1 of 51

educating citizens, building communities

2 of 51

Overview

“Community-Based Learning: Building a Strong Foundation”

Friday, January 18, 2019

12:30-2:00 p.m.

Key Topics:

  • Campus Compact for WI overview and resources
  • Definitions for CBL
  • Best practices for CBL
  • Community partnerships in CBL
  • Measurement and assessment of CBL
  • Integrating CBL into your scholarship

3 of 51

Campus Compact is a national coalition of 1,000 colleges and universities committed to the public purposes of higher education.

We build democracy through civic education, civic action, and community development.

4 of 51

By the numbers

6

MILLION�STUDENTS�in Campus Compact member institutions

1,000

MEMBERS

Public, private, two-year, four-year, urban, rural, minority-serving, faith-based, tribal

30+

YEARS

of leadership in the field of civic and community engagement

STATE AND REGIONAL COMPACTS

working on the ground across the country

30

5 of 51

Campus Compact for Wisconsin (CCWI)�Member Institutions

  • Alverno College
  • Cardinal Stritch University
  • Carthage College
  • Concordia University-WI
  • Edgewood College
  • Lawrence University
  • Marquette University
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Mount Mary University
  • St. Norbert College

  • UW-Eau Claire
  • UW-Green Bay
  • UW-La Crosse
  • UW-Madison
  • UW-Milwaukee
  • UW-Oshkosh
  • UW-Parkside
  • UW-Stevens Point
  • UW-Superior
  • UW-Whitewater

  • Fox Valley Technical College
  • Gateway Technical College
  • Madison Area Technical College
  • Milwaukee Area Technical College
  • Moraine Park Technical College
  • Northeast Wisconsin Technical College
  • Western Technical College

*Representing over 70% of FTE students in WI

6 of 51

Services for �CCWI Members

  • Opportunities for networking and collaboration
  • Technical support and consultations
  • Communication and advocacy tools
  • Information about grants and other special opportunities

7 of 51

Key National �Initiatives

  • Civic Action Planning Resources
  • Newman Civic Fellows Program for Students
  • Thomas Ehrlich Civically Engaged Faculty Award
  • Community Engagement Professional Credentialing Program
  • National & Regional Conferences
  • Publications
  • Webinar Series
  • Democracy Learning Channel

8 of 51

Key Midwest �Initiatives

  • Midwest Campus Compact Conference
  • Midwest Engaged Scholars Initiative
  • Communities of Practice
  • Virtual Peer Learning Calls
  • Civic Action Plan Retreats
  • Carnegie Application Workshops
  • BPACE (Best Practices in Assessing Community Engagement)

9 of 51

Key Wisconsin Initiatives

  • Civic Engagement Institute
  • Annual Awards Program
    • Esther Letven Campus-Community Partnership Award
    • Jack Keating Student Civic Leadership Award
    • Sister Joel Read Civic Engagement Practitioners Award
  • Regional Network Gatherings
  • Campus Election Engagement Project Fellows
  • Impact Mapping Project

10 of 51

CBL Overview

11 of 51

Small Group Discussion

  • How would you define community-based learning?
  • What is your personal “why” for community-based learning?

12 of 51

Definitions

13 of 51

Community engagement (Carnegie Elective Community Engagement Classification, n.d.)

  • Community engagement describes collaboration between institutions of higher education and their larger communities (local, regional/state, national, global) for the mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources in a context of partnership and reciprocity.
  • The purpose of community engagement is the partnership of college and university knowledge and resources with those of the public and private sectors to enrich scholarship, research, and creative activity; enhance curriculum, teaching and learning; prepare educated, engaged citizens; strengthen democratic values and civic responsibility; address critical societal issues; and contribute to the public good.

14 of 51

Civic engagement �(Ehrlich, 2000)

  • Working to make a difference in the civic life of our communities and developing the combination of knowledge, skills, values and motivation to make that difference. It means promoting the quality of life in a community, through both political and non-political processes.
  • Encompasses actions wherein individuals participate in activities of personal and public concern that are both individually life enriching and socially beneficial to the community.

15 of 51

Community engagement v. 2�(Building the Field of Community Engagement, n.d.)

  • Community engagement is a process that includes multiple techniques to promote the participation of residents in community life, especially those who are excluded and isolated, by engaging them in collective action to create a healthy community.

