1 of 104

BREEDING �AND �MANAGEMENT �OF DUCKS

2 of 104

Waterfowls -classification

A. cygnoides- swan goose

A. anser- greylag goose

C.moschata

A.platyrhyncos

Species

Anseres

Anseres

Anseres

Suborder

Anser

Cairina

Anas

Genus

Tribe

Subfamily

Family

Suborder

Order

Anserini

Cairinini

Anatini

Anserinae

Anatinae

Anatinae

Anatidae

Anatidae

Anatidae

Anseriformes

Anseriformes

Anseriformes

Goose

Muscovy

Duck

3 of 104

WATERFOWL

Muscovy duck

Greylag goose

Kuttanad duck

4 of 104

Chromosome number

  • Duck 80
  • Muscovy duck 80
  • Goose 80*

* 82 also have been reported

5 of 104

Duck Breeding

* Growth and carcass traits

* Egg and reproduction traits

6 of 104

GROWTH TRAITS

  • Rapid growth during first weeks of life
  • Attain 70-80 % of adult size at market age (broiler chicken 40 % only)
  • Males grow faster than females
    • White Pekin - 5-8 % (8wks)
    • Muscovy - 45% (11wks)
    • Geese – 10% (8 weeks)

7 of 104

Mallard duck and family

8 of 104

Growth pattern in White Pekin ducks (Cherry Valley)

3367.28

2623.79

2014.60

1309.52

711.85

259.88

53.45

89.34

Mean

218.82

34 d

275.57

43 d

203.84

28 d

156.87

21 d

82.07

14 d

27.08

Body wt- 7 d

4.70

Chick wt

6.64

Egg wt

SD

Trait

N=eggs 675, ducklings 539

Ref: Hall,A.D. and Martin D.M.(2005). Proc. 3rd WWFC, Guangzhou, China

9 of 104

White Pekin ducks

10 of 104

Heritability of Body weight

  • Ducks - 0.4 to 0.6

  • Muscovy - 0.3 to 0.6

  • Geese - 0.3 to 0.5

11 of 104

Mean and h2 estimates in White Pekin ducks �(Cherry valley)

0.29+0.01

15.01

Breast depth (45 d),mm

0.31+0.02

2.63

FCR (28-45 d)

0.26+0.04

96.48

Av. daily gain (28-45 d)

0.51+0.02

3593

45 day wt,g

0.28+0.02

2435

28 day wt,g

0.37+0.03

609.5

11 day wt,g

h2

Mean

Trait

Ref: Hall, A.D. (2005) Proc.3rd Waterfowl Conference, Guangzhou, China

12 of 104

Genetic parameters of growing White Pekin ducks

0.01

22.8

652.4

Subcutaneous fat wt,g

0.22

11.5

52.2

Abdominal fat wt,g

0.05

13.8

121.3

Leg & Thigh muscle wt,g

0.35

23.9

171.3

Breast muscle wt,g

0.46

208.4

2477.7

Slaughter BW,g

0.32

227.5

2854.3

Body wt, 6w, g

h2

SD

Mean

Trait

N=220 progeny from 36 sires and 94 dams

Ref: Z.Li, S.S. Hou and X.L. Liu. (2005) .

Proc.3rd Waterfowl Conference, Guangzhou, China

13 of 104

Selection for market weight

  • Mass selection effective (high h2)
  • Results
    • Ducks
      • Powell (1984)- BW at 7 wks - 3.2 to 3.7 kg – 5 Gens.
    • Geese
      • Schneider (1988) – BW gain – 900g – 5 Gens.

