1 of 35

Decision to Relocate and Rebuild Bret Harte Middle School

Allan Garde

Assistant Superintendent of Business

October 11, 2023

2 of 35

2

September 2021

HUSD Facilities Master Plan Update

Solutions Team met five times and conducted site tours during Spring Break

1952

Original Construction of Bret Harte MS

January 2023

Solutions Team for Bret Harte

Broader Community Input and Outreach

Solutions Team Recommendations to Relocate and Rebuild Bret Harte MS

Feb - May 2023

September 2023

October 4, 2023

Bret Harte Timeline

Resolution #2324-16, Decision to Relocate and Rebuild Bret Harte MS

October 11, 2023

3 of 35

Bret Harte Middle School Campus - Issue to Address

The campus is surrounded by earthquake fault and seismic hazard zones.

Students and Staff are safe. But, we may not use the campus after a large earthquake.

4 of 35

Overview

  1. Bret Harte property has three geological hazards:
    1. 1) Earthquake Fault;
    2. 2) Liquefaction; and
    3. 3) Earthquake-Induced Landslide

  • Modernizing or rebuilding on current property is cost-prohibitive
    • proximity to the geological hazards
    • current code requirements.

5 of 35

Board Resolution #2223-28, Solutions Team Overview 1/11/2023

Solutions Team for Bret Harte to identify and rank options for Board consideration.

6 of 35

Conceptual Options to Relocate Bret Harte

The Solutions Team first looked at all of the 14 properties owned by the District. Each property would have required:

  • Merging with an existing school
  • Relocating an existing school and then modernize and relocate Bret Harte
  • Modernize a vacant property and relocate Bret Harte

7 of 35

Cherryland ES, East Ave ES, Fairview ES, Stonebrae ES, Hayward HS, & CSU East Bay

Bret Harte MS (Center Left of Map), Strobridge (Top Left of Map), & Highland (Center of Map)

8 of 35

Highland Option

9 of 35

Strobridge Option

10 of 35

2-STORY CLASSROOMS

11 of 35

1-STORY CLASSROOMS

12 of 35

ADMIN OFFICE

13 of 35

GYM AND LOCKER ROOM

14 of 35

MPR & KITCHEN

15 of 35

Committee and Staff Recommendations

16 of 35

Top Five Concerns from Survey for Each Site

Strobridge

  1. Location
  2. Distance
  3. Traffic
  4. Accessibility
  5. Safety

Highland

  1. Traffic Congestion
  2. Accessibility and Safety
  3. Site Size
  4. Proximity to CSUEB
  5. Location and Distance

17 of 35

Survey Input - 228 responses - Updated 10/4/23

  • Top Priorities to Address:
  • Campus Safety and Security
  • New and Modern Classrooms
  • Distance and accessibility: Walk, Bike, Drive
  • PE, Athletics, and Activities
  • Space for long-term Flexibility

  • 63% prefer Highland
  • 31 respondents like both options

18 of 35

Solutions Team Recommendations

Highland - Rank: 1

Considerations:

  • Best to serve the current community. 100% of East Avenue, Fairview, and Stonebrae 6th graders go to Bret Harte.
  • Supports the HUSD Mandarin Program.
  • STEAM and Engineering pathways with East Avenue and Fairview.
  • Campus safety and security can be best monitored at Highland.
  • Proximity to CSUEB and strengthen partnerships

Strobridge - Rank: 2

Considerations:

  • Better for size, but would need to consider a change in boundaries.
  • Originally built as a middle school.
  • Close proximity to liquor / cannabis stores.
  • More space for long-term flexibility.

