1 of 15

Hayden Montgomery

Agriculture Programme Director

Global Methane Hub

2 of 15

We must reduce methane emissions faster.

  • 1.5 Degree report (2019). 35% reduction by 2050
  • Global Methane Pledge (2021). 30% reduction by 2030
  • AR6. WGIII (2022) 34% reduction by 2030, 44% by 2040.
  • AR WG II (2022). Methane’s role in preventing warming crucial in reaching tipping points for dangerous impacts on people and ecosystems.

3 of 15

Modelled mitigation potential

  • Most modelled pathways represent the maximum technical potential for anthropogenic CH4 reductions in the underlying models.
  • Further emissions reductions may be achieved through changes in activity levels and/or technological innovations beyond those represented in the majority of the pathways.

4 of 15

Agricultural CH4

  • Research and development are key for all measures.
  • Measures for the mitigation of agricultural CH4 emissions with emerging technologies show promising results.
  • However, the mitigation of agricultural CH4 emissions is still constrained by cost, the diversity and complexity of agricultural systems, and by increasing demands to raise agricultural yields, and increasing demand for livestock products.

5 of 15

6 of 15

Our Partners

7 of 15

  • The Hub will focus on the energy, agricultural, and waste sectors which account for 96% of human-caused methane emissions.
  • We will support ambitious catalytic investments, lay the groundwork for long-term transformation of challenging sectors, and also deliver quick wins in sectors that are ripe for action on the ground.
  • Our vision is to collaborate with governmental and non-governmental entities to scale up cost-effective solutions in methane mitigation and contribute to transformational change.

8 of 15

Approved

  • $10M on energy sector in North America and Europe �(November-December 2021)
  • $10M (3 year) to support 30 countries in methane reduction planning (CCAC).
  • $3M in energy sector for Europe transition.

Quick update on funding.

9 of 15

“…seeking abatement of agricultural emissions through technology innovation as well as incentives and partnerships with farmers.”

“…moving towards using the highest tier IPCC good practice inventory methodologies, consistent with IPCC guidance, with particular focus on high emission sources, in order to quantify methane emissions.”

“…maintaining up-to-date, transparent, and publicly available information on our policies and commitments.”

10 of 15

Wide range of production efficiencies/yields

Agricultural CH4 important in almost all regions

11 of 15

Agricultural CH4 mitigation

  • In each case, efficacy and cost-effectiveness is context dependent

  • MRV not always straight forward

  • Multiple gases with interactions between them – often trade-offs

  • Have to consider system resilience and vulnerability

12 of 15

  • Harmonizing regulations, to the extent possible, to favour economic efficiency and innovation

  • Improving national GHG inventories – agricultural CH4

  • Catalyzing investment in early-stage research

  • Validating new approaches

Accelerating action

  • Scaling up/out of available options

  • Explore how to support sectoral initiatives

  • Public education and awareness

  • Building capability in LMICs

Policy

Innovation

Implementation

Education

13 of 15

Need for improved mechanistic understanding of rumen fermentation to underpin all mitigation interventions

14 of 15

Can satellite observations work for agricultural CH4 and lower cost of MRV?

15 of 15