14 of 104

INDIAN RUNNER DUCKS

15 of 104

Tissue composition in White Pekin ducks (without neck and giblets)

Age, days

Breast muscle, %

Leg muscle, %

Skin & fat, %

28

4.8

18.0

41.6

35

7.0

16.7

41.0

42

8.4

14.7

40.4

49

12.0

14.0

38.1

56

14.4

13.4

37.1

63

15.9

15.9

37.5

Source- R.D.Crawford (1990). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

16 of 104

White Pekin brereder

17 of 104

Tissue distribution in Muscovy ducks ( Males)

20.0

17.6

16.8

3070

11

19.4

19.5

14.7

2678

10

23.2

19.7

9.5

2537

9

25.7

21.4

8.3

2050

8

27.9

21.0

5.4

1789

7

Skin+fat, %

Leg muscle, %

Breast muscle, %

Body weight, g

Age , weeks

Source-R.D.Crawford (1990). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

18 of 104

Muscovy duck

19 of 104

Heritability estimates for body weight

Breed

Age, days

h2S+D

Ref.

Pekin

42

0.34-0.56

Cerveny et al (1986)

49

0.28

Pinjel and Jung (1979)

56

0.35

Pinjel and Heimpold (1983)

56

0.43

Kain (1988)

Muscovy

70

0.43

Ricard et al (1983)

74

0.53

Trettner (1984)

Source- R.D.Crawford (1990). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

20 of 104

Confirmation

  • The Breast muscle thickness
  • Direct measurement or on close relatives
  • Muscle depth using a probe
  • Ultrasound method
  • h2 is medium to high
  • Selection increases the thickness
  • More meat yield

21 of 104

Feed Conversion Ratio

  • Kg feed per kg gain in weight
  • Medium heritable
  • Response to selection has been proved
  • Laborious procedure

22 of 104

Green sheen on Male ducks

23 of 104

EGG PRODUCTION TRAITS

  • High intensity of laying
  • Large eggs
  • Oviposition during night (after midnight)
  • Egger ducks more in in Asia
    • China,Thailand,Vietnam,India
  • Kuttanad ducks of Kerala – a good layer

24 of 104

Heritability estimates

Mazanowski (1988)

0.17

EN

Pekin

0.60

EW

0.4

EW

Cerveny et al (1986)

0.23

EN

Pekin

0.34

AFE

0.47

EW

Wezyk (1971)

0.26

EN

Pekin

Ref.

h2S+D

Trait

Breed

EN-egg number, EW-egg weight, AFE-age at first egg

25 of 104

Selection methods

  • Heritability low
  • Individual recording difficult
  • Family selection can be practiced
  • Selection improves egg number (Powell, 1985)
  • Ducks capable of laying 300 eggs per year

26 of 104

Interspecies hybrids

  • Muscovy (M) X Pekin Mulard or Mules
  • Pekin (M) X Muscovy Hinny
    • AI is to be used
    • Progeny is sterile
    • Low hatchability
    • Good growth rate – for meat production
    • Used for fatty liver production also

27 of 104

Mule Duck

28 of 104

SYSTEMS OF REARING

1. Herded system of rearing or open range rearing.

  1. Semi intensive system
  2. Intensive system

29 of 104

Housing for ducks

30 of 104

1. Open range rearing system

  • Portable light material

  • Fences (60 – 90 cm) height

  • Thatched house

(12’ X 8’/60-70 ducklings)

Housing

31 of 104

2. Semi intensive system

  • Outdoors during day time
  • Cement floor
  • grower and layer ducks
  • Waterer arrangement (channel 50 cm breadth, 15-20 cm depth)
  • Feeder arrangement (long feeders/hanging feeders)

Housing

32 of 104

3. Intensive system

A. ROOF

Shed / gable

5 to 12 m. wide,60 m long

B. SIDE WALLS

1.5 – 3m

C. INSULATION AND

MECHANICAL VENTILATION

Housing

33 of 104

Intensive system (contd..)

D. FLOOR

Cement concrete

All wire mesh

Combination of litter and

wire mesh

Housing

34 of 104

Intensive system (contd..)

  • CEMENT CONCRETE

Easy to clean and disinfect

  • ALL WIRE MESH

12 G (2.6mm)welded 2.5cm mesh 30cm height

slope floor

Litter not needed

No contact between bird and droppings

No frequent cleaning

Housing

35 of 104

Housing

COMBINATION OF LITTER AND WIRE MESH

Wire floor 1/4th of total floor space

Waterers located on one side of the building

Intensive system (contd..)