19 of 35

Solutions Team Recommendations

Highland - Rank: 1

Recommended Solutions:

  • Implement a traffic study
  • Coordination with the City of Hayward
  • Coordination with AC Transit
  • Coordination with Campus Ministry
  • Coordination with CSU, East Bay
  • Field trip to Cherryland and Harder and meet with staff
  • Request for the Board visit the site

Strobridge - Rank: 2

Recommended Solutions:

  • Consider a school boundary study
  • Coordination with the City of Hayward
  • Coordination with AC Transit
  • Field trip to Cherryland and Harder and meet with staff
  • Request for the Board visit the site

Based on the input received from the community, Solutions Team considerations and recommended solutions, and all applicable short-term and long-term needs for the district, staff recommend:

    • Highland to be the new location to rebuild Bret Harte

20 of 35

Next Steps

  • Board approval of Resolution #2324-16, Decision to Relocate and Rebuild Bret Harte MS
  • Initiate preliminary work for implementation:
    • Assign architect
    • Assemble Bret Harte Design Team
    • Collaborate with applicable agencies
    • Initiate formal studies to develop mitigation measures
  • Develop a formal timeline for implementation

Tonight’s decision:

Allow staff to proceed with the preliminary work to relocate Bret Harte to Highland

21 of 35

Appendix

22 of 35

State Regulations for School Buildings & Earthquakes

California Department of Education Title 5, California Code of Regulations

  • 5 CCR 14001 - Minimum Standards

“Educational Facilities planned by school districts shall be:

Located on a site which meets CDE standards as specified in Section 14010.”

  • 5 CCR 14010 - Standards for School Site Selection

“Pursuant to Education Code sections 17212 and 17212.5, the site shall not contain an active earthquake fault or fault trace.”

“The site is not subject to moderate to high liquefaction or landslides.”

California Education Code

  • Education Code 17212.5

“No school building shall be constructed, reconstructed, or relocated on the trace of a geological fault along which surface rupture can reasonably be expected to occur within the life of the school building.”

23 of 35

Review from 2021 Facilities Master Plan

2021 Review by Structural Engineer

  • For the original construction: “Neither the type of structure nor proximity to a fault line were considered when determining the seismic design force.”
  • “Bret Harte middle school would today be required to be designed for more than five times the original seismic design force.”

2021 Review by Former State Architect

  • “Geological hazards investigations were not required for school construction projects until legislation was passed in 1967.”
  • “I share the opinion of the engineer that because of proximity to the Hayward Fault, any future upgrades to the existing building construction of the Bret Harte Middle School, and likely required full current code compliance, would be cost prohibitive.”

24 of 35

Solutions Team for Bret Harte - Considerations

  • Review surplus property
  • Review underutilized property
  • Review middle school needs in the 94541, 94542, & 94546 region
  • Review cost and timeline for implementation
  • Review strategies for resources for Bret Harte implementation
  • Balance the need for a solution to mitigate against seismic concerns with the need to implement this change well to address current and long-term needs

25 of 35

HUSD Properties in 94541, 94542, & 94546

This chart notes all of the HUSD properties within the applicable zip codes.

Current Middle School Acreage:

  • Bret Harte 23.0
  • Chavez 13.8
  • MLK 15.7
  • Ochoa 23.3
  • Winton 12.8
  • Average 17.7

Known ideas from the past:

  • Grade TK-8 Cherryland
  • Grade TK-8 East Avenue
  • Grade 7-8 East Avenue
  • Grade 7-8 Strobridge

Surplus Property

Property Name

Acreage

Brenkwitz / Adult School

16.2

Burbank

5.9

Cherryland

19.4

Former Cherryland

6.5

East Avenue

9.7

Fairview

5.6

Faith Ringgold

6.0

Hayward High

57.5

Helen Turner

7.3

Highland

4.8

Laurel

5.4

Longwood

9.9

Stonebrae

11.5

Strobridge

13.3

26 of 35

  1. Brenkwitz / Adult School
  2. Burbank
  3. Cherryland
  4. Former Cherryland
  5. East Avenue
  6. Fairview
  7. Faith Ringgold
  8. Hayward High
  9. Helen Turner
  10. Highland
  11. Laurel
  12. Longwood
  13. Stonebrae
  14. Strobridge

