BREEDING �AND �MANAGEMENT �OF DUCKS
Waterfowls -classification
A. cygnoides- swan goose
A. anser- greylag goose
C.moschata
A.platyrhyncos
Species
Anseres
Anseres
Anseres
Suborder
Anser
Cairina
Anas
Genus
Tribe
Subfamily
Family
Suborder
Order
Anserini
Cairinini
Anatini
Anserinae
Anatinae
Anatinae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anseriformes
Anseriformes
Anseriformes
Goose
Muscovy
Duck
WATERFOWL
Muscovy duck
Greylag goose
Kuttanad duck
Chromosome number
* 82 also have been reported
Duck Breeding
* Growth and carcass traits
* Egg and reproduction traits
GROWTH TRAITS
Mallard duck and family
Growth pattern in White Pekin ducks (Cherry Valley)
3367.28
2623.79
2014.60
1309.52
711.85
259.88
53.45
89.34
Mean
218.82
34 d
275.57
43 d
203.84
28 d
156.87
21 d
82.07
14 d
27.08
Body wt- 7 d
4.70
Chick wt
6.64
Egg wt
SD
Trait
N=eggs 675, ducklings 539
Ref: Hall,A.D. and Martin D.M.(2005). Proc. 3rd WWFC, Guangzhou, China
White Pekin ducks
Heritability of Body weight
Mean and h2 estimates in White Pekin ducks �(Cherry valley)
0.29+0.01
15.01
Breast depth (45 d),mm
0.31+0.02
2.63
FCR (28-45 d)
0.26+0.04
96.48
Av. daily gain (28-45 d)
0.51+0.02
3593
45 day wt,g
0.28+0.02
2435
28 day wt,g
0.37+0.03
609.5
11 day wt,g
h2
Mean
Trait
Ref: Hall, A.D. (2005) Proc.3rd Waterfowl Conference, Guangzhou, China
Genetic parameters of growing White Pekin ducks
0.01
22.8
652.4
Subcutaneous fat wt,g
0.22
11.5
52.2
Abdominal fat wt,g
0.05
13.8
121.3
Leg & Thigh muscle wt,g
0.35
23.9
171.3
Breast muscle wt,g
0.46
208.4
2477.7
Slaughter BW,g
0.32
227.5
2854.3
Body wt, 6w, g
h2
SD
Mean
Trait
N=220 progeny from 36 sires and 94 dams
Ref: Z.Li, S.S. Hou and X.L. Liu. (2005) .
Proc.3rd Waterfowl Conference, Guangzhou, China
Selection for market weight
INDIAN RUNNER DUCKS
Tissue composition in White Pekin ducks (without neck and giblets)
Age, days | Breast muscle, % | Leg muscle, % | Skin & fat, % |
28 | 4.8 | 18.0 | 41.6 |
35 | 7.0 | 16.7 | 41.0 |
42 | 8.4 | 14.7 | 40.4 |
49 | 12.0 | 14.0 | 38.1 |
56 | 14.4 | 13.4 | 37.1 |
63 | 15.9 | 15.9 | 37.5 |
Source- R.D.Crawford (1990). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
White Pekin brereder
Tissue distribution in Muscovy ducks ( Males)
20.0
17.6
16.8
3070
11
19.4
19.5
14.7
2678
10
23.2
19.7
9.5
2537
9
25.7
21.4
8.3
2050
8
27.9
21.0
5.4
1789
7
Skin+fat, %
Leg muscle, %
Breast muscle, %
Body weight, g
Age , weeks
Source-R.D.Crawford (1990). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Muscovy duck
Heritability estimates for body weight
Breed | Age, days | h2S+D | Ref. |
Pekin | 42 | 0.34-0.56 | Cerveny et al (1986) |
| 49 | 0.28 | Pinjel and Jung (1979) |
| 56 | 0.35 | Pinjel and Heimpold (1983) |
| 56 | 0.43 | Kain (1988) |
Muscovy | 70 | 0.43 | Ricard et al (1983) |
| 74 | 0.53 | Trettner (1984) |
Source- R.D.Crawford (1990). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Confirmation
Feed Conversion Ratio
Green sheen on Male ducks
EGG PRODUCTION TRAITS
Heritability estimates
Mazanowski (1988)
0.17
EN
Pekin
0.60
EW
0.4
EW
Cerveny et al (1986)
0.23
EN
Pekin
0.34
AFE
0.47
EW
Wezyk (1971)
0.26
EN
Pekin
Ref.
h2S+D
Trait
Breed
EN-egg number, EW-egg weight, AFE-age at first egg
Selection methods
Interspecies hybrids
Mule Duck
SYSTEMS OF REARING
1. Herded system of rearing or open range rearing.
Housing for ducks
1. Open range rearing system
(12’ X 8’/60-70 ducklings)
Housing
2. Semi intensive system
Housing
3. Intensive system
A. ROOF
Shed / gable
5 to 12 m. wide,60 m long
B. SIDE WALLS
1.5 – 3m
C. INSULATION AND
MECHANICAL VENTILATION
Housing
Intensive system (contd..)