36 of 104

Management of ducks

37 of 104

Semi intensive system

  • Floor space 1395 sq.cm per bird
  • Run area 929 – 1395 sq.cm. (Up to 16 weeks)
  • Shelter : Run area = ¼: ¾
  • Waterer space : 12.5 to 15 cms.
  • Widely practiced

Management of ducks

38 of 104

Intensive system

  • Confinement rearing
  • Brooding

a. Battery brooder

b. Brooding on wire floors

c. Brooding on deep litter

Management of ducks

39 of 104

a. Battery Brooder

  • 4-5 tiers up to 3 weeks of age
  • Electrical thermostats,heaters or

bulbs

  • Feeders and waterers outside the

tier

  • Area ¼ sq.ft (0.023 sq.m) upto 4

weeks

Management of ducklings

40 of 104

Intensive system

  1. Brooding on wire floors

Wire net (13 sq.mm mesh, 8 gauge thick, 20 - 25 cm above floor )

Up to seven weeks of age

Avoids problem of wet litter

Floors are given a slope

Management of ducklings

41 of 104

Intensive system

  • Brooding on deep litter

a. Litter 5 – 10cm depth

    • Floor space 90 – 100 sq.cm

per duckling

c. Wet litter is a serious problem

Management of ducklings

42 of 104

Intensive system

  • Adult management

a. Litter thickness 15 - 20 cm

b. Wet litter problem

Deep litter

43 of 104

Floor space

Meat type on Deep litter

1800-2250

3 – 7

900

2 – 3

675

1 – 2

450

0 – 1

Floor space

(Sq.cm)

Age in weeks

44 of 104

Floor space

1350-1800

3 – 7

450

2 – 3

300

1 – 2

225

0 – 1

Floor space(Sq.ft)

Age in weeks

Meat type on Wire Floor

45 of 104

Feeder and water space - wire floor

2.50

2.50

2 – 4

1.25

1.25

0 – 2

Water space (cm)

Feeder space (cm)

Age in weeks

46 of 104

Feeder and water space - deep litter

4.50

6.25

8.75

12.5

9-20 weeks

3.75

5

7.5

10

Upto 8 weeks

Layer

Broiler

Layer

Broiler

Waterer space(cm)

Feeder space(cm)

Age in weeks

47 of 104

CAGE SYSTEM –Layer ducks

  • Floor space up to 16 weeks 900 sq.cm per duck
  • Cage size 20” X 16” X 18” for 2 ducks
  • Floor should have a gradient
  • Feeder and waterer outside the cage

48 of 104

EXTENSIVE DUCK REARING SYSTEM

49 of 104

CHARA

KUTTANAD DUCK VARIETIES

CHEMBALLI

50 of 104

Duckling management

  • Temporary thatched sheds
  • 2000 – 6000 ducklings
  • 2m X 4m for 2000 – 3000 ducklings
  • Partition prevents huddling and mortality
  • No artificial warmth
  • Mixed sexes

51 of 104

Duckling management

  • Shed with an enclosed open area used for feeding and watering
  • Starter feed (cooked rice + chick feed + dried fish powder) for 2 weeks
  • Feeding and watering 3 times/day

52 of 104

Brooding shed

53 of 104

Duckling management

  • Swimming from 7th day
  • 1m wide pathway to the water
  • Feeding ( cooked rice + dried small fish + grains)
  • Foraging

54 of 104

Ducklings in rice field

55 of 104

56 of 104

1. Mortality – 8 per cent�2. Males separated at about 2-3 months of age�3. Grower birds in open fields�4. Vaccination-Duck Plague

