1
FINAL SUBMISSION • CANCER CARE (NCG) TRACK
CerviSetu
An assistive co-pilot that helps India reach the WHO 2030 cervical cancer goals: every woman, every language, with extra effort for rural India
TEAM NAME [Free Cervical Cancer]
TEAM CODE [X7WO1W]
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
Not a diagnostic tool: it manages the treatment pathway; clinicians make every medical decision.
2
Team Overview & Responsibilities
Health-a-thon 2026
1
2
3
Our technical team
Doctor partners (clinical)
Institutions & project focus
Dr. Savita Borole — Technical Lead
Project coordination, technical architecture, AI integration oversight, validation planning and final presentation.
Jeet Chavan — Web & Backend Development
Website, patient database, role-based dashboard, referral tracking and alerts.
Percival Trinidade — UI/UX & Multilingual Support
Patient-friendly interface, local-language communication, accessibility and usability testing.
Dr. Niranjan Chavan
Professor and Unit Chief, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai
Validate cervical cancer prevention, screening, referral and treatment pathways; advise on patient safety and clinical protocols.
Dr. Deeksha Nanda — Clinical Workflow Advisor
Define PHC–hospital workflows, review screening and follow-up scenarios, advise on clinician-facing forms and test the clinical journey.
All medical decisions remain with qualified clinicians.
Fr. Conceicao Rodrigues College of Engineering (FRCRCE), Bandra, Mumbai
Technical development and project coordination.
Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College & General Hospital (Sion Hospital), Mumbai
Clinical guidance and workflow inputs.
Project: CerviSetu
Assistive, multilingual cervical cancer prevention and patient-navigation platform aligned with WHO 90–70–90 goals.
Dr Sujata Deshmukh, H.O.D. of the CE Department, FRCRCE, Bandra, provided team coordination and technical guidance.
Proposed responsibilities — to be confirmed by team members and clinical partners.
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
2
3
Problem Statement - The 2030 Goal: From the World to India
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
World: WHO 2030 targets
India today
Rural India needs extra effort
90%
of girls fully vaccinated against HPV by age 15
70%
of women screened with a high-performance test by age 35 and again by 45
90%
of women with pre-cancer treated and 90% with invasive cancer managed
Elimination means fewer than 4 new cases per 100,000 women a year [25]. The 90-70-90 targets are the way there [1].
17.7
new cases per 100,000 women in 2022, over 4 times the elimination level [2][25]
79,906
deaths in 2022, the most of any country [2]
1.9%
of women screened in the national survey [3]
2026
free HPV vaccination for 14-year-old girls began on 28 Feb [24]
0.8% | 3.3%
recent screening in rural vs urban women aged 45+. Urban coverage is also very low [23]
• Rural women reach the centre late and many are lost to follow-up [9]
• Distance, cost, language and fear make women stop treatment [10][11]
• WHO 2026: how a programme screens depends on whether it can follow women up (60% mark) [26]
CerviSetu's answer: one voice-first, low-cost bridge for every woman. Urban clinics get scale and fewer lost results; rural women get extra support: local-language voice, ASHA visits,.
Sources: [1] WHO [2] WCRF/GLOBOCAN 2022 [3] Mohan 2025 [9] Bindu [10] Singh [11] Ghosh [23] Popul Med 2026 [24] India HPV drive [25] WHO strategy [26] WHO 2026 guideline
4
Problem Statement and Supporting Evidence
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
2.4%
urban women aged 30–49 years reported ever being screened for cervical cancer [27]
1.8%
rural women aged 30–49 years reported ever being screened [27]
2.0%
overall screening coverage among Indian women aged 30–49 years; approximately 98% had never been screened [27]
The problem: A major screening gap, with Rural Women
1
Low uptake in both settings
Only 2.0% of women aged 30–49 reported ever being screened in NFHS-5; coverage was inadequate in urban as well as rural India [27].
2
Urban–rural inequity
Screening coverage was 2.4% in urban versus 1.8% in rural women. Distance, service availability and socioeconomic barriers can compound the rural gap [27,28].
3
Missed opportunities for early detection
Limited awareness, embarrassment, low understanding of screening and uneven access to services reduce participation [27,28].
4
Weak follow-up after a positive screen
Fragmented referral pathways and travel to higher centres can delay colposcopy, biopsy and treatment; abnormal results need active tracking [28,29].
WHO 2030 target: 70% of women screened with a high-performance test by 35 and again by 45. CerviSetu addresses the gap by linking community-level screening to timely referral, diagnosis and treatment [1,27].