In another middle school boundary

27 of 35

Deliberation on What Properties to Focus On

Consensus for Removal

  • *Brenkwitz / Adult School
  • *Burbank
  • *Cherryland
  • *Former Cherryland
  • Hayward High
  • *Helen Turner
  • Laurel
  • *Longwood
  • Stonebrae

* Properties in Other MS Boundaries

Consensus to Investigate Further

  • East Avenue
  • Fairview
  • * Faith Ringgold
  • Highland
  • Strobridge

* After site visits, Faith Ringgold was removed from consideration

28 of 35

Miles from Elementary School to Potential New Bret Harte

From / To

Option

Option

Option

Option

East Avenue

Fairview

Highland

Strobridge

Cherryland

2.9 miles

3.4miles

3.3 miles

1.5 miles

East Avenue

-

1.1miles

1.4 miles

3.1 miles

Fairview

1.1miles

-

2.5 miles

3.0 miles

Strobridge

3.1 miles

2.9 miles

3.5 miles

-

Stonebrae

3.8 miles

3.5 miles

2.8 miles

6.1 miles

29 of 35

Removed East Avenue and Fairview from Consideration

Considering one of these two schools would have severely impacted a school community to implement, add several more years until Bret Harte ultimately gets addressed, add time to deliberate if schools should close, merge, or build a new school in addition to the new Bret Harte.

30 of 35

31 of 35

Highland Option - 2021 Highland Boulevard

32 of 35

Strobridge Option - 21400 Bedford Drive

33 of 35

  • Location: Many parents express dissatisfaction with the proposed location, citing concerns about its proximity to the freeway, noise, pollution, and its distance from Hayward residents. Some feel it's not as desirable as the current location, and they worry about the impact on their children's well-being.
  • Distance: The distance between the new site and the majority of Bret Harte's population and feeder schools is a significant concern. Parents worry that it will be too far for their children to travel, leading to inconvenience and potential safety issues.
  • Traffic: Traffic-related concerns include congestion around the new location, difficulty navigating traffic, and safety issues due to increased traffic and the close proximity to the freeway. Some also mention the need for improved access and bus transportation.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility concerns revolve around the location being on the edge of Hayward, making it less accessible for many families. Some parents mention the need for school buses to ensure all students can get to and from school safely.
  • Safety: Safety concerns include the potential exposure of students to unsafe elements in the new location, such as the proximity to weed stores and concerns about the surrounding neighborhood's safety. Parents also worry about the need for additional safety measures like cross guards due to traffic and intersection issues.

These top concerns highlight the importance of location, convenience, safety, and accessibility for parents and their children in the context of the potential school relocation.

Top Five Concerns from Survey for Strobridge

34 of 35

  • Traffic Congestion: Many parents are concerned about traffic congestion, particularly due to the proximity of California State University, East Bay (CSUEB). They worry that the roads may become congested during drop-off and pick-up times, making it challenging for students and parents to access the school.
  • Accessibility and Safety: Some parents express concerns about the accessibility of the Highland Middle School site, especially for students walking or biking to school. The hilly terrain and lack of sidewalks are noted as potential safety hazards.
  • Site Size: The size of the Highland site is a significant concern for many parents. They believe it may be too small to accommodate a middle school with all its programs, leading to potential overcrowding and limitations on future growth.
  • Proximity to CSUEB: The close proximity of the school to CSUEB raises concerns about increased traffic and congestion, as well as potential interactions between middle school students and university students.
  • Location and Distance: Some parents worry about the location being too far away from their current residence or feeder schools, making transportation for students, especially those in the flatlands of Hayward, less convenient.

These concerns highlight the importance of traffic management, accessibility, site size, and location considerations when evaluating the suitability of the Highland site for the potential relocation of Bret Harte.

Top Five Concerns from Survey for Highland

35 of 35