4Cs. This attestation is contextual. In practice, the strength of these factors could depends on the specific context.

Furthermore, it is important to note that credibility can be fragile and can also be quickly eroded if the CF does not maintain ethical and transparent practices.

Ben Ocra, Ghana Philanthropy Forum

33 of 44

The Launch of a Community Foundation

34 of 44

CASE STUDY 1: OBOHEN CF-GHANA / Solves community’s water problem

6 months back 2000 + residents of this community drank from 2 ponds. Through the CF, they now have 2 mechanized boreholes.

CASE STUDY 2: VOLTA-MOSLEMS CF-GHANA/Demonstrates Capacity in governance and project mgt

35 of 44

Perspectives: Pamela Cruz, Comunalia (Alliance of Mexican Community Foundations),

Mexico – Special Projects

36 of 44

COMUNALIA

Comunalia is the Alliance of Community Foundations in Mexico, founded in 2011, it has 17 members in 16 states of the country.

We focus on three lines of action: strengthen our community foundations members, make visible the work of community foundations and amplify/grow new community foundations

As the 4 Cs is a flexible framework, we used it for strategic priorities linked to working groups = we start from within the organization

    • Engage community foundations in strategic planning development
      • Part 1 = Diagnosis / interviews / SWOT analysis
      • Part 2 = in person workshop with community foundations representatives + definition of working groups to frame strategies, indicators, guidelines on the 4 Cs.
      • Part 3 = Timeframe and outcomes presented in the Assembly of members in November 2022
    • 4Cs Committees (that came out of the strategic plan)
      • CF teams and Comunalia participate in committees to support the implementation of the strategic plan based on the 4 Cs.
        • Capacity = we renamed it as Continuidad (in Spanish) mainly focuses on the financial sustainability of Comunalia, and how that can support other CFs
        • Capability = we discuss project and programme design, funding opportunities to write a proposal together with the CFs, define a learning journey for the CFs teams according to their needs and demand of support.
        • Credibility = Public trust, transparency, accountability, audits. Members of the CFs support in having the financial and operational processes of Comunalia in check, but also revising documents for external auditors.
        • Connections = communication strategy, build up of narratives, storytelling and nurturing of connections and partnerships.
    • MEL System is aligned with the 4Cs by setting goals and outcomes for the next 5 years.

37 of 44

4Cs inception (2 levels)

    • Level 1: We are a support organization that supports community foundations
    • Level 2: Community foundations are support organizations of their constituencies, communities, NGOs, etc.

Challenge

    • Comunalia, as a network of 17 community foundations, our members are our governing body. The challenge is using the 4Cs framework to strengthened not only our work, but also to strengthen and support our members.
    • For instance, after one year of defining the strategic plan along the CFs, we realized that it was mostly a wish list from the foundations, so it was difficult to fulfil all of the ideas and expectations from it, so we are reframing those “wishes” into actions we can fulfil in the short and medium term.

38 of 44

Our work on CREDIBILITY

  • Research on trust, funded by the Global Fund for Community Foundations:
  • Engage donors and partners
  • Build trust and legitimacy
    • Walk the talk
    • Empathy
    • Congruence
    • Trust of the community
  • Shared values based on community
  • Seek the wellbeing, development and social justice
  • For CFs, trust is a living and flexible construction that is born and nourished by concrete actions.
    • Collaboration
    • Mobilization
    • Collective transformation of unjust realities
  • Transparency
    • Not only to fulfil a requirement but to share results with the people/communities (devolución de la información)

39 of 44

Our CATALYTIC role = Active Communities Fund (FCA)

    • Co-creation of objectives, criteria and indicators
    • Capacity building = social lab
    • Adapted to local context = legal and fiscal restrictions
    • Mobilization of resources
      • 4% from CFs = USD 250K
      • 12% from international donors (Mott, Coca Cola, IAF) = USD 700k
      • 84% from local organizations = USD 5 million

  • Results
    • 80 projects
    • 15 states out of 32 in the country
    • Over 44 thousand people impacted
    • + 118millions of Mexican pesos of total investment

  • Learnings
    • Train the trainers = direct capacity building
    • Shared spaces
    • Building of collaborations, reduces operational costs, time, people, money
    • Fund administration

40 of 44

41 of 44

Reflection

  • If you would have to pick one effect of PSO to explore in your organization, what would it be?
  • From the conversation, what potential application in your own context?
  • What might be good spaces to connect and exchange practices?

42 of 44

Keep the conversation & collective inquiry going

Some regional/international spaces where the conversation is planned to continue:

WINGS: Lift Up Philanthropy Workgroup (global)

Philea: PEX Catalyst Infrastructure (Europe)

Inspire: Catalyst community foundations and their support organizations (Africa, Europe, Latin America)

Please let us know about conversation spaces where this could be relevant to continue with your engagement and support.

43 of 44

5C: A stimulative frame, many resources & tools

4C for evaluating professional support to philanthropy (WINGS): https://search.issuelab.org/resource/using-the-4cs-evaluating-professional-support-to-philanthropy.html

Catalyst roles of infrastructure and experimental 5C frame for community foundations ecosystems: www.inspire-change.org/catalyst-infrastructure

�Philea PEX Catalyst webpage: https://philea.eu/how-we-can-help/initiatives/pex/pex-projects/pex-catalyst-infrastructure/

�Building Philanthropy Ecosystems (WINGS): https://buildingthepse.wingsweb.org/

44 of 44

5C: Credibility, trust and new organizations�

Credibility and trust (Comunalia, Mexico): https://comunalia.org.mx/eng/portfolio_page/communities-trust-towards-civil-society-organizations-action-research/�Conditions for new community foundations & effects on credibility and trust (Trag Foundation, Serbia):

https://tragfondacija.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Community-foundations-in-Serbia.pdf

https://tragfondacija.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The-impact-of-community-foundations-on-social-changes-in-local-communities.pdf

Philanthropy Transformation

Philanthropy Transformation Initiative Research (WINGS): https://transformphilanthropy.wingsweb.org/