1 of 39

1

October 1, 2019

School Committee Presentation: Social Emotional Learning and

Student School Climate Data

2 of 39

Agenda

Part 1: District Plan Context

Part 2: Action & Outcomes

Part 3: Resource Alignment

Part 4: Looking Ahead

Part 5: Discussion

2

3 of 39

3

Part 1: District Plan Context

4 of 39

District Plan: Vision

4

Every CPS student experiences:

Rigorous, Joyful, & Culturally Responsive Learning

Personalized Support �

Builds Postsecondary Success & �Engaged Community Members

5 of 39

CPS Equity Definition: Adopted August 2018

Racial equity means the absence of institutional and structural barriers experienced by people based on race or color, that impede access,

opportunities, and results.

5

RACIAL EQUITY

Achieving racial equity requires proactive and continuous investment in communities of color, who have endured centuries of systemic oppression. CPS is committed to dismantling structures rooted in white privilege, to hearing and elevating underrepresented voices, and recognizing and eliminating bias.

Equity means that each student, regardless of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, gender identity, disability, sexual orientation, religion, or socioeconomic status will have access to the opportunities, resources, and support they need �to attain their full potential.

EQUITY

6 of 39

6

CPS District Plan 2017-2020: Strategic Initiatives

EQUITY &

ACCESS

ENGAGED

LEARNING

PARTNERSHIP

IMPROVEMENT

1.1. Create a district-wide system for setting goals with students that support their postsecondary success and aspirations. Connect students to supports within and outside of school, and reflect on and monitor progress with students, teachers, families, and partners.

1.2. Provide all CPS educators with cultural proficiency training and implement ongoing cultural proficiency professional learning in all schools.

1.3. Implement the Dynamic Diversity program to recruit, hire, and retain a CPS workforce that reflects the diversity of Cambridge.

1.4. Identify priority standards within the culturally relevant CPS curriculum that communicate what a student should know and be able to do by content and grade level.

1.5. Provide all students with access to challenging curriculum and technology, such as the Grade 9 Level Up and CRLS 1:1 programs.

2.1. Expand integrated, hands-on, real world learning opportunities for all students across the district and provide necessary support to teachers.

2.2. Expand rigorous, joyful, culturally responsive learning experiences across the district.

2.3. Establish student-centered, collaborative, and transformative professional learning that supports the CPS vision.

2.4. Support student, educator, school and district innovation through the Design Lab, in order to improve student success.

3.1. Implement a PK-12 social, emotional, and behavioral learning framework and vision.

3.2. Develop and expand effective inclusive practices in all classrooms through professional learning.

3.3. Improve student engagement by strengthening student experiences in all classrooms, improving existing programs, exploring mentorship programs, and providing relationship building professional learning.

3.4. Continue to develop multi-tiered systems of support for academic and social-emotional learning, such as Response to Intervention.

4.1. Engage families as partners with a formal, ongoing feedback mechanism that creates differentiated opportunities for family voice and engagement.

4.2. Create a coordinated system of partnerships to support students and families, establishing criteria, aligning with CPS vision, ensuring equity across schools and students.

4.3. Create a common evaluation process for partnerships with explicit expectations grounded in equity and connected to evidence-based practices.

4.4. Pursue and expand partnerships with businesses, higher education, city, and community organizations that are aligned with school and student needs and support postsecondary success.

5.1. Institute a continuous improvement process that supports implementation of the district plan: monitoring, evaluating, and sharing progress.

5.2. Conduct grade-span reviews based on defined criteria and act on recommendations, beginning with the elementary and upper school spans.

5.3. Conduct a Special Education review, analyzing referral and disciplinary data by student group, including types of disabilities

5.4. Establish a clear process for vetting, prioritizing, and implementing initiatives in a realistic way.

5.5. Provide targeted support to schools identified as in need based on specific, pre-determined criteria.

WHOLE

CHILD

7 of 39

7

3.1. Implement a PK-12 social, emotional, and behavioral learning framework and vision.

3.2. Develop and expand effective inclusive practices in all classrooms through professional learning.

3.3. Improve student engagement by strengthening student experiences in all classrooms, improving existing programs, exploring mentorship programs, and providing relationship building professional learning.

