Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI)
12.04.2007
3rd GEOS-Chem USERS` MEETING, Harvard University
Lok Lamsal and Randall Martin
Department of Physics and Atmospheric
Science, Dalhousie University
James Gleason
Goddard Space Flight Center
NASA
1
Motivation
Surface measurement sites in US and Canada
2
OMI tropospheric NO2 columns as a proxy for deriving surface NO2
Global distribution of tropospheric column NO2 (Sep. 2005)
3
Derivation of surface NO2 from OMI
OMI grids
GEOS-CHEM grid
GEOS-CHEM
In situ
Houston: 29°N-31°N, 96.25°W-93.75°W
Texas Air Quality Study aircraft campaign
16 August-13 September 2000
Averaged over OMI overpass time
4
NO2 mixing ratio inferred from OMI
5
Comparison between OMI surface NO2 and in situ measurements
r = .75
r = .48
6
Comparison of ground based and OMI surface NO2
r = .65
r = .27
7
Correlation of OMI NO2 with surface measurements
Year 2005
8
Comparison based on land use
ratio
ratio
9
Why is OMI surface NO2 lower than in situ measurements?
Ground based instruments (equipped with molybdenum converter) overestimate surface NO2.
Schaub et al., 2006; Ordóñez et al., 2006; Dunlea et al., 2007
interference large in summer
10
Correction of GB measurements for interference from HNO3, PAN, and alkyl nitrates
Seasonal means of correction factor
11
Correction of GB measurements for interference
Correction factor
12
Correction of GB measurements for interference
Seasonal means of surface NO2 (2005)
GB after
correction
OMI
13
14
15