D. FLOOR
Cement concrete
All wire mesh
Combination of litter and
wire mesh
Housing
Intensive system (contd..)
Easy to clean and disinfect
12 G (2.6mm)welded 2.5cm mesh 30cm height
slope floor
Litter not needed
No contact between bird and droppings
No frequent cleaning
Housing
Housing
COMBINATION OF LITTER AND WIRE MESH
Wire floor 1/4th of total floor space
Waterers located on one side of the building
Intensive system (contd..)
Management of ducks
Semi intensive system
Management of ducks
Intensive system
a. Battery brooder
b. Brooding on wire floors
c. Brooding on deep litter
Management of ducks
a. Battery Brooder
bulbs
tier
weeks
Management of ducklings
Intensive system
Wire net (13 sq.mm mesh, 8 gauge thick, 20 - 25 cm above floor )
Up to seven weeks of age
Avoids problem of wet litter
Floors are given a slope
Management of ducklings
Intensive system
a. Litter 5 – 10cm depth
per duckling
c. Wet litter is a serious problem
Management of ducklings
Intensive system
a. Litter thickness 15 - 20 cm
b. Wet litter problem
Deep litter
Floor space
Meat type on Deep litter
1800-2250
3 – 7
900
2 – 3
675
1 – 2
450
0 – 1
Floor space
(Sq.cm)
Age in weeks
Floor space
1350-1800
3 – 7
450
2 – 3
300
1 – 2
225
0 – 1
Floor space(Sq.ft)
Age in weeks
Meat type on Wire Floor
Feeder and water space - wire floor
2.50
2.50
2 – 4
1.25
1.25
0 – 2
Water space (cm)
Feeder space (cm)
Age in weeks
Feeder and water space - deep litter
4.50
6.25
8.75
12.5
9-20 weeks
3.75
5
7.5
10
Upto 8 weeks
Layer
Broiler
Layer
Broiler
Waterer space(cm)
Feeder space(cm)
Age in weeks
CAGE SYSTEM –Layer ducks
EXTENSIVE DUCK REARING SYSTEM
CHARA
KUTTANAD DUCK VARIETIES
CHEMBALLI
Duckling management
Duckling management
Brooding shed
Duckling management
Ducklings in rice field
1. Mortality – 8 per cent�2. Males separated at about 2-3 months of age�3. Grower birds in open fields�4. Vaccination-Duck Plague
Ducklings
Grower ducklings
Management of adult ducks
BILL MARKING�METHOD FOR IDENTIFICATION OF FLOCKS
Night shelter
Flock shifting by road - transportation charges
Mini Lorry : Rs. 13/km
Lorry : Rs. 20/km
Management of adult ducks
(palm pith + groundnut cake + grains )
Management of adult ducks
Foraging
Management of adult ducks
Management of adult ducks
CORYPHA PALM, TRUNK AND PITH
PROXIMATE COMPOSITION OF PALM PITH(%)
MOIST. | ASH | CP | CF | EE |
42.1 | 1.6 | 10.9 | 8.6 | 13.1 |
Sustainability of palm
Mean body weight(g) of Chara and Chemballi females at different ages
45.95 + 0.40 b
566.48 + 8.15
946.17 + 9.71 a
1417.94 + 9.25
1487.63 + 8.05
1497.51 + 8.38 b
1466.68 + 9.04
1475.45 + 7.88
1328.81 + 8.42 a
1362.81 + 8.91
1402.50 + 12.23 a
46.67 + 0.32a
553.07 + 7.25
995.36 + 8.87 a
1370.05 + 9.22
1534.86 + 7.42
1538.15 + 7.06 a
1486.36 + 8.84
1494.07 + 7.34
1335.24 + 7.44 a
1325.78 + 7.07
1337.60 + 9.72 b
Day old
4
8
12
16
20
30
40
52
60
72
Chemballi
mean + S.E.
Chara
mean + S.E.