Ducklings

57 of 104

Grower ducklings

58 of 104

Management of adult ducks

  • No permanent housing
  • Nomadic, depending on harvest season
  • Foraging in harvested paddy fields
  • Neighbouring states also
  • Trucks, swimming/foot
  • Enclosed with plastic nets/chicken mesh with bamboo pole
  • 2 sets of nets to prevent predators

59 of 104

60 of 104

61 of 104

62 of 104

BILL MARKING�METHOD FOR IDENTIFICATION OF FLOCKS

63 of 104

64 of 104

65 of 104

Night shelter

66 of 104

67 of 104

68 of 104

69 of 104

Flock shifting by road - transportation charges

Mini Lorry : Rs. 13/km

Lorry : Rs. 20/km

70 of 104

71 of 104

Management of adult ducks

  • Flocked in elevated places during nights
  • Laying (12 midnight-6 morning)
  • Egg collection 5A.M
  • Early collection prevents soiling and breakage

72 of 104

  • Foraging begins 6 A.M
  • Paddy fields booked or public auction
  • Hand feeding during lean season
  • Jowar,wheat,paddy or dried fish
  • Maintenance ration

(palm pith + groundnut cake + grains )

Management of adult ducks

73 of 104

Foraging

74 of 104

Management of adult ducks

  • Changing the field
  • No separate breeding flock
  • Sex ratio 3-4 drakes per 100 ducks
  • Fertility 50-80 per cent
  • Drakes control social order

75 of 104

Management of adult ducks

  • Production limited to seven months
  • Hand feeding
  • 125-150 kg per 1000 ducks
  • Feeding umbrella palm
  • Modified extensive management system

76 of 104

CORYPHA PALM, TRUNK AND PITH

77 of 104

PROXIMATE COMPOSITION OF PALM PITH(%)

MOIST.

ASH

CP

CF

EE

42.1

1.6

10.9

8.6

13.1

78 of 104

Sustainability of palm

  • It blooms only once in life.

  • After the fantastic bloom and fruiting, the plant dies.

  • The palm tree intended for feeding ducks to be cut before the onset of blooming.

  • When it blooms, the quality of starch in the pith declines.

79 of 104

Mean body weight(g) of Chara and Chemballi females at different ages

45.95 + 0.40 b

566.48 + 8.15

946.17 + 9.71 a

1417.94 + 9.25

1487.63 + 8.05

1497.51 + 8.38 b

1466.68 + 9.04

1475.45 + 7.88

1328.81 + 8.42 a

1362.81 + 8.91

1402.50 + 12.23 a

46.67 + 0.32a

553.07 + 7.25

995.36 + 8.87 a

1370.05 + 9.22

1534.86 + 7.42

1538.15 + 7.06 a

1486.36 + 8.84

1494.07 + 7.34

1335.24 + 7.44 a

1325.78 + 7.07

1337.60 + 9.72 b

Day old

4

8

12

16

20

30

40

52

60

72

Chemballi

mean + S.E.

Chara

mean + S.E.

Age in weeks

80 of 104

Reproductive traits of Chara and Chemballi

55

58

Days to reach 50 % production from the age at 1st egg

184

187

Average age at 50 % egg production (days)

148

153

Average age at 10 % production (days)

141

144

Average age at 5 % production (days)

148

149

Average age at first egg ( days)

129

129

Age at first egg (days)

Chemballi (N=300)

Chara

(N= 300)

Traits

81 of 104

Egg number per duck and per cent duck-day egg production of Chara and Chemballi at thirteen 28 day laying periods

82 of 104

Mean egg weight(g) of Chara and Chemballi ducks at different ages

68.33 + 0.56 a

 68.94 + 0.20 a

 66.97 + 0.65 a

 68.89 + 0.43 a

 68.28 + 0.46 b

68.19 + 0.59a

 69.94 + 0.33 a

 70.93 + 0.55 a

 68.81 + 0.54 a

 69.47 + 0.50 a

30

40

50

72

 Overall

Chemballi

Mean + S.E.

Chara

Mean + S.E.