3.4. Continue to develop multi-tiered systems of support for academic and social-emotional learning, such as Response to Intervention.

CPS District Plan 2017-2020: Strategic Initiatives

EQUITY &

ACCESS

WHOLE

CHILD

ENGAGED

LEARNING

PARTNERSHIP

IMPROVEMENT

1.1. Create a district-wide system for setting goals with students that support their postsecondary success and aspirations. Connect students to supports within and outside of school, and reflect on and monitor progress with students, teachers, families, and partners.

1.2. Provide all CPS educators with cultural proficiency training and implement ongoing cultural proficiency professional learning in all schools.

1.3. Implement the Dynamic Diversity program to recruit, hire, and retain a CPS workforce that reflects the diversity of Cambridge.

1.4. Identify priority standards within the culturally relevant CPS curriculum that communicate what a student should know and be able to do by content and grade level.

1.5. Provide all students with access to challenging curriculum and technology, such as the Grade 9 Level Up and CRLS 1:1 programs.

2.1. Expand integrated, hands-on, real world learning opportunities for all students across the district and provide necessary support to teachers.

2.2. Expand rigorous, joyful, culturally responsive learning experiences across the district.

2.3. Establish student-centered, collaborative, and transformative professional learning that supports the CPS vision.

2.4. Support student, educator, school and district innovation through the Design Lab, in order to improve student success.

4.1. Engage families as partners with a formal, ongoing feedback mechanism that creates differentiated opportunities for family voice and engagement.

4.2. Create a coordinated system of partnerships to support students and families, establishing criteria, aligning with CPS vision, ensuring equity across schools and students.

4.3. Create a common evaluation process for partnerships with explicit expectations grounded in equity and connected to evidence-based practices.

4.4. Pursue and expand partnerships with businesses, higher education, city, and community organizations that are aligned with school and student needs and support postsecondary success.

5.1. Institute a continuous improvement process that supports implementation of the district plan: monitoring, evaluating, and sharing progress.

5.2. Conduct grade-span reviews based on defined criteria and act on recommendations, beginning with the elementary and upper school spans.

5.3. Conduct a Special Education review, analyzing referral and disciplinary data by student group, including types of disabilities

5.4. Establish a clear process for vetting, prioritizing, and implementing initiatives in a realistic way.

5.5. Provide targeted support to schools identified as in need based on specific, pre-determined criteria.

8 of 39

SYSTEMIC STRUCTURES

Improve district-wide systems and processes to �be more transparent, inclusive, evidence-based, and equitable

4

PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY

Build capacity and accountability at all levels �to address systemic �barriers to racial equity

3

SCHOOL CLIMATE & CULTURE

Foster trust and relationships that support a positive student-centered culture

2

INSTRUCTIONAL CORE

Learner

Educator

Content

Deliver culturally responsive instruction to all students

1

CPS 2019-20 Priorities

9 of 39

9

Part 2: Action & Outcomes

10 of 39

Outcomes & Priorities

School Climate

Relationship

School Climate Survey�By Fall 2020, improve students, �staff, and family perceptions on engagement, instruction, and community support. View Data >>

Students’ Meaningful Connections with Adults�By fall 2020, increase students’ meaningful connections with adults by six percentage points as measured by the Teen and Middle School Health Surveys, which asks whether students have at least one adult that you can talk to at school if they have a problem. View the Data >>

OUTCOMES

DISTRICT PRIORITY

Relationships

11 of 39

School Climate Outcome

12 of 39

Using School Climate Data to Inform our Work

12

LISTEN

CELEBRATE

REFLECT

SHARE

ACT

to the feedback with an open mind

strengths

on areas �of growth.

feedback

on it!

1

2

3

4

5

13 of 39

Vestibulum nec congue tempus

Vestibulum nec congue tempus

02

Vestibulum nec congue tempus

03

01

Vestibulum nec congue tempus

Family Survey�Spring 2018 & 2019

Educator

Survey

Spring 2019

Student Survey

Spring 2018 & 2019

School Climate

Triangulating Perspectives on School Climate

14 of 39

Survey Purpose

  • Hearing from students in a safe, anonymous context.
  • Exploring differences between the experiences �of individuals from different backgrounds.
  • Identifying priorities for building the capacity of schools to engage in meaningful, student-centered partnerships that promote equity and belonging.
  • Using data to learn and improve school climate.

