1 of 25

Blood Transfusion Simulation �Case Study

FUNDAMENTALS NURSING SIMULATION

Ernie Lindain Jr

NUR 7060: Clinical Teaching Strategies

Dr. Phillips

FOR ENTRY-LEVEL BSN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

2 of 25

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

Background and rationale

Educational framework

Participant preparation

Simulation objectives

Roles and patient information

Simulation progression + expected interventions

Debriefing and evaluation

Summary and recommendations

3 of 25

Background and rationale

Blood transfusion is a high-risk nursing intervention that requires strict adherence to safety protocols. Simulation supports the development of clinical judgment, patient safety behaviors, and decision-making in novice learners

(CONNOR ET AL., 2022; OERMANN ET AL., 2023).

4 of 25

Simulation design is informed by evidence-based teaching strategies and recognition of diverse student learning styles to enhance engagement and knowledge retention.

(DEGAGNE & OERMANN, 2025; LAMIRI ET AL., 2020)

Educational Framework

5 of 25

Target Audience (Student Selection)

This simulation case is designed for entry-level (Fundamentals) BSN undergraduate nursing students in their first clinical semester.

​

6 of 25

Participant preparation

Student selection and prerequisites

Assigned readings

Prebriefing and orientation

Review of institutional blood transfusion policies (DEGAGNE & OERMANN, 2025).

7 of 25

Prebriefing establishes psychological safety, clarifies expectations, and prepares students for simulation-based learning. Effective prebriefing is essential to optimize learner outcomes

(OERMANN ET AL., 2023).

Prebriefing

8 of 25

Mr. John Ramirez is a 68-year-old male admitted with symptomatic anemia secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding.

​

HEMOGLOBIN: �6.9 g/dL

�ORDER: �Transfuse 1 unit of packed red blood cells

​

​

Patient �overview

9 of 25

Simulation objectives

Upon completion of this simulation, students will be able to:

Verify blood products using two patient identifiers

​

Perform baseline and ongoing transfusion assessments

​

​

Initiate blood transfusion per institutional protocol

​

​

​

Recognize signs of transfusion reactions

​

​

​

​

Implement appropriate nursing interventions

​

​

​

(CONNOR ET AL., 2022).

10 of 25

Participant roles

Primary Nurse

Secondary Nurse

Clinical Educator/�Charge Nurse

Conducts patient assessment, reviews MD orders and initiates transfusion

Verifies blood product with primary nurse and assists with monitoring

Provides instruction, cues and ensures patient safety

​

(OERMANN ET AL., 2023).

11 of 25

Participant expectations

Students are expected to adhere to transfusion protocol, including reviewing orders, assessing patient, and checking vital signs. They should also communicate effectively, demonstrate professionalism, and engage in reflective debriefing upon completion.

(DEGAGNE & OERMANN, 2025).

12 of 25

Simulation progression

PHASE 1

PHASE 2

PHASE 3

Pre-transfusion verification

​

Active transfusion monitoring

Recognition and management of transfusion reactions

​

13 of 25

Students verify MD orders, confirm consent, obtain baseline assessments, and perform two-nurse blood verification to promote patient safety. Oermann et al. (2023) highlight the importance of teaching students to anchor decisions in evidence-based frameworks.

Pre-transfusion verification

Simulation progression

PHASE 1

PHASE 2

PHASE 3

14 of 25

Students initiate transfusion per protocol, remain with the patient during the initial monitoring period, and assess for early signs of adverse reactions

(CONNOR ET AL., 2022).

Transfusion initiation

Simulation progression

PHASE 1

PHASE 2

PHASE 3

15 of 25

The patient develops fever, chills, back pain, and anxiety. Early recognition of signs and symptoms and intervention are critical to preventing harm (MCCANCE ET AL., 2023).

DeGagne and Oermann (2025) highlight nurse educators playing a pivotal role in reflective practice and professional growth.

Simulation progression

PHASE 1

PHASE 2

PHASE 3

Transfusion reaction

16 of 25

Expected nursing interventions following transfusion reaction

Students should stop the transfusion, reassess the patient, notify the provider and blood bank, and document findings in accordance with safety indicators (GERICH ET AL., 2022).

