1 of 15

Religious Conflict Resolution

Presentation to the Conference, “Psychological Manipulation, Cultic Groups, and Other Alternative Movements

University of Madrid

July 14-16, 2005

Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.

2 of 15

Definitions

  • Religion: 1a. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers…3. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader. 4. A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion. (American Heritage Dictionary, Houghton Mifflin, 2000)

3 of 15

Definitions (Cont.)

  • Conflict: 2. A state of disharmony between incompatible or antithetical persons, ideas, or interests; a clash.
  • Resolve: 7. To bring to a usually successful conclusion, resolve a conflict. (American Heritage Dictionary, Houghton Mifflin, 2000)

4 of 15

Defnitions (Cont.)

  • Religious Conflict Resolution (RCR): The attempt to reduce or end the state of disharmony existing between two or more people (usually family members) resulting from a difference in religious beliefs, practices, or commitment, with “religion” being defined in a broad sense.

5 of 15

Factors in Conflict

  • Each person tends to blame a group or the other person, when in fact all contribute to the conflict.
  • Often neither fully understands the sources of conflict.
  • Much conflict results from communication failures.
  • The “need to be right” is almost always a prime contributor to any conflict. “People would rather be right than happy” – Alfred Adler.

6 of 15

Factors in Conflict (Cont.)

  • Over-reliance on words, which are interpreted, leads to insensitivity to non-verbal communication.
  • Religious conflicts tend to be “buried” (“we don’t talk about religion and politics”) or escalate to a level that demands outside mediation.

Adapted from Richard J. Mayer, (1990). Conflict Management. Columbus, OH: Battelle press.

7 of 15

Why do Families Become Concerned?

  • Notice disturbing behavioral changes.
  • Disapprove of the group’s beliefs or practices.
  • Feel that the family’s religion has been betrayed.
  • Have heard bad things about the group.
  • Don’t know anything about the group, so fear it.

8 of 15

How Have Families Handled These Situations?

  • Wait and hope that it resolves itself naturally (most people ultimately leave controversial groups)
  • Seek help from clergy or other helping professionals. Probably this usually enhances “waiting and hoping” but not much more.
  • Hire intervention specialist to persuade loved one to leave the group (analogous to substance abuse interventions) – “deprogrammer,” “exit counselor,” “thought reform consultant.” Usually, implies goal of “getting person out of the group.”

9 of 15

Best-Guess Probabilities

  • Research has many limitations (difficulty in obtaining representative samples).
  • People stay in groups an average of about 5-7 years.
  • Groups vary tremendously on the dimension of harm.
  • About 100,000 people/year in the U.S. enter and leave groups each year.
  • At most several hundred people per year leave their groups as a result of a family-initiated intervention.

10 of 15

What the Numbers Indicate

  • Only a miniscule percentage of families (less than one percent) can initiate an intervention.
  • Many groups don’t fit the “cult” stereotype.
  • Families need another alternative to “waiting and hoping.”
  • Mediation, i.e., religious conflict resolution, may be a viable alternative for many families. (Has occurred in exit counseling and family consultation, but has not been articulated as a separate process.)

11 of 15

Goals of RCR

  • Improve communication between the parties.
  • Increase each party’s understanding of the perspective and concerns of the other party.
  • Identify points of agreement, toleration, and disagreement.
  • Through improved communication and understanding, increase points of agreement and toleration.
  • Through negotiation, manage remaining points of disagreement.
  • Plan for future beyond RCR - followup

12 of 15

Necessary Conditions for RCR

  • Each party must recognize that this is not a process that leads to “victory” for one side or the other; it is not a “power struggle.” It is an attempt to enhance a relationship.
  • Each party must be willing to change.
  • Each party must be willing to admit error.
  • Each party must be willing to listen, i.e. to place his/her beliefs, values, and judgments aside in order to hear out the other party.
  • Each party must be willing to negotiate in good faith.

13 of 15

Possible Structure for RCR

  • One party seeks out mediator(s)
  • Initial meeting – preliminary assessment of conflict
  • Approach other party about taking part in RCR
  • Two parties meet with mediator(s) to pursue goals of RCR. Two mediators, meeting together and separately with both parties is probably preferable.

14 of 15

Phases of RCR

  • Review of and commitment to goals of RCR.
  • Communications training for both parties.
  • Identification of sources of conflict.
  • Clarification to increase agreement and toleration and agreement about nature of disagreements (i.e., explain other party’s perspective to his satisfaction).
  • Negotiate behavioral contract to minimize disharmony resulting from residual disagreements.
  • Negotiate follow-up plan to monitor adherence to contract.

15 of 15

Discussion

  • Examples of conflict
  • Opinions about viability of this approach