Age in weeks

Figures with different superscripts in a line differ significantly (P<0.05)

83 of 104

�DUCK FARMING ACTIVITIES�

84 of 104

DUCK FARMING ACTIVITIES

85 of 104

DUCK EGGS� BEFORE PACKING

86 of 104

Weekly body weight, daily feed consumption and feed conversion efficiency of Kuttanad ducklings of Kerala

3.06

3668.0

6.28

716.1

102.3

1200

8.

2.72

2953.0

3.58

819.0

117.0

1086

7.

2.49

2133.5

3.52

612.5

87.5

857

6.

2.22

1521.0

2.44

609.0

87.0

683

5.

2.11

912.1

2.34

406.7

58.1

433

4.

1.95

505.4

2.77

354.2

50.6

259

3.

1.15

151.2

1.87

100.8

14.4

131

2.

0.65

50.4

1.36

50.4

7.2

77

1.

Cumul.FCR

Cumulative Feed intake

(g)

Weekly FCR (kg feed / kg meat

Weekly feed intake

(g)

Daily feed intake

(g)

Mean body weight

(g)

Age in weeks

87 of 104

WEEKLY WEIGHT OF KUTTANAD DUCKLINGS �UPTO 8 WEEKS OF AGE

88 of 104

89 of 104

Production performance of Kuttanad ducks from 21 to 40 weeks of age(CAGE).

 

Periods / Age in weeks

 

Overall

 

 

Traits

I

21- 24

II

25-28

III

29-32

IV

33-36

V

37-40

Mean egg No./duck

10.51

 

17.15

 

15.73

 

18.67

 

18.58

 

80.64

Mean % production

37.55

 

61.26

 

56.17

 

66.67

 

66.34

57.60

Dailyfeed Consumption (g)

173.07

2.55

168.25

1.03

166.25

3.88

177.25

4.48

174.58

3.08

171.88

2.13

Feed efficiency

4.61

0.43

3.44

0.46

3.57

0.15

3.190

0.05

3.18

0.16

3.6

0.26

Average egg wt. (g)

47.84

2.40

53.88

2.08

59.33

1.95

63.08

0.80

63.03

0.60

57.42

1.50

 

90 of 104

Frequency distribution (percentage) of egg number/duck up to

280 days of age.

Class

Range

Egg no/ duck

Frequency %

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

<50

50-59

60-69

70-79

80-89

90-99

>100

3.03

9.09

18.18

15.15

12.12

27.27

15.15

91 of 104

92 of 104

CROP CONTENTS OF FORAGING DUCKS

REGION : PALAKKAD

CROP WITH CONTENTS : 40.13g

CONTENTS : PADDY, CRABS, SNAILS, WORMS

SOLID CONTENTS : 22.5g

CROP SAC : 8.22g

93 of 104

CROP WITH CONTENTS

94 of 104

CROP CONTENTS

95 of 104

PROXIMATE COMPOSITION OF CROP CONTENTS (%)

MOISTURE

41.28

CRUDE PROTEIN

14.30

ETHER EXTRACTIVES

2.77

TOTAL ASH

9.72

CRUDE FIBRE

27.8

96 of 104

PREVALENT DUCK DISEASES

1. Duck Plague

2. Duck Pasteurellosis

3. Eye Degeneration

4. Paralysis and Arthritis

97 of 104

Eye Degeneration

98 of 104

SICK BIRDS

99 of 104

�AUTOPSY EXAMINATION�

100 of 104

Duck Plague Vaccination

101 of 104

BLOOD COLLECTION

FOOT LESIONS

FIELD VISITS - PALAKKAD

102 of 104

Flock movement of ducks in Kerala

103 of 104

Duck/Fish integrated farming system

  • Major feature

> increased productivity

> greater income

> improved cash flow

> full employment

> better diet

104 of 104

LEO JOSEPH

PROFESSOR

UNIVERSITY POULTRY FARM,

VETERINARY COLLEGE,

KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

MANNUTHY-680 651