15 of 39

Survey Development

A working group has been meeting over the course of the two years to develop and then modify the student survey: Khari Milner (Agenda for Children/OST), Alice Cohen (SEL), and Rosalie Rippey (Family Communications) were core members of this group.

Versions of the survey were shared with principals �for feedback.

Survey questions were mostly taken from Panorama survey item banks. We had the opportunity to pilot questions from Harvard’s RIDES initiative this spring.

Commitment to keeping survey mostly consistent year-to-year to enable longitudinal comparisons.

16 of 39

What was measured?�

  • School Climate
  • SEL: Social Awareness & Growth Mindset
  • Rigorous Expectations
  • Student-Teacher Relationships
  • Math Classroom Belonging
  • Harvard’s RIDES pilot questions: Cultural Awareness & Action, Sense of Belonging & Diversity & Inclusion

Survey Topics

TODAY’s FOCUS

17 of 39

Who Responded?

1,002 students (~81%) responded

These data are not self-reported; �they are linked to students’ demographics from Aspen, but are reported anonymously.

18 of 39

Things to consider as we review these results:

Panorama uses a five-point scale, typically: Extremely/Quite/Somewhat/A Little/Not at all

Panorama uses the top two categories to suggest �a “favorable” response. This is what we use in �this presentation.

Students at this age are at a particularly challenging stage of development: Identity formation, navigating social relationships

Second largest period of brain growth after infancy

19 of 39

School Climate

46% Favorable

Questions (ordered most favorable to least)

2019

% Favorable

Change

from 2018

20 of 39

School Climate Results by Demographic Group

Most favorable results

Least favorable results

The group size in the following results was 10 or more students. The number shown is the % of students�in that demographic group responding favorably to the school climate question construct.

8th Graders

n=331

Students not in OST

n=141

6th �Graders

n=326

African-�American / Black Students

n=228

54%

37%

42%

42%

80%

English Learner Students

n=32

Asian�Students

n=106

51%

46%

Overall

Favorability

21 of 39

SEL: Growth Mindset

60% Favorable

Questions (ordered most favorable to least)

2019

% Favorable

Change

from 2018

22 of 39

Growth Mindset Results by Demographic Group

Most favorable results

Least favorable results

English Learner Students

n=36

Students with IEPs

n=224

Students Receiving Free/�Reduced Lunch

n=437

6th Graders

n=358

65%

8th Graders

n=340

64%

The group size in the following results was 10 or more students. The number shown is the % of students in that demographic group responding favorably to the growth mindset question construct.

51%

55%

55%

African-�American / Black Students

n=253

56%

60%

Overall

Favorability

23 of 39

SEL: Social Awareness

61% Favorable

Questions (ordered most favorable to least)

2019

% Favorable

Change

from 2018

24 of 39

SEL: Social Awareness

Continued

61% Favorable

Questions (ordered most favorable to least)

2019

% Favorable

Change

from 2018

25 of 39

Social Awareness Results by Demographic Group

Most favorable results

Least favorable results

Asian Students

n=110

African-�American / Black Students

n=253

Students Receiving Free/ Reduced Lunch

n=437

66%

English Learner Students��n=36

66%

54%

58%

The group size in the following results was 10 or more students. The number shown is the % of students �in that demographic group responding favorably to the social awareness question construct.

61%

Overall

Favorability

26 of 39

Action: Systems Level

Self regulation, executive functioning, and motor planning �in all grades.

26

We are teaching

We see much positive evidence of change!

Educators are reporting an increased sense of central cohesion in the District Strategic Plan. �Seeing clearly the intersections / connections in our work on SEL, Equity, and the Whole Child approach.

The Colloquium

Educators are creating

Classroom environments with a heightened clinical awareness of what students may need. �We have normalized increasing self regulation by taking �a break IN the classroom

27 of 39

Action: Systems Level Continued...