16 of 51

Service-learning �(Bringle & Hatcher, 1995)

  • Service-learning as pedagogy offers students an “experience in which students participate in an organized service activity that meets identified community needs and students reflect on the service activity in such a way as to gain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of civic responsibility”

17 of 51

Typology of �Service-Learning

Type

Examples

“Pure” Service-Learning

Sending students out into the community to serve (not placed into any discipline) – E.g. FYE Introduction to Multiculturalism + Diversity

Discipline-Based Service-Learning

Students expected to have a presence in the community throughout the semester; using course content as basis for analysis + understanding

Problem-Based Service-Learning

Students (or teams) relate to the community as “consultants” working for “clients.” They try to understand and address a community problem or need

Capstone Courses

Designed for majors and minors; use knowledge from entire body of course work and combine it with relevant service work. Goal could be to explore a new topic or synthesize student understanding of discipline

Service Internships

Intensive placement; reflection throughout internship using discipline-specific theories

Undergraduate CB Action Research

Students learning research methodology; intensive work with communities to define research questions; advocacy-inspired

18 of 51

Service vs. �Service-learning �(MSU Service-Learning Toolkit, 2017)

19 of 51

Best Practices

20 of 51

Assets vs. Deficits/Needs�(ABCD Institute, n.d.)

21 of 51

Assets vs. Deficits/Needs�(ABCD Institute, n.d.)

22 of 51

Why does this matter?

23 of 51

Four Perspectives on Service-Learning �(Butin, 2003)

  • Technical - personal, social, and cognitive outcomes
  • Cultural - affective outcomes around difference
  • Political - social change outcomes
  • Antifoundational - questioning their role in systems that create a space for SL in the first place

24 of 51

Critical Service-Learning �(Mitchell, 2008)

25 of 51

Small Group Discussion

  • What has been your experience to date with service-learning?
  • Which perspective(s) do you closely align with?
  • Which perspective(s) does your institution align with?
  • How are they similar? How are they dissimilar?

26 of 51

Best Practices for �Service-Learning �(Celio, Durlak, & Dymnicki, 2011)

Student voice (involvement tied to intrinsic motivations)

Community voice (reciprocal partnerships built on trust)

Reflection, assessment, and celebration of the experience

Linked to curriculum and learning outcomes (both for course and institution)

27 of 51

Student Motivation (Rockenbaugh, Kotys-Schwartz, & Reamon, 2011)

Motivational Theory Constructs Supported by Quality Service-Learning:

  • Autonomy – Allow students to select sites, project, or service activities
  • Relatedness – Help students to see how their service can help others and build their sense of connectedness to the outside community
  • Competence – Service opportunities that allow students to use their learning can build their confidence in course material...time service well and make sure they’re prepared!
  • Value – Connect service to concept of building “real-world” skills
  • Interests – Help students connect service to larger issues of importance to them

28 of 51

Community Partner Perspective �(Tinkler et. al, 2014)

  • Be attentive to the community partner’s mission and vision
  • Understand the human dimension of the community partner’s work
  • Be mindful of the community partner’s resources
  • Accept and share the responsibility for inefficiencies
  • Consider the legacy of the partnership
  • Regard the process as important

29 of 51

Reflection practices/models

  • Reflection ”facilitates the students making connections between their service experiences and their learning.”

(Eyler and Giles, 1999)

  • iPERCED Model (Michigan State U., 2017)
  • DEAL Model (Ash & Clayton, 2009)
  • What? So What? Now What? (Rolfe et al., 2001)
  • PARE Model (U. Maryland, 1990s)
  • Reflective Learning Cycle (Gibbs, 1988)
  • Experiential Learning Cycle (Kolb, 1984)

30 of 51

Elements of a �service-learning syllabus �(Heffernan, 2001)

  • include community service as an expressed goal;
  • clearly describe how the community service experience will be measured and what will be measured;
  • describe the nature of the community service or project;
  • specify the roles and responsibilities of students in the service experience and/or project, (e.g., transportation, time requirements, community contacts, etc.);
  • define the need(s) the service meets;
  • specify how students will be expected to demonstrate what they have learned from the service/project (journal, papers, presentations);
  • present course assignments that link the community service and the course content;
  • include a description of the reflective process;
  • and include a description of the expectations for the public dissemination of students' work.

