1 of 14

THE CULTURAL BORDER CROSSING MODEL

APPLIED TO THE

PHYSICS CLASSROOM

Daniel Doucette

Advisor: Dainuvīte Blūma

27 January 2017

Riga, Latvia

2 of 14

Culture

“an ordered system of meaning and symbols, in terms of which social interaction takes place” (Geertz, 1973: 68)

Applications:

  • National (Smith, Dugan, Trompenaars), etc
  • School (eg. Gruenert, Whitaker)
  • Science / Physics
    • ~ subculture of physicists
    • problematic (Harding)
    • URMs

Could understanding culture empower teachers to�resolve the disorders of physics?

2

3 of 14

Border Crossing

Metaphor from Giroux

  • Navigation in margins
  • Must prepare crossers
  • Critically examine power

Categories Costa; Aikenhead

Aligned with Pond, Chini (!!)

“Potential Scientists”

“Other Smart Kids”

“I Don’t Know”

“Outsiders”

“Inside Outsiders”

“I Want to Know”

3

4 of 14

Preliminary Testing

Twin tests: school and home (plus parent), 6 questions, n=11

4

3. Look at something blue. Why is it blue?

a. It is releasing blue light.

b. When white light hits it, the red and green colours are “eaten” and only blue is reflected.

c. Light carries the colour information to your eyes.

d. It just is blue. It has nothing to do with light.

r = 0.511 < 0.602

ρ = 0.569 < 0.618 … student scores not correlated

χ² = 25.81 > 3.84 … student and parent scores are not independent

5 of 14

Instrument Development

Topic: Energy

Consulted literature (Hermann-Abell, DeBoer)

8 questions: motion, thermal, gravity, electric, measureable, transfer, transformation/conservation, power generation

4 answers: scientific, vis-viva, flux, qi

WhatIsMyEnergyType.com (html/css/js)

Validation - doctor, engineer, historian

6th-grade students: results are stable

5

A shoe box is sitting in the centre of a table. In which of the following situations is the box's energy increasing?

  • The box is lifted and placed on a high shelf.
  • A turtle is placed inside the box.
  • The box is gently pushed off the edge of the table and falls to the floor.
  • A smiley face is drawn on the side of the box.

6 of 14

Results I

Population: 27 grade 11/12 students at Int'l School of Latvia

Answers grouped: sci @ school, non-sci @ home = OSK, etc

χ² = 103.3 > 99.6�@ 95% conf

student ID and border-crossing type are not independent, thus border-crossing is a meaningful characterization

6

ID

Pot

Sci

Out

Other

Smart

Inside

Out

Total

8

6

0

0

2

8

9

1

5

1

1

8

10

2

2

2

2

8

7 of 14

Results II

Probabilistic (“Monte Carlo”) Model

To what extent does border crossing affect student answers?

53% of answers were scientific

Simulate 100 classes of 28 random students

Compute χ² for each, find best match to actual (Student's t)

Result: c = 17%

7

Probability of giving the�scientific answer...

Border Crossing Type

Potential Scientist

Other Smart Kid

Outsider

Inside Outsider

At Home

(53+c)%

(53-c)%

(53-c)%

(53+c)%

At School

(53+c)%

(53+c)%

(53-c)%

(53-c)%

8 of 14

Conclusion

  • Border crossing type is a meaningful categorization
  • The categorization aligns with teacher obs. / student goals
  • Effect size of cultural medium is +/- 17%

Limitations:

  • Small sample size (n=27), socioeconomics?
  • 17% is an upper bound, many mitigating factors

Next steps:

  • Teach to educators - cultural awareness; better teaching
  • Investigate value in situ

8

9 of 14

Reference List

Aikenhead, G. (1996) Science Education: Border Crossing into the Subculture of Science. Studies in Science Education, 1996, vol. 27, pp. 1-52

Costa, V.B. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313-333.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, USA.

Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. Routledge, New York, USA.

Gruenert, S., and T. Whitaker. (2015) School Culture Rewired: How to Define, Assess, and Transform it. ASCD: Alexandra, VA.

Harding, S. G. (1998). Is science multicultural?: Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, USA.

Hermann-Abell, C. and G. DeBoer. (2014). Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education. R. F. Chen (Ed.). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Pond, J., & Chini, J. (2015). Exploring Student Learning Profiles in Algebra-based Studio Physics: A Person-Centered Approach. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2015, College Park, MD.

Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees a dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 27(2), 231-264.

9

10 of 14

Thank you!

10

11 of 14

Extension

Could this border-crossing model be applied to other subjects, like the social sciences or the humanities?

Maybe.

Situation, cultural coherency of subject.�Reading, math.

11

12 of 14

Comparison of Pond/Chini & Costa

12

Pond and Chini (2015)

Costa (1995)

Strategic: motivated to learn, able to use self-regulatory strategies as required

Potential scientists: congruent home and science cultures, making for fluid border-crossing

Knowledge-Building: motivated to learn, but not engaged with the course as actively as strategic learners

Other Smart Kids: different home and science cultures; comfortable with the culture of school and capable of navigating the border-crossing, but do not value science personally

Surface: not engaged with the course, and primarily concerned with obtaining a passing grade

I Don’t Know Students: incompatibility between home and school cultures results in struggle and frustration in school, often resulting in seeking strategies to obtain minimally-acceptable grades

Apathetic: unmotivated and unengaged; might want to pass the course, but no personal interest in the subject

Outsiders: science culture is alien, with a border-crossing that is perilous, often because of a mistrust of the culture of the school

Learned-Helpless: motivated to pass, but unable to access self-regulation strategies

Inside-Outsiders: have a personal interest in science, but unable to cross the border because of the influence of the school culture

13 of 14

Monte Carlo Results

13

c

mean chi-squared

std dev in chi-squared

Student's t

0

81.49712889

11.5404567

-59.72158276

0.01

81.79478611

12.05788542

-56.37817652

0.02

81.6453599

11.90887333

-57.48040517

0.03

82.10923697

11.94605501

-56.07355586

0.04

82.98093996

12.11797187

-53.00326828

0.05

83.72471523

12.29419348

-50.33041622

0.06

84.11316905

12.14797379

-49.92502429

0.07

84.61571894

12.61020034

-46.83477247

0.08

86.3624913

12.94878967

-41.34425573

0.09

87.16133987

13.44488011

-37.93981484

0.1

89.78821353

12.97253511

-32.91779279

0.11

90.56795488

13.44507559

-29.92691516

0.12

92.18677204

13.7874296

-25.47089291

0.13

94.77246479

14.21456699

-18.95318788

0.14

96.93948131

13.68076493

-14.68370229

0.15

98.26898728

14.54896494

-10.91772574

0.16

100.8469416

14.62065672

-5.288376366

0.17

103.3769704

15.3634047

0.1748960533

0.18

106.2551893

15.83989513

5.915712908

0.19

109.8625149

16.11912371

12.89015022

0.2

112.8637248

16.24629924

18.63098245

0.21

117.1787008

16.85581199

26.05249975

0.22

119.6222309

16.83582553

30.67311689

0.23

123.303434

17.82394648

35.50375937

0.24

127.552528

18.76191527

40.89056186

0.25

132.3069774

19.3442671

47.43183822

0.26

136.0028613

19.49648114

53.05615155

0.27

139.9807297

20.64367977

56.20119646

0.28

145.2921255

20.26293339

65.54631356

0.29

149.5863702

21.11073351

69.34654949

0.3

156.4710069

21.41411226

78.53082282

14 of 14

Online Quiz “Results”

14