Sources: [1] WHO 90–70–90 targets [27] Garg et al., BMC Cancer 2025 [28] Gupta et al., J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024 [29] Van Dyne et al., MMWR 2019
5
Target Users and Use Case
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
Patient and caregiver
70% of the design effort
• Voice and WhatsApp in her language
• Follow up of vaccination
• Symptom check-ins
Spoke nurse / helper
Lighter paperwork
• Photo of a paper slip instead of typing
• One-tap daily fraction log
• Traffic-light ward board each morning
• Records voice consent
ASHA
Gynaecologist
Safety net and oversight
• Field ticket with token and landmark (Tier 3)
• District officer told only after clinician and legal review (Tier 4)
The task
Diagnosis within 14 days for those screened positive for early initiation of treatment.
Key needs and fit
Existing phones, local language, no extra staff. Tracking of the patient till treatment is completed.
Sources: [8] Chopra et al., NCG consensus guidelines, JGO 2018. Design split and pathway are the team's own (CerviSetu Patient Flow Specification v2.0).
Healthcare Setting
Patient presenting to PHC with relevant symptoms is examined and screened for cervical cancer by Pap smear/VIA screening
6
Target Users and Use Cases
CerviSetu | Rural–Urban Cervical Cancer Care Navigation
Target User | Use Case |
Urban & Rurals Patients | Registration, screening status, multilingual reminders, referral updates and financial assistance guidance |
ASHA Workers / ANMs | Community outreach, patient registration, screening reminders and missed-visit follow-up |
Nurses / PHC & CHC Medical Officers | Record screening results, review follow-up needs, initiate clinician-approved referrals |
Gynecologists / Diagnostic Specialists | Evaluate abnormal screening, arrange colposcopy/biopsy where indicated and refer appropriately |
Oncologists / Government Hospitals | Receive referrals, assess confirmed/suspected cancer, plan treatment and update care status |
Programme Managers / Administrators | Monitor referral completion, delays, missed follow-ups and aggregate care indicators |
Core objective: Close the gap between screening, diagnosis, referral, treatment and follow-up.
7
CerviSetu | HEALTH-A-THON 2026
Key Use Case: End-to-End Patient Tracking
Closed-loop referral pathway — from abnormal screening to care completion
Cervical Cancer Care Navigation • Rural & Urban
02
01
Register & consent
Patient / ASHA / nurse
Patient record + consent
↓
02
Screen & record
HPV / VIA / Pap as appropriate
Screening result
↓
03
Clinical review
Assess abnormal findings
Diagnostic plan
↓
04
Refer & coordinate
Gynecology / district hospital / oncology as indicated
Accepted referral + appointment
↓
05
Treat & follow up
Care team / hospital
Milestones + missed-visit alerts
OUTPUT: Referral completion • Time to diagnosis/treatment • Follow-up status • Escalation of missed visits
8
Solution Overview: Three WHO Targets, One Platform (1 of 2)
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
90
Vaccinate
Dose reminders and records, checked against public-health schedules.
Planned extension
70
Screen
Primary-level screening with VIA or Pap smear; record result and communicate next steps.
Screening/referral pathway
90
Treat
Keep every woman on her treatment clock until the last session.
Built in this submission
How a woman moves through CerviSetu: screening → referral → treatment
Day 1
Onboard
• Patient registered and relevant symptoms noted.
• Basic blood investigations, HHH
• 14-day clock start
• Scheme check (PMJAY)
Days 2-14
Coach
• Patient and relative counselling when screening positive and importance of early diagnosis explained.
• Check-in every 3 days
• Mild: home-care audio with track of symptomatic management.
• Red flag: nurse call
Day 15
Diagnosis and treatment
• Diagnosis by colposcopy guided biopsy
• Further investigations
•treatment started according the staging of cancer
•
If a visit is missed
Escalate
• Tier 1: WhatsApp / SMS
• Tier 2: voice call
• Tier 3: ASHA visit
• Tier 4: district officer, after review
After treatment
Follow up
• Final treatment time logged
• Reminders at 3, 6, 12 months for first 3 yrs for CA cervix.
Abnormal-screen pathway: VIA/Pap smear at the screening facility. If cytology is suspicious for malignancy, arrange colposcopy-guided biopsy at a tertiary centre within 2 weeks (14 days). CerviSetu records the result, referral and completion; clinicians make all clinical decisions.
