1 of 34

Language & Thought

Masoud Jasbi

LIN001

Week 10

2 of 34

3 of 34

Language & Thought

To understand the relation between language and thought we need to first understand and define each.

We have done that for language in this course.

But how about thought?

Thought

Language

4 of 34

What is Thought?

Examples: think about

a cat

a cat chasing a dog

Your first day of school ever

Number 78

Your path going back home from here

The type of food you’d like to have for dinner

The answer to 78 + 87

A great white shark with horse legs running in a grass field

We call all of these thoughts but they are not really the same.

5 of 34

Thought vs. Cognition

Thought is not a technical term.

It is used loosely to refer to all or some mental processes.

The more technical term is cognition.

In cognitive science, cognition has clearer definitions and types:

Visual Cognition

Spatial Cognition

Auditory Cognition

Number Cognition

6 of 34

Relation Between Language & Thought

We are going to talk about three types of relation between them:

  1. Language = Thought
  2. Language determines Thought
  3. Language affects thought

Thought

Language

7 of 34

Language = Thought Hypothesis

This hypothesis has two important assumptions or parts:

  1. Thought refers to ALL mental processes.
  2. Language and thought are the same or mirror each other.

You may have heard this language=thought idea as:

We think in language.

We cannot think what we cannot say (and vice versa).

“The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.”

Do you think this is true?

Ludwig Wittgenstein

8 of 34

Language ≠ Thought: Spatial Reasoning

There are many mental processes that do not involve language.

Example: What would this 3D shape look like from above?

This is a spatial reasoning task.

To solve the task you rely on mental spatial simulation rather than language.

9 of 34

Language ≠ Thought: Navigation

Consider this navigation task:

What’s the shortest path out of the maze?

You probably imagined that path shown in red.

NOT: Down-left-down-notright-down-right-down-left-down

Or: right-go-left-go-...

It is not even clear what would be a good linguistic description of this path!

10 of 34

Language ≠ Thought: Number Cognition

Consider this number task: which side has more circles?

Did you use language to figure this out?

How many dots on the left? How many on the right? Total?

You just knew (somehow) that one side has more dots.

You you didn’t count each side then compare (which would be more linguistic).

11 of 34

Language ≠ Thought: Animal Cognition

Animals and prelinguistic babies can also accomplish:

Basic spatial reasoning,

Navigation,

Approximate number comparison,

Even though they have no language.

12 of 34

Global Aphasia

Individuals with global aphasia are able to add and subtract, solve logic problems, think about another person’s thoughts, appreciate music, and successfully navigate their environments.

The deficit seems to be restricted to linguistic thought and processing.

Rosemary Varley (UCL)

13 of 34

Neuroimaging Studies

Method

fMRI

Linguistic stimuli vs. pseudo-linguistic stimuli vs. other cognitive tasks

Compare activation levels in different regions of the brain

14 of 34

15 of 34

Fedorenko, Behr, Kenwisher (2011, PNAS)

16 of 34

Relation Between Language & Thought

We are going to talk about three types of relation between them:

  • Language = Thought
  • Language determines Thought
  • Language affects thought

Thought

Language

17 of 34

Linguistic Determinism

Another possible hypothesis is that language and thought are not the same and do not mirror each other but language determines and severely limits thought.

Example claims:

Some language doesn’t have a word for turquoise so the speakers can’t perceive the color.

Some language doesn’t have tense so the speakers perceive time differently.

Language with no gender marking don’t have gender discrimination.

18 of 34

Determinism and Perception

Consider this video: what are the name of these objects in the video?

For those of you who didn’t know the names of the instruments:

Did you not perceive the music?

Do you think you didn’t perceive it the way you will after learning the names?

19 of 34

Theoretical Issues with Determinism

Linguistic determinism runs into issues even in theory.

Suppose:

I speak language A with no word for concept X so I cannot understand X.

I start learning language B with a word for X.

Does that mean I can’t learn what the meaning of X is?!

This prediction is contrary to our observations on typical language learning experience and translation.

20 of 34

21 of 34

Relation Between Language & Thought

We are going to talk about three types of relation between them:

  • Language = Thought
  • Language determines Thought
  • Language affects thought

Thought

Language

22 of 34

Note: Language as a Mental Process

Language is itself a mental process and part of human cognition.

So language itself is a type of thought!

When we ask what is the relation between language and thought, we are really asking:

What is the relation between one type of thought (language) and other types of thought (non-linguistic thought)?

It should not be surprising that language affects thought “in some way”. After all we use it to convey thoughts!

23 of 34

Types of Thought (Cognition)

We can now go to subtypes of cognition to better understand how language may affect them or they can affect language:

  1. Number Cognition
  2. Color Perception
  3. Cognition of Time
  4. Spatial Reasoning and Cognition

24 of 34

Number Cognition

Research has discovered to systems of number cognition:

  1. The approximate number system
  2. The exact number system

25 of 34

Trial 1

Which side has more circles?

26 of 34

Trial 2

How many circles are there?

27 of 34

Approximate Number Representation

The approximate number system is a hypothesized mental system that helps us know the approximate number of objects.

It is shared between humans and many other animals.

28 of 34

Exact Number Representation

The exact number representation relies on a count list and a recursive procedure for defining a successor.

Peano Axioms for Natural Numbers (informal):

1 is the primitive natural number and successor to no other number.

Every natural number a has a successor, denoted by S(a).

Distinct natural numbers have distinct successors: if a ≠ b, then S(a) ≠ S(b).

1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 5 < 6 < 7 <

○ < ○○ < ○○○ < ○○○○ < ○○○○○ < ○○○○○○ < ○○○○○○○ <

This system relies on language (i.e. a symbolic system).

29 of 34

30 of 34

Number Words in Pirahã

Humans can understand numbers without knowing number words.

The Pirahã don’t have words for exact quantities.

Evidence: Experiment 1 (Numeral Elicitation, Fig 1)

The Pirahã understand exact quantities.

They perform well on a matching tasks not involving memory.

Evidence: Experiment 2 one-to-one-match, uneven-match

Number words help remembering quantities.

The Pirahã can perform well on a matching tasks not involving memory.

Evidence: Experiment 2 one-to-one-match, uneven-match

They cannot perform well on matching tasks involving memory.

Evidence: Experiment 2 Orthogonal, Hidden, Nuts-in-a-can

31 of 34

Color Perception & Conceptualization

32 of 34

Color Perception & Conceptualization

A more recent hypothesis is that the order reflects communicative efficiency.

Languages start with color labels that are more informative for object identification and contrast.

33 of 34

Language & Personality

It is a common observation or claim that language affects personality.

Many bi/multilinguals believe they have different personalities speaking different languages.

However, there are two important confounds:

  1. Social Relations
  2. Culture

34 of 34

Last Words