1 of 10

CEQA REFORM:�BUILDING AN�AFFORDABLE CALIFORNIA

A Policy Briefing

Presented by: Chris Wilson

Director of Advocacy, Los Angeles County Business Federation (BizFed)

2 of 10

FROM ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO PROCEDURAL WEAPONIZATION

1970

THE ORIGINS

Enacted by Governor Ronald Reagan to ensure public agencies consider environmental impacts, modeled after the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

1972

THE EXPANSION

The Friends of Mammoth Supreme Court decision expanded CEQA's reach to include private projects requiring government approval.

2000s

COMPLEXITY

Evolved from a simple disclosure tool into a 500+ page regulatory framework with thousands of pages of guidelines and technical requirements.

TODAY

LITIGATION RISK

The "private right of action" allows any individual or group to sue, often leading to years of delay regardless of environmental merit.

Source: California Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.

3 of 10

CEQA ADDS $75,000+ TO THE COST OF EVERY NEW HOME

FINANCIAL BURDEN

Environmental review and compliance add significant "soft costs," directly increasing rents and mortgages for all Californians.

WEAPONIZED LITIGATION

NIMBY groups and competitors frequently use CEQA to block transit-oriented development and infill housing for non-environmental reasons.

INFRASTRUCTURE STALLS

Critical projects for clean water, wildfire prevention, and transportation face billions in added costs due to multi-year delays.

Estimated CEQA Compliance Costs per Unit

Please note: $75,000 is a flat fee and does not include “hidden fees” such as delays, litigation or new VMT fees that could reach as high as $324K accord to CARE

Source: HansonBridgett, Coalition for Affordable, Reliable and Equitable Housing

4 of 10

BUSINESS-SUPPORTED REFORMS TARGET INFILL AND TRANSIT – 2025

AB 130

INFILL HOUSING EXEMPTION

Exempts qualifying "infill" housing projects from CEQA review. Imposes a strict 30-day approval deadline for lead agencies.

STREAMLINED APPROVAL

SB 131*

REVIEW CONSTRAINTS

Limits CEQA review for projects that narrowly miss exemptions to only the specific issues that caused the failure.

REDUCED LITIGATION RISK

SB 71*

TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE

Exempts key transit and transportation projects from redundant environmental reviews to accelerate delivery.

FASTER PROJECT DELIVERY

*SUPPORTED BY

Los Angeles County Business Federation (BizFed)

5 of 10

6 of 10

A ONCE-IN-A-GENERATION BALLOT MEASURE: NOV 2026

ENFORCEABLE TIMELINES

Mandatory "shot clocks": 90 days for exemptions; 365 days for full EIRs.

JUDICIAL REFORM

Courts must resolve CEQA challenges within 270 days to prevent delay.

VESTED RIGHTS

Agencies evaluate projects using standards in effect when the application was filed.

SEVERANCE REMEDY

Allows compliant portions of a project to proceed even if one area is found flawed.

TARGET: NOVEMBER 2026 GENERAL ELECTION

7 of 10

8 of 10

9 of 10

What’s On Our Radar So Far?

Bills BizFed is supporting relating to Housing (so far):

    • AB 1740 (Zbur) – Coastal Permit Modernizing
    • AB 2418 (Gonzalez) – Non-Residential Permit Streamlining

Bills/Items BizFed is Watching:

    • VMT Fix (i.e. AB 2552 [Farias], AB 2059 [Wilson]
    • Measure ULA Fix(es)
    • SB 79 (Wiener) Fix from 2025 – BizFed opposed

10 of 10

​

​

Any Questions

Help us cut red tape and make the Golden State affordable again.

Follow BizFed on Social Media for Latest News and Updates

  • Instagram: @BizFed

​

  • ”X” [formally Twitter]: @BizFed

​

  • Website: www.bizfedlacounty.org

Questions: Chris Wilson, Director of Advocacy

chris.wilson@bizfed.org or (562) 201-6034