Sources: ISCCP–FOGSI Gynae Oncology–AOGIN India Consensus Guidelines (2020), pp. 3–5 [30]; treatment pathway: CerviSetu Patient Flow Specification v2.0; WHO targets [1].
9
CERVISETU / HEALTH-A-THON 2026
Solution Overview & Key Features
A multilingual, patient-centred navigation platform for rural and urban cervical cancer care.
CerviSetu • Connecting screening to timely care
01
THE SOLUTION
Connect patients, ASHA/ANM workers, PHCs, specialists and government hospitals to track screening, referrals, treatment and follow-up.
Patient tracking
Registration, screening results and longitudinal care status.
Clinician-approved referrals
PHC/CHC → diagnostic services → specialist or government hospital, as indicated.
Closed-loop coordination
Track referral acceptance, visits, diagnosis and treatment milestones.
Multilingual assistance
Regional-language and voice guidance, reminders and patient queries.
Financial navigation
Explain relevant government schemes and eligibility requirements.
Role-based dashboards
ASHA, nurses and doctors see pending referrals and missed follow-ups.
10
CERVISETU / HEALTH-A-THON 2026
Patient Journey & Expected Impact
From abnormal screening results to completed referral, appropriate treatment and continued follow-up.
CerviSetu • Connecting screening to timely care
02
01
Register
Patient / ASHA / nurse
→
02
Screen
HPV / VIA / Pap results
→
03
Review & refer
Clinician-led diagnostic pathway
→
04
Navigate care
Hospital visit + financial guidance
→
05
Track & follow up
Treatment status + missed-visit alerts
EXPECTED IMPACT
Fewer missed follow-ups
Flag missed visits for healthcare-worker outreach.
Timelier referrals
Improve coordination from primary care to diagnostic and oncology services.
More accessible care
Regional-language support and government-scheme awareness.
Measurable progress
Track referral completion, time to diagnosis and treatment initiation.
Clinical safeguard: Abnormal screening does not itself confirm cancer; referral and treatment decisions require clinician review.
11
Key Features, Evidence and Expected Impact (2 of 2)
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
Feature | What it does | Evidence behind it |
Community screening: VIA / Pap smear | Support screening at accessible facilities; capture modality, date and result. Provide local-language information and reminders. | India's operational framework includes VIA; Pap cytology is used where laboratory capacity exists [28,29]. NFHS-5 coverage: 2.4% urban vs 1.8% rural [27]. |
Urgent referral for suspected malignancy | Flag suspicious cytology and coordinate tertiary-centre colposcopy-guided biopsy within 2 weeks (14 days); track whether the appointment and biopsy are completed. | ISCCP–FOGSI–AOGIN consensus: suspicious-for-malignancy reports require colposcopy/biopsy within 2 weeks [30]. |
Diagnosis and treatment | Track each treatment step, project the completion date and flag patients at risk of exceeding 56 days. | Prolonged overall treatment time is associated with persistent disease, local recurrence and disease progression |
4-tier follow-up and navigation | Missed appointment triggers SMS/WhatsApp, voice call, ASHA follow-up and escalation after clinical review. | Patient navigation can improve screening uptake, although evidence for abnormal-result follow-up is less certain [15,22]. Rural access barriers and low screening uptake are documented [27,28]. |
Multilingual records and referral tracking | Capture screening and biopsy status, draft voice notes, maintain signed records and show referral closure across spoke and hub. | Digital tools can support continuity but do not replace functioning health services [17]. WHO and Indian evidence emphasise accessible, connected screening and follow-up [28,29]. |
Expected impact (pilot outcomes to measure, not yet results): increase screening uptake in both rural and urban populations; reduce the urban–rural coverage gap; increase the proportion of women with suspicious cytology receiving colposcopy-guided biopsy within 14 days; improve completion of referral and treatment pathways; and increase completion of cancer treatment within 56 days. Report every measure separately for rural and urban women.
Evidence: [4] Petereit 1995 [5] Oncotarget 2017 [8] NCG [15] Dalton 2019 [17] WHO 2019 [22] Nelson 2025 [27] Garg et al. 2025 [28] Gupta et al. 2024 [29] Van Dyne et al. 2019 [30] ISCCP–FOGSI–AOGIN 2020
12
Technology, Tools and AI Approach
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
INPUTS
RULES ENGINE (no ML)
AI SERVICES
OUTPUTS AND STORES
Why most alerts are rules, not AI
Screening intervals, 2-dose HPV timelines, and 14-day follow-up windows are strict clinical protocols, not probabilities. Deterministic code guarantees 100% auditable alerts, while AI is restricted to voice translation, report OCR, and clinician-reviewed note drafting.