Age in weeks
Reproductive traits of Chara and Chemballi
55
58
Days to reach 50 % production from the age at 1st egg
184
187
Average age at 50 % egg production (days)
148
153
Average age at 10 % production (days)
141
144
Average age at 5 % production (days)
148
149
Average age at first egg ( days)
129
129
Age at first egg (days)
Chemballi (N=300)
Chara
(N= 300)
Traits
Egg number per duck and per cent duck-day egg production of Chara and Chemballi at thirteen 28 day laying periods
Mean egg weight(g) of Chara and Chemballi ducks at different ages
68.33 + 0.56 a
68.94 + 0.20 a
66.97 + 0.65 a
68.89 + 0.43 a
68.28 + 0.46 b
68.19 + 0.59a
69.94 + 0.33 a
70.93 + 0.55 a
68.81 + 0.54 a
69.47 + 0.50 a
30
40
50
72
Overall
Chemballi
Mean + S.E.
Chara
Mean + S.E.
Age in weeks
Figures with different superscripts in a line differ significantly (P<0.05)
�DUCK FARMING ACTIVITIES�
DUCK FARMING ACTIVITIES
DUCK EGGS� BEFORE PACKING
Weekly body weight, daily feed consumption and feed conversion efficiency of Kuttanad ducklings of Kerala
3.06
3668.0
6.28
716.1
102.3
1200
8.
2.72
2953.0
3.58
819.0
117.0
1086
7.
2.49
2133.5
3.52
612.5
87.5
857
6.
2.22
1521.0
2.44
609.0
87.0
683
5.
2.11
912.1
2.34
406.7
58.1
433
4.
1.95
505.4
2.77
354.2
50.6
259
3.
1.15
151.2
1.87
100.8
14.4
131
2.
0.65
50.4
1.36
50.4
7.2
77
1.
Cumul.FCR
Cumulative Feed intake
(g)
Weekly FCR (kg feed / kg meat
Weekly feed intake
(g)
Daily feed intake
(g)
Mean body weight
(g)
Age in weeks
WEEKLY WEIGHT OF KUTTANAD DUCKLINGS �UPTO 8 WEEKS OF AGE
Production performance of Kuttanad ducks from 21 to 40 weeks of age(CAGE).
Periods / Age in weeks
Overall
Traits
I
21- 24
II
25-28
III
29-32
IV
33-36
V
37-40
Mean egg No./duck
10.51
17.15
15.73
18.67
18.58
80.64
Mean % production
37.55
61.26
56.17
66.67
66.34
57.60
Dailyfeed Consumption (g)
173.07
2.55
168.25
1.03
166.25
3.88
177.25
4.48
174.58
3.08
171.88
2.13
Feed efficiency
4.61
0.43
3.44
0.46
3.57
0.15
3.190
0.05
3.18
0.16
3.6
0.26
Average egg wt. (g)
47.84
2.40
53.88
2.08
59.33
1.95
63.08
0.80
63.03
0.60
57.42
1.50
Frequency distribution (percentage) of egg number/duck up to
280 days of age.
Class
Range
Egg no/ duck
Frequency %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
<50
50-59
60-69
70-79
80-89
90-99
>100
3.03
9.09
18.18
15.15
12.12
27.27
15.15
CROP CONTENTS OF FORAGING DUCKS
REGION : PALAKKAD
CROP WITH CONTENTS : 40.13g
CONTENTS : PADDY, CRABS, SNAILS, WORMS
SOLID CONTENTS : 22.5g
CROP SAC : 8.22g
CROP WITH CONTENTS
CROP CONTENTS
PROXIMATE COMPOSITION OF CROP CONTENTS (%)
MOISTURE | 41.28 |
CRUDE PROTEIN | 14.30 |
ETHER EXTRACTIVES | 2.77 |
TOTAL ASH | 9.72 |
CRUDE FIBRE | 27.8 |
PREVALENT DUCK DISEASES
1. Duck Plague
2. Duck Pasteurellosis
3. Eye Degeneration
4. Paralysis and Arthritis
Eye Degeneration
SICK BIRDS
�AUTOPSY EXAMINATION�
Duck Plague Vaccination
BLOOD COLLECTION
FOOT LESIONS
FIELD VISITS - PALAKKAD
Flock movement of ducks in Kerala
Duck/Fish integrated farming system
> increased productivity
> greater income
> improved cash flow
> full employment
> better diet
LEO JOSEPH
PROFESSOR
UNIVERSITY POULTRY FARM,
VETERINARY COLLEGE,
KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
MANNUTHY-680 651