31 of 51

Community Partnerships

32 of 51

Benchmarks for Partnerships �(Campus Compact, 2000)

Stage 1: Designing the Partnership

Stage 2: Building Collaborative Relationships

Stage 3: Sustaining Partnerships Over Time

33 of 51

Core Components of Authentic Partnerships �(Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, 2006-08)

Transformational Relationships

Quality Processes

Meaningful Outcomes

34 of 51

Principles of Effective Partnerships�(Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, 2013)

  1. Foundation of mutual trust, respect, genuineness, and commitment
  2. Values multiple kinds of knowledge and life experiences
  3. Consider the nature of the environment
  4. Specific purpose (MOU or other agreement)
  5. Agreed upon outcomes and process for accountability
  6. Asset-based
  7. Balance of power and resources among all
  8. Clear and open communication among all
  9. Principles and processes established with input and agreement of all
  10. Feedback among all
  11. All partners share in accomplishments
  12. A plan for future closure if/when they dissolve

35 of 51

Small Group Discussion

  • Which of these principles have you already addressed or started to address?
  • Which of these principles still need some work?
  • Choose one principle you still need to work on and share with your small group how you might address this in the coming month.
    • If your peers have experience in this area, what advice do they have to give?
    • If your peers don’t have experience in this area, how else might you find help/advice?

36 of 51

Measurement and Assessment

37 of 51

Tips for Sustaining Partnerships �(Portland State University, 2008)

  • Maintain good communication
  • Develop a timeline
  • Document and track progress
  • Conduct progress checks about the partnership, asking open-ended questions to gather information
  • Based on progress checks, make adaptations to plans for future
  • Remain flexible
  • Celebrate accomplishments!

38 of 51

Assessing Community Partnerships�(Portland State University, 2008)

  • What’s working well?
  • What’s not working well?
  • What changes are necessary to improve our partnership?
  • What expectations have been met?
  • What expectations have not been met?
  • What are sources of satisfaction?
  • What are sources of frustration?

39 of 51

Assessing Student Learning�(Campus Compact Knowledge Hub, n.d.)

  • Identify civic goals, objectives, and/or outcome(s) you are able to accomplish through your school, department, and curriculum, program, and/or pedagogy

  • Now that you know what you expect your students to learn or develop and where (or how) they will learn those things, identify how you can assess or measure their growth or knowledge

  • Finally, now that you know what your students have learned or how they have developed and where/why those things occurred, identify how to make that data useful and put it to good use (including assessing your own practice)!

40 of 51

Reflection practices/models

Reflection ”facilitates the students making connections between their service experiences and their learning.”

(Eyler and Giles, 1999)

  • iPERCED Model (Michigan State U., 2017)
  • DEAL Model (Ash & Clayton, 2009)
  • What? So What? Now What? (Rolfe et al., 2001)
  • PARE Model (U. Maryland, 1990s)
  • Reflective Learning Cycle (Gibbs, 1988)
  • Experiential Learning Cycle (Kolb, 1984)

41 of 51

Reflection examples

Written Reflection Strategies:

    • Blogging
    • Journals
    • Reflective essays

Oral Reflection Strategies:

    • Discussions
    • In-class activities
    • Multimedia presentations
    • Role plays

Other Creative Strategies:

    • Photo essays
    • Sculpture
    • Storyboarding
    • Videos

42 of 51

Small Group Discussion

  • What reflective practices have you used in past courses?
  • What reflective practices might translate well to a service-learning course?
  • Choose one example of an effective reflective practice you are considering for our course and share with your peers.
    • If your peers have experience in this area, what advice do they have to give?
    • If your peers don’t have experience in this area, how else might you find help/advice?

43 of 51

Integrating your Scholarship

44 of 51

What is community-engaged scholarship?�(Doberneck, et al., 2017)

  • Teaching and learning
  • Research
  • Creative activities
  • Service
  • Commercialized activity

45 of 51

Plan Ahead

Documentation and data collection

Structure

Process

Outcomes

Impacts

Least publishable units

Frameworks, models, etc.

Methods, processes, etc.

Programs descriptions, case studies, etc.

Findings, results, impacts, etc.

Critical reflections

Writing for publication

Identify target journals or other outlets

Design article structure

Collaborate with students & community partners

46 of 51

Small Group Discussion

  • What is interesting or significant about your CES from a disciplinary perspective?
  • What is interesting or significant about your CE from an engagement perspective?

47 of 51

Resources

Service-learning Toolkits:

Community Partnerships:

48 of 51

Resources

Measurement and Assessment:

Integrating and Publishing Scholarship:

49 of 51

Get in touch!

Trina Van Schyndel

Director, Wisconsin Campus Compact

tvanschyndel@compact.org

@WICampusCompact� @WICampusCompact

https://wicampuscompact.org/

Sign up for our monthly newsletter here!

50 of 51

Large Group Discussion

1. What barriers have you experienced/do you foresee when it comes to CBL and community partnerships?

2. What knowledge, skills, and values do you already possess that may help you overcome those barriers?

3. What additional kinds of support can help you overcome those barriers?

51 of 51

Thank you!