Built on rails India already has
Powered by 93.95+ Cr ABHA IDs and FHIR R4 (CARE EMR) for seamless ASHA-to-Tertiary referrals. Uses Sarvam AI / Bhashini for rural dialects and aligns directly with India’s national Cervavac HPV drive.
Sources: [17] WHO 2019 [20] ABDM Mission Steering Group, MoHFW, 10 Jul 2026 [21] DPDP Act 2023. Architecture: CerviSetu Patient Flow Specification v2.0.
13
Build Sprint Journey and Progress
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
Milestone
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Pathway map, 14-day clock for , ward board
Reviewed Hindi voice scripts (3 tracks)
4-tier escalation and ASHA web ticket
Voice notes, FHIR output, consent and audit ledger
Bar positions are indicative: [adjust to your real sprint log].
How the idea evolved
• Round 1: clinic-side tools only
• Now: aimed at all three WHO targets, deepest build on treatment (~70% patient / 30% clinician effort)
Design changes
• No fixed water volumes before kidney tests are checked
• Hindi script: 'अंदरूनी विकिरण उपचार'; never 'painless'
• Travel pass held until the hub confirms the slot
• Identity shared with authorities only after clinician and legal review
[Confirm clinical review is documented]
Working now
Demo with clinic-tablet and patient-phone views, Fraction-15 advance, hub slot confirmation, 5 REST endpoints [confirm against your build].
Still incomplete
Live state-transport and dharamshala booking (simulated now); pilot on real pathway data; [add other gaps].
Sources: Timeline from the team's 30-day plan and Patient Flow Specification v2.0; confirm status before submitting.
14
Evaluation and User Validation
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
1. Rule test cases
2. AI components
3. User validation
Outcome measures for the pilot
Follow-Up Adherence: Targets a +24.0% increase in 14-day follow-up and dose completion, cutting loss-to-follow-up from 60% to less than 10%.
Decentralized Filtering: Benign cases resolved locally by ASHAs, preventing unnecessary tertiary overcrowding.
Economic Relief: Saves 145,000 km of unneeded tertiary travel and ₹27.8 Lakhs in out-of-pocket costs per district.
Study Design: Pre/post-pilot evaluation under the AID-CARE quality-improvement protocol.
Limitations
Synthetic Benchmark: Validated on multi-stage synthetic profiles (PT-RURAL-7891, PT-VACC-101, PT-PREC-202); IEC/IRB ethics approval required before live deployment.
2G Connectivity: Deep rural belts (e.g., Sonbhadra) require offline-first SQLite PWA caching on ASHA devices.
Study Scope: Single-centre quality-improvement framework, not a multi-centre RCT.
15
Safety and Responsible AI
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
Privacy and consent
Security and audit
AI limits
Human oversight
Clinical guardrails
Bias, access, inclusion
Sources: [17] WHO 2019 · [18] WHO AI Ethics for Health 2021 · [21] DPDP Act 2023 | Regulatory Class: Non-Diagnostic Clinical Decision Support & Workflow SaMD (CDSCO Class A / Low Risk, MDR 2017).
16
Deployment, Cost and Sustainability Plan
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
To pilot at one centre
• One NCG spoke and its hub, plus a clinical lead
• De-identified pathway dates for a baseline audit
• Staff Android phones; WhatsApp Business and IVR provider
• Offline-friendly queue; human fallback for women without a phone
• Track workload and cost per completed pathway
Integrations
• ABDM / ABHA through FHIR R4
• Bhashini / Sarvam for Indic speech
• Hospital ward list, OT scheduling, CARE EMR (proposed)
• State transport and dharamshala booking (simulated today)
Scale and sustain
• The NCG links 108 institutions [8]; the same spoke-hub pattern repeats
Cost item | Pricing assumption | Estimate |
One-time: setup and staff training per facility | 3 trainer/onboarding days × ₹4,000/day (NHM norms) | Rs 12,000 |
One-time: language and script review | 21 scripts (3 clinical flows × 7 languages) × ₹1,200 review | Rs 25,200 |
Per transaction: message, call minute, speech-to-text | WhatsApp (₹0.12) / SMS (₹0.12) / IVR (₹0.40) / Sarvam STT & OCR (₹0.50) | Rs 0.45 per use |
Monthly per facility: hosting and messaging | 20 active patients (₹80 messaging) + AWS Mumbai infra (₹920) | Rs 1,000 / month |
Monthly per doctor | ₹1,000 facility cost ÷ 2.5 clinicians (₹0 software license) | Rs 400 / month |
Costs are left blank on purpose: no sourced price list was available. Fill them from your provider quotes and state your assumptions. Open standards and existing phones keep one-time cost low.