17 of 25

Participant preparation

Facilitate structured reflection on student performance

Promote development of clinical judgment and decision-making

Reinforce patient safety principles related to blood transfusion

Support transfer of simulation learning to clinical practice

(OERMANN ET AL., 2023; CONNOR ET AL., 2022)

​

​

18 of 25

Debriefing phases

Students verbalize initial thoughts and responses

Faculty normalizes stress and uncertainty common in simulation

Reaction Phase

Analysis Phase

Review patient cues indicating �a transfusion reaction

Examine priority of nursing interventions

​

Discuss adherence to transfusion protocols and safety standards

Evaluate communication and teamwork

Summary Phase

Identify key learning points

Discuss application of transfusion safety principles in clinical practice

19 of 25

Sample Debriefing Questions

What assessment findings indicated a transfusion reaction?

How did communication influence patient outcomes?

Which nursing actions were most critical to patient safety?

How can this experience improve future clinical practice?

​

20 of 25

Evaluation

Evaluation includes formative and summative methods such as faculty observation, performance checklists, and self-reflection to assess learning outcomes (GERICH ET AL., 2022).

Measure achievement of simulation learning objectives

Assess development of clinical judgment and safety behaviors

Identify areas for improvement in transfusion-related care

​

​

​

(OERMANN ET AL., 2023).

21 of 25

EVALUATION

Evaluation includes formative and summative methods such as faculty observation, performance checklists, and self-reflection to assess learning outcomes (Gerich et al., 2022).

Measure achievement of simulation learning objectives

Assess development of clinical judgment and safety behaviors

Identify areas for improvement in transfusion-related care�(Oermann et al., 2023)

22 of 25

Evaluation Methods

Evaluation Methods

Faculty observation using a standardized performance checklist

Assessment of clinical judgment, aligning with simulation objectives

Student self-reflection, promoting metacognition and learning

Peer feedback during debriefing discussions

​

​

Evaluation Criteria

Accurate patient identification and blood verification

Timely recognition of transfusion reaction symptoms

Appropriate implementation of nursing interventions

Effective communication and teamwork

Compliance with institutional policies and patient safety standards

(GERICH ET AL., 2022)

​

​

​

23 of 25

Recommendations

Recommendations for Students

Review blood transfusion protocols and reaction management regularly

Strengthen assessment and early recognition skills

Practice structured communication techniques (e.g., SBAR)

Recommendations for Faculty

Repeat simulation with alternative transfusion reaction scenarios

Increase scenario complexity as students progress in the curriculum

Incorporate electronic documentation to reflect clinical practice

Use evaluation data to guide future instruction�(DeGagne & Oermann, 2025)

Future improvements include increasing case study complexity, reviewing electronic health record documentation, and reinforcing safety indicators.

​

(Gerich et al., 2022; DeGagne & Oermann, 2025).

24 of 25

Simulation-based education enhances transfusion safety, clinical judgment, and student readiness, aligning evidence-based teaching strategies with learner needs ��

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

(CONNOR ET AL., 2022; LAMIRI ET AL., 2020).

Summary

25 of 25

References

Connor, J., Flenady, T., Massey, D., & Dwyer, T. (2022). Clinical judgement in nursing: An evolutionary concept analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31(1–2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16469

DeGagne, J., & Oermann, M. (2025). Teaching in nursing and role of the educators (4th ed.). Springer Publishing.

Gerich, H., Moen, H., & Peltonen, L. (2022). Identifying nursing sensitive indicators from electronic health records in acute cardiac care. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(8), 3726–3735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13802

Lamiri, A., Qaisar, R., Khoaja, D., Abidi, O., Bouzoubaa, H., & Khyati, A. (2020). Descriptive study of nursing students’ learning styles. The Open Nursing Journal, 14(1), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434602014010309

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rogers, J. L. (2023). Pathophysiology: The biological basis for disease in adults and children (9th ed.). Elsevier.

Oermann, M. H., Shellenbarger, T., & Gaberson, K. B. (2023). Clinical teaching strategies in nursing (6th ed.). Springer Publishing.