1 of 69

Panel:

Facilitation as civic infrastructure

FearlessCities.nyc

July 2018

�Claudina Sarahe (@itsmisscs)�Liz Barry (@lizbarry)

Patrick Connolly (@patconnolly)

2 of 69

Ttcat

Wu, Min Hsuan

Deputy CEO,

Open Culture Foundation

g0v Hackathon organizer

Much of this deck was created by:

3 of 69

https://slido.com

Enter code�#5869

Ask or upvote

Engage. Ask questions anytime.

4 of 69

抗爭照片

5 of 69

The Sunflower movement began with:

massive

public

street �demonstrations

6 of 69

7 of 69

8 of 69

Photo credit: Evan Yu

9 of 69

and was supported by:

open source

activist�technology

communities

10 of 69

11 of 69

12 of 69

13 of 69

Demonstrating against

Demonstrating for

Demonstrating process

14 of 69

Learning from Sunflower movement

Government data not openinformation inequality

Policy making not transparent → distrust of government

Information overload → �hard to reach consensus

15 of 69

16 of 69

17 of 69

18 of 69

19 of 69

20 of 69

Online deliberation

21 of 69

How do we improve democracy by the bandwidth we have online today?

22 of 69

Too big power

Too little trust

Luke Duncan: Liquid Democracy, Ethereum, and the slow path to revolution. https://medium.com/hive-commons/liquid-democracy-ethereum-and-the-slow-path-to-revolution-9c1d5916e706

23 of 69

Luke Duncan: Liquid Democracy, Ethereum, and the slow path to revolution. https://medium.com/hive-commons/liquid-democracy-ethereum-and-the-slow-path-to-revolution-9c1d5916e706

24 of 69

Democracy = Vote?

Luke Duncan: Liquid Democracy, Ethereum, and the slow path to revolution. https://medium.com/hive-commons/liquid-democracy-ethereum-and-the-slow-path-to-revolution-9c1d5916e706

25 of 69

Fact-check?

Civil Society?

Values?

Human rights?

Background knowledge?

26 of 69

We want more dialogue before voting!

27 of 69

ICANN’s Multistakeholders

關係圖

28 of 69

Deliberative (participatory) Democracy

talk

talk

talk

talk

Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics http://www.bioethicsinstitute.org/scarcemed/deliberative-democracy

29 of 69

Deliberative (participatory) Democracy

Offline

Too much time

Too little scale

Online

Too big scale

Too little time

In deliberation, it’s not the amount of people that counts, but the diversity of opinions

30 of 69

31 of 69

32 of 69

Participatory Budget

33 of 69

34 of 69

Like “We the people”

35 of 69

36 of 69

vTaiwan

37 of 69

Pol.is

38 of 69

Taiwan Open Government Report 2014-2016

39 of 69

https://blog.pol.is/uber-responds-to-vtaiwans-coherent-blended-volition-3e9b75102b9b

40 of 69

AND, assistance from an online platform called pol.is:

41 of 69

42 of 69

43 of 69

44 of 69

The Blulu Metrics

Blulu Metrics by Chia-Hua Lü, ETBlue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://goo.gl/forms/RB7gSLFJfFl6RmcA2.

45 of 69

46 of 69

Why is it so difficult?

1.

Participation rate is low,

and most discussion happens somewhere else

47 of 69

Why is it so difficult?

2.

Rely on

Political will and Power

48 of 69

49 of 69

50 of 69

Why is it so difficult?

3.

Which stage of policy making is open?

51 of 69

The Blulu Metrics

Agenda Setting

Survey

Inform

Discussion

Voting

Decision

Respond

Accountability

Evaluation

Implementation

Legislation

Planning

Problem Analysis

Blulu Metrics by Chia-Hua Lü, ETBlue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://goo.gl/forms/RB7gSLFJfFl6RmcA2.

52 of 69

The Blulu Metrics

Agenda Setting

Survey

Inform

Discussion

討論

Voting

投票

Decision

Respond

Accountability

Evaluation

政策評估

Implementation

政策執行

Legislation

政策合法化

Planning

Problem Analysis

Blulu Metrics by Chia-Hua Lü, ETBlue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://goo.gl/forms/RB7gSLFJfFl6RmcA2.

53 of 69

Why is it so difficult?

4.

Institutionalized experimental models that create heavy burden on civil servants

54 of 69

Political Leader/ Civil servants / Intermediaries

Political Leader

Civil servants

55 of 69

Political Leader/ Civil servants / Intermediaries

Political Leader

Civil servants

Intermediaries

Public

56 of 69

gov

people

← participation space

57 of 69

Why it’s so difficult?

5.

How to improve the quality of discussion online?

58 of 69

59 of 69

fact-checking

Developing semi-automated tool

60 of 69

🔎

❤️

💡

Facts

Feelings

Ideas

Decisions

61 of 69

Based on conversation in four stages:

  1. Objective: Facts  —  What do we know?
  2. Reflective: Feelings  —  What are our reactions?
  3. Interpretative: Ideas  —  What insights do we get?
  4. Decisional: Actions  —  What should we do?

62 of 69

63 of 69

Why it’s so difficult?

6.

Imagination

64 of 69

accountability => trust

open (transparent)

open (decision-making)

open (participate)

65 of 69

Design the tools that empower not only the people but also civil society organizations and representatives => Value

66 of 69

66

Democracy everyday

=> Culture

67 of 69

g0v Summit 5-7 Oct

Ttcat@ocf.tw

Open Culture Foundation

g0v.tw

68 of 69

CALL TO ACTION

Find more info at 4am.tw, Composites Collective, g0v.asia/tw

Practice these methods to become a “nobody”

Revisit failed public conversations with these methods

Livestream local meetings & "keep receipts" for transparency

Gather & synthesize information on divisive issues

Join g0v.network and collaborate

69 of 69

Thank you!

@itsmisscs | @lizbarry | @patconnolly

Join.g0v.today #vnetwork�nobodies@g0v.network

Please let us know what you think.