Kebbi story telling�of Moon Festival
1
授課教師：陳冠甫老師 陳玫蓉教授
114-2人工智慧在語言學習的運用
題目、節慶主題
設計者學號姓名:
12121253楊樂怡 12121240陳俐帆
1.腳本前（初稿）
2
內容：在接觸 Persona 概念前寫的第一版故事腳本，原封不動呈現。
2：Persona
完整的 Persona
3
4
5
3.設計決策對照表
6
Persona 特質 | 對應設計決策 | 具體做法 |
小學英語程度 | 多鼓勵性語助詞 | 不管yes or no都會得到Great!的回答 |
華人文化背景不強 | 增加圖片幫助想像 | 每個介紹都有放上偏童趣的圖片 |
高趣味性 | 增加不同動作 | 每個開場語或結束語都有盡量用不同的動作搭配表情 |
4.腳本後（修訂版）
7
依據 Persona 修訂後的最終故事腳本。用途：與腳本前對照，呈現語言、文化解釋、互動設計的改變。
5.RoFlow 整體流程圖
一張縮放後可看見所有節點的整體流程截圖
打開你的 RoFlow 專案，把畫面縮放到能看見所有節點為止。使用截圖功能（Windows: Print Screen；Mac: Shift+Command+4）拍下整張流程圖。
8
6.關鍵節點細節��
點進你這次工作中新增或大幅修改的節點，拍下該節點的內部設定畫面。若你這次修改了多個節點，每個都拍一張。若只有微調文字，拍最主要的那一個即可
內容：挑選 2 至 3 個最能代表設計思考的節點內部畫面（例如含變數的條件分流、含多層回饋的答題節點），呈現節點內部設定。
9
7.變數與條件設定�使用「變數」或「條件分流」功能請另外拍一張變數設定頁面。
10
8.Kebbi 說故事影片
11
9.反思Reflection(楊樂怡)
It’s easier to visualize the style of interaction based on the level of English used in the dialogue. Our target audience is students in grades 1 through 6, so we’ll communicate using basic English and plenty of encouragement.
We made the most changes to the animations and dialogue to help children focus on the robot and feel more engaged.
We were concerned about whether the text was too small, if the interactions felt clunky, or if the children might find it too boring or fail to fully understand. After testing the interactions, we felt they were generally acceptable and were fairly satisfied.
12
9.反思Reflection
4. What was the biggest challenge in this project, and how did you solve it? �這次設計最困難的部分是什麼？
The challenge lies in understanding our target audience, as I’m unsure what foundational knowledge of Chinese culture foreign children have. Fortunately, the teacher provided us with advice based on her experience.
5. If you could redesign your project, what would you change? Why? �如果重新設計，你會怎麼改？
1. Add interactive elements such as videos and introduce more variables.
2. Make the responses at key points more comprehensive.
13
9.反思Reflection (陳俐帆)
Our target users were elementary school students from grade 1 to 6. So we used simple and easy language to introduce the Moon Festival, and we focused more on interaction to keep them interested.
We revised the script the most. While building the RoFlow project, we also changed and improved the script step by step.
We cared most about making users feel encouraged. We used easy questions and simple choices, and if they answered wrong, they could try again. We also used positive words like “Great” to make Kebbi feel friendly.
14
9.反思Reflection
4. What was the biggest challenge in this project, and how did you solve it? � 這次設計最困難的部分是什麼？
The biggest challenge was balancing learning and fun. If there was too much information, it became boring, so we kept the story short and added small quiz questions.
5. If you could redesign your project, what would you change? Why? � 如果重新設計，你會怎麼改？
I would add more interaction, like games or sounds in the story. This would make the project more interesting and suitable for different learners.
15
10.參考資料與素材來源
16