Sources: [8] Chopra et al., NCG consensus, JGO 2018. Cost figures to be completed by the team.
17
What Next? Plans to Take the Initiative Forward
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
Days 1-30
Pilot at one NCG centre
• Map the real pathway with the clinical lead
• Dry run on de-identified records
• Baseline audit: treatment completion, drop-out
Months 2-4
Measure and refine
• Compare before and after on the same measures AID-CARE used [19]
• Tune Hindi scripts with patient feedback
• Add screening and vaccination reminders (WHO 70 and 90)
• Report rural and urban results separately
Months 5-12
Scale and fund
• Extend to more spokes around the hub
• Seek NCG and state partnerships; [grants / funding plan]
• Publish pilot results
Our ask
One NCG partner centre and de-identified pathway dates for a baseline audit. Every day saved on treatment protects pelvic control [4].
Make all information public on Health-a-thon or other websites?
[Yes ]
Sources: [4] Petereit 1995 [19] AID-CARE 2026. Funding plan to be completed by the team.
18
Thank you
CerviSetu • [X7WO1W]
savita.borole@fragnel.edu.in | https://cervi-setu.pages.dev/ | https://drive.google.com/file/d/16l-TvH1dR5j1hMcbAAils9efy5uEkBBj/view?usp=sharing | https://github.com/ihatecoding01/CerviSetu
Health-a-thon 2026 • Cancer Care (NCG)
HEALTH-A-THON 2026
19
Appendix: Evidence References
HEALTH-A-THON 2026 • FINAL SUBMISSION
[1] WHO. Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative: 90-70-90 targets (WHA, Aug 2020).
[2] WCRF International. Cervical cancer statistics (GLOBOCAN 2022).
[3] Mohan R, et al. Female-specific cancers, India, GLOBOCAN 2022. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2025.
[4] Petereit DG, et al. Adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;32(5):1301-7.
[5] Taiwanese nationwide cohort: overall treatment time in cervical cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8(49):85203-13.
[6] Gupta IJ, et al. Interdigitated vs sequential HDR brachytherapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2023;24(10):3441-5.
[7] Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(35):5802-12.
[8] Chopra S, et al. NCG consensus guidelines, cervical cancer. J Glob Oncol 2018;4:1-15.
[9] Bindu T, et al. Survival and loss to follow-up, rural Kerala. Indian J Public Health 2017;61(1):43-6.
[10] Singh K, et al. Adherence to radiotherapy, Punjab. Asian Pac J Cancer Care 2022;7(1):3-8.
[11] Ghosh G, et al. Advanced radiation therapy, remote centre, central India. Int J Res Med Sci 2024;12(9):3263-6.
[12] Duffy EA, et al. Nephrotoxicity in cisplatin therapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2018;22(2).
[13] Basch E, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes. JAMA 2017. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7156
[14] Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance. Cochrane 2013.
[15] Dalton M, et al. Patient navigation in LMICs: scoping review. PLoS ONE 2019;14(10):e0223537.
[16] Sinsky C, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice. Ann Intern Med 2016.
[17] WHO. Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening, 2019.
[18] WHO. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, 2021.
[19] AID-CARE bundled-workflow QI project, India, 2026. PMID 42409422 (team deck cites Bonala et al., BMJ Open Qual, doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003874).
[20] ABDM Mission Steering Group, MoHFW, 10 Jul 2026 (93.95 crore ABHA; 105 crore records).
[21] Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, Government of India.
[22] Nelson HD, et al. Patient navigation for breast and cervical cancer screening: meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2025;185(8):976-85.
[23] Rural-urban gap in cervical screening, women 45+, India (LASI Wave 1). Popul Med 2026, Suppl 1.
[24] India national HPV vaccination drive for 14-year-old girls, 28 Feb 2026 (news report; confirm with MoHFW/PIB release).
[
Data note: NFHS-5 (2019–21) asked specifically about cervical cancer screening; the NFHS-4 MMWR (2015–16) used self-reported prior cervix examination. These indicators have different definitions and should not be interpreted as a direct time trend.