Clinical sophistication in Student Support Teams across the district, as evidenced �by targeted case management, higher family involvement in complex cases, increased teacher participation, targeted intervention

There is increased

Morning Meeting, class discussions are giving students a sense of reciprocity, mutuality, and belonging.

Groups

Schools are creating

More trauma-sensitive environments, spaces for self regulation, restorative structures. Adults are changing their response to students and are better able to recognize signs of distress and respond holistically.

28 of 39

Action: School-Level Elementary

Improving Systems for Social �Emotional and Behavioral Support

Connecting SEL to culturally �responsive and inclusive practices

28

29 of 39

29

Action: School-Level�Upper School SEL

Two schools developing home visitation programs, targeted family outreach (ex: Grade 6)

Student sense of belonging is a major focus, we will see a change in this data.

Spent a lot of time at the start of the year unpacking "belonging" data. Presented the findings to staff to start the year off with a focus on building and maintaining authentic relationships with students.

Set goals for this year's survey data for increasing the sense of belonging at VLUS for all students, and particularly students of color.

Growth mindset data used in MCAS data meetings with teachers to guide them in identifying an early benchmark of change on which to focus to address achievement gaps. This data will inform the Classroom Action Research RAUC starting as part of our equity work this year.

The ILT is looking at data around belonging and bringing that to grade-level advisory meetings so teams can reflect and identify goals they want to set that can be addressed through the advisory program. These data are being combined with excerpts of student quotes from Building Equity Bridges project.

Example

1

Example

2

30 of 39

Action: School-Level | CRLS

  • Girls groups
  • Suicide Prevention training for all staff
  • Mindfulness
  • Parent Group

30

  • Staff development related to SEL, behavior, equity, groups meeting by grade band teams to ensure discussion of common issues that adults �are experiencing
  • Classroom observation �and coaching

31 of 39

31

Part 3: Resource Alignment

32 of 39

  • Social Emotional Learning is one of five priorities in every school’s school improvement plan
  • Professional time
  • Admin Council working groups to drive action around: relationships, discipline,
  • Student support teams
  • Increased opportunities for educator support

Resource Alignment: Social Emotional Learning

33 of 39

Investments: Financial Resources

School & District �Social Workers

  • Six elementary schools supported �by .5 FTE Social Worker & one elementary school by 1.0 FTE �Social Worker
  • 2.0 District level social workers

FY 2018-Fy 2020 �Budget Additions

  • FY 18: 1.0 FTE Social Worker & �1.0 FTE Elementary Health Teacher ($150K)
  • FY 19: 1.0 FTE Social Worker & �$30K for school team coaching ($105K)
  • FY 20: 1.0 FTE Social Worker ($75K)

34 of 39

Investments and Outcomes

  • More access to teachers and classrooms, psycho-ed, groups
  • Tier 1 and 2 support = integrated service delivery= more therapeutic school
  • Supporting adult mindset shift=more for the whole child

Elementary Social Workers: The NOW factor

  • Increase in trauma and social anxiety. Able to help without pathologizing
  • Peer mediation, social competency building through non- binary groups
  • More comfortable for families to access support and guidance, discussion guides to use at home

35 of 39

Targeted Support KLO

What we saw

Targeted support:

SEL paras: Supporting students, creating structures for individuals and groups

New crisis response protocol, SST protocols

Addressing secondary trauma

PBIS initiative

General educators / special educators dedicated collaboration time

Early evidence of progress: office referrals significantly reduced (Sept 2019 vs. Sept 2018)

36 of 39

36

Part 4: Looking Ahead

37 of 39

Areas to Strengthen

Educator stress, Educator self care, the human cost of staying emotionally attuned

Exclusionary discipline; an equity issue

Support for students in the transition years, Preschool-JK, Grade 5, Grade 8

Student/Educator relationships

Our responses to emotional communication

Using data to inform action

38 of 39

38

Part 5: Discussion

39 of 39

Social-Emotional Learning and Equity

When you consider the importance of SEL, you shift the focus away from simply holding kids and teachers accountable for narrow achievement gaps, you start asking questions like…

What do we need to do to support this child so that �s/he can learn?

What do we need to do to support this school so that it has the ability to serve the needs of its students?

Pedro Noguera